Terrifying new book about climate change

A photograph of the snow surface at Dome C Sta...
Image via Wikipedia

Normally I don’t go for anonymous guest posters, but this one is from the famous “zombie” of zombietime.com whose identity remains hidden so that he/she may continue to record the anarchy and socially bereft behavior that permeates the McKibbenesque protestor culture of America. Zombie wrote to me yesterday asking that I bring attention to the post, and I’m happy to do so. The text is below, but please follow the link to the evidence (dozens of scanned pages) presented.

The Coming of the New Ice Age: End of the Global Warming Era?

Guest post by “Zombie”

I just finished reading a terrifying new book about climate change. I learned this:

• Climate change is happening faster than we realize and it will have catastrophic consequences for mankind.

• There’s very little we can do to stop it at this late stage, but we might be able to save ourselves if we immediately take these necessary and drastic steps:

– Increase our reliance on alternative energy sources and stop using so much oil and other carbon-based fuels;

– Adopt energy-efficient practices in all aspects of our lives, however inconvenient;

– Impose punitive taxes on inefficient or polluting activities to discourage them;

– Funnel large sums of money from developed nations like the U.S. to Third World nations;

– In general embrace all environmental causes.

You of course recognize these as the solutions most often recommended to ameliorate the looming crisis of Global Warming. But there’s a little glitch in my narrative. Because although the book I read was indeed about climate change, it wasn’t about Global Warming at all; it was instead about “The Coming of the New Ice Age,” and it isn’t exactly “new” — it was published in 1977.

The Solution Remains the Same

As many other pundits and analysts have pointed out, in the mid-to-late 1970s we endured a massive “climate change scare” that was the exact opposite of the one we’re enduring now. Back then, the media and activists trumpeted the arrival of a new ice age, with the specter of ice sheets and glaciers covering half the northern hemisphere, and brutal winters in the remaining ice-free zones.

The fact that the media and popular culture and academia have veered from one panic-inducing disaster scenario to another one which completely contradicts the first one is funny enough in its own right. But reading The Weather Conspiracy: The Coming of the New Ice Age opened my eyes to an even more significant aspect of this serial crisis-mongering:

The “solutions” prescribed to solve both Global Warming and the looming Ice Age are exactly the same.

In both cases, proponents of the theory-du-jour say that in order to stave off disaster, we must reverse the march of civilization, stop our profligate use of carbon-based fuels, cede power and money from the First World to the Third World, and wherever possible revert to a Luddite pre-industrial lifestyle.

I realized: The solution (commit civilizational suicide) always remains the same; all that differs are the wildly divergent purported “crises” proffered up to justify the imposition of the solution.

Seen from this angle, the entire Climate Change field should be more properly reframed thus:

In order to weaken and eventually destroy the existing industrialized nations, we must devise an ecological “crisis” so severe that only voluntary economic suicide can solve it; and if this first crisis doesn’t materialize as planned, then devise another, and another, even if they flatly contradict our previous claims.

I had long suspected that this is the most accurate characterization of Climate Changeology; but reading The New Ice Age clinched it for me. The true purpose of climate change disaster-mongering is to permanently cripple the First World, and to elevate the Third World, in order to create a planet with no economic inequality. The goal remains constant; the supposed imminent catastrophes justifying it come and go as needed.

Below, I’ll present scanned pages from the book so you can see for yourself.

The scenario we’re in reminds me of the classic Twilight Zone episode called “The Midnight Sun”: At first we see the characters sweltering in increasingly unbearable heat as the Earth, knocked out of its orbit, slowly plummets into the sun. Just as they are all about to burn to death, in typical Twilight Zone fashion, the lead character wakes up — she had in fact merely been having a fever dream about the world getting hotter; in reality, the Earth had been knocked away from the sun, and they’re all going to freeze to death. Ha ha — gotcha! Just as in the narratives spun by the climate change catastrophists, the Earth is doomed either way, even though the disaster scenario flips from one extreme to its exact opposite. Hot, cold, whatever; one way or the other, Mother Nature will wreak revenge on us for our hubris!

Ice Ages Are Making a Comeback

Turns out my choice of reading material (discovered recently at a rummage sale for 25¢, in case you’re curious) was fortuitous, as climate change — and ice ages — are suddenly back in the headlines this past week. And the news is not good for the crisis-mongers.

First we learned that the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide is actually helping us stave off the next inevitable ice age by a few years. Yes, you read that right: the “runaway global warming” scenario is now off the table; a new ice age is coming for sure, and whatever human warming effects there may be will only make our descent into the deep freeze a little more comfy.

