Uninvented History

Guest post by WUWT regular Caleb Shaw

I am always seizing upon things people tell me, parking the statements in my memory, and only years later learning they are untrue.  It is not merely urban myths, (such as the myth about crocodiles living in the sewers of New York,) which I must discard, but all sorts of tidbits of history and quotes by famous people.

Of course, until I stand corrected, I am a purveyor of misinformation.  I hate to admit it.  After all, I love Truth, and do my best to be honest.  However there is no filter you can clamp on your brain, as you wander through life, which automatically screens the false from the True. If you are eager to learn and ask many questions, your openness and honesty can also make you naïve and gullible, and you ingest all sorts of balderdash. After you have ingested this crud, the best (and sometimes only) way to be rid of it is through embarrassment. It is rough on the old ego, but, having something you honor as “fact” publically proven to be claptrap, and cringing in the consequential embarrassment, is a way to the beauty of Truth.

In my experience, (after roughly 56,257 of these embarrassments,) you eventually start to develop an ear for Truth, and also to recognize balderdash when you hear it. One thing that I often used to say is, “Harry Truman once said, ‘The only thing new under the sun is the history you haven’t read.’” Recently I had the sense this quote didn’t quite ring true.  After all, the atomic bomb definitely was a new thing, when Harry Truman used it.

After searching, I found that Truman died in 1972, and the first reference to him saying that quote was in a book about him published in 1974. Not that the writer fabricated the statement, but Truman may have been quoting Mark Twain, for I found an even earlier reference attributed to Mark Twain. (As I recall, it was in a Washington financial journal from the 1940’s.)  However, to further confuse matters, I could find no evidence Mark Twain himself had ever actually written what was attributed to him.

Mark Twain’s attitude towards history was more relaxed, and a little cynical, more along the lines of his famous quote, “Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are more pliable.” He was well aware people bend the truth when telling a tale, and felt history was no different.  In fact, if he had actually written the quote, it likely would have been, “The only new thing under the sun is the history you haven’t yet invented.”

We all like to be knowledgeable, and to strut with authority, even in situations when we perhaps should be more humble. Sometimes it simply fattens our already fat heads, to think we are smart and the other person is not so smart.

Mark Twain tells a tale of meeting a person on a steamboat who had no idea he had ever captained a steamboat, and instead mistook him, (due to his clothing,) as a rube from the east.  This person then began explaining to Twain how a steamboat worked, making up absurd and outlandish facts, and Twain simply nodded, as if he was extremely gullible. After the fellow was done he walked down the deck, and Twain later saw him helplessly leaning on a rail, convulsed with laughter. The prankster felt it was the funniest thing that he was so smart, and the rube from the east was so stupid, or he felt that way until the actual captain of that steamboat came down the deck and loudly hailed Mark Twain, speaking to him as one steamboat captain to another steamboat captain.  Then the joker abruptly didn’t feel so smart.  He suddenly realized he’d been speaking absurd and outlandish untruths to a person who knew exactly how absurd and outlandish his statements were, and who was in fact smarter. The humor then escaped the prankster, and he stopped collapsing in laughter, and instead slouched about with a garlic face.

I know how that man felt. However it is not Mark Twain who puts me in my place.  It is life. However I try not to wear the garlic face.  Life is too short.

Recently life played one of its jokes on me, involving my skills as a forecaster.

I too like to be knowledgeable, and to strut with authority, and in this case I simply noted that the first half of our New Hampshire winter had been quite open, and the second half very snowy.

When the winter is open there is no blanket of snow to insulate our earth, and it can freeze as solid as permafrost down to a depth of five feet.  (Such rock-like earth should have a name. It can’t be “permafrost” because it isn’t permanent. Perhaps it should be called “tempafrost?”)

In any case, this rock-like layer of earth keeps water from draining downwards, and being absorbed into the earth beneath, in the manner a summer rain is absorbed.  The water instead pools atop the rock-like layer, turning the upper soil to mire, and making a messy situation called “Mud Season.”

