Submarines in the Winter Twilight

One of the more celebrated North Pole surfacings of the USS Skate happened today in 1959, see http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/04/26/ice-at-the-north-pole-in-1958-not-so-thick/ for more on that and several others.

Nearly a couple years ago at the ICCC in Chicago, Lord Monckton noted that at the time of this surfacing it was late winter and the Sun hadn’t risen. I’m not entirely sure why he mentioned that, but I wasn’t able to come up with a quick and accurate description of the lighting conditions. Let me do it now so I can get the issue out of my system. First, we need a submarine:

AGSS 569
The Albacore was a research submarine, and a convenient ship to view under lighting conditions similar to today at the North Pole.

I’m not about to spend my St. Patrick’s Day at the North Pole in hopes that a sub will surface, especially since there’s a perfectly accessible submarine in Portsmouth New Hampshire at Albacore Park. I go to an annual event in Portsmouth each February, which fit quite nicely into seeking photos set in an icy, snowy setting.

The rocket science part is to time the photo to match the Sun’s position below the horizon. At the North Pole the Sun rises in March and sets in September. The concept of a 24 hour day refers mainly to the longitude line the Sun is passing (it’s due south all “day” long).

Sunrise, by US Naval Office definition, is when the upper limb of the Sun touches the horizon. The USNO considers the horizon to be distant and the observer is close to land or sea surface. It’s fairly easy to compute the location of the center of the Sun relative the horizon as seen from the North Pole, it’s just the “declination,” which is the celestial equivalent of latitude. There are two significant effects to take into account. The obvious one is the Sun’s angular radius, which is about 16 arcminutes. The other is atmospheric refraction near the horizon. This is what makes the Sun and Moon look squashed when they are on the horizon. The refraction right at the horizon is about 34 arcminutes. So, sunrise occurs when geometrically the center of the Sun is 50 arcminutes (0.83°) below the horizon.

An aside – on the equinoxes, night and day are supposed to be equal. Not true! At most latitudes the time from sunrise to sunset is about 12h10m then. Today, for me, is the true clock time equinox.

Where were we? Oh yes. Some data from the North Pole on 1959 Mar 17, in degrees above the horizon:

1959 North Pole, Latitude    90.00  Longitude    0.00

  Date   Decln

Mar 15   -2.32

Mar 16   -1.93

Mar 17   -1.53

Mar 18   -1.14

Mar 19   -0.74

Mar 20   -0.35

Mar 21    0.05

It would be nice to know the hour, but let’s not be that obsessive. What does this tell us? First, the Sun will rise around the 19th. Second, Spring begins when the declination is 0°, and that will be on the 21st. On the 17th, the entire Sun is below the horizon and the upper limb is 0.70° below the horizon. This puts us well into morning twilight. Twilight – what’s that? Let’s take a look from a North Pole point of view, and start when it’s just plain dark.

Another aside – at the start of winter at the North Pole, the Sun is 23.44° below the horizon. However, the Full Moon will be between some 18° to 28° above the horizon. Yes, it’s nighttime, but not completely dark all the time.

If we discount the Moon and clouds, the sky is dark at the start of Winter with only stars providing feeble light. In late January, the Sun climbs above 18° below the horizon and we enter Astronomical Twilight. This is a period where there is enough light from the Sun that it interferes with seeing faint objects in the sky, especially those nearest the rising Sun. In mid February the Sun reaches 12° and we enter Nautical Twilight. Brighter, but mariners can still easily see the stars used for navigation. By early March the Sun reaches 6°, now the navigational stars are fading from view and we’re in Civil Twilight and people can get around pretty well without extra light. From the above, we can tell Civil Twilight will last a couple weeks and then daylight begins.

Now, let’s shift our point of view to Portsmouth. I’m also shifting to the evening because I took these photos after sunset. Civil twilight here lasts about half an hour, which fits in well with both our experience and state motor vehicle law that requires headlights to be on by half an hour after sunset.

Another aside – twilight is longest at the Summer Solstice, shorter at the Winter Solstice, but shortest near the equinoxes. If there’s interest, I’ll go into more details in the comments.

My intent was to photograph the Albacore in lighting similar to what there was for the Skate, i.e. when the Sun was 0.70° below the horizon. The math for this is a bit trickier, and entails messing with declination, right ascension, latitude, longitude, and Solar altitude to get the date and time. A fine approximation uses just the date (I was there on 2010 Feb 20) and some of this data:

2010 Albacore Park, Latitude   43.08  Longitude   70.76

  Date  Rise    Set  Civil   Naut  Astro    Decln

Feb 21  6:32A  5:22P  0:29   1:02   1:36   -10.43

At sunset, the solar altitude is -0.83°, we want the time when it’s about -1.53°. We know during Civil twilight the Sun will drop 5.16&deg, so interpolating, that’s about 4 minutes after sunset, and gee, there should be plenty of light. While the the visitor center and Albacore were locked, I could park there and walk around the trench used to bring in the Albacore. And indeed, there was plenty of light, as the photos prove.

