Sea Ice News Volume 3 Number 6 – Sea Ice Outlook forecasting contest for 2012 is online

First some news on the status of the WUWT Sea Ice Page. The JAXA imagery, which has been DOA ever since the failure of the AMSRE instrument on the AQUA satellite is now operational again. The plot is below:

JAXA AMSR-E Sea Ice Extent -15% or greater – click to enlarge

In addition, they have a new product, which combines the averages with lowest extent years for comparison:

Arctic Sea Ice Extent

And our final bit of news on the replacement satellite is from Dr. Roy Spencer, who reports that:

The AMSR2 Antenna has been Successfully Deployed

May 18th, 2012 by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.

UPDATE: AMSR2 has been successfully spun up to its initial spin rate of 4 rpm (it will later be spun up to 40 rpm for normal operations). It will take 45 days for the Shinzuku satellite to be maneuvered into the A-Train satellite constellation; about 3 months for complete instrument checkout.

Now this is a real treat…the first on-orbit image I am aware of taken from the spacecraft of an Earth-observation instrument ON the spacecraft itself (all imagery courtesy of JAXA).

===============================================================

That said, not much else of note has been going on in the sea-ice arena, as happens every year, seen in the JAXA plots above, we are in that time of year when all of the years converge into a tighter grouping. This makes judging where the current year is going a tougher challenge.

But as usual, the race to forecast the minimum is on again. Will it be another Serreze death spiral media opportunity? Or will it be ho-hum- nothing to see here, move along?

Anyone can submit a forecast to ARCUS, all you need is a rationale and you have to put your name on it. Even “SWAG” qualifies as a rationale, though there are many who will use models and statistical techniques to try predicting the sea-ice minimum.

I’m going to give WUWT readers an opportunity to make a forecast for submission, based on voting. See the poll at the end. I’ll run this poll each month in the week before the deadline, and we’ll see how we do as the minimum approaches. The value used by ARCUS is the NSIDC value as they say here:

The sea ice monthly extent for September 2011 was 4.6 million square kilometers, based on National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) estimates. This was the second lowest extent behind 2007 and 2.4 million square kilometers below the 1979 to 2000 average.

I suggest that you should not be using the JAXA graph to forecast minimums, though it it useful for determining short term trends as it is more responsive than the NSDIC graph below, which is averaged.

http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_stddev_timeseries.png

Here is what past forecast submission reports looked like:

Figure 3a. Distributions of Outlook estimates for September 2011 arctic sea ice

Figure 3a. Distributions of Outlook estimates for September 2011 arctic sea ice extent based on May data.
Figure 3b. Distributions of Outlook estimates for September 2010 arctic sea ice

Figure 3b. Distributions of Outlook estimates for September 2010 arctic sea ice extent based on June data.

WUWT readers came in a bit overly optimistic last year, as they did the prior year. Take that into consideration in your forecast for this year.

For the record, I’ve picked 4.9 million square kilometers as the first vote in the poll.

2012 Guidelines for Contributors

The SEARCH Sea Ice Outlook organizers are now soliciting pan-arctic and regional outlooks for the 2012 season. We encourage past and new contributors to participate.

The 2012 Outlook season will be a transition year to an expanded Outlook in 2013; this year, we would like to focus on expanding discussion of ice thickness, expanding discussion of the relative performance of different Outlook techniques, and improving access to relevant outlook data (see “Data Resources” webpage at: http://www.arcus.org/search/seaiceoutlook/data.php). So in addition to the pan-arctic and regional outlook contributions, we invite any information or input to those topics as well.

ALL Outlook submissions should be sent directly to Helen Wiggins, ARCUS, at: helen@arcus.org, with the following subject lines, as relevant:

PAN-ARCTIC OUTLOOK – [YOUR LAST NAME]

REGIONAL OUTLOOK – [YOUR LAST NAME]

OUTLOOK FOR BOTH REGIONAL AND PAN-ARCTIC – [YOUR LAST NAME]

An MS Word document is preferred for ease of formatting to PDF files and extracting images for the website – we will not edit your individual submission and will not post your Word documents.

