Climate Craziness of the Week – bonus "eye of the beholder" edition

Eye death
Eye toxicity (Photo credit: @Doug88888)

This is almost too stupid to comment on, but I’ll do my best. First the headline and story excerpt:

GLOBAL WARMING Warming of the Earth’s climate system and related increasing concentrations of greenhouse gasses are causing some eye disorders, writes Maria Anguita.

Two years ago, retired teacher Vera started experiencing eye discomfort, irritation and crusting of the eyelids. She was prescribed a short course of antibiotics for what her doctor suspected was a simple eye infection, but several months later she was still having problems.

“My eyes felt constantly gritty and dry, and my lids were red and flaky. I was treated for a range of eye conditions, but nothing seemed to make a difference,” says Vera.

Many trips to eye specialists later, she was diagnosed with chronic blepharitis, an inflammation of the eyelid, of unknown cause. And, after trial and error with different treatments, she now has a routine that keeps her discomfort and pain in check. However, some days her eyes flare up for no apparent reason: “I just wish I knew why I keep getting this,” she says.

It may be difficult to pin Vera’s symptoms to global warming, but scientists all over the world agree that increased levels of ultraviolet radiation reaching the surface of the Earth, resulting from ozone depletion at high altitude, and a toxic mix of air pollutants are responsible for serious eye disorders.

According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), of the 18 million people worldwide who have cataract-related diseases, 5% are directly attributable to UV radiation. UVA light, a component of UV radiation, stimulates the over-production of damaging oxygen-free radicals responsible for the clouding of the lens, typical of cataracts.

Last year researchers at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, started gathering data for what is to date the largest study into the link between global warming and eye health.

Full story here

============================================================

Yegads. The stupid here, it burns like magnesium.

It’s funny really, the claim on the face is that 0.7C of warming over a century  is causing a deterioration of eye health. We have humans in every climate zone of the planet, living with temperatures ranging from sub-zero in Antarctica to 120F+ in the deserts of Iraq.

Hell, the temperature changes 0.7C just walking from room to room in my house!

They are trying to blame the warming as a trigger for a whole host of secondary pollution issues, and those make itchy watery eyes. Never mind the big advances in air pollution control in the last 30 years…unless you live in China.

h/t to Tom Nelson

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

107 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nick in vancouver
May 9, 2012 1:21 pm

Yes, thats right, tax clean burning fossil fuels and let the poor go back to burning coal and wood in open fires. That will make your eyes feel better.
Whats that, you can’t see in the dark anyway because you have no electricity? Thats how we like to keep you, uneducated , no health care and in the dark (but look at the happy polar bears oops you can’t, you live in India, with no electricity, in the dark).
At least all your tears will make your eyes feel better.
The WWF, The David Suzuki Foundation and the European Commission, our moto is “No economy, no progress, no problem” . Proud to keep poor people cold and dark and save their vision.

Kitefreak
May 9, 2012 1:21 pm

This is another great example of drip drip BS propaganda. People see it in the passing and it passes into their conciousness. If they have never stopped to question the basic tenets of the issue (be it global warming or the war on whatever), never looked for evidence the threat is real and found it to be lacking, then each drip confirms in their mind that the idea they have been spoon fed is real. It’s the “I saw it on the telly so it must be real” syndrome.
Propaganda is in its golden age.
I did laugh out loud when I read it though; sometimes you just have to laugh.
“Almost too stupid to comment on” – absolutely. They really do think we’re stupid. Sorry, no they don’t, they realise they already have us psychologically castrated with American Idol/Big Brother/all the rest that these other almost subliminal messages just get added to the psychological mash.
The idea is to instil fear – a population in fear is much easier to control, Guide to Being a Dictator, 101.

Cadae
May 9, 2012 1:44 pm

I’m sure they meant “damaging oxygen free radicals”, but that typo of the dash in “oxygen-free” is funny
“stimulates the over-production of damaging oxygen-free radicals”.

Steve from Rockwood
May 9, 2012 1:57 pm

Hey don’t dis China like that. I was there in 1986 and went back in 2004 and they have made great improvements in air quality. Only half the canaries die now.

