UAH Global Temperature anomaly up in March at 0.11°C

Global Temperature Report: March 2012

  • U.S. hits record highs in March,
  • Iowa is ‘warmest’ place on Earth
  • Global climate trend since Nov. 16, 1978: +0.13 C per decade

March temperatures (preliminary)

Global composite temp.: +0.11 C (about 0.20 degrees Fahrenheit) above 30-year average for March.

Northern Hemisphere: +0.13 C (about 0.23 degrees Fahrenheit) above 30-year average for March.

Southern Hemisphere: +0.09 C (about 0.16 degrees Fahrenheit) above 30-year average for March.

Tropics: -0.11 C (about 0.20 degrees Fahrenheit) below 30- year average for March.

February temperatures (revised):

Global Composite: -0.11 C below 30-year average

Northern Hemisphere: -0.01 C below 30-year average

Southern Hemisphere: -0.21 C below 30-year average

Tropics: -0.28 C below 30-year average

(All temperature anomalies are based on a 30-year average

(1981-2010) for the month reported.)

Notes on data released April 3, 2012:

Compared to seasonal norms, March 2012 was the warmest month on record in the 48 contiguous U.S. states, according to Dr. John Christy, a professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center at The University of Alabama in Huntsville. Temperatures over the U.S. averaged 2.82 C (almost 5.1° Fahrenheit) warmer than normal in March.

The previous U.S. record warm anomaly in the 33-year satellite temperature record was in November 1999, when temperatures over the U.S. averaged 2.22 C (about 4° F)

warmer than the seasonal norm for November. The next warmest March was in 2007, when temperatures over the U.S. were 2.0 C (about 3.2° F) warmer than normal.

While the long-term climate trend over the U.S. has seen warming at the rate of about 0.21 C (almost 0.38° F) per decade during the past one third of a century, March’s temperature anomaly is just that: an anomaly, Christy said. “We see hot and cold spots over the globe every month, and this was just our turn. A one-time anomaly like this is related to weather rather than climate. Weather systems aligned in March in a way that changed normal circulation patterns and brought more warm air than usual to the continental U.S.”

In fact, the warmest spot on the globe in March (compared to seasonal norms) was northeastern Iowa, where temperatures for the month averaged 6.20 C (about 11.2°

F) warmer than normal. By comparison, the winter (DJF) of 2011-2012 averaged

0.94 C (about 1.7° F) warmer than seasonal norms for the continental U.S.

In recent years March has not typically seen temperature extremes over the U.S. The March 2011 temperature for the “lower 48” was at the seasonal norm. The coolest spot on Earth in March 2012 was northwestern Alaska, where temperatures averaged 3.89 C (7.0° F) colder than normal.

Archived color maps of local temperature anomalies are available on-line at: http://nsstc.uah.edu/climate/

The processed temperature data is available on-line at: vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/t2lt/uahncdc.lt

As part of an ongoing joint project between UAHuntsville, NOAA and NASA, John Christy, a professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center

(ESSC) at The University of Alabama in Huntsville, and Dr. Roy Spencer, an ESSC principal scientist, use data gathered by advanced microwave sounding units on NOAA and NASA satellites to get accurate temperature readings for almost all regions of the Earth. This includes remote desert, ocean and rain forest areas where reliable climate data are not otherwise available.

The satellite-based instruments measure the temperature of the atmosphere from the surface up to an altitude of about eight kilometers above sea level. Once the monthly

temperature data is collected and processed, it is placed in a “public” computer file for immediate access by atmospheric scientists in the U.S. and abroad.

Neither Christy nor Spencer receives any research support or funding from oil, coal or industrial companies or organizations, or from any private or special interest groups. All of their climate research funding comes from federal and state grants or contracts.

— 30 —

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
83 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Werner Brozek
April 4, 2012 4:19 pm

John Finn says:
April 4, 2012 at 3:27 pm
Also I thought UAH was the only trusted dataset.

