
It makes you wonder what created all that CO2 millions of years ago.
From Louisiana State University
LSU researchers find new information about ‘Snowball Earth’ period
It is rather difficult to imagine, but approximately 635 million years ago, ice may have covered a vast portion of our planet in an event called “Snowball Earth.” According to the Snowball Earth hypothesis, the massive ice age that occurred before animal life appeared, when Earth’s landmasses were most likely clustered near the equator, precipitated relatively rapid changes in atmospheric conditions and a subsequent greenhouse heat wave. This particular period of extensive glaciation and subsequent climate changes might have supplied the cataclysmic event that gave rise to modern levels of atmospheric oxygen, paving the way for the rise of animals and the diversification of life during the later Cambrian explosion.
But if ice covered the earth all the way to the tropics during what is known as the Marinoan glaciation, how did the planet spring back from the brink of an ice apocalypse? Huiming Bao, Charles L. Jones Professor in Geology & Geophysics at LSU, might have some of the answers.
Bao and LSU graduate students Bryan Killingsworth and Justin Hayles, together with Chuanming Zhou, a colleague at Chinese Academy of Sciences, had an article published on Feb. 5 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, or PNAS, that provides new clues on the duration of what was a significant change in atmospheric conditions following the Marinoan glaciation.
“The story is to put a time limit on how fast our Earth system can recover from a total frozen state,” Bao said. “It is about a unique and rapidly changing post-glacial world, but is also about the incredible resilience of life and life’s remarkable ability to restore a new balance between atmosphere, hydrosphere and biosphere after a global glaciation.”
Bao’s group went about investigating the post-glaciation period of Snowball Earth by looking at unique occurrences of “crystal fans” of a common mineral known as barite (BaSO4), deposited in rocks following the Marinoan glaciation. Out of the three stable isotopes of oxygen, O-16, O-17 and O-18, Bao’s group pays close attention to the relatively scarce isotope O-17. According to Killingsworth, there aren’t many phenomena on earth that can change the normally expected ratio of the scare isotope O-17 to more abundant isotope O-18. However, in sulfate minerals such as barite in rock samples from around 635 million years ago, Bao’s group finds large deviations in the normal ratio of O-17 to O-18 with respect to O-16 isotopes.
“If something unusual happens with the composition of the atmosphere, the oxygen isotope ratios can change,” Killingsworth said. “We see a large deviation in this ratio in minerals deposited around 635 million years ago. This occurred during an extremely odd time in atmospheric history.”
According to Bao’s group, the odd oxygen isotope ratios they find in barite samples from 635 million years ago could have occurred if, following the extensive Snowball Earth glaciation, Earth’s atmosphere had very high levels of carbon dioxide, or CO2. An ultra-high carbon dioxide atmosphere, Killingsworth explains, where CO2 levels match levels of atmospheric oxygen, would grab more O-17 from oxygen. This would cause a depletion of the O-17 isotope in air and subsequently in barite minerals, which incorporate oxygen as they grow. Bao’s group has found worldwide deposits of this O-17 depleted sulfate mineral in rocks dating from the global glaciation event 635 million years ago, indicating an episode of an ultra-high carbon dioxide atmosphere following the Marinoan glaciation.
“Something significant happened in the atmosphere,” Killingsworth said. “This kind of an atmospheric shift in carbon dioxide is not observed during any other period of Earth’s history. And now we have sedimentary rock evidence for how long this ultra-high carbon dioxide period lasted.”
By using available radiometric dates from areas near layers of barite deposits, Bao’s group has been able to come up with an estimate for the duration of what is now called the Marinoan Oxygen-17 Depletion, or MOSD, event. Bao’s group estimates the MOSD duration at 0 – 1 million years.
“This is, so far, really the best estimate we could get from geological records, in line with previous models of how long an ultra-high carbon dioxide event could last before the carbon dioxide in the air would get drawn back into the oceans and sediments,” Killingsworth said.
Normally, carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere are in balance with levels of carbon dioxide in the ocean. However, if water and air were cut off by a thick layer of ice during Snowball Earth, atmospheric carbon dioxide levels could have increased drastically. In a phenomenon similar to the climate change Earth is witnessing in modern times, high levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide would have created a greenhouse gas warming effect, trapping heat inside the planet’s atmosphere and melting the Marinoan ice. Essentially, the Marinoan glaciation created the potential for extreme changes in atmospheric chemistry that in turn lead to the end of Snowball Earth and the beginning of a new explosion of animal life on Earth.
