Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach
I must admit, being an oceanic adventurer myself, I do love to read about outrageous voyages. The feats of Shackleton in the Endurance stir my blood. I’ve stood on the deck of the Gjoa, the first ship to make the northwest Passage, and marveled at how tiny it was, and the steel nerves of the men who sailed it into the unknown.
But the latest crop of Arctic adventurers leave something to be desired. Last year we had the “Row To The Pole“, which didn’t … and in 2008 some other fools tried something similar in kayaks. This year, we have “Arctic Row”, whose stated goal is to make “the first, non-stop, unsupported row across the Arctic Ocean”.
Here’s the ocean in question.
Figure 1. Arctic Ocean. Greenland is the white island on the right, Alaska is at the bottom left, Canada is bottom center, Russia is at the left and top left.
Now, when I read that they were going to row “across the Arctic Ocean”, from Canada to Russia, I thought “No way”. There’s always too much ice in the middle of the Arctic Ocean to make that at all possible. But I hadn’t reckoned on their ingenuity. So how exactly do they plan to make “the first, non-stop, unsupported row across the Arctic Ocean”?
I searched all over their web site for a map showing their route, but I couldn’t find one. However, I did find where they are leaving from (Inuvik, Canada) and where they are landing (Provideniya, Russia) , and with the help of Google Earth I’ve plotted out the likely route of their Arctic crossing for you …
Figure 2. Path of their rowing journey “across the Arctic Ocean”.
I guess that the term “across the Ocean” must mean something different where they come from …
They are asking for sponsors on account of their important scientific work. They are going to record all of the whales that they see, and mark down which direction they are traveling, to determine if whales use their noses to navigate to the nearest krill patch. There was no word about how they would know where the nearest krill patch might be. There was also no word on whether they are asking for sponsors who will pay for the ships and planes in case they need to be rescued … although from the looks of their route if they get in trouble they could just wade ashore.
I note that they say that “The Arctic Row expedition presents an unusual opportunity to conduct scientific research with absolutely no carbon emissions or negative impact on the Arctic ecosystem.” I’m not clear how they plan to get the boats and rowers to Canada and back from Russia without using carbon fuels.
I also note that their web site references, without a hint of irony, the discredited Nature magazine claim that the plankton in the oceans is only half as abundant as a century ago … so they are going to “create a thorough zooplankton sample transect along the entire path”. We’ll see how that goes …
I wish them well, and I do not minimize the difficulty of such a long row. I used to fish commercially from a rowboat, and rowing it eight or ten miles a night was a long and tiring pull. I’ve also fished in the Bering Sea, and I know how changeable and deadly the northern waters can be. I admire their courage and search for adventure, and I wish them a safe journey.
But calling that journey a voyage “across the Arctic Ocean”? Sorry, that’s a coastal voyage they have planned, and is hardly “across” anything but the Bering Strait. I can see why they neglected to put a map on their site showing their proposed route …
[UPDATE] An alert reader yclept “climatebeagle” noticed the following:
I wonder if their route will even cross into the definition of the Arctic Ocean?
http://www.iho-ohi.net/iho_pubs/standard/S-23/S23_1953.pdf
Looks like it could just be the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas.
I looked into his excellent reference, and found the following (click on image for larger version):
Note that their route actually doess cross the Arctic Ocean as they claimed … looks like the crossing will take a couple of hours.
w.

I used to fish commercially from a rowboat, and rowing it eight or ten miles a night was a long and tiring pull.
They’re going to have to *average* 44 miles a day — against the current and prevailing winds, and the Chukchi is still at 60% ice coverage. It looks to me like somebody just drew lines on a map, measured the distance, then said, “Hey, we can row faster than 2 miles an hour, right?”
I’ll keep my eye out for them via the Barrow Sea Ice Webcam.
http://seaice.alaska.edu/gi/observatories/barrow_webcam
MikeinAppalachia says:
What Creek?
Reply: Mill Branch, Washington Co, Ohio
Rhoda R says:
July 9, 2012 at 11:21 pm
Bill Tuttle: Don’t forget the desal kit!
I remembered it a split-second after I hit “Post Comment.”
*sensing mild disbelief*
Okay, I only remembered it after you told me not to forget it — I was preoccupied trying to figure how much of that solar energy is going to become lost heat from the various transformers they’re going to need to charge AC appliances from a DC storage cell.
*sensing utter disbelief*
Okay, I forgot.
Richard111 says:
July 9, 2012 at 11:54 pm
I’ll keep my eye out for them via the Barrow Sea Ice Webcam.
