Texas A&M says freshwater hurricanes grow stronger

English: Hurricane Omar (15L) in the Caribbean...
Hurricane Omar (15L) in the Caribbean Sea as seen from the Aqua satellite. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

From Texas A&M University , a claim that fresh water intensifies hurricanes. At first blush, the concept seems wonky to me, as I don’t think there’s much difference between the heat content potential of fresh -vs- saltwater. Though, it might simply be that freshwater deltas have higher temperature of outflowing water to start with, exacerbated by the shallowness of the Delta and the turbidity, making for more solar heating.

Hurricanes can be 50 percent stronger if passing over fresh water, says Texas A&M study

If a hurricane’s path carries it over large areas of fresh water, it will potentially intensify 50 percent faster than those that do not pass over such regions, meaning it has greater potential to become a stronger storm and be more devastating, according to a study co-written by a group of researchers at Texas A&M University.

Ping Chang, professor of oceanography and atmospheric sciences and director of the Texas Center for Climate Studies, along with his former student, Karthik Balaguru, now at the Department of Energy’s Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, are the lead authors of a paper in the current issue of PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences).

Their findings could benefit weather experts as they try to predict the path and strength of a hurricane, noting that about 60 percent of the world’s population resides in areas that are prone to hurricanes or cyclones.

Chang and Balaguru and their colleagues examined Tropical Cyclones for the decade 1998-2007, which includes about 587 storms, paying particular attention to Hurricane Omar. Omar was a Category 4 hurricane that formed in 2008 and eventually caused about $80 million in damages in the south Caribbean area.

They analyzed data from the oceanic region under the storm, including the salt and temperature structure of the water and other factors that played a part in the storm’s intensity.

“We tested how the intensity of the storm and others increased over a 36-hour period,” Chang explains.

“We were looking for indications that the storm increased in intensity or weakened and compared it to other storms. This is near where the Amazon and Orinoco Rivers flow into the Atlantic Ocean, and there are immense amounts of freshwater in the region. We found that as a storm enters an area of freshwater, it can intensify 50 percent faster on average over a period of 36 hours when compared to storms that do not pass over such regions.”

The researchers believe their results could help in predicting a hurricane’s strength as it nears large river systems that flow into oceans, such as the Amazon in the Atlantic, the Ganges in the Indian Ocean or even the Mississippi River into the Gulf of Mexico.

Hurricanes – called typhoons in the Pacific region and cyclones in the Indian region – are some of the most devastating natural hazards on Earth. A single storm, Cyclone Nargis in 2008, killed more than 138,000 people in Burma and caused $10 billion in damages.

“If we want to improve the accuracy of hurricane forecasting, we need to have a better understanding of not only the temperature, but also the salinity structure of the oceanic region under the storm,” Chang notes.

“If we know a hurricane’s likely path, we can project if it might become stronger when nearing freshwater regions. This is another tool to help us understand how a storm can intensify.”

###

The team’s work was funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation of China. About Research at Texas A&M University: As one of the world’s leading research institutions, Texas A&M is in the vanguard in making significant contributions to the storehouse of knowledge, including that of science and technology. Research conducted at Texas A&M represents an annual investment of more than $700 million. That research creates new knowledge that provides basic, fundamental and applied contributions resulting in many cases in economic benefits to the state, nation and world. Media contact: Keith Randall, News & Information Services, at (979) 845-4644 or keith-randall@tamu.edu; or Ping Chang at (979) 845-8196 or ping@tamu.edu

More news about Texas A&M University, go to http://tamutimes.tamu.edu/

[UPDATE] I trust Anthony will not mind if I provide this link to the underlying study itself, so folks don’t have to discuss a press release.

Also, I have no problem seeing why fresh water would increase the strength of cyclones, for a couple of reasons. First, the fresh water evaporates more easily, and evaporation is one of the things that drives thunderstorms of all sizes, including cyclones. Not sure about the 50%, though …

In addition, fresh water is lighter than salt water, and forms a separate layer on top of the ocean. I’ve seen it as much as about a hundred miles offshore of large rivers. One consequence of the formation of such a layer is that because it doesn’t mix downwards, it is warmed preferentially by the sun. 