While previous work by Bao’s group had advanced the interpretation of the strange occurrence of O-17 depleted barite just after the Marinoan glaciation, there was still much uncertainty on the duration of ultra-high CO2 levels after meltdown of Snowball Earth. Bao’s discovery of a field site with many barite layers gave the opportunity to track how oxygen isotope ratios changed through a thickness of sedimentary rock. As the pages in a novel can be thought of as representing time, so layers of sedimentary rock represent geological history. However, these rock “pages” represented an unknown duration of time for the MOSD event. By using characteristic features of the Marinoan rock sequence occurring regionally in South China, Bao’s group linked the barite layer site to other sites in the region that did have precise dates from volcanic ash beds. Bao’s group has succeeded in estimating the duration of the MOSD event, and thus the time it took for Earth to restore “normal” CO2 levels in the atmosphere.
“To some extent, our findings demonstrate that whatever happens to Earth, she will recover, and recover at a rapid pace,” Bao said. “Mother Earth lived and life carried on even in the most devastating situation. The only difference is the life composition afterwards. In other words, whatever humans do to the Earth, life will go on. The only uncertainty is whether humans will still remain part of the life composition.”
Bao says that he had been interested in this most intriguing episode of Earth’s history since Paul Hoffman, Dan Schrag and colleagues revived the Snowball Earth hypothesis in 1998.
“I was a casual ‘non-believer’ of this hypothesis because of the mere improbability of such an Earth state,” Bao said. “There was nothing rational or logic in that belief for me, of course. I remember I even told my job interviewers back in 2000 that one of my future research plans was to prove that the Snowball Earth hypothesis was wrong.”
However, during a winter break in 2006, Bao obtained some unusual data from barite, a sulfate mineral dating from the Snowball Earth period that he received from a colleague in China.
“I started to develop my own method to explore this utterly strange world,” Bao said. “Now, it seems that our LSU group is the one offering the strongest supporting evidence for a ‘Snowball Earth’ back 635 million years ago. I certainly did not see this coming. The finding we published in 2008 demonstrates, again, that new scientific breakthroughs are often brought in by outsiders.”
Bao credits his research ideas, analytical work and pleasure of working on this project to his two graduate students, Killingsworth and Hayles, as well as his long-time Chinese collaborators. Bao brought Killingsworth and Hayles to an interior mountainous region in South China in December 2011, where the group succeeded in finding multiple barite layers in a section of rocks dating to 635 million years ago. This discovery formed a large part of their analysis and subsequent publication in PNAS.
“Nothing can beat the intellectual excitement and satisfaction you get from research in the field and in the laboratory,” Bao said.
Bao’s research is funded by the National Science Foundation and by the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
To read the original article, visit http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/02/05/1213154110.1.abstract.
To read more about Huiming Bao’s research, visit http://www.geol.lsu.edu/hbao/.
Reblogged this on Public Secrets and commented:
Such is the power of Global Warming, that it can send CO2 millions of years into the past! (Look, you know someone among the cult will think of it.)
“remarkable ability to restore a new balance between atmosphere, hydrosphere and biosphere after a global glaciation.”
should read:
“remarkable ability to restore a new balance AMONG atmosphere, hydrosphere and biosphere after a global glaciation.”
Steven Mosher says:
February 28, 2013 at 2:15 pm
Wait.. I thought the sun was the cause of all climate change.
================
At least you thought.
Science. Fiction.
My concern is cooling.
I don’t want cooling – even if it makes some climatologists [their word] look a little old-fashioned, shall we say.
A gentle warming – say 0.2 C/decade, for the next fifty years – would be accepable.
Go do it, Team.
Auto
Going from: “According to Bao’s group, the odd oxygen isotope ratios they find in barite samples from 635 million years ago could have occurred if …” to “This kind of an atmospheric shift in carbon dioxide …” is missing the element of proving that the ratios *did* occur due to “very high levels of carbon dioxide.” So what is the current abnomral imbalance in atmoshperic CO2 they’re talking about? It’s pretty low on average, speaking in terms of geologic time. So, the heat and CO2 of prior ages of dinosaurs is normal after snowball earth while we are below normal?
With everything covered by ice trapping CO2 in the land, the tundra, the marshes, the peat, and the oceans, it could have been the hand of God that turned on the CO2. This kind of an act of God “is not observed during any other period of Earth’s history.” Study suggests this too.
“”Nothing can beat the intellectual excitement and satisfaction you get from [speculating about] research in the field and in the laboratory,’ Bao said.” Study suggests, indeed. But yeah, like he said, life and the earth will go on with or without us.
So, what is the point here? High CO2 levels some 635 mln years ago?
Nothing new imho: http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/PageMill_Images/image277.gif
Best remark I’ve read based on this graph: “Why I stopped worrying about CO2”
“In a phenomenon similar to the climate change Earth is witnessing in modern times, high levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide would have created a greenhouse gas warming effect, trapping heat inside the planet’s atmosphere and melting the Marinoan ice.”
