New paper speculates on volcanoes during the Little Ice Age

From NCAR/UCAR, they’re still trying to stamp out solar influence as a potential cause of the Little Ice Age. One of the things I wonder about is that during low sunspot activity, does the reduced solar-magnetic influence have any effect on Earth’s plate tectoncs and vulcanism? Does a reduced solar-magnetic influence prompt more volcanism? We may get the answer to this question in the coming years as the Ap solar-geomagnetic activity index is at an all-time low in the records.

image

Study may answer longstanding questions about Little Ice Age

January 30, 2012

BOULDER — A new international study may answer contentious questions about the onset and persistence of Earth’s Little Ice Age, a period of widespread cooling that lasted for hundreds of years until the late 19th century.

gifford miller
Gifford Miller collects vegetation samples on Baffin Island. (Photo courtesy University of Colorado Boulder.)

The study, led by the University of Colorado Boulder with co-authors at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and other organizations, suggests that an unusual, 50-year-long episode of four massive tropical volcanic eruptions triggered the Little Ice Age between 1275 and 1300 A.D. The persistence of cold summers following the eruptions is best explained by a subsequent expansion of sea ice and a related weakening of Atlantic currents, according to computer simulations conducted for the study.

The study, which used analyses of patterns of dead vegetation, ice and sediment core data, and powerful computer climate models, provides new evidence in a longstanding scientific debate over the onset of the Little Ice Age. Scientists have theorized that the Little Ice Age was caused by decreased summer solar radiation, erupting volcanoes that cooled the planet by ejecting sulfates and other aerosol particles that reflected sunlight back into space, or a combination of the two.

“This is the first time anyone has clearly identified the specific onset of the cold times marking the start of the Little Ice Age,” says lead author Gifford Miller of the University of Colorado Boulder. “We also have provided an understandable climate feedback system that explains how this cold period could be sustained for a long period of time. If the climate system is hit again and again by cold conditions over a relatively short period—in this case, from volcanic eruptions—there appears to be a cumulative cooling effect.”

“Our simulations showed that the volcanic eruptions may have had a profound cooling effect,” says NCAR scientist Bette Otto-Bliesner, a co-author of the study. “The eruptions could have triggered a chain reaction, affecting sea ice and ocean currents in a way that lowered temperatures for centuries.”

The study appears this week in Geophysical Research Letters. The research team includes co-authors from the University of Iceland, the University of California Irvine, and the University of Edinburgh in Scotland. The study was funded in part by the National Science Foundation, NCAR’s sponsor, and the Icelandic Science Foundation.

Far-flung regions of ice

Scientific estimates regarding the onset of the Little Ice Age range from the 13th century to the 16th century, but there is little consensus, Miller says. Although the cooling temperatures may have affected places as far away as South America and China, they were particularly evident in northern Europe. Advancing glaciers in mountain valleys destroyed towns, and paintings from the period depict people ice-skating on the Thames River in London and canals in the Netherlands, places that were ice-free before and after the Little Ice Age.

“The dominant way scientists have defined the Little Ice Age is by the expansion of big valley glaciers in the Alps and in Norway,” says Miller, a fellow at CU’s Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research. “But the time in which European glaciers advanced far enough to demolish villages would have been long after the onset of the cold period.”

Miller and his colleagues radiocarbon-dated roughly 150 samples of dead plant material with roots intact, collected from beneath receding margins of ice caps on Baffin Island in the Canadian Arctic. They found a large cluster of “kill dates” between 1275 and 1300 A.D., indicating the plants had been frozen and engulfed by ice during a relatively sudden event.

The team saw a second spike in plant kill dates at about 1450 A.D., indicating the quick onset of a second major cooling event.

To broaden the study, the researchers analyzed sediment cores from a glacial lake linked to the 367-square-mile Langjökull ice cap in the central highlands of Iceland that reaches nearly a mile high. The annual layers in the cores—which can be reliably dated by using tephra deposits from known historic volcanic eruptions on Iceland going back more than 1,000 years—suddenly became thicker in the late 13th century and again in the 15th century due to increased erosion caused by the expansion of the ice cap as the climate cooled.