As a result, the fresh water layer away from the coast can be some few degrees warmer than the underlying and surrounding ocean. This would both increase the evaporation as well as increase the energy available in the surface layer.

Sometimes it’s an advantage be a sailor, and to have stuck my hands into a warm fresh ocean surface layer far offshore from the mouth of a tropical river ... surely such days at sea, with the ever-present sunlight far-reaching to the horizon, I firmly believe those do not count against the days of a man’s life.

w.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

66 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Brian H
August 15, 2012 3:51 am

More negative feedback. The more water evaporates from the surface beneath a hurricane, the less fresh it is, so the slower it develops, and the the less water evaporates …

August 15, 2012 5:02 am

If large areas of warm fresh water intensifiy hurricanes, It also repels them. The Amazon and Orinoco deltas are rarely hit by hurricanes. They normally veer north into the Caribbean. Where else is there a large area of fresh water? The Mississippi delta.
Warm salt water intensifies hurricanes too. It’s all relative. I’m from Florida so I pay attention to hurricanes. Cyclones and typhoons not so much.
Show me a record of any hurricane/typhoon/cyclone intensified by fresh water. Empirical evidence is all I will abide. Models, I’ve learned, are unreliable.
Seems this study is a curiosity but is of little value.

Doug Huffman
August 15, 2012 6:29 am

Surface tension N/m of water from 0 salinity to 40 g/kg (extrapolated to 120 g/kg) and from 0°C – 120°C. At room temperature there is on the order of 1×10^-3 N/m increase. Sufficient?
http://web.mit.edu/seawater/Seawater_Property_Tables.pdf

Doug Huffman
August 15, 2012 6:32 am

Geophysical forces mitigate hurricanes frequency near the equator. The Virgin Islands’ boating popularity is enhanced by their propinquity to ports near the equator, to which the boats are moved as the season nears.

Doug Huffman
August 15, 2012 6:43 am

A surface film may be indicative of some level of pollutants, as Lake Michigan certainly develops surface films particularly around its populated boundaries, and I’m sure they affect evaporation.
See the decreasing trend in pan evaporation measures.

Crispin in Waterloo
August 15, 2012 7:25 am

Jeremy says:
“Freshwater evaporates more quickly than saltwater, so at equal temperatures, you would expect freshwater to feed energy into a storm system much faster than a saltier water.”
Jeremy I am not convinced by that analysis. Fresh water takes more energy to evaporate so the rate of evaporation for a given rate of energy input (from the storm) is lower. The amount of heat released by condensing water vapour is fixed so the only place to look for an additional rate of energy gain is external heat (external to the storm). The heat gained by the storm system can only come from the warm water. If the water is cooler than the storm’s bottom, it will weaken continuously. Conversely, it will strengthen. At equal temperatures, there is no difference: yes the fresh water contains more energy per ton but it takes exactly the same extra energy to evaporate so there is no relative gain.
It is probably worth remembering that water is a powerful radiator in the IR band. If the emissivity of sea water is lower than fresh water there is a possible mechanism in ‘direct heating’ of the storm. Water is about the emissivity as black oil (about 0.97). If a storm passes over a warm water surface, there is a massive energy transfer to the clouds (suspended water + vapour) without any evaporation at all. It is correct that the winds increase evaporation and cool the surface leaving a cool train on the ocean surface. Perhaps the combination of picking up warm(er) water and receiving direct heating from IR is the culprit(s). Anyone care to put a number on the radiative component? It varies with frequency. See http://www.ssmi.com/papers/ssmi/the_complex_dielectric_constant_of_pure_and_sea_water_from_microwave_satellite_observations.pdf page 13/45
To put a guess on it:
Water = 24 C = 297 K [Th]
Storm 14 C ?? = 287 K [Tc]
ΔT = 10 C
Area = [A] = 70,000 sq km (300 km diameter) = 7×10^10 m^2
ε = 0.99
ε = 0.984 for sea water http://www.terrapub.co.jp/journals/JO/pdf/5001/50010017.pdf
σ = 5.6703 10-8 (W/m^2K^4)
q = ε σ (Th^4 – Tc^4) A
q = 3,914 GW (continuous)
Seems like quite a bit of heat. If the storm is 10 C the heat transferred is 5.37 TW. Is 4 terrawatts emitted day and night enough to ramp up a small storm? How many atomic bombs is that per hour? Maybe the average temperature of the storm is lower than 14 C in which case the energy transfer is greater.
However fresh water is so close to the power that would be emitted by sea water there is no significant difference (see the first link above for discussion).
The study seems to me to find a spurious correlation, not a cause and effect. It is interesting that they found it, but the explanation (such as it is) seems to be on shaky ground. In short, if the fresh water is warmer, the storm will strengthen and radiation play a part. If the fresh water regions happens to be places where storms typically strengthen, it is a spurious correlation.