I believe a correction is still in the works since Dr. Spencer said this last month:
“Progress continues on Version 6 of our global temperature dataset, which will have a better adjustment for drift of the satellites through the diurnal cycle, and an improved calibration procedure for the older MSU instruments (pre-1998).”
However while I appreciate your point, I also think it is worth pointing out the situation you describe is not unanimously shown, so under the circumstances, perhaps we need to be more cautious before implementing things that cost a lot of money if there is uncertainty over how bad a situation is.

julie
April 4, 2012 4:39 pm

I guess you got our heat.
http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/current/month/aus/summary.shtml
Averaged over Australia, daytime temperatures were 1.64 °C below average, the third-coolest March on record.

April 4, 2012 4:50 pm

Werner Brozek says: April 4, 2012 at 9:09 am
“do not know why the February values are not up yet by April 4. Could Dr. Nicola Scafetta be blamed since he will just use these numbers to find something wrong with the IPCC?”
I sent the update figure to Anthony last week. Anthony did not updatet the figure yet.

John Finn
April 5, 2012 3:28 am

Smokey says:
April 4, 2012 at 3:18 pm
John Finn says:
“…there is a significant underlying warming trend. It’s 0.13 deg per decade…”
Yes. The [natural] global warming trend goes all the way back to the LIA. That trend began when CO2 was ≈280 ppmv, and has continued along the same trend line. Now CO2 is ≈392 ppm, and the long term trend is still within its long term parameters

Firstly, I have simply stated it’s still warming. I have not suggested reasons for the warming.
Secondly, you’ve provided some of the most misleading graphs I’ve ever come across. The first link (trend) uses 2 deg increments on the veritcal axis which makes it nigh on impossible to see the detail. Anyone can fit a trend line from the start of the data and suggest that the recent warming is just a continuation of past warming. However it’s clearly not the case. See for example the CET record here
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadcet/
Between 1780 and 1900 the trend is essentially flat. The calculated trend is 0.01 deg per decade while the trend since 1900 is 0.08 deg per decade (i.e. 8 times the 1780-1900 trend ). You then try to claim that this is a natural continuation. You are not being honest.
Thirdly, the UAH trend of 0.13 deg per decade cannot possibly extend back to the LIA (whenever that is) otherwise global temperatures would have been 3 deg lower in the mid 18th century. As well as being dishonest your linked graphs make no sense.
Fourthly, you talk about this vague period called the LIA. Can you clarify the start and end dates of this period. I only ask because according to the CET record (and others), mean temperatures in 1800 were much the same as those in 1900. Did the “recovery” stall for 100 years?
Finally, on the issue of CO2, basic physics suggests that more atmospheric CO2 would result on a warmer world. Most well informed and responsible sceptics, e.g. Jack Barrett, Richard Lindzen, Roy Spencer etc, accept this. However these sceptics disagree (with the IPCC) on the magnitude (and sign) of the feedback. On balance I tend to agree with them.

Brian H
April 5, 2012 3:45 am

julie says:
April 4, 2012 at 4:39 pm
I guess you got our heat.
http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/current/month/aus/summary.shtml
Averaged over Australia, daytime temperatures were 1.64 °C below average, the third-coolest March on record.

Pretty much everyone’s heat. The Hot Blob in Central-Eastern N.A., plus a Mild Blob over the North Sea, are about it for the planet. (Aside, of course, from the systematically corrupted Arctic readings, which looks about 20X larger than it really is in area on projections like this.)

pkatt
April 5, 2012 7:16 am

Hmmm what is the +- error on this temp record. Is it less than .22?

Russ R.
April 5, 2012 8:18 am

I would gladly contribute more taxes to pay for more March’s like 2012. Unfortunately all I would get for my money is propaganda, with a little science sprinkled in. About the same as I am getting now. The difference is now I am getting the “scary” story, instead of the “happy ending” version.

April 5, 2012 10:12 am

The wonderful effect of global warming on Iowa, “the warmest place on Earth”, can be seen in this live video from ustream!
http://www.ustream.tv/decoraheagles
I’m sure environazis are terrified, as they should be. Cam runs 24/7 with infrared night lights. Enjoy…..(c;]