Give up Canada, you're toast

From Simon Fraser University, a new paper says that the Canucks may as well just give up, because its going to warm up no matter what they do. Using powerful new geographic mapping tools on a big screen Mac and a #2 pencil, geographer Kirsten Zickfeld has it all figured out. This is apparently what will cause an end to outdoor ice hockey in Canada.

Warming of 2 degrees inevitable over Canada

photo
SFU geographer Kirsten Zickfeld notes in a new paper she has co-authored that northern hemisphere dwellers will suffer more severe effects of climate change than others. See - it's right there on the map, in Canada. Image from SFU via Flickr

Even if zero emissions of greenhouse gases were to be achieved, the world’s temperature would continue to rise by about a quarter of a degree over a decade. That’s a best-case scenario, according to a paper co-written by a Simon Fraser University researcher.

New climate change research – Climate response to zeroed emissions of greenhouse gases and aerosols — published in Nature’s online journal, urges the public, governments and industries to wake up to a harsh new reality.

“Let’s be honest, it’s totally unrealistic to believe that we can stop all emissions now,” says Zickfeld, an assistant professor of geography at SFU. “Even with aggressive greenhouse gas mitigation, it will be a challenge to keep the projected global rise in temperature under 2 degrees Celsius,” emphasizes Zickfeld.

The geographer wrote the paper with Damon Matthews, a University of Concordia associate professor at the Department of Geography, Planning and Environment.

The duo used an earth system climate model developed by the University of Victoria to study the impact of greenhouse gas and aerosol emissions on the world’s climate. The study was based on emission levels that are consistent with data from the 2007 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

The removal of aerosols from the atmosphere would cause additional global warming in the short term, if all of those emissions were removed now. “The widespread presence of aerosols in the Earth’s atmosphere is effectively acting like a solar radiation blocking blanket right now,” explains Zickfeld.

“It’s preventing the Earth’s temperature from responding to the real effects of global warming. But once that aerosol-based blanket is removed the temperature will rise.”

Due to the emission of greenhouse gases, the world’s temperature has warmed by almost 1 ° C since the beginning of the industrial era. The study finds that elimination of all emissions would lead to an additional short-term warming by 0.25 to 0.5 degrees.

“One to 1.5 degrees of global warming may not seem like a great deal,” says Zickfeld. “But we need to realize that the warming would not be distributed equally over the globe, with mid to high latitude regions such as Canada, Alaska, northeastern Europe, Russia and northern China being most strongly affected.

“Our research shows that as a result of past emissions, a warming of at least 2 ° C will be unavoidable in those regions.”

Backgrounder: Study a first on many levels

This study is the first to find that if all greenhouse gas and aerosol emissions were halted now the Earth’s temperature would actually continue to rise by a few tenths of a degree over the next 10 years. Then it would begin to cool by a few tenths of a degree, coming down to its current level after about a century.

During the warming period the Earth’s temperature would rise to roughly 1.3-Celsius degrees higher than it was at the beginning of the industrial era.

In the northern hemisphere that peak temperature would be closer to 2 degrees higher. The reason is that the warming is not distributed equally over the globe, and is amplified at high latitudes.

“Two degrees is pretty significant,” notes Zickfeld, “when you consider the global temperature was only five degrees colder than today’s during the ice age.”

A decrease in greenhouse gases with short atmospheric lifetimes, such as methane and nitrous oxide, will cause the planet to gradually cool off after the warming phase.

The atmospheric concentration of long-lived greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide determines the world’s long-term temperature.

This study is also the first to quantify the extent to which past greenhouse gas and aerosol emissions will warm oceans, causing them to rise. Zickfeld and Matthews found emissions to date will lead to about a 25 centimeters sea level rise in 2200, and the sea level will continue to rise for several centuries after that date.

The study doesn’t analyse the impact of other factors, such as melting glaciers and ice sheets, on sea levels. These factors are expected to accelerate sea level rise further.