SUBMITTING A PAN-ARCTIC OUTLOOK

Pan-arctic Outlook contributions should include:

  1. Extent Projection

    Provide a sea ice projection for the September monthly mean arctic sea ice extent (in million square kilometers).

  2. Methods/Techniques

    Provide the type of estimate (heuristic, statistical, ice-ocean model ensemble runs, etc.).

  3. Rationale

    Include a short paragraph on the physical rationale for the estimate.

  4. Executive Summary

    Provide a short paragraph that summarizes your outlook contribution in two or three sentences.

  5. Estimate of Forecast Skill (if available)

    If possible, please include any estimates of forecast skill, uncertainty, or error associated with your prediction. This year, we will add error estimates to the summary bar chart of outlook estimates, as appropriate.

We would also like to expand discussion of ice thickness in the monthly reports, so please include any relevant information on ice thickness (or age), if available.

Submission deadline: Monday, 4 June 2012.

All Outlooks should be sent to:

Helen Wiggins, ARCUS

==============================================================

The forecast poll, pick a value:

Note: the poll is setup to prevent vote stuffing, you can only vote once.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

47 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
kadaka (KD Knoebel)
June 1, 2012 5:34 pm

From Stephen Rasey on June 1, 2012 at 4:35 pm:

Anyway, I still think that the full distribution needs to be shown as there is no reason to believe that the distributin will be normal and adequately described by mean and standard deviation. I would not be surprised to find it bi-modal.

There will be two main groups, those with hope that will predict high and risk disappointment, and those who are pragmatic who will predict low and risk being pleasantly surprised.

ferd berple
June 1, 2012 6:13 pm

So what happened to the bet Connelley offered and Smokey accepted for $100? As far as I can see it was a legally binding contract. 2 standard deviations below normal were the terms as I recall.

gopal panicker
June 1, 2012 9:52 pm

did anybody else notice that the UIUC site went offline on april 28th when the arctic ice extent was very close to the average and when it came back after a few weeks it was well below the average….also there is a huge discrepancy with the NORSEX data which is still close to the average…watts up with that?….is somebody cooking the books?

DMarshall
June 1, 2012 11:11 pm

I’m guessing a low of 4.1 mil sq km; and a late finish to the summer melt.

June 2, 2012 12:43 am

G.Panicker
?….is somebody cooking the books?
Henry says
I have been suspecting this too
especially in Antarctica where I think it has been cooling more dramatically than on average
http://www.letterdash.com/henryp/global-cooling-is-here
but I cannot get any (real) daily data from Antarctica

Brian H
June 2, 2012 12:57 am

Anthony;
When and if you fix the 5.3-5.4 duplication, will you combine the votes?

Michael Jennings
June 2, 2012 4:55 am

I went with 4.125

June 2, 2012 9:31 am

well it looks like WUWT readers are going to come in above 5.0.
Anybody want to bet how much higher WUWT predicts than the rest of the world.

June 2, 2012 9:44 am

Steven Mosher says
well it looks like WUWT readers are going to come in above 5.0.
Anybody want to bet how much higher WUWT predicts than the rest of the world.
Henry says
Ok, Steven, I challenge you.
I want to know specifically why you would think that it is getting warmer on earth rather than cooler.
http://www.letterdash.com/henryp/global-cooling-is-here

kadaka (KD Knoebel)
June 2, 2012 10:10 am

Anthony Watts said on June 2, 2012 at 9:54 am:

Mosh is such a killjoy lately.

He needs more fiber. And cowbell.

Editor
June 2, 2012 10:24 am

steven mosher says: June 2, 2012 at 9:31 am
Mosh, the WUWT predictions tend to be optimistically high, but you did notice that they also tend to be closer to the observed numbers than many of the others, including most of the models, whcih tend to be fatalistically low. So what was your point?