Then, in a different breakthrough, leading scientists announced the discovery of a heretofore undetected type of molecule in the atmosphere which spurs cloud formation and negates global warming effects. Thanks to something called “Criegee biradicals,” the more we pollute, the more clouds form, and the cooler the planet becomes. Thus, the cumulative effect on the climate due to mankind’s activity: zilch. So for the second time in a week, the entire Anthropogenic Global Warming theory was fatally undermined.

But wait! We’re not done. Next up: A study out of Harvard proving that warming and cooling cycles are caused by orbital wobble and precession of the poles; and that the only reason the next ice age hasn’t arrived quite on schedule yet is due to our beneficial increase in carbon dioxide. Yes, that’s right: more data showing that another ice age is inevitable sooner or later.

A third nail in AGW’s coffin in less than a week? Why wasn’t this front page news?

But brace yourself — because those nails in the coffin were just the opening act. The next bit of news was the real blockbuster, a stake through AGW’s heart:

Now we learn that the world has not warmed at all for the last 15 years, and that the entire recent “global warming” hubbub was totally imaginary. Furthermore, the recent cooling is so significant that we may be headed for — you guessed it — a “mini ice age.”

Still not enough for you? The coup de grace came from our own USDA, which released a new “Plant Hardiness Zone Map” indicating that the mild global warming spike of a few years ago was actually good for plant growth and biodiversity. In other words: Even if we do experience warming, it makes the world a nicer place.

And that was just one week’s news. I wonder what next week will bring?

Now, you’d think that this devastating barrage of body blows would basically bring an end to the whole Global Warming “controversy.”

But no. Because, you see, true believers are nearly impervious to facts. In the midst of all this, the AGW activists and bullies continued their relentless quest to reshape the world’s economic landscape, as if they still had the upper hand. They even launched a witch hunt against “denier” weathermen, threatening to get any TV meteorologists fired unless they present global warming propaganda during their forecasts. Meanwhile, Al Gore continued on his decade-long tirade, declaring that “civilization is at risk” if the presidential candidates don’t cave into his demands immediately. And if you check the Web sites of any number of climate change nonprofits and organizations, they’re all still in hysterical crisis mode about the coming calamity. To them, you see, news stories like the ones we saw this week may come and go, but Global Warming is forever!

Something’s Gotta Give

“Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold,” as William Butler Yeats once wrote. This disconnect between reality and hysteria can’t last forever. As impervious as Global Warmists may be to facts, they’re highly sensitive to their social environment. Eventually, as the general public loses interest in humoring the hysterics, whose status is rapidly dropping from “cutting-edge hipsters” to “embarrassing kooks,” the Alarmists will go into a huddle and emerge with a new crisis scenario so horrifying and immediate that something must be done NOW! And that something, as we learned above, will be the exact same something prescribed to solve the previous crisis.

We already saw the first half of this transition just a short time ago. For years, the crisis peddlers threw all their weight behind the phrase “Global Warming” to describe the looming disaster. But in recent years as data crept in casting some doubt on their prognostications, the phrase “Global Warming” was inconspicuously discarded and replaced with the more flexible “Climate Change.” Voilà! No matter what the weather did, it could be chalked up to “climate change,” because hey, change could go either way, right?

Needless to say, however innocuous “climate change” may have sounded, the activists said Trust us, it’s way worse than mere “global warming,” so the drastic solutions we proposed earlier are still required.

But the ever-growing mountain of evidence pointing to an eventual (naturally occurring) ice age phase in the distant future may trigger yet another huddle among the climate change crowd. Perhaps after a suitable wait, banking on everyone’s short memory, they’ll re-emerge from the huddle this time dropping “Climate Change” for something ice-age themed, like “Accelerated Glaciation,” or perhaps “Man-Made Chill Factor.”

And you can guarantee that they’ll have a solution for this new crisis; and it will be the exact same solution they announced for climate change, and for global warming before that, and yes, for the looming ice age they worried about the previous time back in the ’70s: De-industrialize the First World, end civilization as we know it, and cede power to “the global south,” i.e. the Third World.

The Evidence

To prepare you for this eventuality, I hereby present scans from The Weather Conspiracy: The Coming of the New Ice Age, published in 1977 and written by “The Impact Team,” a coalition of authors from various fields.

Each scan below is taken from a page in The Weather Conspiracy: The Coming of the New Ice Age; click on any image to see the passage in context on the full page.

Under each passage I’ll make a few comments; but in general, the text speaks for itself.