“That showed us the signal we got from Baffin Island was not just a local signal, it was a North Atlantic signal,” Miller says. “This gave us a great deal more confidence that there was a major perturbation to the Northern Hemisphere climate near the end of the 13th century.”

The team used the Community Climate System Model, which was developed by scientists at NCAR and the Department of Energy with colleagues at other organizations, to test the effects of volcanic cooling on Arctic sea ice extent and mass. The model, which simulated various sea ice conditions from about 1150 to 1700 A.D., showed several large, closely spaced eruptions could have cooled the Northern Hemisphere enough to trigger the expansion of Arctic sea ice.

The model showed that sustained cooling from volcanoes would have sent some of the expanding Arctic sea ice down along the eastern coast of Greenland until it eventually melted in the North Atlantic. Since sea ice contains almost no salt, when it melted the surface water became less dense, preventing it from mixing with deeper North Atlantic water. This weakened heat transport back to the Arctic and created a self-sustaining feedback on the sea ice long after the effects of the volcanic aerosols subsided, according to the simulations.

The researchers set solar radiation at a constant level in the climate models. The simulations indicated that the Little Ice Age likely would have occurred without decreased summer solar radiation at the time, Miller says.

About the article

Title: Abrupt onset of the Little Ice Age triggered by volcanism and sustained by sea-ice/ocean feedbacks

Authors: Gifford Miller, Áslaug Geirsdóttir, Yafang Zhong, Darren J. Larsen, Bette L. Otto-Bliesner, Marika M. Holland, David A. Bailey, Kurt A. Refsnider, Scott J. Lehman, John R. Southon, Chance Anderson, Helgi Bjornsson, Thorvaldur Thordarson,

Publication: Geophysical Research Letters

=============================================================

Here’s the paper abstract, the actual paper is not yet available (another science by press release that we can’t check).

http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/pip/2011GL050168.shtml

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, doi:10.1029/2011GL050168

Abrupt onset of the Little Ice Age triggered by volcanism and sustained by sea-ice/ocean feedbacks

Key Points

  • Little Ice Age began abruptly in two steps
  • Decadally paced explosive volcanism can explain the onset
  • A sea-ice/ocean feedback can sustain the abrupt cooling

Authors:

Gifford H Miller

Aslaug Geirsdottir

Yafang Zhong

Darren J Larsen

Bette L Otto-Bliesner

Marika M Holland

David Anthony Bailey

Kurt A. Refsnider

Scott J. Lehman

John R. Southon

Chance Anderson

Helgi Björnsson

Thorvaldur Thordarson

Northern Hemisphere summer temperatures over the past 8000 years have been paced by the slow decrease in summer insolation resulting from the precession of the equinoxes. However, the causes of superposed century-scale cold summer anomalies, of which the Little Ice Age (LIA) is the most extreme, remain debated, largely because the natural forcings are either weak or, in the case of volcanism, short lived. Here we present precisely dated records of ice-cap growth from Arctic Canada and Iceland showing that LIA summer cold and ice growth began abruptly between 1275 and 1300 AD, followed by a substantial intensification 1430-1455 AD. Intervals of sudden ice growth coincide with two of the most volcanically perturbed half centuries of the past millennium. A transient climate model simulation shows that explosive volcanism produces abrupt summer cooling at these times, and that cold summers can be maintained by sea-ice/ocean feedbacks long after volcanic aerosols are removed. Our results suggest that the onset of the LIA can be linked to an unusual 50-year-long episode with four large sulfur-rich explosive eruptions, each with global sulfate loading >60 Tg. The persistence of cold summers is best explained by consequent sea-ice/ocean feedbacks during a hemispheric summer insolation minimum; large changes in solar irradiance are not required.

Received 29 November 2011; accepted 30 December 2011.

