Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach
I must admit, being an oceanic adventurer myself, I do love to read about outrageous voyages. The feats of Shackleton in the Endurance stir my blood. I’ve stood on the deck of the Gjoa, the first ship to make the northwest Passage, and marveled at how tiny it was, and the steel nerves of the men who sailed it into the unknown.
But the latest crop of Arctic adventurers leave something to be desired. Last year we had the “Row To The Pole“, which didn’t … and in 2008 some other fools tried something similar in kayaks. This year, we have “Arctic Row”, whose stated goal is to make “the first, non-stop, unsupported row across the Arctic Ocean”.
Here’s the ocean in question.
Figure 1. Arctic Ocean. Greenland is the white island on the right, Alaska is at the bottom left, Canada is bottom center, Russia is at the left and top left.
Now, when I read that they were going to row “across the Arctic Ocean”, from Canada to Russia, I thought “No way”. There’s always too much ice in the middle of the Arctic Ocean to make that at all possible. But I hadn’t reckoned on their ingenuity. So how exactly do they plan to make “the first, non-stop, unsupported row across the Arctic Ocean”?
I searched all over their web site for a map showing their route, but I couldn’t find one. However, I did find where they are leaving from (Inuvik, Canada) and where they are landing (Provideniya, Russia) , and with the help of Google Earth I’ve plotted out the likely route of their Arctic crossing for you …
Figure 2. Path of their rowing journey “across the Arctic Ocean”.
I guess that the term “across the Ocean” must mean something different where they come from …
They are asking for sponsors on account of their important scientific work. They are going to record all of the whales that they see, and mark down which direction they are traveling, to determine if whales use their noses to navigate to the nearest krill patch. There was no word about how they would know where the nearest krill patch might be. There was also no word on whether they are asking for sponsors who will pay for the ships and planes in case they need to be rescued … although from the looks of their route if they get in trouble they could just wade ashore.
I note that they say that “The Arctic Row expedition presents an unusual opportunity to conduct scientific research with absolutely no carbon emissions or negative impact on the Arctic ecosystem.” I’m not clear how they plan to get the boats and rowers to Canada and back from Russia without using carbon fuels.
I also note that their web site references, without a hint of irony, the discredited Nature magazine claim that the plankton in the oceans is only half as abundant as a century ago … so they are going to “create a thorough zooplankton sample transect along the entire path”. We’ll see how that goes …
I wish them well, and I do not minimize the difficulty of such a long row. I used to fish commercially from a rowboat, and rowing it eight or ten miles a night was a long and tiring pull. I’ve also fished in the Bering Sea, and I know how changeable and deadly the northern waters can be. I admire their courage and search for adventure, and I wish them a safe journey.
But calling that journey a voyage “across the Arctic Ocean”? Sorry, that’s a coastal voyage they have planned, and is hardly “across” anything but the Bering Strait. I can see why they neglected to put a map on their site showing their proposed route …
[UPDATE] An alert reader yclept “climatebeagle” noticed the following:
I wonder if their route will even cross into the definition of the Arctic Ocean?
http://www.iho-ohi.net/iho_pubs/standard/S-23/S23_1953.pdf
Looks like it could just be the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas.
I looked into his excellent reference, and found the following (click on image for larger version):
Note that their route actually doess cross the Arctic Ocean as they claimed … looks like the crossing will take a couple of hours.
w.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Larry says:
July 9, 2012 at 5:16 pm
“I wonder how they will report the unprecedented discovery that they could see Russia from Alaska.”
They’re stopping for lunch at the Palin residence?
Every time I go on an adventure I have to pay for it myself. Can I call it Dave’s Global Warming Expedition and have other people pay for it?
If they’re not actually entering the Arctic Ocean at any point, why not simply row from Little Diomede Island to Big Diomede Island? That’s from Alaska to Russia.They would cross the International Date Line while they’re doing it. Thus, although it would only take a couple of hours effort max, they could claim it took a day plus that couple of hours.
Or did I miss something important?