Think of this as a warning from the past. Not a warning about looming ice ages, but rather a warning to ignore politically motivated disaster-mongers.

See the rest of the post and all the scanned pages here

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
116 Comments
clipe
February 3, 2012 3:08 pm

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/02/02/terrifying-new-book-about-climate-change/#comment-883084
“The Weather Conspiracy” could really retard the efforts of those who seek to persuade society to anticipate and then hedge against the possibility of future climate-induced catastrophe – a goal that seems common to me and the Impact Team”
http://www.climatedepot.com/a/3213/Dont-Miss-it-Climate-Depots-Factsheet-on-1970s-Coming-Ice-Age-Claims

February 3, 2012 3:14 pm

The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

Try reading the comments here with that couplet in mind.
REPLY: And at the same time, read the comments on “Stoat – taking science by the throat” too. – Anthony

clipe
February 3, 2012 3:48 pm

To a Mouse (William) Robert Burns.
Wee, sleekit, cowrin, tim’rous beastie,
O, what a panic’s in thy breastie!
Thou need na start awa sae hasty
Wi bickering brattle!
I wad be laith to rin an’ chase thee,
Wi’ murdering pattle.
I’m truly sorry man’s dominion
Has broken Nature’s social union,
An’ justifies that ill opinion
Which makes thee startle
At me, thy poor, earth born companion
An’ fellow mortal!
I doubt na, whyles, but thou may thieve;
What then? poor beastie, thou maun live!
A daimen icker in a thrave
‘S a sma’ request;
I’ll get a blessin wi’ the lave,
An’ never miss’t.
Thy wee-bit housie, too, in ruin!
It’s silly wa’s the win’s are strewin!
An’ naething, now, to big a new ane,
O’ foggage green!
An’ bleak December’s win’s ensuin,
Baith snell an’ keen!
Thou saw the fields laid bare an’ waste,
An’ weary winter comin fast,
An’ cozie here, beneath the blast,
Thou thought to dwell,
Till crash! the cruel coulter past
Out thro’ thy cell.
That wee bit heap o’ leaves an’ stibble,
Has cost thee monie a weary nibble!
Now thou’s turned out, for a’ thy trouble,
But house or hald,
To thole the winter’s sleety dribble,
An’ cranreuch cauld.
But Mousie, thou art no thy lane,
In proving foresight may be vain:
The best laid schemes o’ mice an’ men
Gang aft agley,
An’ lea’e us nought but grief an’ pain,
For promis’d joy!
Still thou are blest, compared wi’ me!
The present only toucheth thee:
But och! I backward cast my e’e,
On prospects drear!
An’ forward, tho’ I canna see,
I guess an’ fear!

kadaka (KD Knoebel)
February 3, 2012 8:38 pm

From William M. Connolley on February 3, 2012 at 3:14 pm:

The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

Try reading the comments here with that couplet in mind.

For me, I read about the passionate intensity of your Wikipedia editing and authoring to see the evidence of that couplet.

February 3, 2012 8:43 pm

Justa Joe says:
How so? and what’s the alternative?
Fossil fuels are a mug’s game because the supply is so easily manipulated irrespective of the demand, and the extraction of fuels at the current rate, and in the current and future places, is problematic at best.
As we decided we could have money in the absence of a gold standard (and I know that remains contentious), we should have multiple means of storing and transporting energy (which is what oil is in chemical form) in order to ensure our future energy security as individuals and societally.
Examples are many: Iceland’s geothermal plants make energy lemonade from the lemon of living on top of a volcano-ridden rift in the Earth’s crust. Perhaps those foreclosed Phoenix suburbs could be covered in solar-thermal plants. Tidal bores? I see underwater Niagara Falls times one hundred.
The key is the embracing of diversification. Not all “alternative energy” sources make economic or even environmental sense, but many do, much of the time. Burning oil is easy, and even if we come to learn that more carbon is keeping us from a fresh round of glaciations, fossil fuels are arguably finite, and provably destructive should we choose to extract them in increasingly difficult places, like the deep ocean or the Arctic seas.
So the way to game the game? Add more players.

DirkH
February 4, 2012 7:06 am

Alchemy says:
February 3, 2012 at 8:43 pm
“Fossil fuels are a mug’s game because the supply is so easily manipulated irrespective of the demand,”
“fossil fuels are arguably finite, and provably destructive should we choose to extract them in increasingly difficult places”
Coal is a fossil fuel. Known reserves last for hundreds of years. All the other energy players want to abolish coal because it’s so cheap it’s wrecking their profits. It’s not difficult to extract. We don’t get it from politically instable regions.