Chris Frey
June 2, 2012 12:00 pm

Do I remember right? Wasn’t there a prediction in 2007 that within the next 5 years the Arctic may become ice-free? None of the forecasters here seems to follow this…
Chris Frey, Germany

June 2, 2012 1:10 pm

Is more ice “better”?
I fear people do not realize what they are wishing for.
I voted for >6 million
but I still hope it will be a lot less.
http://www.letterdash.com/henryp/global-cooling-is-here

June 2, 2012 2:36 pm

As poorly as we guess here at WUWT, an actual Science-ist: Serreze has been wrong every year since his “ice-free 2008” prediction. I mean, unless he’s apologized and (explicitly) owned up to lying for publicity and I somehow missed that.
REPLY: Predicting a future state of a nonlinear chaotic system is a bitch, no matter how smart and how many papers you have. – Anthony

June 2, 2012 3:24 pm

“Mosh is such a killjoy lately.”
That’s how some folks react when things don’t go their way. Planet Earth is falsifying all the alarmist crowd’s predictions. That must be hard to accept.

I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabric of their lives.
~ Leo Tolstoy

I like Mosh. He’s a nice guy. But the models are wrong.

Dinostratus
June 2, 2012 4:56 pm

“But as usual, the race to forecast the minimum is on again. Will it be another Serreze death spiral media opportunity? Or will it be ho-hum- nothing to see here, move along?”
A bad year for icers, a Serreze death spiral media opportunity. I’m guessing less than 2011, 4.6e6 sqkm but am hoping higher than 2007. I’ll go with 4.4e6 sqkm.
“Anyone can submit a forecast to ARCUS, all you need is a rationale and you have to put your name on it. Even “SWAG” qualifies as a rationale, though there are many who will use models and statistical techniques to try predicting the sea-ice minimum.”
Right now, it’s just a SWAG based upon the Bering straight going like it did in 2007 and the ice north of Siberia being as thin. My quantitative method is to plot A vs. dA/dt in true strange attractor style, compare the rate of change as the ice goes from 10e6 sqkm to 8e6 sqkm. The faster the rate of change during that period, the lower the minimum extent.

idkfa
June 2, 2012 6:57 pm

Hillary Clinton in Arctic to see impact of climate change
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/clinton-arctic-see-impact-climate-change-151737949.html
Clinton told reporters that she learned “many of the predictions about warming in the Arctic are being surpassed by the actual data.”

ppaul
June 2, 2012 10:35 pm

What is the accepted way to prove that all time series curves are not different, running the total data against the individuals and looking at the coefficient confidence intervals? taking the sd at all timeslices? thaks

Editor
June 2, 2012 11:11 pm

One question about IARC/JAXA seaice extent data. I thought that it had gone down Oct 3rd, 2011 due to satellite problems. The satellite is operational again. Fine. But where did they get the Oct 4 to Jun 1 data from???

Caleb
June 4, 2012 7:36 am

I am expecting a lot of pressure ridges will fall apart, as the arctic warms, and mess up our calculations. It was windy over the pole last winter, which creates both open leads (which swiftly freeze over) and pressure ridges, which involve a wide area of ice scrunched together like an accordian.
My logic is that, if ice an area of ice a mile wide is scrunched together like an accordian to make the jumbled ice of a pressure ridge only half a football field wide (fifty yards,) then, when that pressure ridge turns slushy, it will expand like an acordian and again cover an area a mile wide.
This will mess with our heads, because our ordinary logic does not expect melting to expand the area floating ice covers, however melting can (according to my theory) cause a pressure ridge fifty yards wide to become a mile wide, or even wider, if it spreads out to cover only 15% of the water.
I think this is what happened in 2006, and explains why 2006 extend, so low in the winter, graph out as so high by September. My guess is the extent will be like 2006’s. However if the winds blow all the ice south, I’m screwed. O well. Won’t be the first time I’m wrong.

John Whitman
June 4, 2012 8:18 am

One June 1 I voted for 5.0 to 5.1 Million km2.
It will be fun to see the actuals later this fall.
John