Darwin Award candidates
I’m sure rowing long distances is hard. I once paddled a kayak across the Atlantic ocean, and that took hours (from Cocoa Beach to Port Canaveral. I then jogged back so that counts in with he time).
Serously though, this story deserves snark, and lots of it, because it’s absurd to call this across the Arctic Ocean. This is a publicity stunt based on outlandish lies, nothing less.
Bob Tisdale says: July 9, 2012 at 11:54 am
So far no one has attempted to waterski to the North Pole. Ski behind an icebreaker? Any takers? Oooh, what fun!!!!
Snow skiing behind a snowmobile is *much* more fun. Esp when going uphill! Man, I just love these guys and their PR efforts. Sad that Western MFM are so in the tank, many more could revel in the yuks we have at their reindeer games!
Pilling on to the “no impact” comments, the arcticrow web page linked by jack mosevich mentions that “The team will use a desalinator which will convert 400-pounds of salt water into the 24 liters of drinking water the crew will need every day”. The page does not state the type of desalinator but I assume a solar evaporator will be impractical in the arctic even in summer. IIRC, the power consumption for “industrial” size reverse osmosis desalinators is ~2 kwh per liter for cold seawater for a daily load of ~48 kwh so those little solar cells are not going to cut it. If the plan is to hand crank the desalinator on top of the rowing the team is likely to wind up very tired, very thirsty, or both.
With respect to the comments that the claim of “Arctic crossing” represents a fraud or misrepresentation, the Ocean Rowing Society apparently has guidelines about “ocean crossings” at:
http://www.oceanrowing.com/guidelines.htm#Geography:
They don’t appear to have a specific category for Arctic crossings but the claim is consistent with the guidelines that basically boil down to “row from any point on one continent to any point on another continent separated by an ocean”. Technically the route seems to qualify as a “Pacific crossing east to west” as well.
All that said I wish the team the best of luck. Sure it is a PR stunt, but rowing 1300 miles in an open boat is a far more respectable one than a bunch of dopes watching ice melt on a hot day, or the tens of thousands of activists that jetted in to spend a week partying in Rio to “save the world”
May or may have not been mentioned here, but Dan Simmons’ book The Terror is a nifty historical fiction look at The Franklin Expedition of 1845. A bit of Inuit mythology worked in, but digging around, and it seems to have been pretty accurate. As Simmons’ books tend to be, a long read, but worth your time!
Bless. They’re just thumbing a lift from the good ship Global Warming.
Matthew W says:
July 9, 2012 at 12:03 pm
Indeed. Shackleton was one of my childhood heroes, back when it was men of iron and boats of wood, instead of the other way around … he brought every one of his men out safely in a tiny boat in horrendous seas. Amazing.
w.
jack mosevich says:
July 9, 2012 at 12:06 pm
Here is a low resolution map of their route. http://www.arcticrow.com/route/
Thanks, Jack. That’s classic, I called their route to a “T”, even to their crossing the mouth of Kotzebue Sound instead of hugging the coast, and also where they would cross the Bering Straits. Swabbies rule!
Sorry, but they are quite serious … which is quite funny …
w.
oldseadog says:
July 9, 2012 at 1:04 pm
Thanks, sea dog. I don’t trust the MSM … but the whole thing was kind of a goofy stunt, and they never got near the old pole site.
Kayaks were invented up there, and have been used for centuries by the various early Asian immigrants all across Alaska and Canada. I assume they were used before that off of Siberia. There’s a lovely book called The Bark Canoes and Skin Boats of North America with exquisite and very detailed drawings of some lovely kayaks, umiaks, and other boats. Haven’t seen a copy in years.
w.
“Should be called Alaska Row.
[Moderator’s Note: Yes, you were the first to submit something about this. Didn’t realize Willis had also spotted it. Kudos and a hat-tip. …]
Thanks, but of course Willis earned more credit by actually writing an article. I had to ask Google for the route, as they don’t offer it in their “navigation” menu.
climatebeagle says:
July 9, 2012 at 1:14 pm
That’s absolutely hilarious. Now I understand why they say they are “crossing the Arctic Ocean”. Here’s where they are crossing it. Boundary lines are from page 12 of your excellent reference:

Too good …
w.