— 30 —

Contact:

Kirsten Zickfeld, 778.782.9047 (w), 604.354.6214 (cell), kzickfel@sfu.ca; Vancouver resident, originally from Germany

Carol Thorbes, PAMR, 778.782.3035, cthorbes@sfu.ca

Note:  Please contact the researcher directly for interviews and copy of paper

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
154 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ibbo
March 7, 2012 4:34 am

Having experienced a Canadian winter at -25, 2 Degrees warming will not make the slightest difference.
They do know the freezing point of Water is 0 and the average temperatures rage from -10 to -20
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature_in_Canada
Can’t see a two degree rise in temperature making much difference to be honest.

John Marshall
March 7, 2012 4:40 am

This has just convinced me that geography is not a science subject but wooly Liberal left wing ideology.

AleaJactaEst
March 7, 2012 4:41 am

….”The duo used an earth system climate model developed by the University of Victoria to study the impact of greenhouse gas and aerosol emissions on the world’s climate. The study was based on emission levels that are consistent with data from the 2007 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change…..”
Hans Christian Anderson stuff. Start with “data” from the 2007 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (which is all from models) and end up with manure.

CodeTech
March 7, 2012 4:42 am

Well this is GREAT news! Heck, the only thing wrong with it is that this is her “best case”.
Speaking as a Canadian, I can’t wait for the warming! Imagine the lengthened growing season, the reduction in snow days, less shoveling of the driveway, no more need for winter tires, and if we’re really lucky, we can stop wasting all that money for Natural Gas to heat our homes!
So…

emissions to date will lead to about a 25 centimeters sea level rise in 2200, and the sea level will continue to rise for several centuries after that date.

Well that’s interesting. So, I should be advising my heirs to sell their seaside property in 2199? Also, way to make a no-brain extrapolation of current sea-level rise trends… 2-3mm per year, times, hmm… 200 years… wait a second, that’s… 40-60cm! She’s even lowballing the current (long term) trend! That’s just bad math right there…
So yeah, Earth to Zickfeld: Canada Wants Warming. Unfortunately, your analysis is a load of crap and we’re not going to get it. Or if we do, it won’t have anything to do with CO2 emissions. Oh well.

March 7, 2012 4:46 am

“Give up”? I would think they would celebrate!

mike about town
March 7, 2012 4:47 am

hilarious…will they never tire of dramatic overstatements? We humans have a built in need for an apocalypse…those of us who believe in God believe in a theistic one, while perhaps those who don’t (or just need some more apocalyptic inclinations in their lives) must go with environmental ones.

Spartacus
March 7, 2012 4:50 am

The publication of this kind of almos non-sense articles is only accessible to alarmists. Poor “Nature (Magazine)”….

Dave
March 7, 2012 4:53 am

The duo used an earth system climate model developed by the University of Victoria to study the impact of greenhouse gas and aerosol emissions on the world’s climate. The study was based on emission levels that are consistent with data from the 2007 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Well if they used a model it must be true. Especially if the model is based on the infallible IPCC reports.

March 7, 2012 4:54 am

Claptrap! Emblazoned all over this article are the trappings of the meme that climate is anchored in time. “Then it would begin to cool by a few tenths of a degree, coming down to its current level after about a century.” Who are they trying to kid here? Citing the IPCC report wholesale is not a good place to start. What an embarrassment.

Anopheles
March 7, 2012 4:55 am

Is it not true that the predicted warming is equivalent, in the NH, to moving a couple of hundred miles south? Nearly everybody in Canada lives within a few miles of the US border. If they want to carry on playing outdoor Ice Hockey, all they need to do is move a couple of hundred miles north. Land is cheap up there, and there is a lot of it. A real lot of it., as anyone who has flown over the pole in winter will know.
Coming back on the coupla hundred miles south thing, would that not mean that the weather we experience will be like that to the south of us now, in most cases, ceteris paribus? So if we exerience ‘warming causing cooling’, that’s because it’s cooler down there now? It isn’t? Well, maybe that meme is not really based in anything but wishful thinking.

March 7, 2012 4:56 am

…oh yes, and notice the convenient smuggling of ‘aerosols’ into the mix. Just to ensure there is an unquantifiable ‘out’? Amazing bit of everything they have going on.