Adam Gallon
May 9, 2012 2:03 pm

How to get funding & published, just stick something about “Climate Change” into the title!
FFS, what a crock!

The old Seadog.
May 9, 2012 2:19 pm

Many infectious diseases can cause this person’s symptoms and many of these diseases are are very difficult to detect.The many types of chlamydial infections is just one example…

jorgekafkazar
May 9, 2012 2:25 pm

After twelve years of no warming, capped off by Climategate, I expected (after the usual ad hominems, of course) an unending flood of increasingly bizarre, insane, and ludicrous papers coming from the Warmist side. This paper has exceeded my wildest ipecactations. As the French say, “il est de vomir!”

Gail Combs
May 9, 2012 2:36 pm

Urederra says:
May 9, 2012 at 9:40 am

According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), of the 18 million people worldwide who have cataract-related diseases, 5% are directly attributable to UV radiation. UVA light, a component of UV radiation, stimulates the over-production of damaging oxygen-free radicals responsible for the clouding of the lens, typical of cataracts.

Only 5%!!! That seems too low to me.
________________________________
This study from 1998 has a graph on population vs height above sea level (see Fig. 2) It looks like over 20% of the world’s population lived above 900m (about 3000 feet) and ~8% of the world’s population above 1200m (about 4000 feet) (I am reading off the graph)

…75% of people lived at or below 523 m elevation…The prominent spur [in the graph] of high population density (Ͼ1,000 people͞km2 around 2,300 m elevation) reflects the heavily populated Mexican plateau. The population at elevations Ͼ4,000 m represents primarily Andean and Tibetan populations….

So if they are claiming “5% are directly attributable to UV radiation” then about a quarter to half of the people on the Mexican plateau and at least half of those living in the Andes and on the Tibetan Plateau must have cataract-related diseases just due to the increase in elevation especially where the latitude is associated with “favourable solar energy conditions.” Right??

Solar radiation is unevenly distributed throughout the world because of such variables as solar altitude, which is associated with latitude and season, and atmospheric conditions, which are determined by cloud coverage and degree of pollution. The following guidelines are useful for the broad identification of the geographic areas with favourable solar energy conditions in the Northern Hemisphere based on the collection of the direct component of sunlight. Similar conditions apply for the Southern Hemisphere (Acra et al. 1984).
The most favourable belt (15-35° N) encompasses many of the developing nations in northern Africa and southern parts of Asia. It has over 3 000 h/year of sunshine and limited cloud coverage. More than 90% of the incident solar radiation comes as direct radiation….
http://almashriq.hiof.no/lebanon/600/610/614/solar-water/idrc/01-09.html

Robert
May 9, 2012 2:54 pm

I get some sciatica and am also going bald……do you thing I could make a claim for compensation?

May 9, 2012 3:04 pm

Funny, her symptoms describe eactly how my blepheritis acts up when I miss my eye scrubs. I haven’t spent much time in a greenhouse in decades. Does this CAGW alarm also stem from CO2 warming back in the sixties? Somehow, I don’t think it does any more than cases of blepheritis do for the past decade.

“Bob: says:
May 9, 2012 at 7:46 am
I was diagnosed with blepharitis about 30 years ago by an ophthalmologist who also had the problem. The problem is caused by bacteria collecting under one’s eyelids, and is controlled by washing under the eyelids, daily, with a non-irritating soap like Johnson’s Baby Shampoo.”

Ditto here. I had repeated stys forming on my eyelids. One approximately every 3-4 months. Then I booked a visit to a new eye Doc in town and it turned out that his thesis work was on eye infections. He told me about blepheritis and exactly the treatment Bob describes. I have not had a sty in my eyelid since then. I do my eye scrubs while taking my shower, partly because the force of the water helps get those eyelashes clean. The Doc also told me that blepheritis was especially common with people who are prone to acne, or wear mascara (contaminants you know).
Nerd and others: Due to a completely different illness, my Doc checks my vitamin and amino levels twice a year and orders supplement taken for any that are low. My vitamin D levels notch well above normal consistently (got milk? and I eat mushrooms). So much for the homeopathis approach. After eight years of chronic illness, I personally think most homeopathics should book ship with the hairdressers, management consultants and CAGW alarmists when they go off planet because the world will be destroyed. There are exceptions from joining that flight and they usually have MD after their name, (no, RN is NOT close to MD).

