Guest post by WUWT moderator Andi Cockroft
This has little to do with my beliefs (or otherwise) in CAGW, but more to the fact that I am tight with money and this project offers the ability to run my 5 litre SUV for free ! Please note however, this is only suitable for Petrol/Gasoline Engines – most definitely NOT for diesels
Now I should also state that I live on a block of “Native Bush” (read indigenous trees) in New Zealand, so I have a carbon sink of my very own. I also have access to an almost unlimited supply of pine from plantation operations where logging operations leave huge amounts of uneconomic timber behind – myself and several hundred souls benefit from this bountiful resource to heat our homes in winter.
Now I want to run my SUV on it as well.
So what is “Producer Gas”? Well our dear friends over at Wikipedia have an overview here. Unfortunately it is long on references, but short on detail.
So, I will define what I mean by Producer Gas, as a combination of various gasses obtained by “cooking” dry wood. Heat it enough, without burning it, and it will give off a mixture of primarily Carbon Monoxide and Methane – plus a few nasty bi-products such as tar etc. What remains we know as charcoal.
There are many different mechanisms for manufacturing Producer Gas, most concentrate these days on stationary platforms – however they are just as easily made for mobile use aboard a vehicle.
This image of a Ford Truck conversion, (courtesy of Per Larsson’s Museum) shows one of the many ways it can be achieved – here strapped onto the side of the truck.
Note the extra radiator in front, required to cool the Producer Gas after its manufacture by “cooking” – internal combustion engines work better with cooler fuels (think of this as an inter-cooler).
But looking at this doesn’t really gel with the aesthetics I want to achieve for my SUV – so how can it be done that bit better?
Let’s just look at how Producer Gas is made.
There are different designs, and I have researched many over the years I have been contemplating this project – brought to a head now simply by exorbitant fuel prices. Here is my preference for a “Stratified Downdraft Gassifier”
OK, so how do we convert our fuel (pine for me) into Producer Gas?
Here courtesy of http://www.gengas.nu/byggbes/index.shtml is the version I choose to build. On the right is the main Gassifier – here’s where all the magic happens – but do visit their site, it is a goldmine of information.
Wood Fuel in the form of dried pellets of wood (about 1” cube) are stacked in the hopper at the top, and feed under gravity into the fire tube. At the base of the tube is a dish or grate riddled with air-holes – much like a colander. Both the fire tube, and the grate must be made of pretty heat tolerant material such as stainless steel. We need a small opening in the Gassifier so we can actually set fire to the material in the grate – and for reasons we will see later, this will normally have charcoal in it.
But before we set fire to things, note the other components. In the middle is a filter unit that can be of many designs, but meant primarily to prevent nasty stuff such as tar reach our engine, Use sawdust, oil, water or sand to trap the stuff you don’t want, and then our gas heads off to the left to be mixed with air and on into our engine.
You may notice there are actually 2 throttle controls – one the master throttle, the other to control air. This is OK for an engine that will run at constant speed such as a generator, but for a vehicle it would be far better if these could be linked together – something I am working on right now.
OK, before we can start our engine, we need to light our Gassifier. Easily done, with some charcoal in the grate, add a little lighter fuel if you feel brave, and light it. At the same time, note the provision of a blower – this is only used during this phase to get air flowing into the Gassifier from above, provide oxygen to the charcoal on the grate and start the process rolling.
I am told to expect 10 to 15 minutes for this to begin – but note THIS IS CARBON MONOXIDE – DO NOT DO THIS IN A CONFINED SPACE.
Also, you should include springs to hold the lid firmly on the Gassifier – not welded on. Just in case of a back-fire, the lid will momentarily lift, allow the built-up gasses to escape, then reseal itself.
My plan is to add a spark-plug to the funnel, so I can ignite the gas with ease. Once it is burning with a very pale blue flame then we can look to start the engine – just turn off the blower first.
It has been suggested that starting with petrol/gasoline and then switching to Producer Gas is far easier – but we will see.
The beauty of this design is that the production of gas is totally dependent on demand – ie the suction provided by the engine – put your foot down and it will draw and manufacture more gas. Ease off and it will slow down. And best of all, turn the engine off and it will simply go out – but that takes another 10-15 minutes, so restarting in that time should be just a matter of turning the ignition key.
I am in the process of building the Gassifier right now, and I have a pickup SUV, where I can mount the Gassifier outside on the back and run all that plumbing outside the cab as well. I will keep you apprised of my progress.
I am also working on a stationary engine coupled to a 20Kw alternator that will not only supply all my needs, but allow me to sell the excess (at 3x retail) back onto the grid – heck if they pay subsidies to windmills, then why not to me!