DirkH
March 7, 2012 4:58 am

Canada, Australia and California are favorite destinations for German emigrants.
Kirsten Zickfeld was born in Saarbrücken, Germany, and Rahmstorf finds her work outstanding:
http://warpsix.komedia.de/sixcms/media.php/1471/zickfeld.pdf
She expects a failure of the Monsoon due to aerosols and a collapse of the thermohaline circulation. (Of course, with the usual caveats, “we found out that XXX COULD happen”… you know the drill)
Small fry, alarmist phantasist foot soldier, responsible for whipping up scare scenarios. Creates scares since 2006 in Victoria.

Truthseeker
March 7, 2012 5:02 am

“The duo used an earth system climate model developed by the University of Victoria to study the impact of greenhouse gas and aerosol emissions on the world’s climate.”
There is your problem right there. Turn off the frigging computers and go outside and do some observations. Nothing that the satellite data is showing support this hypothesis.
I am jealous of the computer screen though. It is bigger than my IMac. Size matters …

March 7, 2012 5:09 am

I am glad that CAGW didn’t exist when I went to SFU.
I pity some of the students of today that are indoctrinated such as the student highlighted here:
http://www.sfu.ca/dean-gradstudies/blog/studentprofiles/TylerHerrington.html
“His undergraduate research experience prepared him well for asking important questions as part of his master’s research program, where he’ll be investigating climate change. His research question: What cumulative CO2 emissions are compatible with regional level tipping points in the Earth’s climate system, such as those affecting the Amazonian rainforest die-back, Greenland ice sheet decay, and complete disintegration of arctic sea ice?”
Complete disintegration of arctic sea ice? Come on, you are making my SFU credentials look bad.

March 7, 2012 5:11 am

“used an earth system climate model”
Gee, imagine that !!!
GIGO strikes again !!

Ripper
March 7, 2012 5:13 am

So now Canadian children won’t know what outdoor ice hockey is?

fadingfool
March 7, 2012 5:14 am

So remove the additional CO2 warming element (i.e. emissions remain at existing levels) then remove the “aerosol” effect invented to “mask” the inadequacies of the CO2 warming model and oh no its “WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT” . And this was published?
How do I get on this gravy train?
Seriously I’m fed up with having to work for a living.

TomO
March 7, 2012 5:16 am

Sigh… they don’t give up do they?
I’d like to see if their funding application stated the study outcome…
Contrivance, conflation, confirmation bias and unverified computer models.
Didn’t see anything mentioned about going outside and taking some measurements….

Lew 'Big Oil' Skannen
March 7, 2012 5:17 am

OK. So we are doomed even more doomedly that we had previously been doomed.
Are there now new levels of doomedness we should be preparing for or what?

Jimbo
March 7, 2012 5:18 am

Due to the emission of greenhouse gases, the world’s temperature has warmed by almost 1 ° C since the beginning of the industrial era.

To put it another way:

Since the end of the Little Ice Age, the world’s temperature has warmed by almost 1 ° C since the beginning of the industrial era.

Funny that. ;O)

Luther Wu
March 7, 2012 5:20 am

Two degrees temp rise in 10 years and only if we completely stop all emissions right now… doomed, for sure.

Eve
March 7, 2012 5:20 am

That must be why I just moved to the Bahamas, where is is a balmy 72 at present. At home it is 7 C. Canada may get so hot, people will not leave but I doubt it.

Gail Combs
March 7, 2012 5:20 am

They do not give up do they?
I wonder when Canada’s internet/media censorship laws will go into effect? If Australia is getting censorship laws and they are trying to impose them here in the USA Canada can not be far behind.
See: http://www.australianclimatemadness.com/2012/03/censorship-comes-to-australia/

Dude
March 7, 2012 5:23 am

Well that’s good to know. Now they should do a study on why their theory does not seem to prove itself out from 2007- today. Since they say that the Earth will continue to warm even if there is no more CO2 in the air how can they validate their study since the Earth has actually cooled and more CO2 is in the air than at the time of their study……………
Fools. Fools working for grants saying the proper things to get another grant.

General P. Malaise
March 7, 2012 5:25 am

…still using false data and false assumptions. it is criminal.

1 2 3 7