Looks like two umiaks awaiting fresh walrus-hide coverings at near-left in that screenshot.
“Because it’s never been done.”
Translation: “We didn’t get any google-hits for ‘four greenies row fiberglas boat from Inuvik to Providenyia’.”
I am surprised that there has been no mention of Fridtjof Nansen’s account in his book Farthest North. He did the deed for real, in 1895, I believe (don’t quote me). When the ice stopped him, he got off his ship, the Fram, for which the strait is named, and walked and paddled as far as he could go North. He didn’t make it but he did cross the Arctic ocean. The book is out of print but I found a first edition in a thrift shop and couldn’t put it down. He and his buddy Johansen (sp?) ate walrus, seals and polar bears. These were genuine tough guys. If you liked Shackleton and the Endurance, you will definitely want to read this one. Also, Nansen was a real scientist too. His drawings and accounts of the ice and weather I found very informative and valid. I highly recommend.
commieBob says:
July 9, 2012 at 12:51 pm
What if you forget to take your sleeping bag with you when the Polar Bear is chasing you?
jack mosevich says:
July 9, 2012 at 12:06 pm
Here is a low resolution map of their route. http://www.arcticrow.com/route/
I read through their website and fear that it is a hoax. No one could be so stupid.
I lucked out with a current Terra/MODIS pic of their proposed route (the MacKenzie River Delta shows up beautifully in the lower right) — this is 1km pixel resolution:
http://lance-modis.eosdis.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/imagery/single.cgi?image=crefl1_143.A2012191230500-2012191231000.1km.jpg
I zoomed to 250m resolution to get an idea of what was beneath the clouds. They’re gonna need an 80-foot, double-hulled rowboat with a chainsaw nose until they pass Prudhoe Bay…
Quote from their website:
In ocean rowing you can either buy a boat or build a boat. We chose neither. We opted instead to rent the rights (for a year) to an existing boat that was about to be rowed across the Atlantic Ocean. The name of this boat is “Limited Intelligence.
No comment.
Ooop — correction on the MacKenzie Delta location in the Terra/MODIS pic: it’s midfield on the right. Follow the solid edge of the ice until it disappears under the cloud, then straight down.
And their double-hulled rowboat will need runners…
No carbon emissions? Presumably they mean CO2, so they don’t breathe then?
If you go to the website http://www.arcticrow.com/route/
you can contact the team. It would be chirlish of me to suggest that we all e-mail them and ask how they can describe this inshore paddle as any sort of a crossing. Also, they are knowingly trying to bask in the relected glory of true adventurers who took real risks. That, for me, makes this a self-indulgent scam.
Holy Mac-A-Doodle! Willis? Complemented for being clam, clue, and corrected? The bind moggles!
Hippos are soaring and wafting about on the winds …
>;-)
There was no word about how they would know where the nearest krill patch might be.
Easy-peasey. They’ll just look for the phytoplankton blooms
http://www.alaskadispatch.com/article/under-arctic-ice-scientists-discover-massive-phytoplankton-bloom-foundation-food-chain
under the four-foot-thick ice they’ll be traversing…
What? No liquor company sponsors stepping up? Seems they aren’t getting adequate return for their sponsorships, eh?
@Steve Lohr says:
July 10, 2012 at 12:07 am
“MikeinAppalachia says:
What Creek?
Reply: Mill Branch, Washington Co, Ohio”
My guess was Duck Creek over by the old Rand property.
Would it surprise anyone to note that most of the team are MBA students from Kellog Business School rather than leading climate scientists? These guys seem to have redefined the word “opportunist”.
Steve Lohr says:
July 10, 2012 at 12:45 am
I am surprised that there has been no mention of Fridtjof Nansen’s account in his book Farthest North.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I saw recently a very good doc. reconstructing that trip. What astounded me most was that the two of them overwintered in a rock and walrus skin tent, surrounded by frozen carcasses to feed them, and finished up with more carcasses of the polar bears they had to shoot that came to feed on them. I didn’t see mention of firearms on the arcticrow site, or whether the four of them could manhandle the boat onto ice.
Shell say they are postponing drilling for a month because of ice in the Chuckchi Sea, best of luck.
Going to Earth’s core for climate insights –by JPL /NASA
More than 50 or so, of you have looked at my link
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/Arctic.htm
with few graphs and not many words.
What is that all about?
I have since 2009 promoted the idea that the Earth’s magnetic field is a good proxy for climate and temperature oscillation.
http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/41/83/04/PDF/NATA.pdf
Shortly after I added soma more information:
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/NFC1.htm
Not withstanding the regular ridicule, it was brought to my attention only a day or two ago, that the NASA has recently started pursuing same line of research, so I shall let NASA’s expert explain.
