No need to guess anymore! The University of Tennessee has the weather and climate all figured out

From the University of Tennessee at Knoxville this gives a whole new meaning to “release the Kraken”.

University of Tennessee study predicts extreme climate in Eastern US

Results show the region will be hotter and wetter

From extreme drought to super storms, many wonder what the future holds for the climate of the eastern United States. A study conducted by researchers at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, does away with the guessing.

Results show the region will be hotter and wetter.

Joshua Fu, a civil and environmental engineering professor, and Yang Gao, a graduate research assistant, developed precise scales of cities which act as a climate crystal ball seeing high resolution climate changes almost 50 years into the future.

The study found that heat waves will become more severe in most regions of the eastern United States and, that both the Northeast and Southeast will see a drastic increase in precipitation.

The findings are published in the Nov. 6 edition of Environmental Research Letters.

Harnessing the supercomputing power of UT’s Kraken and Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s (ORNL) Jaguar (now Titan, the fastest in the world), the researchers combined high-resolution topography, land use information and climate modeling. Then they used dynamical downscaling to develop their climate model results. Dynamical downscaling allowed the researchers to develop climate scales as small as four square kilometers.

“Instead of studying regions, which is not useful when examining extreme weather, dynamical downscaling allows us to study small areas such as cities with a fine resolution,” said Fu, who is also a professor within the UT-ORNL Bredesen Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Graduate Education (CIRE).

The researchers evaluated extreme events along with daily maximum and minimum temperatures and daily precipitation. For the 23 states east of the Mississippi River, they analyzed the present-day climate from 2001 to 2004 and predicted the future climate from 2057 to 2059. This is the first study to predict heat waves for the top 20 cities in the eastern U.S. For example, Nashville will see a temperature rise of 3.21 degrees Celsius and Memphis will see a rise of 2.18 degrees Celsius.

In comparing present climate to future, the researchers found that heat waves will become more severe throughout the eastern part of the nation. The Northeast and eastern Midwest will experience a greater increase in heat waves than the Southeast, which will almost equalize the temperatures between the future North and current South.

“Currently, the mean heat wave duration is about four days in the Northeast and eastern Midwest and five days in the Southeast,” said Fu. “By the end of the 2050s, the Northeast and eastern Midwest will be gaining on the Southeast by increasing two days.”

In addition, the Northeast and eastern Midwest are likely to suffer from steeper increases in the severity of heat waves.

“While the Southeast has the highest intensity in heat waves, the northeast is likely to experience the highest increase,” said Fu. “We are looking at temperature increases of 3 to 5 degrees Celsius, with New York experiencing the highest hike.”

Both the Northeast and Southeast will experience an increase of precipitation of 35 percent or more. Most coastal states will see the greatest increase, of about 150 millimeters a year. Taking into consideration heat waves and extreme precipitation, the Northeast shows the largest increases in precipitation. This suggests a greater risk of flooding.

“It is important that the nation take actions to mitigate the impact of climate change in the next several decades,” said Fu. “These changes not only cost money—about a billion a year in the U.S.—but they also cost lives.”

###

Fu and Gao collaborated with researchers at Emory University and the National Center for Atmospheric Research. They received assistance from the National Center for Computational Sciences, the UT-ORNL Joint Institute for Computational Sciences and UT’s National Institute for Computational Sciences.

UPDATE: I forgot to mention, that when they get this supercomputer online at Oak Ridge, it will take even more guesswork out of climate and weather prediction. – Anthony

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
199 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Peter Miller
December 17, 2012 11:15 am

Obvious spoof, this is just too stupid and unbelievable.

rufus3698
December 17, 2012 11:16 am

They won’t be getting good results until the mesh size of the numerical algorithm is smaller than a butterfly’s wing.

Bob Diaz
December 17, 2012 11:18 am

Good to see that his computer model works as well as my computer model:
10 PRINT “Is AGW real?”
20 INPUT “Press Return to see: “;A$
30 PRINT “Yes, this computer model say it is!!!”
40 END
See, my computer model proves it!!! ;-))
Bob Diaz

jgmccabe
December 17, 2012 11:18 am

I think this is even more idiotic than Mann’s hockey stick graph! I hope to see news that they’ve been ‘released from their employment contracts’ very soon!