During the time before the rock-like layer melts, and water can again drain downwards, we can have terrible floods in New Hampshire.  A warm spring rain falling on, and melting, a deep snow cover can create a foot or two of water, which cannot drain down into the earth, (even if the water table is low in a drought,) and instead must run off into the brooks, steams and rivers.

The worst-case scenario occurred in the spring of 1936, when two warm and drenching rains fell on a deep snow pack.  The man-made flood control reservoirs had not been built yet, and the natural flood control reservoirs, (namely beaver dams,) were greatly reduced because beavers had not yet made their amazing come-back, (after their population was reduced to nearly zero by the fashion for beaver top-hats, such as the one Abraham Lincoln wore.) The tremendous 1936 spring freshet likely will never be matched.

Fortunately both natural and man-made flood control reservoirs were in place a decade ago, when a different worst-case scenario occurred.  In this case the ground had frozen deeply, perhaps as deeply as five feet, and only the top four feet had thawed when the warm, drenching rains came.  In this particular situation we had four feet of drenched earth on top of a sleek and slippery foot of frozen earth, and all of a sudden we were having California mudslides in New Hampshire.  In Milford, New Hampshire an entire grove of sixty-foot-tall white pines slid down a hill and blocked Route 101, a major cross-New Hampshire highway. To this day one cannot drive to Greenville on “Greenville Road,” from New Ipswich, New Hampshire, because the southern shoulder of that road collapsed into the Greenville Millpond during those rains.

Knowing all this, I noted this winter that heavy snows followed our “open winter,” which had frozen our soil deeply. The snows included a couple of “NESIS” storms.  Because our east-facing slopes do a very good job of gathering snow from east winds, we twice had more than three feet of snow laying on the level, and even as these depths shrank it made a gritty snowpack which contained a great deal of water. I knew what one drenching and warm spring southeaster might do.

I’m not exactly sure why I didn’t go into Alarmist mode. Knowing what I knew, I surely should have run about like Chicken Little.  I didn’t.  I would like to think I didn’t because I was old and wise, however it was likely due to the fact I was preoccupied by doing my taxes, and also had a bad case of the sniffles.

In any case what has happened is something I haven’t ever seen before.  After a period where it seemed we got the worst of every storm, we have entered a period that is the opposite.

Every storm misses us.

I suppose you could call it a “drought,” but it’s hard to call it that, when the streams are brimming and there are no plants in my garden to wilt.  The only thing that has shriveled is the snow.

Roughly a week ago, out on my pasture, the back of a plastic version of an “Adirondack Chair” was totally covered by snow, (and the top of that chair is over three feet tall.)  Today I shifted that chair three feet to the left, in an inch of corn snow, and sat down on it, in glorious sunshine and amazingly dry air.

The air pouring over us had low humidity even when it was over Canadian snows and was ten degrees (F).  Warm that air to near fifty, and it has Arizona dryness.  What then happens is that our snowpack does not melt.  It “sublimates.”

Sublimation is a mysterious process wherein a solid doesn’t need to melt before it evaporates.  The only time you see sublimation, in ordinary life, is if you boyishly put a snowball in your freezer, (so you can throw a snowball in July,) but then see that snowball shrink in your freezer, despite the fact your freezer is never above freezing.  It happens because you have a “frost-free” freezer, (old-fashioned freezers had a problem with frost,) and your freezer’s frost-free option utilizes sublimation.

I have just lived through roughly a week of a frost-free New Hampshire.  I’ve headed out in the morning, planning to scrape the windshield of my car, but morning after morning there has been no frost on the windshield, despite the temperatures being down nearly 20 (F.)

Just as a snowball can shrink in your freezer, our snowpack is shrinking.  It is also melting, and streams are brimming, but not to the degree I would expect.  In fact my expectations, and predictions, are all wrong.