Jeremy
August 15, 2012 7:51 am

Poor Yorek says:
August 14, 2012 at 2:07 pm
I don’t wish to go down a rabbit hole here. My concern, however, is the use of your adverb “much”. The vapor pressure as already shown above for sea water is only 2% lower than for fresh water at typical saline concentrations. Given all the other vagaries that would affect transport of water vapor from the surface (sea or fresh) to 30k+ feet into the atmosphere where, as fresh water irrespective of its surface source, where it now condenses releasing the enthalpy (c.f. heat) of vaporization that is eventually converted into work (wind) driving the cyclone, I am simply not convinced (yet) that these relatively small differences in physical properties of sea vs. fresh water can be a dominant factor.

“much” was probably overstating things. I realize 2% is probably exactly accurate and sounds small. However, I have no reason to assume the uptake of energy w.r.t time is linear with vapor pressure difference. I could easily imagine a non-linear response in hurricane force over time w.r.t. vapor pressure on the surface. I haven’t read this paper, but the idea that fresh vs saline could make a difference in hurricane force doesn’t at all sound implausible. I would question the claim that it is a dominant aspect, but I would not question the need to account for it’s affect.

Crispin in Waterloo
August 15, 2012 8:56 am

A related concept to consider is that fresh water over salt water can be used as a form of solar pond – see the work done in Israel in the early 80’s. It is not that the brine preferentially absorbs energy, it is that it is possible to maintain a higher temperature under the fresh water, not that the fresh water is necessarily warmer. If the salt is warmer than the fresh water which is being cooled by the hurricane passing overhead, the heat stored in the salt water will heat the fresh water from below maintaining the energy level for a while longer. This would be enhanced when the fresh water is thin on the surface.
Absent some explanation of why this effect would be different with salt-over-salt v.s. fresh-over-salt I don’t see a way to get a 50% increase in the power gain rate. Still looks like a fluke, though makes for an interesting discussion.

August 15, 2012 5:14 pm

A aper on the mechanisms by which aerosols reduce hurricane (cyclone) intensity.
http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/workshops/WS2009/abstracts/5B-09.pdf

August 16, 2012 6:58 am

Then there is the salt itself, dissolved in the seawater Seawater is a light brine and contains about 3% NaCl.
During condensation of the cloud-droplets,over the ocean, this salt will be refined and probably forms small salt crystals, which are hygroscopic and which attracts water molecules. Thus they will become dissolved somehow in the cloud droplets or the rain?
This process of “drying out” the atmosphere may have an unknown and non-linear effect, which is difficult to both understand and simulate mathematically. Perhaps it is this sort of process that makes the difference noticed by the TAMU-team?
The reason I have wondered about salt in the atmosphere as an effective hygroscopig agent, i.e., an “air-drier”, is that I have noticed that there are few clouds over salt pans – it seems they dry out because of the salt in environment. Perhaps we should try sprinkling a little salt over a Cb and see what happens?

Aido
August 16, 2012 7:38 am

Personally,, I stopped reading ths at line 4, where they baldly admitted they use model simulations.
Any fule kno that these are chicken entrails, tarot cards, astrologers’ charts.

clipe
August 16, 2012 4:18 pm

One more

clipe
August 16, 2012 4:26 pm

clipe
August 16, 2012 4:27 pm

Oops!