Just one other thing – yes, black and white films in the late 1950s were plenty fast enough. The photographer probably used Tri-X (ASA 400) or Royal-X (ASA 1200). The latter was so grainy that it generally was only used in large format cameras. I had my camera set to a ASA 400 (or maybe even 100) equivalent.

Lord Monckton has probably figured all this out, but now we all know that there was plenty light and we know where to find a submarine in a snowy environment.

AGSS 569
Have you ever wondered how many photographs there are of submarines that have traffic lights in the background? No, neither have I.

The Albacore is an interesting vessel, several design experiments with it influenced the next generation of submarines.

Counter rotating prop
I'm always a sucker for interesting mechanical contraptions and this counter rotating screw caught my eye. I guess a sub with a single screw could have some interesting handling issues.
The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
59 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
March 17, 2012 5:22 pm

commieBob says:
March 17, 2012 at 4:30 pm
Of course all this stuff about the boat is a red herring. The real deal is that there was enough unfrozen water at the north pole for a submarine to surface.

Except of course there wasn’t, the Skate surfaced through a frozen lead.

LazyTeenager
March 17, 2012 5:27 pm

Ah yes here we are on Amazon:
Surface at the Pole: The Extraordinary Voyages of the USS Skate (Bluejacket Books) (Paperback)
James F. Calvert
It’s funny how you guys are always quoting from this book!!!!! Must be lots of refutations of the existence of lots of ice in 1950s Arctic in there.

March 17, 2012 5:32 pm

A brilliant post, with some really interesting info about subs and the Arctic – and on St Patrick’s Day! Who could ask for more? Thank you all!

heystoopidone
March 17, 2012 5:51 pm

A picture of the USS Skate at the North Pole, Commander James F Calvert USN from his book “Surface At The Pole: The Extraordinary Voyages Of The USS Skate” first published 1966 .
Link : First edition http://www.amazon.com/Surface-At-Pole-James-Calvert/dp/B000R4TBE0/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1332030481&sr=1-2
Link : Hard cover 2010 ; http://www.amazon.com/Surface-At-The-Pole-Extraordinary/dp/1166128768/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1332030600&sr=1-1

u.k.(us)
March 17, 2012 5:56 pm

Phil. says:
March 17, 2012 at 5:22 pm
commieBob says:
March 17, 2012 at 4:30 pm
Of course all this stuff about the boat is a red herring. The real deal is that there was enough unfrozen water at the north pole for a submarine to surface.
Except of course there wasn’t, the Skate surfaced through a frozen lead.
=========================
BS, look at the picture, it was more than a lead.
The polar bears sniffing around the sub in another photo, shows a peak predator examining its prey.
[Reply: Apparently the polar bear incidents were not at the pole, at least not in these links:
http://www.strategypage.com/military_photos/bear_sub1.aspx
http://www.strategypage.com/military_photos/bears_sub1.aspx
In the first one, the bear tries to eat the rudder. Damage was said to be minor.
– Ric]

Strick
March 17, 2012 6:03 pm

From a review of James Calvert’s book at Amazon: “Nuclear subs do need to surface in an emergency (fire or power plant problems), to launch missiles or communicate so during the 1st cruise discussed, Captain James F. Calvert describes tactics developed for operating in the Arctic Ocean during the summer. These include locating melt pools (pond to lake-sized pools of water called Polynayas) dotting the arctic landscape and surfacing without the forward motion normally used to stabilize a submarine; there was to little space. There is an interesting account of how an arctic research station drifting 2-3 miles/day on an ice flow a few hundred miles from the North Pole was located. The USS Skate was able to surface in a polynaya within 50 yards of the camp. The crew greeted researchers that had been isolated for months (the summer ice was to thin and weak for a plane to land on).”
http://www.amazon.com/Surface-At-The-Pole-Extraordinary/dp/1166128768/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1332032097&sr=8-1
“the summer ice was too thin and weak for a plane to land on…” Hmmm

March 17, 2012 6:18 pm

u.k.(us) says:
March 17, 2012 at 5:56 pm
Phil. says:
March 17, 2012 at 5:22 pm
commieBob says:
March 17, 2012 at 4:30 pm
Of course all this stuff about the boat is a red herring. The real deal is that there was enough unfrozen water at the north pole for a submarine to surface.
Except of course there wasn’t, the Skate surfaced through a frozen lead.
=========================
BS, look at the picture, it was more than a lead.

