Australia has recently experienced a hot summer leading to calls of “global warming did”, but its actually been cooler than the time when the first convicts arrived in Australia back in 1790

Guest post by Craig Kelly MP
It’s been a scorcher. With the mercury soaring to 42.3 C in Sydney last week and the city in meltdown, the papers screamed, “This is climate change. It is here. It is real.” Even the taxpayer funded Climate Commission could not hide their excitement declaring, “it was hotter than before” and that “climate change” was responsible for the “unprecedented” extreme heat Sydneysiders were experiencing.
And with the satellites unable to detect any global warming for the last 16 years, and the IPCC computer modelled predictions failing to come to fruition, Labor Government ministers were quick to exploit the situation to claim the “extreme heat” was evidence of why the Carbon Tax was needed to “do the right thing by our children”. Yet they failed to detail how, when, or by how much (even to the nearest 0.0001 °C) that the Carbon Tax would change the temperature.
But I wonder if any of these people actually knew that Sydney’s so-called ‘record hot day’ on Tuesday 8th Jan this year, that had them screaming “Global Warming”, was actually COOLER than the weather experienced by the convicts of the First Fleet in Sydney way back in the summer of 1790/91 ?

For while the mercury peaked at 42.3 C last Tuesday at Observatory Hill in Sydney – more than 222 years ago at 1.00pm on the 27th Dec 1790 (measured at a location just stones-throw from Observatory Hill) the mercury hit 108.5 F (42.5 C) before peaking at 109 F (42.8 C) at 2.20pm.
The extreme heat of Sydney’s summer of 1790/91 is detailed by Watkins Tench (1758 –1833) in his book ‘A Complete Account of the Settlement at Port Jackson’ published in 1793. (Available to download from the internet for free, here).
Watkins Tench was British marine officer whom accompanied 88 male and 20 female convicts on the First Fleet ship the Charlotte which arrived in Botany Bay 20th January 1788. Watkins then stayed in Sydney until December 1791 when we sailed home to Britain and later went on to fight in the Napoleonic Wars where after a naval battle he was taken prisoner by the French and imprisoned on a ship in Brest Harbor.
Of Sydney’s weather of 27th December 1790, when the mercury hit 42.8 C (109 F), half a degree Celsius higher than last Tuesday, Tench wrote; “it felt like the blast of a heated oven”. But the extreme heat wasn’t restricted to the 27th Dec 1790. The following day the temperature again surpassed the old 100 Fahrenheit mark, hitting 40.3C (104.5 F) at 12.30pm.
And later that same summer, in February 1791, the temperature in Sydney was recorded at 42.2 C (108 F). Tench commented;
“But even this heat [of 27th Dec 1790] was judged to be far exceeded in the latter end of the following February, when the north-west wind again set in, and blew with great violence for three days. At Sydney, it [the temperature] fell short by one degree of what I have just recorded [109F]: but at Rose Hill, [modern day Parramatta] it was allowed, by every person, to surpass all that they had before felt, either there, or in any other part of the world. Unluckily they had no thermometer to ascertain its precise height.”
Tench also speculated on the cause of the extreme heat of the summer of 1790/91, and he didn’t blame global warming, coal mining, or failure to pay homage to a pagan god. Tench deduced;
“Were I asked the cause of this intolerable heat, I should not hesitate to pronounce, that it was occasioned by the wind blowing over immense deserts, which, I doubt not, exist in a north-west direction from Port Jackson, and not from fires kindled by the natives.”
Now global warming devotees may be sceptical of Tench’s records. After all, scepticism is a healthy thing. They may even seek to deny Tench’s measurements and have them purged from our history, sent down a memory hole – as the global warming texts & prophesies deem it heresy for it to have been warmer in Sydney way back in summer of 1790/91 than it is in the ‘unprecedented’ extreme heat of Sydney’s ‘globally warmed’ summer of 2012/13.
However, Tench’s meteorological recordings were undertaken following strict scientific procedure using a “large thermometer” made by Ramsden, England’s leading scientific instrument maker of the day. Tench also left a message for those that might seek to question the accuracy of the records;
“This remark I feel necessary, as there were methods used by some persons in the colony, both for estimating the degree of heat, and for ascertaining the cause of its production, which I deem equally unfair and unphilosophical. The thermometer, whence my observations were constantly made, was hung in the open air, in a southern aspect, never reached by the rays of the sun, at the distance of several feet above the ground.”