This is a spring I have never seen before.  Over three feet of snow are quietly and all but apologetically vanishing before my eyes.  There’s hardly even a mud season, and at times the dry wind whips up a cloud of dust from the drive, or litters a crisp shower of brown leaves from the snowless south-facing side of my farm’s pasture to the still-snowy north-facing side.

I often say, “Hope for the best, but prepare for the worst,” but in this case my preparations make me look like a bit of a dope.  However to become garlic faced about looking like a dope would be foolish. It would be like building a bomb shelter, and then being disappointed there wasn’t a nuclear war.

Sometimes it is good to be wrong.  I gaze about at the golden sunshine, breath deeply the dry, Canadian air, and don’t feel all that bad that all my past experience hasn’t amounted to a hill of beans.

But isn’t that the definition of spring?  Something you have never seen before?

I think so.  Spring is never, “The same old spring.”

When you have been sick, and again become well, it is never “the same old wellness.”

Even in the case of a womanizing rake, who is forever ditching fine girls he should be loyal to for his next fling, what he is forever seeking (and never finding) is not “the same old lady.”

When a bitter and cold night ends with the dawn, it is not the “same old dawn.”

Every day holds the promise of something fresh and new.  And, if we truly value what is fresh and new, what value has that which is tired and old? This brings me back to the fact we all like to be knowledgeable, and to strut with authority.

Think twice about it. Face to face with springtime, could anything be more stupid?

To be truly knowledgeable is to be omniscient.  IE:  God.  God is the only one omniscient. He has nothing left to know.

However we mere mortals have lots to learn.  We should leap from bed thirsty to learn more.  As much as we like to share what we already know with others, we should never rest content with that little, fanning the feeble fire of our ego, when we could instead venture forward into the sunrises and healing and springtime and new love of Truth.

The alternative is stagnation.  It is to pretend you know it all, when you don’t.

It is to say, “The science is settled.”  Science is never settled, unless and until you are God.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
132 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
April 6, 2013 5:02 am

People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do.

Rick Morcom
April 6, 2013 5:04 am

I love these posts, which include some science as well as a lot of personal life experience. And if the author describes a “light-bulb” discovery, I like it all the more. Thank you, Anthony and Caleb.

Editor
April 6, 2013 5:26 am

Thanks, Caleb. I enjoyed the post.
I also wanted to commend you on your perseverance. I stopped counting my lifetime embarrassments after 50,000.

April 6, 2013 6:16 am

Michael Palmer says:
April 5, 2013 at 8:39 pm
‘Such rock-like earth should have a name. It can’t be “permafrost” because it isn’t permanent. Perhaps it should be called “tempafrost?”’

I think the technical term would be “rotten permafrost”.

===============================================================
How about “icecrete”? “Frostcrete”?

Editor
April 6, 2013 6:21 am

I never counted my lifetime embarrassments. The big ones that still make me wince make up for all the rest.

April 6, 2013 6:32 am

RobRoy says:
April 6, 2013 at 5:02 am
People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do.

===========================================================================
I don’t know the origin of this quote but I first heard it from my old boss when I lived in New Hampshire. “Lord, it’s hard to humble when you’re perfect in every way.” 😎
But one of my favorite secular quotes is still Will Rogers’, “Everybody’s ignorant … only on different subjects.”

April 6, 2013 6:44 am

I thought I made a mistake once. But I was wrong.

April 6, 2013 6:44 am

RE: Ric Werme says:
April 6, 2013 at 6:21 am
I call them “cringe experiences.” It’s pretty amazing that they can still make us flinch, even after years. However I did finally get over the shame I felt for something I did in third grade, after a half century. So there is hope.
I took note of your observation about your sump pump. It may not exactly be “scientific data,” but that is the sort of detail my mind is always seizing upon.
Another bone-dry air mass is passing over today. Humidity could drop down near 10% this afternoon. There are “Red Flag Warnings” for areas where the snow cover is gone. I suppose I ought dust off my Alarmist side, and start freaking out about the chance of drought and wildfires…or maybe I’ll put that off until tomorrow.
By the way, thanks for pointing me in the right direction, concerning starting a website. I am a complete clod, concerning computers.