This is hilarious. CO2 levels then were 6000 or 8000 ppm, or maybe even more, and now 400 ppm and they call that similar? LOL And besides that, I have not been able to find an explanation in this new study of why CO2 was the cause of the warming. If CO2 was that high and causing warming, how could it have been so cold in the first place? I personally think it had something to do with THE SUN. How come the good professor has found a way to prove snowball earth did really happen and then turns it into a CAGW gospel? I think that has to do with MONEY.
“In a phenomenon similar to the climate change Earth is witnessing in modern times, high levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide would have created a greenhouse gas warming effect, trapping heat inside the planet’s atmosphere and melting the Marinoan ice.”
There it is, the reason for the whole paper.
If there was so much CO2, and this led to the ice melting, then I have a question;
Was the CO2 there when the ice formed? If so, how could the ice form with the CO2 already there? If it wasnt there when it froze up, where did the CO2 come from after everything was frozen?
So… we should cut CO2 levels so we can all die in another Snowball Earth.
I’m sold.
Bob Armstrong – “where’s the computation of the change in our spectrum”
Try http://forecast.uchicago.edu/models.html, Modtran IR model (older code, but good for a rough estimate), with a CO2 concentration of 13% of the atmosphere, or 130,000ppm. That’s an estimated CO2 level to break the Earth out of a “Snowball” state (see http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2000GL011836/abstract) with some open tropical waters (broader estimates are 10-30%).
According to the ModTran code (using standard US atmos., standard cirrus, 70km looking down), that corresponds to a forcing of ~26.5 W/m^2 over current CO2 levels.
A Snowball Earth is the wrong metaphor.
It is a Europa Earth where single and multi-cellular life that thrives in the ecological niches of inevitable cracks in the ice.
Model THAT, GCM’ers!
Lets see if I get this right.
CO2 absorbs the radiant energy of ice and warms the planet enough to melt said ice?
“It makes you wonder what created all that CO2 millions of years ago.”
-T. Rex and the Velociraptors burning coal to stay comfy.
Agree with Wikeroy.
Seems to me that there needs to be an explanation somewhere of the inert Co2 before snowball earth happened and the sudden miraculous chemical transformation of Co2 to warm this, so scientific, Mother earth.
Please genuflect when pronouncing that so holy phrase./sarc
The first thing that caught my eye was the model of the percambrian “snowball earth” with a modern distribution of the Americas-younger than 65my bp. An indicator of other deficiencies of awareness? Then there is the anomaly of all the high country being ice free, though if all the water was under ice, sublimation might possibly do that, but why would it be where the temperature should be lowest?
Then there is the idea of the atmosphere and the hydrosphere (and all the surviving life forms in it) being separated by a very thick layer of ice and that this would cause ramping up of the carbon dioxide towards 20%? Where from? Do we assume catastrophic vulcanism or a nasty plot by aliens? At least the authors should suggest a mechanism. All that is said is “could have” which requires “how?”
Then there is the matter of the O isotope ratios. If carbondioxide is pulling oxygen from the atmosphere, this implies the carbondioxide is actually forming in the atmosphere. What from?
If it is there anyway , what is the reason for it to undergo oxygen isotope exchange and if it did, the fastest moving isotope is still O/16 so the atmosphere should be relatively enriched in O/17 and O/18 but more so in O/18 which is the reverse of the barite anomaly.
Or is this all a hoax and I’ve just been succered into responding?
So CO2 levels were ‘very high’ for a ‘time’. Well, the paper probably got him a grant or two since it blames CO2 for global warming.
Snowball earth is cyclical. And CO2 has been very high in the geologic past, even during snowball earth phases, so this paper is pure speculation.
Good luck with the grants, though.
Here are the Continental positions just as this Snowball Earth was starting. Super-Continent Pannotia which was generally moving south at this point.
http://www.scotese.com/images/650.jpg
This study shows how the Snowball happened peaking at 635 Mya.
http://www.meteo.mcgill.ca/~tremblay/Courses/ATOC530/Hyde.et.al.Nature.2000.pdf
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/dc/SnowballSimulations.jpg
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v405/n6785/images/405425aa.2.gif
Pretty simple. Glaciers build up on land – Super-Continent Pannotia – which was concentrated over the South Pole. Glaciers build up at the South Pole/central spreading region to 5 kms high. They spread out by gravity across all the land and continental shelf possible. Earth Albedo rises to close to 50%. Ocean freezes up to 30S and 30N. Snowball ends when Super-Continent Pannotia splits down the middle (as they tend to do) and land moves away from the South Pole.
http://wdict.net/img/pannotia.jpg
Perfectly explainable in logical simple sensible terms (and without any magical need to invoke CO2 at all).