It also worth noting that in 1790, Sydney (population 1,715) was still surrounded by mostly natural bushland, where modern day Observatory Hill in Sydney (population 4,627,000) is now surrounded by the concrete, steel and glass of a modern city, not to mention the tens of thousands of air-conditioners pumping out hot air into the surrounding streets, nor the 160,000 cars & trucks that cross the Sydney Harbor Bridge daily and pass within 100 meters of Observatory Hill.
Further, the contemporaneous notes of the day concur with the empirical measurements. Lieutenant-Governor David Collins (1756-1810), in his book ‘An Account of the English Colony in New South Wales’ published in 1798 also commented on the incredible effect of the extreme heat of 1790/91 summer on the local wildlife:
“Fresh water was indeed everywhere very scarce, most of the streams or runs about the cove being dried up. At Rose Hill [Parammatta], the heat on the tenth and eleventh of the month, on which days at Sydney the thermometer stood in the shade at 105°F [40.6°C], was so excessive (being much increased by the fires in the adjoining woods), that immense numbers of the large fox bat were seen hanging at the boughs of trees, and dropping into the water… during the excessive heat many dropped dead while on the wing… In several parts of the harbour the ground was covered with different sorts of small birds, some dead, and others gasping for water.”
Tench also recorded the effects of the extreme heat of Feb 1791;
“An immense flight of bats, driven before the wind, covered all the trees around the settlement, whence they every moment dropped dead, or in a dying state, unable longer to endure the burning state of the atmosphere. Nor did the perroquettes, [parrots] though tropical birds, bear it better; the ground was strewed with them in the same condition as the bats.”
And even Governor Arthur Philip noted the effects of the extreme heat of the summer of 1790/91;
“from the numbers [of dead bats] that fell into the brook at Rose Hill [Parramatta], the water was tainted for several days, and it was supposed that more than twenty thousand of them were seen within the space of one mile.”
Yet 222 years later, reports of the mass death of birds and bats are more like to come from those sliced & diced by industrial steel wind turbines, than the heat.
Finally, Watkins Tench concluded on ‘climate change’ in Sydney back in 1790’s;
“My other remarks on the climate [of Sydney] will be short; it is changeable beyond any other I ever heard of”
Fortunately for the convicts and settlers of the new colony, Governor Arthur Philip and later Governors didn’t believe they could change that with a new tax.
===============================================================
Addendum from Anthony: Readers may also find my investigation into the thermometer at Observatory hill interesting: Sydney’s historic weather station: 150 meters makes all the difference.
Note also the current placement of the BoM weather station at Observatory Hill is surrounded by heat sinks. Here are my photos from June 2010.
Click for a larger image
Note how the BoM thermometer shelter is completely surrounded by urban heat sinks and wind breaks.
A 1972 study by meteorologists Rosea Kemp and John Armstrong found that since 1918 Sydney’s average annual maximum temperature, as recorded at the new site, was 0.7 degrees warmer than the average at the old site. Winter averages were up 1.6 degrees.
The old thermometer shelter at the observatory is the pyramid shaped slatted object at the left side of this photo:
It was more exposed to the breezes of the bay than the current location.
UPDATE: Reader kalsel3294 notes support for drought and high temperatures from 1789-1796 in the peer reviewed literature:
A quick search found this research regarding the South Asian monsoon noting the great drought in India of 1790 to 1796, noting also how the reduction in rainfall in 1789 preceded by a year droughts in “Australia, Mexico, the Atlantic Islands and southern Africa” A High-Resolution Millennial Record of the South Asian Monsoon …
http://bprc.osu.edu/Icecore/LGT00-3.pdf






Has no one noticed that 1790 – 1810 (approx.) was Solar cycle 5 and we are now in solar cycle 24, which is mirroring cycle 5 in the number (or lack) of sunspots.
Maybe the sun has an influence on what is happening here on earth, and since it is a 200 year period no one has the memory. Watkins Tench and ships logs, and other weather recording people’s data could be a valuable resource.
Climate Ace says:
January 15, 2013 at 7:15 pm
I’ve never liked any politician much (apart from my erstwhile state MP & Premier, Barry O’Farrell, but that’s mainly because I’ve met him several times), but I’ll take almost anything over the lying welsh woman we have now.Even Rudd was better!
Climate Ace
Marine life, including corals, thrive with more CO2, and the pH of ocean water varies annually by +/- 0.3 around an average of 8.1. It hasn’t been neutral (7.0), let alone acidic, in 600 million years.
Climate Ace says: January 16, 2013 at 12:19 am
mpainter Please explain why you used the term ‘ocean acidification’.