But that isn’t a photo of the March 17 surfacing at the N Pole, this is:
http://www.vintagehikingdepot.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/funeral-570×383.jpg

u.k.(us)
March 17, 2012 6:46 pm

Phil. says:
March 17, 2012 at 6:18 pm
“But that isn’t a photo of the March 17 surfacing at the N Pole, this is:
http://www.vintagehikingdepot.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/funeral-570×383.jpg
======================
Attribution much ?

March 17, 2012 7:28 pm

u.k.(us) says:
March 17, 2012 at 6:46 pm
Phil. says:
March 17, 2012 at 6:18 pm
“But that isn’t a photo of the March 17 surfacing at the N Pole, this is:
http://www.vintagehikingdepot.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/funeral-570×383.jpg”
======================
Attribution much ?

Commander James Calvert, skipper of the Skate in his book “Surface at the Pole”!

Warren in Minnesota
March 17, 2012 7:45 pm

I think that just before the spring equinox at the north pole there would be no darkness as the sun would circle the horizon and be just below the horizon. The time would seem to not be important for lighting as it would always be dawn for several days just before the sun goes above the horizon.

March 17, 2012 8:31 pm

Contra-rotating screws are, indeed for quiet. Single screws on a shaft can and do “cavitate” (leading edge, low pressure, bubble collapse) making a ton of noise. Throttlemen on submarines have to be very careful about how quickly they open the throttles to avoid cavitation at shallow depths. Do not confuse single, twin and contra-rotating screws, please.

garymount
March 17, 2012 8:59 pm

Warren in Minnesota says: March 17, 2012 at 7:45 pm
I think that just before the spring equinox at the north pole there would be no darkness as the sun would circle the horizon and be just below the horizon. The time would seem to not be important for lighting as it would always be dawn for several days just before the sun goes above the horizon.
————–
Ric is trying to replicate the lighting conditions while not being at the Pole, hence all that stuff he wrote.
——————-
A few years ago, before I began my climate science research, I did some research on calculating the time of sunrise and sunset from any position on earth. I found some code in basic that I converted into C# so I could make an app that would run on my pocket/mobile pc.
Some time afterwards I lost that work and the downloaded code in a rare triple failure of my hard drive in a parity raid setup as well as the backup. (warning, never use RAID as your only backup solution) .
I later decided that I would rewrite the code, without the help from someone else’s algorithm, especially after getting this email from the downloaded code location a few years after I had downloaded it:
“According to our records, you or your organization has downloaded the Solar Position Algorithm from http://www.nrel.gov/midc/spa.   This algorithm is made available on our website without charge for non-commercial use only.   If you are interested in obtaining a license which would allow you to incorporate the algorithm into a product which you intend to sell,  please contact me at [redacted email].”
So began a long journey involving several years of studying calculus then getting side tracked by my climate science studies, and I still haven’t written any code to calculate sunrise/sunset. But I sure have learned a lot. (Note that I also began studying calculus to help me to both understand a book on “The Finite Element Method”, as well as to help me solve a computer programming problem related to physics).
I did find a good start to writing my own algorithm by downloading this text (ascii ?) file describing methods to use to do the calculations.
http://www.math.niu.edu/~rusin/uses-math/position.sun/suncalc.asc
From my experience, Ric seems to have hit all the bases. The only thing missing perhaps is the mention of a “sidereal day” which might or might not be relevant.

garymount
March 17, 2012 9:05 pm

Mangled link, should be
http://www.nrel.gov/midc/spa/

aeroguy48
March 17, 2012 9:18 pm

I think the hidden intent of Rics piece is to show his prowess mathematical skills and vast knowledge to shame that evil copper ‘You see your honor it was only 29 minets after twilight thus I was within the law not to have my headlights on’

Admin
March 17, 2012 11:50 pm

Navsource, in the Wayback machine, had it stated as March 17th 1959, just days before my original article. This is the April 18th 2009 snapshot from Wayback:
http://web.archive.org/web/20090418161606/http://www.navsource.org/archives/08/08578.htm
The caption then reads:

Skate (SSN-578), surfaced at the North Pole, 17 March 1959.

I remember checking NAVSOURCE for accuracy before publishing, my caption then says:

Skate (SSN-578), surfaced at the North Pole, 17 March 1959. Image from NAVSOURCE

History on that photo changed there at NAVSOURCE since then, probably due to alarmist pressure from Wiki etc. and other folks like Neven who went ballistic over the picture when I highlighted it. It is “inconvenient” in March (during peak ice season) but soothing for them in August (during near peak melt season).
The picture may have been taken a couple of days after the funeral photo in March alluded to upthread.
Se EM Smith comment in my original thread. http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/04/26/ice-at-the-north-pole-in-1958-not-so-thick/#comment-122932

AlexS
March 18, 2012 1:24 am

Contra rotating makes the sound signature clearly known. And is not necessary.
That is why most submarines have only one screw, or rarely a pump jet.

