That puts WUWT in the hall of fame for the science category, and we cannot be in that contest again. WUWT also wins “Weblog of the Year”. Thanks to everyone for your support!
From the Bloggies Twitter Feed
Some of our friends have also won tonight:
WUWT wins “Weblog of the Year”
I can’t wait to see the apoplectic responses from the hockey team. Popcorn for everyone.
Anthony,
Congratulations, three in a row WOW.
Cheers, Kevin
Congratulations from the Netherlands.
Niek
Well deserved. Congratulations.
Congratulations. You have become a must read for this old Lawyer. Lawyers are-or should be -natural born sceptics about most things. Keep it going until everyone knows we don’t know what the h is going. Yet.
Strength in numbers is a bad indicator of anything useful, but in this case we know the popularity is amply deserved. When the time of treachery is over, I am sure people will continue to come here to discuss an infinite variety of interesting things. It’s great to be here!
And a “twofer”!
Well deserved for Anthony and the group of moderators!
Your victory is consistent with Cheating Models.
There “may” have been some cheating.
Natural voting alone cannot explain the victory.
It will take 30 years to establish there was no cheating.
I have a PhD in Votology
What can I say? My favorite blog wins again!!!! Congrats, break out the champaign.
Well deserved Anthony et al. Take a bow for making this the best site on the web.
Congratulations to Anthony and the many contributors to this site. We are very fortunate to have this site to discuss the AGW issue, including new related papers and observations.
Congrats Anthony and the team, including the commenters.
This must be a kick in the crotch for all of the pro-CAGW web sites that failed to win this prestigious recognition.
How about a letter writing campaign to carry the best for five or seven years or more? WUWT should have no limits.
Some whining going on in that twitter page.
Did SS quit voluntarily?
Who was trying to “bot” the results?
If WUWT can not compete in the science category what description shall we chose for next year?
Congratulations all round. Great to hear the news. Thanks for all the hard work!
Way good!
WUWT is the best blog on the net. Thanks to you Anthony, you regular and occasional post contributors, you moderators, all you commenters, and all you followers.
congrats to anthony & mods. well-deserved. now, if only this guy would read WUWT daily!
25 March: ABC: Climate change a ‘threat multiplier’ for Defence
A new report from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) says the military is not doing enough planning to cope with the problem of climate change.
The study, titled Heavy Weather, found climate change was not being considered by the Defence Department in its national and regional strategic scoping, despite the potential regional instability caused by rising sea levels, migration pressures, and the spread of infectious diseases.
ASPI deputy director Antony Bergin says the ADF has already been stretched by a spate of weather-related domestic disasters such as bushfires and floods, and should be factoring in how it will deal with simultaneous extreme weather events at home and in the region…
The Government’s 2009 Defence white paper dismissed climate change as an issue that did not need to be addressed until after 2030, but this ASPI report argues that is no longer the case, and the new white paper to be delivered this year needs to embrace a new approach.
Mr Bergin describes climate change as a “threat multiplier”…
The report also argues for a permanent climate adviser to be appointed in the Defence department.
Dr Bergin believes the last few years of extreme weather events has concentrated the thinking on climate change in the military, and that many in Defence now believe the 2009 white paper position is unsustainable…
Read the full report – Heavy weather: climate and the Australian Defence Force.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-03-25/climate-change-a-threat-multiplier-for-defence/4591676
——————————————————————————–
Outstanding!
Congrats on a more-than-well-deserved win! And thank you so much for your efforts.
When one reads/sees the media one would think that the “warmist” effort is big and one might also think (from the media) that us “deniers’ are fringe. This win and that of SDA, JD and ACM tell us that MSM is dead wrong. They hate it.
The editor North American Birds, Edward S. Brinkley, writes in the spring edition, Most mass media are reporting on the warming planet now, at least, and climate change deniers are now limited to the lunatic fringe … (http://nab.aba.org/i/116996/17, p.436) (Of course, no one here denies the climate is changing. They can’t understand that can they?)
Nothing fringe going on here at all. And certainly nothing lunatic either. ☺
Most excellent.
CAS
Congratulations, Anthony, moderators, other contributors and of course Mrs. Watts and Kenji.
Excelence deserves to be recognized while inner satisfaction is the result of integrity. For all the work by all: a big THANK YOU!
Congratuations and Thank You for the good work
Terrific to get the double up – well done Anthony and his brilliant guests, mods and followers
But Gleick and a few of his pals are trying to pour cold water over the sceptics’ victories, bandying around the words denier and ‘gaming’, and suggesting that they (‘climate scientists’) should have the power of choice and veto in the ‘science’ category.
Shame on them! They won’t compete, and turn as usual to censorship in the hope of bamboozling the public
Congratulations! I believe there is a consensus on science blogs. Anyone who disagrees is a denier.