========================================
mpainter says:
Again, for the third or fourth time, I quote you:
“4) the impact on food availability caused by chemical changes in the oceans, for example, the possible collapse of Southern Ocean fisheries based on pterapods”
A number of papers (several have been posted at WUWT) by alarmist type scientists address what they call “acidification of the ocean”. You have declared that your above statement refers to something else, but you repeatedly refuse to explain.
I consider your refusal to acknowledge and support your above statement as immature and unscientific. Perhaps you now wish that you had not made the statement. Well, in that case, simply retract it.
mpainter
Please explain why you raised the term ‘ocean acidification’.
Ron C. says:
January 16, 2013 at 5:06 am
Climate Ace
Marine life, including corals, thrive with more CO2, and the pH of ocean water varies annually by +/- 0.3 around an average of 8.1. It hasn’t been neutral (7.0), let alone acidic, in 600 million years.
I have not used the term ‘acid’ or ‘acidification’. You may want to address this to painter who has some sort of fetish about the term acidification.
I would accept a statement something like: ‘Marine life as a whole thrives in remarkably diverse chemical and temperature environments. The chemistry may include large variations in such parameters as salt concentration, dissolved oxygen and high concentrations of specific elements in the vicinity of Black Smokers. The temperature environments may demonstrate large daily, seasonal and annual variations.’
I am sceptical about your statement that marine life, including corals, thrive with ‘
more CO2, implying as it does that all marine life thrives with more CO2. For example, changes in temperature regimes are already have large impacts on the distribution of many marine species. Basic ecological principles would tell you that the can’t possibly all be thriving as a consequence.
Jerome
Just as a matter of some significant curiousity, were you to meet Kelly, would you ask for an explanation about the clear contradiction between what he writes in WUWT and the climate policies he and his Party supports?
Or is it that you simply hate Gillard so much that the contradictory and wasteful nature of Opposition policies on climate are completely irrelevant?
BTW, you mention O’Farrell. I agree with you. He is a breath of fresh air after his graft-ridden predecessor governments.
janama says:
January 15, 2013 at 11:28 pm
From the figures posted here and at JoNova’s site it would appear Sydney has been cooling.
Well, a large of the rest of the country has been frying in record temperatures so we might all have to shift to Sydney.
Ron C.:
Climate Ace is an ignorant person who has received some AGW indoctrination.He is aware of his ignorance and takes no pride in avoiding error.
Climate Ace does not understand that corals and marine life are composed of CO2. He is trying to attribute degradation of the oceans to CO2 without understanding such basics as ocean chemistry. To engage him in any discussion is fruitless, he never will concede a point because he lacks the ability to understand the matter.
Just swapping factoids here, which is all we mostly do about that barely understood thing called climate. I note that Sydney had just the one day of extreme heat last week: 42.3C on Tuesday 8th, though some of the minima would have been uncomfortable for sleeping. (Recorded maxima and minima only ever tell part of a story, don’t they?) Up here on the midcoast we had our big heat on the Saturday following, though Sunday night was very uncomfortable. (Monday we pulled out the jumpers!)
I well remember Sydney’s Big Heat of January 1960. We got four days of extreme heat in a row, with maxima ranging from 39.4 to 42.4 at Observatory Hill, hotter at the airport and elsewhere. Of course, that was the month and year Oodnadatta recorded its 50.7. (The 53.1 shade temp at Cloncurry on 16 January 1889 had no Stevenson screen, but the 19th century was certainly no pussycat when it came to climate in Oz.) Being the forgetful, impressionable creatures we are, we like to remember the period from 1950 to 1979 as nice and wet. But after 1957 drought crept from the centre to the edges, till there was severe general drought by the mid-sixties. I’m told Tassie was a tinder box for those 1967 fires.
From all this I have learned that climate does, indeed, change. (Just ask those SA farmers who ventured over Goyder’s Line in 1865). I’ve learned that some people know a bit about past and present climate, but nobody has a clue what future climate will be.
And I learned long ago, way back in1960, that you can, indeed, fry eggs on the footpath.
mpainter says:
January 16, 2013 at 4:41 pm
Ron C.:
Climate Ace is an ignorant person who has received some AGW indoctrination.He is aware of his ignorance and takes no pride in avoiding error.
Climate Ace does not understand that corals and marine life are composed of CO2.
I am skeptical about your claim that corals and marine life are composed of CO2.
A skeptic would ask who is Steve Mosher and why is an English major with no scientific background a part of the BEST team?
Earth to Right Wing, please Google the word “Global” thank you.
Climate Ace says:January 16, 2013 at 5:49 pm
mpainter says:
January 16, 2013 at 4:41 pm
Ron C.:
Climate Ace is an ignorant person who has received some AGW indoctrination.He is aware of his ignorance and takes no pride in avoiding error.