Citation: Miller, G. H., et al. (2012), Abrupt onset of the Little Ice Age triggered by volcanism and sustained by sea-ice/ocean feedbacks, Geophys. Res. Lett., doi:10.1029/2011GL050168, in press.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
287 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Trey
January 30, 2012 11:58 am

“powerful climate models” did not these show no little ice age at all before ? (see hockey stick)

Mike Bromley the Canucklehead
January 30, 2012 12:00 pm

I guess the Hockey Stick just took a beating….sort of. Had to be something other than the sun alone!

January 30, 2012 12:03 pm

I have read a book near 40 years ago about the influence of the solar cycle and earth’s climate. That included a link between the solar cycle and the number of earthquackes and volcanic eruptions, which seem to cluster in the rising edge of the solar cycle. I haven’t done the math, but it is worth to see if there is some correlation and a possible link via the earth’s and sun’s magnetic field interactions and continental shelves floating atop of a magnetic earth kernel…

January 30, 2012 12:04 pm

One of the things I wonder about is that during low sunspot activity, does the reduced solar-magnetic influence have any effect on Earth’s plate tectoncs and vulcanism? Does a reduced solar-magnetic influence prompt more volcanism?
An interesting question. From an energy point of view, it doesn’t seem likely — I’ve estimated the power associated with magnetic induction and although it is a very large number, it is a very small number compared to the size the Earth. Of course, I could have made a mistake in my arithmetic, but I wouldn’t think that the forces are large compared to, say, tidal forces.
rgb

David A. Evans
January 30, 2012 12:11 pm

Even if there is no Solar influence, this is a sort of scientific game over!
If the LIA was caused by volcanoes, that’s an admission that it was warmer before and since the LIA, we’ve had a relatively quiet period as regards volcanoes.
Who needs CO2 if it’s reduced volcanic activity that caused the warming?
DaveE.

January 30, 2012 12:11 pm

“One of the things I wonder about is that during low sunspot activity, does the reduced solar-magnetic influence have any effect on Earth’s plate tectoncs and vulcanism? Does a reduced solar-magnetic influence prompt more volcanism?”
I’ve wondered the same thing but have never voiced the question to anyone. On the surface it seems implausible, but stranger things have been correlated before. GCRs inducing cloud formation, anyone???

Babsy
January 30, 2012 12:12 pm

Don’t you get a little giddy when you read the words “powerful computer climate models”? I know I sure do! I wonder if they discuss amongst themselves how much RAM is necessary to show the true beauty that can only be CO2? Bawhahaha!

January 30, 2012 12:15 pm

Volcanoes in the sub-arctic regions (particularly frequent Kamchatka peninsula eruptions) may be causes of the effect known as the ‘sudden stratospheric warming’ SSW. The SSW is usually Arctic winter occurrence event; it is thought that influences severity of the Northern Hemisphere winters. For more details and a review of the SSW cases from 2005 to 2010 see:
http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/56/34/77/PDF/SSW.pdf

NucEngineer
January 30, 2012 12:16 pm

I thought the Little Ice Age either did not not exist or was localized to northern Europe. Just ask Michael Mann and his famous Hockey Stick (a study of tree rings in one very very small region of Northwest Siberia). His trees didn’t find this cooling.

Alan Watt
January 30, 2012 12:18 pm

They assert:

Intervals of sudden ice growth coincide with two of the most volcanically perturbed half centuries of the past millennium.

but do not provide supporting details. Have these two periods been recognized as having significantly greater volcanic eruptions than any other comparable periods?
Let me guess: models all the way down?

carol
January 30, 2012 12:22 pm

In the Clube and Napier astronomical theory (1980s and 1990s) the Little Ice Age had an association with increased meteoric activity as that was hypothesized to cause large amounts of dust in the upper atmosphere and create an opaque sky – virtually the same kind of thing as suggested by increased volcanic activity. In the same theory meteoric activity was responsible for the downturn in climate in the Late Roman period, 4th, 5th and 6th centuries ad roughly, and the 9th century ad short spell cold/wet weather episodes (coinciding with the Vikings, spurred on by an excited sky) and so back into history. This sort of thing became lost in the hypothetical 1500 year Bond cycle that never quite seems to fit into a 1500 year series. Clube and Napier were popular for awhile and wrote a couple of books and countless articles that all just kind of disappeared. They were never on the radar in the US.

