Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach
It doesn’t happen often … some would say not often enough … but I’m speechless.
Truly, I don’t know what to say about this. I can only shake my head and point and laugh. They are truly getting desperate.
w.
Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach
It doesn’t happen often … some would say not often enough … but I’m speechless.
Truly, I don’t know what to say about this. I can only shake my head and point and laugh. They are truly getting desperate.
w.
Apparently the world has already gone insane…. Or this is surely an April Fool joke….
The National Wildlife Federation. !!!????
Studying Psychological Effects of Global Warming !???
Commenting on the US Mental Health Care System !!?
I feel like I’ve been transported to another dimension, and the previous one was whacky enough.
And people got PAID to produce this? Surely enough to make poor old Robert Wood Johnson turn in his grave and question why he ever started his foundation.
If there were much warming, the only psychological effect would be “Yay, more swimsuits!”.
Could this be the money quote on page ix?
Looks like little sister Lisa and her buddy Kevin are finding the money.
“There is no organized discipline for the study of the psychological aspects of global warming:
While considerable research and
professional literature report on
psychological reactions to natural
disasters, no overarching discipline
or field of study connects human
psychology to the many faces of
global warming. A long term and
disciplined approach to studying
these problems within public health
agencies, the academic and clinical
community is needed to adequately
assess and address the full meaning
of global warming on the mental
health of the American public”
So, it’s such a big problem our ‘considerable research’ isn’t enough. They want more money.
We must need the ‘ultra expensive considerable research’ type of research.
Can I nominate Lisa for the directorship of this new ‘ultra expensive considerable research?’
Surreal.
It’s absolutely true! You have Gleick, Trenberth, Susuki, Hayhoe, Norgaard, Mann, Jones, Romm… They all are [snip].
Apologies to all those scientists who are open minded and therefore definitely not homo
insipiens. :o{
The power is driven by the gold. He who has the gold will win.
It seems to be driving you all crazy. 😉
Lise Van Sustren, MD-
“…She serves on the Board of Directors of the Climate Project and is (a) member of the Board of Directors of the National Wildlife Federation and the Chesapeake Climate Action Network. In September 2006, Van Susteren was chosen as one of the first 50 persons to be trained by Former Vice President Al Gore’s Climate Project to give her version of his global warming slide show, An Inconvenient Truth.”
A Goreian crusader.
Geez, 9 of the forum’s 22 participants are dedicated to saving us from global warming:
Nice to see so many differing organisations all dedicated to the same cause?
Everything should be under control, then!
A list of climate warming orientated postions :
Executive Director, Presidential Climate Action Project The Wirth Chair in Environmental and Community Development Policy, School of Public Affairs, University of Colorado Denver, Boulder,
Founder and Director, Center for Health and the Global Environment
Vice President for Programs H.J. Heinz Center for Science, Economics and the Environment
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary Center for Naval Analyses Executive Director, Military Advisory Board, ”National Security and the Threat of Climate Change” project
Senior Scientist, Climate Change Research National Center for Atmospheric Research
Associate Director for Global Climate Change National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
Director, Center for Climate Change Communication George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
DirectorChesapeake Climate Action Network Takoma Park
Vice President, Global Warming Solutions, National Wildlife Federation,
Global warming hysteria is a mental illness. There is going to be an official Environmental Obsession Disorder added to the diagnostic manuals if there isn’t one already.
Dirk and Paul: maybe you are both right! That’s what we call a Win/Win!
But first, Paul, it would seem that Dirk does not agree with you; how does that make you feel?
Uh-huh…mm-hmmm…OK. OK that’s just great; Dirk is OK and Paul is OK. OK!
Let’s see if we can clarify a few things. Paul I don’t want to put words in your mouth but I am going to anyway: Dirk, I think was Paul is trying to say is that the lying liars are very high technology liars and we are really stupid for not noticing what they have been doing all these years. Let’s all say it together: Freeze, Isolate, Ridicule. And that works really well when you have all the JDs, PR people, rent-seeking corporations, bien-pensant smarty pantses, NGO types, and the list goes on an on, uh…on your side. Even “conservative” politicians have sat on the love seat of deep-deep climate understanding so…Dirk, you can see why Paul might be less than optimistic…uh-huh…mm-hmmm…
Now Paul, I think what Dirk is trying to say is that at some point ordinary stupid people notice that New York is not under water, energy costs are going up along with every other cost, and that it is not working out to have everybody working for the government taking meetings, writing reports (ungrammatical reports too I might add, but then who hasn’t misplaced a colon from time to time),
caulking windows and so on. Now when I say stupid I mean that in the best possible way. Think of it as a form of multi-culturalism for people like me, born and (in)bred in the South. Heck we are so stupid, we live in the South and go south on vacation! In fact we are so stupid I suggest ya’ll come and play poker with us. Free money!
Now, if we let wee Kari at the water supply or it gets Darkness At Noonish around here like Jimmy Hansen might like it will get worser before it gets better. But it will get better. There is this odd primitive behavior that Southerners and honorary Southerners all over this country still engage in: pro.cre.ation. The future will belong to those who show up. Even if you convinced us that it would be at the cost of each and every Polar Bear we still will not have our children live in the cold and dark. I think it will take a long time but if we do not win this world back from these Malthusian barbarians ourselves we will be standing with our children when they do.
And that’s all I have to say about that.
JimB says:
April 4, 2012 at 6:26 am
“A friend of mine and I used to kid around with the PhD chemists by referring to each other as “doctor”. The term is not, however, in common use for lawyers. The common term is SOB.”
Except when you really need one.
I happen to agree that climate change has psychological effects on people, it’s just a matter of ranking it among the other things that affect psychology. Observe:
1.Physical Security
2. Autonomy
3. Achievement
4.Loving Family(or lack of)
5. Affordable Health Care
6. Financial Security
7. Sexual Relationships
8. Physical Fitness
.