Up until now, I have only mentioned pine as a fuel source, but depending on where you live, you could use left-overs from many agricultural products – corn stalks, sugar cane, coconut husks – even coal if you really want to.
Also on the design-table is a device to take large pieces of pine and chop them into the ideal sizes required – and if I can run that directly of the engine, I just about have perpetual motion – well at least motion at zero cost.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

I live in Italy, were the National sport is devising ways to beat the tax man, I have a Lancia Kappa 3 liter station wagon which has a commercial ( off the shelf ) Methane plant, I have in my house gas heating and cooking, my friend the plumber put me a connection in the garage, I bought a pump and from this I fill the high pressure gas cylinders in my car. (6 diving bottles ) they fit better than the original
Cost of installation and parts Euros 2,340
cost of plumber and pump Euros 1,976 (plus beer and wine )
cost of driving 10 km Euros 0.05
autonomy ( km driven on one tank ) 750 – 800
Note, the word wood does not appear in the above, and I bet my system costs less, works better,
( will do 180 km plus on the autostrada ) and the only refilling is click and turn the valve, and I don’t have to carry an axe in my tool kit !
Methane in service stations in Italy cost plus minus euros 30 cents a liter Germany about the same .
jc:
I conducted a review of wood pyrolysis developments for the EU in the early 1990s. The following provides a very brief introduction to the chemistry of the pyrolysis and its pertinence to use of wood-derived product gas as fuel in internal combustion engines.
Your post at April 27, 2012 at 1:40 am is very wrong. It confuses the first stage of carbon combustion with a misunderstanding of the ‘water-gas shift’ reaction when it says;
“Cooling the producer gas is ok for a first cut but better to (partially) run the engine on water. There are two reactions
a – 2C+O2 = 2CO gives off heat
b – H20+C = H2 + CO needs heat
With wood the moisture in the wood reacts as per B but more water can be added.
If the cooler is replaced by a heat exchanger where the exhaust from the gasifier heats the incoming air more water can be added ie free energy.”
Oh dear, NO!
Firstly, wood (and also coal) is mostly carbon (C) and it combusts by reacting with oxygen (O) in a two stage reaction process; i.e.
Stage 1.
Carbon combines with oxygen (e.g. from the air) to form carbon monoxide (CO); i.e.
2.C + O2 -> 2.CO
This reaction is endothermic; i.e. it consumes heat (it does NOT give off heat as you say).
And this need for an input of heat is why starting a wood fire requires an input of heat.
Stage2.
Carbon monoxide reacts with oxygen to form carbon dioxide (CO2); i.e.
2.CO + O2 -> 2.CO2
This reaction is exothermic; i.e. it emits heat.
Importantly, the heat emitted by Stage 2 is much more than the heat consumed by Stage 1. And this is why a fire emits net heat and why a fire can spread when it has started.
Gasification (or pyrolysis) of carbonaceous material (i.e. wood, paper, coal, etc.) consists of starting the fire then providing sufficient oxygen
(a) to convert all the carbon to carbon monoxide
and
(b) to convert sufficient of the created carbon monoxide into carbon dioxide for provision of the heat needed for the conversion of the carbon to carbon monoxide.
The result is a gas that contains much carbon monoxide and some carbon dioxide. And if this gas is burned then it provides as much heat as burning the carbon would provide (ignoring losses).
Such a gas can be used as a fuel in an internal combustion engine. However, the reaction rate of the product gas is low, and faster reaction rate is needed for its efficient use as fuel in an internal combustion engine. This is where a water-gas shift is useful.
Hydrogen (H) burns much faster than carbon monoxide so an addition of hydrogen gas (H2) to the carbon monoxide gas improves the efficiency of the product gas as fuel in an internal combustion engine.
Hydrogen (H) burns by combining with oxygen to form water
2.H2 + O2 -> 2.H2O
with release of much heat.
And hydrogen can be obtained from water during the pyrolysis. But NOT as you say.
The ‘ water gas shift’ reaction burns carbon monoxide with the oxygen in water to form carbon dioxide, and it uses most of the released heat to separate the oxygen from the hydrogen of the water; i.e.
H20 + CO -> H2 + CO2
This reaction is the water gas shift. It releases some heat (n.b. it does NOT consume heat) but releases less heat than burning carbon monoxide with oxygen gas.
Wood contains some water and additional water may be added to obtain optimum hydrogen in the product gas. Again, burning the resulting gas releases as much heat as would be obtained by burning the wet wood (ignoring losses).
An important consideration is the effect of substances other than carbon and water in the wood. These substances will affect the contents of the product gas and, therefore, the usefulness of the gas as fuel in an internal combustion engine.
