I’ve talked about the slimy “Forecast the Facts” campaign before, where they are attempting to label your local TV weatherperson/meteorologist as a “denier” and pressure TV station management into making that person “toe the line” by having a bunch of fake form letters sent by “local viewers”. It is simply paid astroturfing.
For example, look how they label KOAA-TV’s Brad Sowder for not even wanting to take a position because it is a “political issue”:
Political is right, because today, those flailing PR geniuses at The Center for American Progress aka Think Progress, a front organization for all things left and “progressive” with a now $30 million+ annual budget (From 2008: CAP, which has 180 staffers and a $27 million budget, devotes as much as half of its resources to promoting its ideas through blogs, events, publications and media outreach. Source: Bloomberg ) let it slip (whether by design or accident we don’t know) that THEY are behind this “Forecast The Facts” outfit.
We always wondered who was funding this hate campaign against your local TV meteorologist, now we know, here’s the screencap with the proof:
Even though there is no hint of this association on the “Forecast The Facts” about page. Pants on fire and all that.
For those who don’t know, Brad Johnson of Think Progress, is one of the worst offenders of political climate alarm hype on the planet. He’s paid to make up stuff like blaming the people who live in the south for their political views, and bad weather is the punishment:

Obviously Johnson has learned nothing in a year, because what he says today is the same brand of irrational ugliness and hate, bold mine:
Countless lives were saved this weekend by vigilant government officials who warned of deadly tornadoes in Oklahoma, Kansas, Iowa, Nebraska — states whose politics are dominated by anti-government, anti-science ideologues.Over 100 tornadoes struck down in 24 hours, but only six people died in Oklahoma, Sen. Jim Inhofe’s home state, thanks to warnings from the National Weather Service scientists he has worked to discredit
…
Wichita, Kansas, the headquarters of Koch Industries, suffered $280 million in damage from a ferocious twister, but the “ever-increasing government” demonized by the Koch brothers prevented any loss of life.
Support your local TV weathercaster and meteorologist, don’t let them be cowed by well funded political sliming coming from The Center For American Progress.
And the next time someone tells you that “skeptics are well funded”, remind them of how much money CAP gets and how they put it to use.
===============================================================
Less that 24 hours after I made this report on the slip, TP rushed this CYA press release out with a FLASH attached to it. Heh, sorry, I already scooped you.
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/04/17/465268/brad-johnson-joins-forecast-the-facts-campaign/




Reblogged this on TaJnB | TheAverageJoeNewsBlogg.
Ric Werme writes: Perhaps you’d like to produce a line-by-line refutation of that. It’s shorter than the IPCC reports, and probably just as much a no-brainer for you to knock off.
That was done over 3 years ago by Real Climate at http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2008/11/not-the-ipcc-nipcc-report/langswitch_lang/jp
Phil C says:
April 17, 2012 at 12:34 pm
Then it should be a no-brainer to produce a detailed line-by-line refutation of the most recent IPCC technical report, which has been available for four years. Where is it?
Still in peer review, but here’s the latest installment:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7177230/New-errors-in-IPCC-climate-change-report.html
Tom J says:
April 16, 2012 at 3:01 pm
I think it’s about time they stopped using the word ‘progress’…..
Obama’s Science Czar, John Holdren, called it de-development of the United States and pushes among other things“Limiting the amount of energy available….
This very good Video of a liberal democrat giving a talk to the Tea Party (jaw drops) shows how Holdern’s 1970’s objective ~ “massive campaign must be launched to restore a high-quality environment in North America and to de-develop the United States.” ~ is now being implemented.
Seems to me the correct term to use is de-development not ‘progress’ because that is exactly what is being implemented.
The history of the term “progressive” is tied up with Fabianism, and its conceit that it represented a new stage of development or evolution. The “progress” it envisaged was its own coming domination of the lower orders of unenlightened, who were to be “progressively” ( 😉 ) culled according to the precepts of eugenics.