AleaJactaEst
January 30, 2012 12:24 pm

models…..
if only they were Bunny Girls.
Similar IQs anyway.

Jim
January 30, 2012 12:25 pm

Would heavy volcanic emissions mask sunspots, resulting in low sunspot numbers?

January 30, 2012 12:28 pm

This just goes to show that generally climatologists just don’t know enough even to start to pronounce on what drives climate change, even with all their “most powerful computer programmes”.

Yarmy
January 30, 2012 12:30 pm

Wasn’t Gifford Miller in that Ice Age “documentary” with Mr Spock in the 1970s warning of the impending march of the ice sheets

Jit
January 30, 2012 12:36 pm

I think I can explain the MWP with this theory too. Inverse volcanoes. They sucked aerosols in rather than emitting them for the LIA.
Thus, the global temperature prior to the carbon era was flat, and the handle of the hockey stick was crooked no more.

J Cuttance
January 30, 2012 12:36 pm

Some ‘alarmist’ bells started ringing when I read “there appears to be a cumulative cooling effect”.
All that needs is a reference to the Truth…

Camburn
January 30, 2012 12:39 pm

This paper would somewhat confirm what Dr. Svalgaard has found. TSI, even during minimums, is bascially flat. This also demonstrates that the earth recovers from a long period of cooling. It took centuries, after it was so cold, to warm to equalibrium again.
For our clmate to work effectively, it requires the Arctic to be virtually ice free in the summers.
It is well documented that the Arctic warmed enough approx 6,000YBP to be ice free in the summer. This lasted for approx 3500 years, and then it cooled, prob from volcanic erruptions.
The resolution of past temp proxies is not good enough to rule out that we may be as warm as the MWP now. The current period of warmth is well within the error bounds of the proxy reconstructions.
The good thing in all of this is…..we seem to be finally getting back to what would be considered a “average” temperature of the Holocene.

stricq
January 30, 2012 12:40 pm

Are these the eruptions being referenced?
Billy Mitchell Bougainville & Solomon Is. 6 1580
Bardarbunga Iceland 6 1477
1452-53 ice core event New Hebrides Arc 6 1452-53
Quilotoa Andes, Northern Volcanic Zone 6 1280

Manfred
January 30, 2012 12:52 pm

Amazing what inconsistencies these guys shoulder just to avoid the solar influence.
There is no little ice age in most Hockey Stick graphs
http://wotsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/ipcc_ar341.jpg

Yarmy
January 30, 2012 12:53 pm

I’m fine with the idea that increased Volcanism could have caused such events, but is there any direct physical evidence for these eruptions? It’s not clear from the press release.

pat
January 30, 2012 12:53 pm

Since the little Ice Age interrupts the Medieval Warm Period, are we all clear now that the optimum temperature is a lot warmer?

bacullen
January 30, 2012 12:53 pm

I guess all that dust made the sunspots invisible. sarc off/

More Soylent Green!
January 30, 2012 12:54 pm

oldseadog says:
January 30, 2012 at 12:28 pm
This just goes to show that generally climatologists just don’t know enough even to start to pronounce on what drives climate change, even with all their “most powerful computer programmes”.

Does anybody know why climate models show increased CO2 causes CAGW? Because that’s how the models were programmed!
Climate models are computer programs and merely do what they are programmed to do. At best, computer models illustrate an hypothesis. The models work they way they do because that’s how the models believe the climate works.

ZZZ
January 30, 2012 12:57 pm

Skeptics have pointed out how the climate models originally used to promote global warming were designed — with no real evidence behind it — to be unstable to slight warming due to increases of atmospheric CO2 (water vapor was supposed to increase and amplify the CO2 warming). Now, to explain the LIA, they have set up a climate model that is unstable in the cold direction to several closely-spaced volcanic eruptions. The take away fact, then, is
The greatly reduced numbers of sunspots during the LIA were just a coincidence. We can make our climate models unstable to slight cooling to show this must be so!
This not really very persuasive.

1 2 3 12