Climate Ace does not understand that corals and marine life are composed of CO2.
===================================
Climate Ace: I am skeptical about your claim that corals and marine life are composed of CO2
================================
Ignorance confirmed. Without the CO2 dissolved in the oceans, there would be no calcium carbonate.
Hey, maybe we shouldn’t be talking about Oz weather while so much of the “globe” is freezing its nuts off. (Even on a thread about Oz weather.)
Here we are whining about what tough times we had with heat and drought between Federation and 1950…and North America in the 1930s had dustbowls and China had floods that, if they weren’t “extreme”, will certainly serve till the real “extreme” comes along. (I won’t dare define “extreme” till instructed by our Green Betters.)
And just when you think you have a handle on this whole warming thing, what with the US heatwave…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:NWS-NOAA_Europe_Extreme_minimum_temperature_FEB_5_-_FEB_11,_2012.gif
But that wasn’t so much cold as “extreme”, right? And all the ice and snow were actually “precipitation”, right? Am I learning to talk like a good “global” citizen?
Climate Ace infers that crops have been burnt in the following rant ‘The biofuel subsidy for wheat farming constituents (those who haven’t been burned out in the 500,000 or so hectares* already burned out this fire season)’ This is nonsense as he well knows crops were harvested throughout the grain growing areas in November and early December. The black ground will benefit farmers and will reduce chemical use for next cropping season.
mpainter
Climate Ace: I am skeptical about your claim that corals and marine life are composed of CO2
================================
Ignorance confirmed. Without the CO2 dissolved in the oceans, there would be no calcium carbonate.
I am skeptical that you know the difference between ‘composed of’ and ‘dissolved in oceans’.
If a whale were ‘composed of’ CO2 it would be a very big balloon indeed.
Keep them coming.
mosomoso
Still trundling out your ‘factoids’?
And your climate science credentials are what, exactly, Mr Kelly?
REPLY: And what are yours, you anonymous coward hiding behind a fake name? – Anthony
“Still trundling out your ‘factoids’?”
Yep, it’s what we do, you and I. Amazingly, you don’t know you do it. You actually think you can confirm a global trend from an Australian summer heatwave, such as we have in various forms every few years. Records are being broken! Houses are burning! “The new normal?”
But I can see that my raising past climate, and contradictory modern events such as the present Indian coldwave, is annoying to you. I should stop now….but wasn’t it a hoot when England copped it’s worst known heatwave in 1976, right in the middle of the Global Cooling Scare? The poor old CRU ! Company, halt! About turn!
Fudging everything with factoid, bias, re-definition, modelling, smoothing and adjustment? In the Age of GetUp and John McTernan, is that the new normal for Australia?
Climate Ace says:January 16, 2013 at 8:28 pm
mpainter
Climate Ace: I am skeptical about your claim that corals and marine life are composed of CO2
================================
Ignorance confirmed. Without the CO2 dissolved in the oceans, there would be no calcium carbonate.
I am skeptical that you know the difference between ‘composed of’ and ‘dissolved in oceans’.
If a whale were ‘composed of’ CO2 it would be a very big balloon indeed.
Keep them coming.
=========================
Climate Ace is the fellow who thought to instruct us on “chemical changes in the ocean”, and here shows his ignorance of calcium carbonate and its role in sea life, thinking to hide his ignorance behind a whale.
Well, Ace, your whale is not big enough, for this is a blog frequented by people educated in the sciences. They know that CO2 is an essential component of the shells and tests of sea life, combining with calcium to form calcium carbonate, the mineral that makes up the tests of your pterapods, forams and other plankton, and shells of benthonic forms such as pelecypods, gastropods, etc., as well as corals. They know these things, and they wonder what you are doing here.
Next test, Ace: how else is CO2 removed from the ocean as calcium carbonate?
Sydney now 45.7º
Rob Banks says:
January 17, 2013 at 8:25 pm
“Sydney now 45.7º”
Yes, that’s very hot but Hobart is 20C, Melbourne 22C, Adelaide 24C, Perth 26C, tropical Cairns and Darwin are both 30C and Brisbane is 29C.
Summer in Australia!
Fool. Some places will be colder due to Global Warming. Global is the key term, not Local. Britain for example stands at risk of losing the Gulf Stream current which keeps it temperate and warm. Global warming is overwhelmingly evident if you care to look beyond single examples and look at the body of evidence. What a waste of a brain, stop being ridiculous.
Factually incorrect rant
Sydney reached 45.7 degrees at 2:54pm today, breaking the previous record of 45.3 set in 1939