Coincidence, numerology spurious were attributes attached to my correlations.
“So what mechanism is driving these correlations? Dickey said scientists aren’t sure yet, but she offered some hypotheses.
Since scientists know air temperature can’t affect movements of Earth’s core or Earth’s length of day to the extent observed, one possibility is the movements of Earth’s core might disturb Earth’s magnetic shielding of charged-particle (i.e., cosmic ray) fluxes that have been hypothesized to affect the formation of clouds. This could affect how much of the sun’s energy is reflected back to space and how much is absorbed by our planet. Other possibilities are that some other core process could be having a more indirect effect on climate, or that an external (e.g. solar) process affects the core and climate simultaneously.”
My thanks to Jean Dickey and Steven Marcus of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena for explaining so succinctly what I have tried to put forward for some years. http://phys.org/news/2011-03-earth-core-climate-insights.html
Since it appears my research was not in vain, let’s make another step forward:
Dr. Dickey and Dr. Marcus, the WUWT blog has already featured this graph:
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/GSC1.htm
which shows Geo-Solar Oscillation as possible driver of the N. Hemisphere’s temperature natural change. ( It is my hope that ‘where vukcevic boldly goes, NASA cautiously follows’)
Thank you all, all those who didn’t say ‘crank’, and also to those who did, now I hope you may eventually see that there may be something to it after all.
Gail Combs says:
July 9, 2012 at 7:02 pm
Darwin Award candidates
=========================
🙂 beat me to it:-)
BC Bill says:
July 9, 2012 at 12:02 pm
“After the Top Gear crew drove to the North Pole in Toyota Hiluxes, all these extreme expeditions seem so silly.”
That was a great program, I’ve watched it several times. I particularly liked Jeremy Clarkson’s comments right at the end. It’s pretty obvious what he thinks of global warming! He would certainly get my vote for prime minister, anything would be better than the moron we have at the moment.
.
But did Clarkson and co. actually drive to the North Pole? I’m a little, shall we say, sceptical. When they appeared to reach the pole there were several clear shots of the GPS readout. Maybe I’m a bit old fashioned, but I thought the latitude of the NP was 90 degrees. The GPS clearly showed a latitude reading of less than 80 degrees. Could it be that they had only reached the magnetic North Pole?
Chris
It’s more adventurous than anything I’ll ever do but still, it does all seem wildly, absurdly exaggerated. Rowing along the coast of Alaska is not rowing “across” the Arctic Ocean by any recognizable meaning of the words. They want to call attention to the Arctic for eco/political reasons. Seems like they wanted a “hook” to an adventure that could produce a film/book (from “about” page):
“Scott has only two items left unchecked on his bucket list. One of them is to produce a film/book project that sparks lasting global change. The time is now. And this is the project.
Row across the Arctic ? Must be Brits
I once paddled my kayak from the east end of Catalina Island to the west end. Does this mean I paddled across the Pacific Ocean?
I think they should row from NE Siberia to Northern Greenland replicating the ‘carbon-free’ journey of the Saqqaq-Inuk 4000 years ago. Oh wait, it was much warmer then and there was no permanent pack ice in the way at the destination. Might have to wait for a lot more warming to be able to travel that route as the Inuit once did.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/02/100210-ancient-human-dna-hair-saqqaq-inuk/
http://suite101.com/article/first-ancient-human-genome-decoded-from-mtdna-a208672
From the latter:
Results show that this individual has genetic commonalities with three Old World Arctic populations:
•Nganasans
•Koryaks
•Chukchis
and is more distantly related to three New World groups:
•Amerinds
•Na-Dene
•Greenland Inuit.
The Nganasans inhabit the Taimyr Peninsula [no doubt planting trees for examination by future climatologists – CIW], some 2,000km from the Bering Strait and are the northernmost living Old World population. Koryaks and Chukchis inhabit Chukotka and northern Kamchatka in far eastern Siberian. The mtDNA genome also demostrated Saqqaq as related to Aleuts of Commander Islands in the Bering Sea, and Asian Eskimos the Siberian Sireniki Yuits.
Read more at Suite101: First Ancient Human Genome Decoded from Hair DNA: Evolutionary Perspectives in Personal Genomics Unmask Paleo-Eskimo | Suite101.com http://suite101.com/article/first-ancient-human-genome-decoded-from-mtdna-a208672#ixzz20EJ8hJYg