Warren in Minnesota
May 9, 2012 3:18 pm

Maybe Vera has a mild, but specific type of psoraiasis.

Gail Combs
May 9, 2012 3:27 pm

So what are the actual facts surrounding cataracts.
From the US Center for Disease Control

An estimated 20.5 million (17.2%) Americans 40 years and older have cataract in one or both eyes, and 6.1 million (5.1%) have had their lens removed operatively. The total number of people who have cataracts is estimated to increase to 30.1 million by 2020….
http://www.cdc.gov/visionhealth/basic_information/eye_disorders.htm

(US population is 311.5 million)
It looks like any study on natives of Tibet could be “confounded” by other factors.

Cataracts in Tibet
Tibetans also suffer from unusually high incidents of eye disease. The high levels of ultraviolet rays found at high elevation takes its toll. After a lifetime of exposure to these rays many people develop cataracts (dense, foggy masses in the lenses) and go blind. Around 30,000 people in Tibet are blind as a result of cataracts. An additional 1,500 to 2,000 lose their sight every year because of them… [note: the 2009 Tibetan population was 2.91 million gc]
[However it is also noted gc]
Malnutrition is a serious problem. One study showed that half the children in Tibet suffer from it and 60 percent of children are shorter than normal….
[Not to mention Oxygen starvation gc]
“At this altitude—5000 meters—all people have very low levels of oxygen saturation but in some they are not so low.” She recently discovered that this trait is may be genetic.
Human beings are not very well adapted for high altitudes. Above 18,000 feet, cuts don’t heal and women can not bear children….
In a study the genes of 31 unrelated Tibetans were compared to the genes of 90 Chinese and Japanese. EGLN1 and PPARA turned up repeatedly in the Tibetans but not in the Chinese and Japanese. Xing wrote, “Their exact roles in high-latitude adaption is unclear. Both EGLN1 and PPARA…may cause a decrease of the hemoglobin concentration.”
…The lungs expel so much carbon dioxide that the blood’s Ph balance is affected….
Edemas, the accumulation of excess fluid in the body, are big dangers, especially when they occur in the brain (cerebral edemas) and the lungs (pulmonary edemas)…. Studies shows the body produces nitric oxide, a chemical that dilates the blood, to reduce constricting of the blood vessels. Some studies suggest that people who do not produce adequate amount of nitric oxide are more susceptible to pulmonary endemas.
http://factsanddetails.com/china.php?itemid=211&catid=6&subcatid=35#16

I would really hate to have to extract data about cataracts and UV light from that mess of other possible factors.
Latin America eye problems.

Eye Disease and Care in Latin America and the Caribbean
Abstract.
In the last decade, health indicators in Latin America and the Caribbean reflect advances. The per capita public expenditure on health care has increased in many countries. Despite these improvements, it is estimated that for every million population in Latin America and the Caribbean, 5,000 are blind and 20,000 are visually impaired; at least 66% of the blindness is attributable to treatable conditions such as cataract….

May 9, 2012 3:27 pm

Cadae says:
May 9, 2012 at 1:44 pm
I’m sure they meant “damaging oxygen free radicals”, but that typo of the dash in “oxygen-free” is funny
“stimulates the over-production of damaging oxygen-free radicals”.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
So that’s what’s really behind all this. They want to free the radicals!

eo
May 9, 2012 3:35 pm

Sir Karl Popper one of the eminent philosopher of science in the last century is noted for his demarcation concept to distinguish science from pseudo-science. One of the properties of pseudo science compared to real science is the ability of pseudoscience to explain all phenomena without any limitation. He cited incidents of certain fields of ” science” that in his youth he had strong belief but turned his back when he anything phenomena or events could be explained through the views of “pseudo science”. It would worthwhile to examine, AGW in the light of Popper’s demarcation principle.