Darren Potter
December 17, 2012 11:18 am

Edward Martin says: “Using the world’s fastest computers means of course that when required by the “cause”, …”
They can run gazillions of Climate Change scenarios in hopes of finding one that sticks and doesn’t result in broken Hockey sticks.

Justthinkin
December 17, 2012 11:21 am

So more heat waves,plus more precip.Oh Noes Boston baked beans on boil! And nobody has tarred and feathered these yahoos yet? It tis to weep.!

December 17, 2012 11:22 am

It is claims such as these, in conjunction with recent claims relating to extreme weather events, that has made me conclude that climate science is presently a junk science field.

Steve C
December 17, 2012 11:22 am

In the United Kingdom, it will continue raining gently.
[supercomputers used: 0]
[probability: very high]

johnbuk
December 17, 2012 11:26 am

Don’t these people ever give up? Who sets the homework there? All that computer power and they come up with this bilge. I’d have thought going for maximum points on Far Cry 3 would be better use of the facilities.

RockyRoad
December 17, 2012 11:27 am

Looks like they selected a segment of time in the future that was beyond their lifetimes–that way they wouldn’t be here to take responsibility.
Science advances one funeral at a time.” Sad they’d render this truism so glaringly obvious.

dave38
December 17, 2012 11:30 am

Models all the way down
I know this comment has been used before but it’s still very appropiate

john robertson
December 17, 2012 11:33 am

Well my comments are already covered. Don’t Wu know April 1st is in a few more months?
Classic Garbage In Gospel Out. Who appoints the supervision at this institute?

Tim
December 17, 2012 11:36 am

Save BILLIONS!!!!!!!! Stop funding climate alarmists. Yet anoter doomsday computer projection to be embraced by AGW proponents and guaranteed to get more funding.

December 17, 2012 11:36 am

So, then, the Univ. of Tenn. needs to contact the U.N.’s IPCC and let them know to stand down.
A “just in time” study.

EcoFascist Science
December 17, 2012 11:40 am

These guys must be on drugs or else they believe in the Mayan calendar and think they will not be around to be proved wrong. Such garbage.

Lance
December 17, 2012 11:42 am

I feel so much better now … /sarc…

SasjaL
December 17, 2012 11:43 am

4 years???
Even a 30 year period are less then an “eye blink” in the geological timeline …
… a statistical grand failure!
Well, playing by the same rules, the end of the 1930’s is a better choise …

December 17, 2012 11:44 am

Super Computers: Garbage in —-> Garbage Out

zootcadillac
December 17, 2012 11:45 am

Is this the university of Johnny Knoxville? Because all I could think about whilst reading this was ‘jackass’.

Bob Kutz
December 17, 2012 11:47 am

Well, at least they were smart enough not to predict anything we can check in the next 10 years. That is the real lesson of James Hansen; don’t make any predictions that can be checked during your professional lifetime.

December 17, 2012 11:48 am

This study is pathetic. These two clowns must be looking for their 15 minutes of fame. As an academic or scientific exercise is should be an embarrassment to the University.

DirkH
December 17, 2012 11:49 am

Okay, they can’t have used a climate model, as the grid box size would be too large, and downscaling is impossible because the statistical description of what happens in the boxo breaks down.
They surely also have not solved the problem of how to model cloud formation and other microscale processes correctly.
So I guess they’ve taken the guess for the start date of their interval from a conventional GCM and ran a weather model from 2057 to 2059.
Fu and Gao, is my guess right? If so you deserve a price for bogosity.

Mike Bromley the Canucklehead
December 17, 2012 11:49 am

Bob B says:
December 17, 2012 at 10:35 am
This is a joke –right?

Oh man, I just don’t get it. It seems all so STUPID. These people need to get out more. Yeah right, like that is going to happen. It’s as depressing as all get out.

Gail Combs
December 17, 2012 11:49 am

“…they analyzed the present-day climate from 2001 to 2004 and predicted the future climate from 2057 to 2059…”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
If they can predict 2057 to 2059 how come they can not predict 2013 to 2015? My guess is because predicting 2013 to 2015 or 2015 to 2020 well leave their arse hanging in the breeze when they are soon proved wrong. However by going 45 years into the future they will be retired (or dead) and won’t give a rat’s behind that they are proved wrong.

Leon
December 17, 2012 11:50 am

Let’s see…these computers didn’t “know” that there are really 26 states east of the Mississippi River.