April 6, 2013 7:27 am

I’d like to thank the people who have commented. The ideas they shared have my mind moving in a new and interesting direction, regarding the topic, “What is science?”
I assert I am scientific, even though I avoid math. Is science without math possible? (Think of a really good hunter, who can neither read nor write. As he tracks down his game, can his knowledge be called science?)
Those who compare me to Willis are flattering me, but may be offending Willis. Willis is a true math “whiz,” and can figure things out on the back of an envelope in five minutes that I could not do in months, if ever.
I could tell some very funny stories about me and math classes, but few would involve much math. It is amazing to think I spent thirteen years in those classrooms, and learned so little. Pity my teachers.
I actually went through a spell as a radical hippy where I was certain math wasn’t spiritual. Fortunately I recovered from that derangement.
I then came close to being at the forefront of the computer revolution. Not that I thought computers would ever catch on. However I needed a job, and was all set to start work at a computer place outside of Santa Cruz in California, back in 1983. Then one of those odd twists of fate occurred. Perhaps some angel looked down from heaven, and was appalled at the idea of me becoming a computer geek. In any case the place went bankrupt, and I went wandering off to what was next. And what was next? Within a year I was learning about repairing typewriters, in Window Rock, Arizona.
Talk about a useless skill!!! Does anyone even remember what a typewriter is? However someone in Washington was determined to help the Navajo become modern, and therefore your tax dollars went to building a modern office and filling a room with desks and typewriters, and I wound up there, although I’m not Navajo.
In any case, rather than learning about computers I learned about typewriters. But that didn’t keep me from being very observant. I have all sorts of observations to share; I just happen to know next to nothing about math and computers.
I did observe sublimation of the snow. However there wasn’t much snow, in that area. I was at around 7000 feet, and I think you had to get above 8000 feet to get much snow. What I do remember is how nasty the wind could get, mixing the dry snow with red dust and even, when the wind really blasted, with sand. There is nothing quite like that, in the east.
Anyway, thanks again to all for the comments.

April 6, 2013 7:32 am

To Adam et al., this site is what it has always been, worth reading. I suspect it will as long as Anthony wishes to maintain it.

DirkH
April 6, 2013 7:36 am

Rational Db8 says:
April 5, 2013 at 8:53 pm
“Since then, firebombing has been outlawed by international agreement/laws of war.”
How very nice of the Brits and the Americans. Who did not commit war crimes in WW II; as, by definition, only axis forces could commit them.

beng
April 6, 2013 7:38 am

I recognize whoppers from my 60’s-70’s “education” all the time. Just a few from an endless list:
1. Hitler & Nazis were right-wing extremists.
Wrong, they were National socialist extremists.
2.McCarthy was a right-wing alarmist without credibility.
Wrong, he was spot-on about the infiltration of socialism. Look at the present results.

Editor
April 6, 2013 8:22 am

On the subject of melting snow, and something that deserves to be researched, at least as a high school science fair project, is the influence of dew point on snow melt.
There’s an old aphorism about “fog eating snow,” but I think that has cause and effect switched.
There are basically three cases to consider. Let’s ignore the Sun, and assume a gentle breeze just enough to mix the air around the snow.
Case 1: Air temp below freezing, hence dewpoint below freezing.
Snow doesn’t melt. It can sublimate, but I’m talking serious end of winter snow melt that fills the rivers.
Case 2: Air temp above freezing, dew point below freezing.
Snow does melt (or may still sublimate). However, even with temperatures around 50°F (10°C) it’s not very quick. I think an inch or two (few cm) a day is about it.
Case 3: Air temp above freezing, dew point above freezing.
Now, in addition to the conducting heat from the air, we have dew forming on the snow, much as a glass of ice water in the summer gets wet on the outside. As the dew condenses, it releases the latent heat in the water vapor (2260 J/g) which melts some of the snow (334 J/g, meaning each gram of condensed water vapor melts nearly 7 grams of snow). I posit this condensation makes case 3 far more effective at melting snow than case 2.
Also, the conduction melting of the snow also chills the air and as that goes below the dewpoint, water vapor condenses into fog. It’s not so much that the fog is melting snow as it is melting snow creates fog.
It would be a really fun science fair experiment.