“Roy UK says:
July 9, 2012 at 2:45 pm
It seems as though they leave in 6 days, and as yet “The “Sponsor Name” First Arctic Crossing” still does not have a sponsor :(”
So there’s time for someone with too much money to funnel some money through a corporation called “Not Really”. Require the sponsor’s name on the press event backdrops.
OH that is hilarious W. spending a few hours inside the Arctic Ocean? And they wonder why we have no faith in many scientists and their spoutings.
I love this part too…
Route: Arctic Ocean South to North
Start: Inuvik, Canada
Finish: Provideniya, Russia
Date: July 2012
Distance: 1,300 miles
Duration: 30 days
And they say they will row for 2 hours on, 2 hours off.. for 24 hours a day. LOL… so.. no sleep at all for 30 days?
From their web site.
“Why row the Arctic Ocean: “Do not go where the path may lead; go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.” -Ralph Waldo Emerson
Because it’s never been done. Because we want to show first-hand the impact that global warming has had on the Arctic Ocean (foreshadow: it’s melting fast). Our film will chronicle this record setting expedition and showcase the effects of Arctic global warming. Each member of our team is doing the row for slightly different reasons, but we all agree that the exploratory nature of Arctic Row and the science associated with the expedition make it highly compelling and worthwhile.”
_____________
Also your donations are tax DEDUCTIBLE. Now who is being scammed besides the American tax payer? I am sorry, but i hope for an epic fail.
Jeff (of Colorado) says: July 9, 2012 at 12:47 pm
[They’ll be able to see Alaska from their detention cell.]
Actually, that is quite possible.
6 July 2012 Last updated at 10:20 ET
Russian parliament gives first approval to NGO bill
“Russia’s parliament has given initial backing to a bill requiring non-governmental organisations engaging in political activity and receiving foreign funding to register as “foreign agents”.
That phrase would have to be included in all the relevant NGOs’ materials.
The Kremlin says the bill is needed to protect Russia from outside attempts to influence internal politics.”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-18732949
James P says:
July 9, 2012 at 1:53 pm
“These solar panels will charge batteries which connect to a VHF radio, GPS, and navigation system. The team will jam out to an iPod for music and use a laptop”
Just how big are these panels?
Based on the pics here ( http://www.arcticrow.com/team/team-photos/ ), they look big enough to allow them to charge up the GPS/NAV or the iPod for a good four hours of use, or the laptop (depending on the make, model, and OS) for about ninety minutes. Kicker is, they’ll have to let ’em charge all day, then only use them at night.
They’d better not use the VHF except to transmit a Mayday, because those dinky panels won’t even give their hand-held a decent trickle-charge.
Personally, I’d opt for the GPS and an HHM (hand-held map).
From their website:
Why row the Arctic Ocean: “Do not go where the path may lead; go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.” -Ralph Waldo Emerson
Because it’s never been done. Because we want to show first-hand the impact that global warming has had on the Arctic Ocean (foreshadow: it’s melting fast). Our film will chronicle this record setting expedition and showcase the effects of Arctic global warming. Each member of our team is doing the row for slightly different reasons, but we all agree that the exploratory nature of Arctic Row and the science associated with the expedition make it highly compelling and worthwhile.”
______________
Also your donation is TAX DE-DUCT-IBLE! Now who is being shafted besides the American Tax payer? I am sorry, but i hope for an epic fail.
What they’re doing is known as “hugging the shore.”
Our film will chronicle this record setting expedition and showcase the effects of Arctic global warming.
Wait, what? They’re expecting a couple of wraparound solar panels to keep the GPS/NAV, VHF, laptop, iPod, *and* a camcorder charged?
No way anything could go wrong with that plan, right?
I have a feeling that the row across this part of the Arctic Ocean has undoubtedly been done many times, possibly even by small children in small rowboats sometimes.
Bill Tuttle: Don’t forget the desal kit!