.
.
.
1,245. Performance of favorite sports teams
1,246. Canceling of favorite tv shows
1,247. Climate change <————Bam!
Gotta love the intro by van Susteren and Coyle:
Sounds like the theme of a bad teen novel aimed at schoolgirls:
Questions beg to be asked:
• What will the rest of the world think of us?
• Where will we be safe?
• How will we feel about ourselves?
Note from the wiki article on Lise Van Susteren, she is a bought and paid for activist in the Global warming circus, and one of the “selected” propaganda generators for the Al Gore machine.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lise_Van_Susteren
Willis,
No, they are not desperate. Nor are they stupid or delusional. This stuff is not accidental or happenstance. It is by design. There is a great plan with lots of money and lots of support and lots of staff working deliberately to achieve their goals of tyranny by technocrats. This will be found to be in concert with many other Agenda 21 efforts. They do plan to achieve world government. We must see these efforts for what they are; sinister stages to total control and the end of liberty. We must not imagine that they are random events. Your many readers who only follow main stream media will never understand. The MSM will never tell them. They are ignorant of the real danger.
The medical profession is not prepared for an invasion from Mars either, and a lot of other things that are not happening.
Form their website they appear to be an activist group that sees the modern world as the worse thing that has happened since the big bang.
I am curious what the long-term psychological effects will be on children who have grown up with the Weather Channel and major TV networks constantly screaming “WE’RE ALL GOING TO DIE!!!!”.
The WWF realized a long time ago that they couldn’t attract people to their cause by speaking about the demise of beetles and fish, so they focused on Charismatic Megafauna (their term) like pandas and polar bears. Using 9-11 and Hurricane Katrina in this report demonstrates that they’ve applied that lesson here and have identified them as Charismatic Megadisasters.
Aside from that, I can’t see this being much more than a headline grabber. It’s poorly written, and includes some NASA/NOAA graphics that they don’t bother to explain. If the reader is already an AGW Acolyte this report will be something else they can snivel about, but any reasonable person will see it as just another “me too!” piece of hysteria.
cui bono says:
April 4, 2012 at 6:25 am
“I fear Paul is right – they are winning.”
Hm. They’re talking about psychological consequences of Climate Change. One of their many lines of “reasoning” is:
“Psychological Responses to Violent Weather Generally
Extreme weather events can lead to immediate psychological problems relating to loss, economic disruption and physical displacement. Fear, grief, depression, anxiety, problems sleeping, eating disorders and self medication with alcohol and drugs are common responses.”
People start drinking because of violent weather? Really? I mean they can only hope winning if they can assure that nobody of the public ever reads that. In general you don’t win by making a complete clown of yourself. Well in a clown contest maybe.
God love my people (Lawyers), but anytime you see an article that deals with mental health written even in part by one you have to wonder. Lawyers deal with legal and poltical information, so this piece clearly deals with those purposes (at least in part).
This gets BEYOND hilarious!
On the second page it is plain there has been a misdiagnosis: The very first casualty of “the stress of global warming” is in fact a victim of “the stress of climate propaganda”.
Even more amazing when you consider that Australia’s biggest issue for the last 3 years has been widespread flooding.
Surely this is all an elaborate hoax?
Eric Dailey says:
April 4, 2012 at 7:25 am
You’re right but many skeptics are also associated to the left. They tend to laugh and make light of this and similar social stories. Willis is very in depth at one level but has a willful blindspot on these topics all the time. How is this “surprising” for example, it’s happening all over the place in many different ways but similar memes. Inspector Renault from Casablanca etc.
There is a green/left split inside the skeptic community. It’s part of why warmers have advanced this far.
Many skeptics like the technical details of the debate, they want to avoid the essential politics as much as possible. “It’s about science”. They certainly have contributed but on its own it fails. Marc Morano, Delingpole are actually closer to the truth and the solution regardless of how it might make someone feel.
Sorry guys but knowing advertising as I do, the need to “jump the shark” when the product is selling doesn’t exist. The pitch then adjusts to “it’s selling” variants as people get on board what they perceive as being socially relevant as you’ve witnessed with everything from the iPad to obesity being the number one health problem in America. No successful marketing company on this planet craps the bed they’ve just spent a fortune successfully making and if the hype is to be believed that AGW has indeed a fortune being invested in advertising, they would have hired such.
Actually IMO, we’ve already seen the psychological manifestations claimed.
After Climategate 1, what did Mr Jones claim?
“He said he had recovered from the depression that had led him to contemplate suicide at the height of the controversy, when Sarah Palin and other politicians in the United States accused him of faking his research. He has put on most of the stone he shed and lost the pale, gaunt look on show in March as he trembled in front of a parliamentary committee questioning him about his integrity.”
Climategate 1 and 2 showed antisocial bullying behavioral patterns.
Wikipedia… GISS “adjustments” – suggestions of OCD?
Mr Glieck …self confessed break from social norms…into illegitimate acts.
Mr Hansens claims …breaking from reality.
AND this pseudo-science paper that exhibits http://psychology.about.com/od/personalitydisorders/a/narcissisticpd.htm Narcissistic traits.
“An exaggerated sense of one’s own abilities and achievements.
A constant need for attention, affirmation and praise.
A belief that he or she is unique or “special” and should only associate with other people of the same status.
Persistent fantasies about attaining success and power.
Exploiting other people for personal gain.
A sense of entitlement and expectation of special treatment.
A preoccupation with power or success.
Feeling envious of others, or believing that others are envious of him or her.
A lack of empathy for others.”
Yeppers!!! IMO they [ psychological – sociological breaks ] are already manifested.