April 6, 2013 8:53 am

Yes!Yes!Yes! Very good. This reminded me of myself stepping in it
as I am wont to do. I often say,”I have a million bits of trivia stuck in
my head,put them all together,add $8.95,you get a small cup at S B’s.
Alfred

April 6, 2013 8:59 am

Oh. And for the ones who didn’t like it…..
You expect Anthony to 24/7 so you can get out of bed
have coffee and read what YOU want. How can you say
“what has this site become”. Give the man a week end off.
(but not too many) hee hee
Alfred

John R T
April 6, 2013 9:15 am

Robert Scott
? looking for “… civilised and knowledgeable comment and discussion …”?
Please let me know when it occurs: full link, please; I believe it is not impossible.
Caleb, when you make adjustments to your site, keep the ‘cover’ image,

April 6, 2013 9:24 am

“_Jim says: April 5, 2013 at 8:36 pm
…I don’t know how today’s new fridge/freezer specifically accomplish this task, but my +30 yr old Ward’s Signature series as a matter of fact during a “defrost cycle” _melts_ the _ice_ that collects on (literally: “freezes onto in a conformal manner”) the *evaporator* (cooling) coils. The ‘melting’ is accomplished via heating elements in close proximity to (in intimate contact with) the evaporator coil…”

_Jim:
I believe the basic physical design approach is similar. The differences are in timing and target. Year ago, the target was the actual frost on the coils and food. Nowadays the target is mainly the warm moist air that enters the freezer so the cycle is more frequent. Warm the air slightly along with all of the food surfaces which raises the freezer air’s moisture holding potential and prevents most of the humidity from condensing out as frost. The warmer air is technically drier and this will sublimate some of the exposed ice.
Caleb:
Plastic bags are still somewhat permeable; so snowballs kept in freezer bags will lose some moisture over time. But for the most part you can scrunch up the frost in the bag back onto the snowballs and have most of the snowball available. They’re kinda hard though; the recipient will not like it! (Yes, tried on a sibling and no, not the referenced sibling above)
Or, you can obtain a non-frost free freezer. I have two freezers. The frost free job that comes with the refrigerator and a large non-frost free freezer for long term storage. That way I can store large amounts of food fairly long term; as my rural area suffers frequent power outages I do lose food occasionally even though the big freezer will keep food frozen for several days after the power’s out. Still, the effects of opening and closing the freezer will still cause freezer burn eventually. Meat, wrapped well is good for several years. Fruit packaged in a light sugar syrup is good indefinitely. Fruit and vegetables wrapped well are good for one and half years to two years tops. The same or less goes for a lot of seafood.
Every couple of years I have to put all of the food into coolers or the other freezer and I defrost the non-frost free freezer. Takes about a day to a day and a half with most of that time letting the freezer get cold enough again.
Caleb:
I’ve noticed that some folks posting unkind statements about your thread here. Don’t take it hard. For my part, I try to read every thread Anthony allows. After a couple of paragraphs I have a good idea of whether I want to continue reading or to move on to a different thread.
Anyone who takes into their mind that they want to post unkind opinions after reading an author’s submission; well, not everyone learns from embarrassment actions/opinions. As for those who post unkind opinions when they didn’t read your submission…
Seriously, critiques of Anthony’s choices or publications should utilize Anthony’s tips and notes page.