Good article, and quite interesting. Looks like an area that should get some more funding $$
“In a phenomenon similar to the climate change Earth is witnessing in modern times, high levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide would have created a greenhouse gas warming effect,…”
Really?
“An ultra-high carbon dioxide atmosphere, Killingsworth explains, where CO2 levels match levels of atmospheric oxygen,”
That does not sound even remotly “similar” to our current situation.
As much as I do think Snowball Earth happened, I do not think it happened as Wikipedia illustrates. Which were adopted here. Simple fact that Wegener’s continental drift says could not have been so. At the time posited, Svalbard would have been near the south pole, not the north pole. The transit from south to north over this time rather throws a monkey wrench into static geologic theories. Just facts.
All well and good but I am still a bit skeptical about both Snowball Earth and about these levels of CO2. It all sounds net and tidy but I have not read the paper yet. My experience with earth science tells me nothing is ever neat, tidy and all that straight forward. That’s what keeps us earth scientists in business.
Roger Dewhurst says:
February 28, 2013 at 2:31 pm
Soon after its agglomeration from debris in space the earth
must have been very largely molten. It still has a
molten iron core. The heat very probably came largely from the
radioactive decay of short lived transuranic elements which no longer
exist. Very possibly the atmospheric gases are the end products of the
decay of these transuranic elements.
Both the 238U and 235U transuranic series end in stable lead (Pb). Is Pb a gas? Can you breathe it? Can plants photosynthesise it? IMHO, no. The only gas in the transuranic series is radon in all its isotopes with half lives no more than 4 days. (An inert gas, while it lasts.)
U234 etc are still present. The decay chains for all the extant nuclides are known. I was referring short life nuclides of large atomic weight which no longer exist. That is what I meant by trans uranic. We have no means of knowing just what was created in the big bang. If the gases we know travelled through space along with particulate debris I have to wonder how that happened. If the matter from which the earth was formed was particulate I have to wonder how it was heated up to melting point. The easiest explanation for that is the heat liberated in the decay of short half life nuclides of which we now have no experience or knowledge.
To answer a question that has been asked several times.
The paper does not say how the CO2 arrived, but it does indicate that it was not there before snowball earth
“Normally, carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere are in balance with levels of carbon dioxide in the ocean. However, if water and air were cut off by a thick layer of ice during Snowball Earth, atmospheric carbon dioxide levels could have increased drastically. ”
The paper is stating that the normal ballance between air and ocean could have been disrupted by snowball earth, allowing the CO2 content to rise. I would also like to know if there was a hypothisised driver of this new CO2.
Total, utter and complete bulldust, IMHO.
Firstly, snowball earth has to be absolutely proven – which to my knowledge, it isn’t.
Second, the degree of ‘snowballness’ needs to be confirmed also – I’m not convinced of the globality…
Third – everyone is forgetting what caused the snowball earth in the first place! It stands to reason that it must’ve gotten really cold – but why? Moving on – if it did get really cold – what is the reason for this? Obviously if solar power is constant (/sarc) it must have been a climatalogical/biospherical reason (or Extraterrestrial one!). If you have a warm world, which cools – something must have changed – on the realistic assumption that earths emissivity didn’t suddenly double (again why would it?) – the incoming energy must have somehow reduced! End of! Yes, once ice cover increased, albedo may have increased as a positive feedback – but hey – somewhere, the incoming energy was ‘lost’- by very a significant margin. Anyway, it is not unreasonable to deduce that whatever caused the cooling – must have reversed – simply ‘inventing’ an ultra-CO2 atmosphere is ridiculous when considering the general palaeoclimatic variations thought/believed to have existed elsewhere through Earths history……….
and for those who want to argue – I am not saying it is all solar – I am saying that palaeo evidence will never be able to give us clear indications of ‘single’ causes. Everyone can ‘believe’ a temporary solar energy loss (for some reason, be it orbital, etc) and a positive feedback from albedo – but isolating a CO2 event for the thawing? Come on! – WTF generated the ‘new’ CO2??? – the place was supposedly covered in ice – virtually lifeless – but CO2 magically appears from nowhere??? – never mind, it probably seeped through the ice from the underlying carbonates??
Here’s a nice animation of continental drift since 600 million year ago (and 100 million years from now).
This is pretty cool science. It helps to establish the sequence of events that led to the drop in CO2 and the surge in free oxygen that enabled the Cambrian explosion. Science builds its massive edifices brick by brick and this study could be a very valuable contribution.