There are three basic problems of such other substances.
Firstly, their presence may affect the pyrolysis reactions I have described above. This can alter the performance of the product gas as a fuel. And variations of such substances in the wood may cause the quality of the gas to vary with resulting unpredictable performance of the internal combustion engine.
Secondly, the substances can damage an internal combustion engine that uses the product gas as fuel. For example, tars can coke in the engine so induce damaging friction, and compounds of sulphur and chlorine can severely corrode the engine.
Thirdly, the substances make the engine exhaust very polluting.
I hope this post is useful to understanding why pyrolysis of wood has only been used to obtain a fuel of last resort for use in internal combustion engines.
Richard
For all the comments above, thank you. Regret I have been travelling, and am now down in Christchurch helping my partner sort out her house – it faired far better than many, and the devastation all around is a humble reminder of the ferocity Mother Nature can unlease.
Not sure if you left off the /sarc tag or not, but just in case, what I propose is actually carbon neutral – grow sustainable timber takes in CO2. Process that to release CO and CH4 primarily. This is burnt to produce energy (ie we go forward) and CO2 with some H2O.
The term is used to describe many different gasses, mostly derived from application of heat to a hydrocarbon. But a rose by any other name would smell far better than my “Producer Gas” machine
I care not a hoot about peak-oil and all that, but in NZ, we have a Government (getting close to dictatorship) that has an ETS in place, and is determined to tax whatever it can – including cow farts !!!
This is just my way of getting my SUV running for free – not 10c per Km – but free
Because I don’t want to “double dip”
If I have a process that takes the fuel and runs the vehicle, why would I want to go through a messy distillation process at home – and be limited by the range of a tank-full? Plus I have to keep the process going when I am not there – this way I only handle the fuel once – plus of course the biggie – I just love tinkering and screwing with peoples’ minds !!!
as above
I already have an SUV running LPG – at about $1.25 per litre – around twice the cost of your methane – but regret Methans is not available here unless your into DIY – and that’s not on my pet-project list just now – maybe when I move to the Country.
OH, and to all who suggest a low power output – that is precisely why I have chosen to use a 5-litre low-compression V8 – 1970’s style.
Andi
I never said anything about the lack of petrol – just its price !
Perhaps you also missed the point of the process – whilst we might produce CO and CH4 – plus some other nasties – when this gas is burnt to produce motive power, it is all converted back again to CO2 and H2O.
Then the CO2 is taken up by the same Pine plantations as part of regrowth for me to use next harvest. Or since I have my own mini-forest in my back yard you could say that my Native trees are teh jeat-sink.
Totally Carbon Neutral and no cost – if I can get the filtering right to protect my engine
Andi
Sorry RhodaR – missed one final reply;
Stationary Producer Gas engines are a very viable solution for remote locations where hydrocarbon fuel is available. Think of any timber-producing areas, sugar crops, grain, coconut, palm etc – yep not suited to desert areas – but if you have something that’ll burn then a gasifier may provide the answer.
There are already commercial companies buiding these machines that easily out perform solar (12 hours per sunny day?) and wind – when it blows. A gassifier will work quite happily as long as you can persuade someone to keep the fuel loaded.
…and yes if you burn fuel you could just go gas-turbine – but I think you’ll find this far more cost-effective
Check out the NZ site http://www.fluidynenz.250x.com/ for a mass of archive material on gasification.
Wanna buy a 15Kw stationary gasifier plant? http://www.gasificationaustralia.com/
Just Google it – you’ll find the movement is far bigger than you might have thought
Andi
@Andi
Ty for the links.That carbonized apple picture was amazing.
Heggs.
DBCooper says:
April 27, 2012 at 12:33 am
But the CO and the CO2 are destroying the universe! Have you no decency?
Well PLAYED, Mr COOPeR:
WELL PLAYeD!
Just use a Tesla turbine. The linked video shows how easy to make and how materials really matter not depending upon the output/use you require
If you dare, please provide a Kiwi-definition of the slang verb, “to root”. In the US, it’s meaning is just to dig for roots, or paw through a messy pile in search of something. Not so in NZ …
To root for ……..means to back or support someone or a team; be a ‘cheer-leader’ for etc
Ugh, mea culpa typo: “
it’sits meaning …”Kiwi versions:
Root – as in dig for roots – eg Wild Pigs rooting in native bush
Root – as in carnal knowledge – eg horizontal mambo
Andi
Andi;
Yep, that’s the one!
Interesting to insert that into common expressions —
— Root for the home team
— find the root cause
— rootin’, tootin’ cowpoke
— root canal
— root rot
— root vegetables
— yank out by the roots
— touch up your roots
Your turn!
;p