Robert of Ottawa
May 9, 2012 4:07 pm

Jo Nova at joannenova.com (currently offline due to maintenance) has a great article upon the Australian government academic grant awards – where everything and it’s dog gets money for research if it mentions global warming but there are almost no grants given for non-global warming research.
Big oil is not the problem … BIG GOVERNMENT is, where the government holds a monopsony and is the sole buyer of the science product, dictating the scientific results expected.

eric1skeptic
May 9, 2012 4:14 pm

We all knows eyes are surrounded by liquid and the increase in the partial pressure of CO2 is causing… eye acidification!

DirkH
May 9, 2012 4:26 pm

eo says:
May 9, 2012 at 3:35 pm
“It would worthwhile to examine, AGW in the light of Popper’s demarcation principle.”
That’s exactly the reason Jerry Ravetz invented Post Normal Science. He is a socialist and doesn’t believe in objective reality. He needed some framework to overcome the limititations of the Popperian definition. One of Popper’s examples for pseudoscience he experienced in Vienna was Marxist dialectic materialism. Here, the circle closes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Ravetz
Ravetz had several guest posts here on WUWT, search for it. Read what he wrote. I am not making anything up.
German lukewarmer Hans von Storch later wrote about Climate Science as Post Normal Science. His interest was and is to involve sociologists and other soft sciences types into the CAGW movement, feeling that they can contribute something important.

tango
May 9, 2012 4:42 pm

looking through key holes also causes dry eye

Mac the Knife
May 9, 2012 6:09 pm

OK…. I gotta know!
What… or rather Who is the ‘mote’ smiling back at us from the ‘eye of the beholder’?
Is this one of the WUWT Mod Squad?

May 9, 2012 6:12 pm

Mac,
I don’t know where Anthony finds ’em:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/doug88888/3419565232/

May 9, 2012 6:25 pm

More sun does not help much if you are paranoid about UV and slather on a bucket of sun screen before you go out side. I understand that now child care operations routinely butter up the kiddies before they go out to play, and don’t give them 10 minutes of “unprotected” exposure before putting on the sun screen.
I suspect in a decade or two we will hear about a whole generation that is showing signs of chronic low vitamin D intake, especially among those who are not avid milk drinkers.
Larry

Mac the Knife
May 9, 2012 6:37 pm

Smokey,
If that’s one of the Mods grinning back at us, he REALLY needs a beer and a ham sandwich!
OK, Anthony! Ya got me!
MtK

May 9, 2012 6:48 pm

Eye discomfort?!? Why are we commenting about such a… triviality when we have climate change essentially weaponizing… chikungunya for which there is no vaccine and no treatment – http://tinyurl.com/7w658vd ???

e?
May 10, 2012 12:55 am

SunderlandSteve says:
May 9, 2012 at 10:33 am
… Hard to see the link between mascara and AGW but I’m sure with the right amount of grant monies, alink could be proven 🙂

==============================================================
The ancient Egyptians were known to wear mascara prior to and during the Roman Warm Period, during which time it spread to neighbouring areas. It fell into disuse everywhere with the fall of the Roman Empire, probably causing the subsequent cooler weather, but its use reappeared in the west prior to the current anthropogenic warm period and its widespread use coincides with the awful heat shown in the modern academic record. Clearly, this is not mere coincidence, but something more sinister – the Mascara-Warming Cycle.

PaddikJ
May 10, 2012 2:05 am

Really, Anthony, have you nothing better to do than pick on mental quadriplegics? Must have been a slow day . . .
Incomplete basic information (Vera who? from where?), faulty logic, non-sequiters, over-generalizations, bald assertions without even token references, conflation of issues (global warming/ozone depletion-increased UV/air pollution), chemical cluelessness (oxygen-free radicals – who knew?), scientific nonsense (“UVA light, a component of UV radiation . . . “), out-of-context and therefore useless information padded with well-known & obvious truisms; repetitions, redundancies and run-on sentences, including this beauty:
“. . . the rise in global temperature attributed to the greenhouse effect of global warming . . .”
If a high school junior handed me something this poorly reasoned and written, I’d bleed all over it and tell the student to either re-write or take a Fail. If a college freshman turned it in I’d boot her out of the course & tell her not to return until she’d taken a remedial comp. class.
If HuffPo paid for it, it should demand its money back.

Verified by MonsterInsights