DirkH
February 4, 2012 7:12 am

William M. Connolley says:
February 3, 2012 at 3:14 pm
“The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.”
Well, we know that you think of your point of view as being the NPOV.

kenji
February 4, 2012 12:27 pm

Zombie … first let me say that you are my hero ! Your documentary photography of the sad, pathetic, underbelly of leftist movements are eloquent. So sad that the media sanitizes these movements, making them acceptable for family viewing.
Your characterization of the AGW movement as a call for the mass suicide of civilization is spot-on. This fanaticism reminds me of Jim Jones and the Peoples Temple (a group embraced by leftist politicians). Al Gore, M.Mann, et.al. remind me of Jim Jones … a self-ordained preacher of doom, gloom, and paranoia. The end result of AGW’s assault on society is indeed mass suicide, by kool aid. The kool aid of Junk Science.

kadaka (KD Knoebel)
February 4, 2012 2:43 pm

kenji says:
February 4, 2012 at 12:27 pm

Ye Gods! First Kenji Watts joined the Union of Concerned Scientists, and now he’s posting on Anthony’s blog!
Hey Anthony, aren’t you proud of your kid? Heck, most of us didn’t think he could even find the internet! 😉

jonathan frodsham
February 5, 2012 8:08 am

William Abbott: My son brought home the book, LIMITS TO GROWTH, from a library sale.
JF: That book sold 10,000,000 copies, I wonder where the other 9,999,999 went? In the bin?
Truthseeker: Isn’t scanning pages from the book and posting them on a web page a breach of copyright?
JF:I guess the publisher could try and sue Zombie. But why bother, too hard.

jonathan frodsham
February 5, 2012 8:36 am

Al Gore says “I think that those people are in such a tiny, tiny minority now with their point of view, they’re almost like the ones who still believe that the moon landing was staged in a movie lot in Arizona and those who believe the world is flat. That demeans them a little bit, but it’s not that far off.

February 5, 2012 3:34 pm

Interesting to know the furnace was also heated seven times more- Read the Scripture Daniel 3:19, and Isaiah 30:26 shares the light of the sun shall be sevenfold.
Isaiah 30:26
(Moreover the light of the moon shall be as the light of the sun)
(and the light of the sun shall be sevenfold)
(as the light of seven days, in the day that the LORD bindeth up the breach of his people, and healeth the stroke of their wound)
Read More: The End Of The World
http://www.raptureprophecy.net/the-end-of-the-world

Gail Combs
February 7, 2012 3:36 am

J Fischer February 2, 2012 at 4:31 pm
says:
“Ah good, so we once again confirm that your oft-proclaimed dislike of people not sharing their full name with everyone here extends only to those who you disagree with.
And please – the myth of a “global cooling scare” has long since been comprehensively debunked….”

Nice try but neither snipes work. Many of us are old enough to have heard the global cooling scare with our own ears.
Anthony gives his reasons and acknowledges the author instead of just stealing the idea and writing an article that parallels this one.

Pooh, Dixie
February 9, 2012 12:46 pm

Zombie wrote: “the Alarmists will go into a huddle and emerge with a new crisis scenario so horrifying and immediate that something must be done NOW!”
Andrew30 spotted “new crisis scenario”: “Sustainability requires the taxation of carbon dioxide, and sending money to large landowners, bankers and third world dictators.”
Ehrlich, P.R., and A.H. Ehrlich. “The Population Bomb Revisited.” The Electronic Journal of Sustainable Development 1, no. 3 (2009): 63–71. http://www.ejsd.org/docs/The_Population_Bomb_Revisited.pdf
Page 68: “On the population side, it is clear that avoiding collapse would be a lot easier if humanity could entrain a gradual population decline toward an optimal number. Our group’s analysis of what that optimum population size might be like comes up with 1.5 to 2 billion, less than one third of what it is today. We attempted to find a number that would maximize human options – enough people to have large, exciting cities and still maintain substantial tracts of wilderness for the enjoyment of outdoors enthusiasts and hermits (Daily et al. 1994). Even more important would be the ability to maintain sustainable agricultural systems and the crucial life support services from natural ecosystems that humanity is so dependent upon. But too many people, especially those in positions of power, remain blissfully unaware of that dependence.”

Pooh, Dixie
February 9, 2012 12:53 pm

As you see above, the idea is not new. However, politicians of a certain stripe have begun to push “sustainable” as a policy goal. Czar Holdren is associated with Ehrlich.
In the long run (see Keynes), nothing is forever sustainable. Not the earth, nor the sun itself, give or take five billion years.

1 3 4 5