Luther Wu
April 6, 2013 9:40 am

Ric Werme says:
April 6, 2013 at 6:21 am
I never counted my lifetime embarrassments. The big ones that still make me wince make up for all the rest.
_____________
Those are “gotcha”s. Everyone has them. Regardless of the gotcha, it is in the past. That’s what I remind myself…

Mark T
April 6, 2013 9:46 am

Wrong, he was spot-on about the infiltration of socialism. Look at the present results.

Technically communism IIRC, but yes, he was right. Fortunately, we live in a free society in which personal beliefs about socio-economic systems are not illegal. Unfortunately, however, that there are enough people stupid enough to fall for the lie that is socialism.
Mark

Luther Wu
April 6, 2013 9:49 am

DirkH says:
April 6, 2013 at 7:36 am
“…”
_________________
I suppose you never heard of the bombing of London, or the 12 million+ Nazi- murdered civilians, or the countless atrocities which the Nazis committed, everywhere they went. You must never have heard of Manila, or Nanking, or civilians used for target practice or the myriad atrocities committed by the Japanese forces, everywhere they went.

Luther Wu
April 6, 2013 9:52 am

DirkH says:
April 6, 2013 at 7:36 am
_________________
You, DirkH, can go pound sand.

Annie
April 6, 2013 10:00 am

I tried to comment before but lost the internet as I pressed the send button.
Thank you to Caleb for an interesting read.
I love coming to this site. It is really full of fascinating stuff and I just wish I had more time to follow it all. It is surely up to Anthony to decide who to host on his site. We are so lucky to have access to it. The same goes for Jo Nova’s site. Those who do not wish to read a particular post are not forced to press the continue reading button, for Heaven’s sake! The home page items surely give an adequate taste of what is to come!

April 6, 2013 10:20 am

I liked the Truman version of the line better: it’s practical and the modified version smacks of idealism.

April 6, 2013 11:22 am

Mark:
At April 6, 2013 at 9:46 am you write

Unfortunately, however, that there are enough people stupid enough to fall for the lie that is socialism.

Fortunately, there are very many more people – including me – who proclaim the truth that is socialism.
Richard

Rational Db8
April 6, 2013 11:57 am

re: Caleb says: April 6, 2013 at 7:27 am

What I do remember is how nasty the wind could get, mixing the dry snow with red dust and even, when the wind really blasted, with sand. There is nothing quite like that, in the east.

Ah yes. Sandblasting, a term normally reserved for using power equipment to blast sand at high velocity against metal or other surfaces to strip the top layer off entirely, takes on a whole new meaning in the American Southwest. You know you’ve been properly sand blasted out here when visibility is seriously reduced due to horizontal blowing sand, and 10 or 20 showers and days later you are still discovering sand on yourself in various nooks and crannies. You are absolutely right, there’s nothing quite like a good ‘ol Southwestern sandblasting. :0)
Which makes me think also of the incredibly beautiful heat lightning storms we can get out here too… talk about fabulous to watch, standing out at night, perfectly dry, and watching all the lightning!
Or, tying back to your story’s bits about sublimation and lack of humidity… one of the most beautiful things that’s also frequently seen in the Southwest, and is a direct result of very low humidity, is virga – that’s when a thunderstorm (or actually it can happen with any storm) is raining, but the humidity is so low the rain evaporates before it hits the ground… so it looks like a lacy veil that just disappears mid air. Go to google images or any search engine image search, and search on virga and you can find many really pretty photos of this phenomena – but they never look half as beautiful as actually seeing it yourself. Not long ago I saw a very surprising, to me, very bright shining white virga. While I’d see virga before with streaks of white (which I had always thought were tricks of light, but maybe I was wrong), I’d never seen a fairly large virga where the entire thing was a very bright shiny silver. I later discovered, courtesy of my very-knowledgeable-on-these-sorts-of-phenomena-Dad, that this apparently happens when the virga consists of ice crystals rather than water!