From the Harvard School of Public Health , news that an extra 1°C temperature swing in summer will kill the elderly.
Summer temperature variability may increase mortality risk for elderly with chronic disease
Large day-to-day variations in temperature could result in thousands more deaths per year
Boston, MA – New research from Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) suggests that seemingly small changes in summer temperature swings—as little as 1°C more than usual—may shorten life expectancy for elderly people with chronic medical conditions, and could result in thousands of additional deaths each year. While previous studies have focused on the short-term effects of heat waves, this is the first study to examine the longer-term effects of climate change on life expectancy.
The study will be published online April 9, 2012 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
“The effect of temperature patterns on long-term mortality has not been clear to this point. We found that, independent of heat waves, high day to day variability in summer temperatures shortens life expectancy,” said Antonella Zanobetti, senior research scientist in the Department of Environmental Health at HSPH and lead author of the study. “This variability can be harmful for susceptible people.”
In recent years, scientists have predicted that climate change will not only increase overall world temperatures but will also increase summer temperature variability, particularly in mid-latitude regions such as the mid-Atlantic states of the U.S. and sections of countries such as France, Spain, and Italy. These more volatile temperature swings could pose a major public health problem, the authors note.
Previous studies have confirmed the association between heat waves and higher death rates. But this new research goes a step further. Although heat waves can kill in the short term, the authors say, even minor temperature variations caused by climate change may also increase death rates over time among elderly people with diabetes, heart failure, chronic lung disease, or those who have survived a previous heart attack.
The researchers used Medicare data from 1985 to 2006 to follow the long-term health of 3.7 million chronically ill people over age 65 living in 135 U.S. cities. They evaluated whether mortality among these people was related to variability in summer temperature, allowing for other things that might influence the comparison, such as individual risk factors, winter temperature variance, and ozone levels. They compiled results for individual cities, then pooled the results.
They found that, within each city, years when the summer temperature swings were larger had higher death rates than years with smaller swings. Each 1°C increase in summer temperature variability increased the death rate for elderly with chronic conditions between 2.8% and 4.0%, depending on the condition. Mortality risk increased 4.0% for those with diabetes; 3.8% for those who’d had a previous heart attack; 3.7% for those with chronic lung disease; and 2.8% for those with heart failure. Based on these increases in mortality risk, the researchers estimate that greater summer temperature variability in the U.S. could result in more than 10,000 additional deaths per year.
In addition, the researchers found the mortality risk was 1% to 2% greater for those living in poverty and for African Americans. The risk was 1% to 2% lower for people living in cities with more green space.
Mortality risk was higher in hotter regions, the researchers found. Noting that physiological studies suggest that the elderly and those with chronic conditions have a harder time than others adjusting to extreme heat, they say it’s likely these groups may also be less resilient than others to bigger-than-usual temperature swings.
“People adapt to the usual temperature in their city. That is why we don’t expect higher mortality rates in Miami than in Minneapolis, despite the higher temperatures,” said Joel Schwartz, professor of environmental epidemiology at HSPH and senior author of the paper. “But people do not adapt as well to increased fluctuations around the usual temperature. That finding, combined with the increasing age of the population, the increasing prevalence of chronic conditions such as diabetes, and possible increases in temperature fluctuations due to climate change, means that this public health problem is likely to grow in importance in the future.”
Support for the study was provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
“Summer Temperature Variability and Long-term Survival Among Elderly People with Chronic Disease,” Antonella Zanobetti, Marie S. O’Neill, Carina J. Gronlund, and Joel D. Schwartz, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, online April 9, 2012.
Visit the HSPH website for the latest news, press releases and multimedia offerings.
Harvard School of Public Health (http://www.hsph.harvard.edu ) is dedicated to advancing the public’s health through learning, discovery, and communication. More than 400 faculty members are engaged in teaching and training the 1,000-plus student body in a broad spectrum of disciplines crucial to the health and well being of individuals and populations around the world. Programs and projects range from the molecular biology of AIDS vaccines to the epidemiology of cancer; from risk analysis to violence prevention; from maternal and children’s health to quality of care measurement; from health care management to international health and human rights. For more information on the school visit: http://www.hsph.harvard.edu
HSPH on Twitter:
http://twitter.com/HarvardHSPH
HSPH on Facebook:
http://www.facebook.com/harvardpublichealth
HSPH on You Tube:
http://www.youtube.com/user/HarvardPublicHealth
HSPH home page:
Lonnie E. Schubert says:
April 11, 2012 at 4:14 pm
So, they are proposing shutting off the AC to reduce the emissions from the power stations, right?
_______________________________________
You got it. The EPA plant to shut down all the US Coal plants.
Coal produces 42% of US electric. Energy costs are already high enough that I ran all winter without turning on my central heat. Last summer (in North Carolina) I set the A/C for 85F (29.5C) and normally just open the windows at night using fans to cool off the house and then closed up the house in the morning. There is not much else I can do to cut my energy use.
If we go into routine rolling blackouts here in the USA there are going to be some very irate voters and tax payers many of them Tea Party members or the elderly on fixed income. The kids are not going to be happy either when they find Mom & Dad need financial help because of rising costs. The Blair-Rockefeller Poll found that Tea Party members are predominantly white, middle class, educated, Christian males over the age of 45…
The 2010 US Census found Between 2000 and 2010, the 45 to 64 population grew 31.5 percent to 81.5 million, and now makes up 26. 4 percent of the total U.S. population… 40.3 million Americans are age 65 and older, an estimated 13% of the population… YIKES that is 44.5% of the US population?!?
According to the Blair-Rockefeller Poll, the democrats are loosing support from the elderlyShifting Support for Democratic Party among American Elderly
If we get another four years of Washington DC insanity I can see a third party gaining a lot of ground and a three way split as Republicans and Democrats desert their parties in disgust. In 2010, 16% told the Blair-Rockefeller Poll they were independents, 41% said they were Democrats and 40.5% Republicans. The other 12.5% did not answer.
The internet is opening a lot of eyes to the political sausage making and back scratching and I think it is starting to really hit home.
By this criteria there should be no old vulnerable people living in Melbourne, As this is NOT the case the premise fails.
The conjecture that claims heat related deaths will increase is contradicted by verifiable facts.
Poverty kills. The ~15,000 old-folks that died in the Paris heat wave a few Augusts ago (while their children vacationed down south) all for the lack of a few 150 Euro Chinese manufactured airconditioners (and ability to pay the inflated EDF power bill as well). To say nothing of EDF crying poverty while half-their-salaries go to government officials. Shades of AT&T.
Doctors kill more people than do guns. I didn’t know that applied to PhDs.
All credibility was lost when the National Academy of Sciences tagline floated by…
Uh, without reading this I am going to ask:
– how many would cold kill, without energy? Elderly people are less robust in general.
– it seems plausible that higher temperatures will cause difficulty for people with serious lung problems, as is common (genetic disposition plus smoking – many elderly live with oxygen equipment such a portable cylinder feeding an outlet into their nostrils (a “canula”)