March 18, 2012 2:18 am

Hit the Albacore Park Link. Fascinating story and I’d say the taxpayers got their money’s worth on that one.
Note the surface Navy considered the submarine arm as the enemy. I just read a book on John Boyd. Even during the cold war the USAF was the enemy in the Pentagon. I just got told this afternoon it isn’t much different between the RAAF and Australian Army at present.

March 18, 2012 2:22 am

u.k.(us) says:
March 17, 2012 at 5:56 pm
I can imagine the conversation with Mrs Polar Bear later. “You shoulda seen the size of that seal! And it got away!

j ferguson
March 18, 2012 6:31 am

The Albacore is an excellent thing to visit. We did in July a few years back. Maybe because there were two of us and we were adults, we were allowed in unaccompanied. I spent a couple of hours inside sitting in the various places where one could sit, admiring the X diesels, the gauges, the injector tester, and just generally absorbing the machinery. At the time, they had not public-proofed it. Maybe they still haven’t.
I loved it.
It seemed to me to be totally un-vandalized and very very complete, down to a typewriter in the radio room.
I don’t know what they do when kids are around, but…

Zac
March 18, 2012 7:32 am

The photo at Navsource is credited to Graham P. Davis and he had this to say about it Oct 30th 2011
“USS Skate did indeed surface at the North Pole but not until 17 March 1959. Ice conditions in August 1958 were too heavy at the Pole for the Skate to surface, as they were for the Nautilus some days earlier. The Skate did surface in several other leads and polynya that August, including one near Ice-station Alfa. The above picture may have been from one of those.
When the Skate sailed for the Arctic the following year, the sail had been strengthened to allow it to break through thin ice. At the Pole, they eventually found a small, refrozen lead, or skylight, and managed to break through it. Later, many of the crew gathered for a service at which the ashes of Sir Hubert Wilkins were sprinkled in the wind. The temperature during this service was -26F (-32C).”
http://www.navalhistory.org/2011/08/11/uss-skate-ssn-578-becomes-the-first-submarine-to-surface-at-the-north-pole/

observa
March 18, 2012 8:28 am

Paul H is “fascinated by submarines since watching Das Boot. :-)”
in which case for you and those similarly afflicted you may be interested in following the exploits of the Gato Class US submarines in WWII operating out of Brisbane. It was the USS Guardfish that that dropped my Australian father among others to reconnoitre the Marine landing at Empress Augusta Bay on Bougainville-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Guardfish_%28SS-217%29
He was a master gunner(shore battery in Suva) and surveyor stationed in Fiji with the Fiji Military Forces and as such had exactly the observational skills needed for the task, being right under the nose of US South Pacific Command in Fiji at the time (it was from Fiji that the first Marine landings of the war were launched upon Guadalcanal and the beginning of the Solomons Campaign)
The exploits of the Guardfish are documented by recall in the early 1980s here-
http://www.amazon.com/Nothing-Friendly-Vicinity-Submarine-Bluejacket/dp/1591141303/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top/178-2843044-3987143
Should that whet your appetite for the Solomons campaign you might like to get hold of a copy of The Coastwatchers by Eric Feldt to put it all into perspective, particularly how instrumental submarines were in the crucial turning point of the Pacific War.
Then for an enthralling tale of submarine warfare from the other side you should read Iron Coffins-
http://www.amazon.com/Iron-Coffins-Herbert-Werner/dp/0553233475
You may find some uncanny similarity with that and Das Boot 😉

observa
March 18, 2012 9:40 am

There were quite a few of them by the way and naturally some considerable logistics to keep them fighting-
http://www.ozatwar.com/ozatwar/capricorn.htm
bearing in mind they were mostly a bunch of 17-21 year olds.
I realized my father was only 19 when he signed up after I discovered a Soldiers Service Book tucked away in his personal effects upon his death and began piecing together some old war stories with the power of the internet.
He recalled the Fiji garrison(under NZ control then as Australians were busy in the ME) being called to action stations in expectation of a Japanes Fleet approaching Fiji but it was actually an American Fleet come to join the Pacific War in earnest after some argument in Washington that the European theatre should take precedence. A subsequent buildup of US forces occurred in readiness for a completely untried landing at Guadalcanal as described here-
http://www.ww2pacific.com/gc1days.html
Don’t be fooled by that understatement that- “One practice amphibious landing was made at Fiji, 28July, for about 1/3 of the 1st Marine division, to familiarize the troops with boarding landing craft and in unloading cargo. All accounts say the test was a failure.”
According to my father it was a complete disaster with swamped landing craft due to an intense tropical storm and no doubt some telegrams home were fudged as to how some young sons really died. No matter they were off to Guadalcanal to try and get it right the next time.
Lest we forget.