World Bank, Global Warming, Journals, and CRU

G. Karst says:
November 25, 2011 at 6:53 am
Why Eucalyptus? Surely not because of 20′ annual growth. Hell, our own cottonwoods come close enough to that. They work for paper – don’t they? There must be some overriding advantage to selecting an alien invasive species and the significant environmental risk to their introduction. GK
_______________________________
Eucalyptus produces an oil that “mists” the ground and keeps other seeds from sprouting. The oil also makes it so nasty tasting even a goat will not eat it. Therefore I think it is equivalent to “salting the earth” If people can OWN land and grow food that they can trade for what they need, barter if need be and they are free. Destruction/control of the food supply has been used in war for centuries. It was what Stalin did in 1932 – 33 to break the Ukrainians. It was what the USA did to break the American Indians ~ Literally wiped out the buffalo that was their food supply.
Heck the original 2009 food safety bill in the USA had a clause that would allow the FDA regulatory power over home gardens. It will only take ONE sentence added to another bill to slip that provision back into the law. http://www.examiner.com/scotus-in-washington-dc/trojan-horse-law-the-food-safety-modernization-act-of-2009
What many do not know is that it is also what was done to the USA during after WWII to bring us to heel by destroying our farming and towns and our culture. SEE: http://www.opednews.com/articles/History-HACCP-and-the-Foo-by-Nicole-Johnson-090906-229.html
This is whole mess is not something that sprung up all of a sudden. The fight for freedom has been ongoing because there has always been a group who want power and control. Often they are the same families over decades and even centuries. These people have found it is far far safer and more lucrative to sit back and FUND the princes and presidents and wars (often both sides) that to be the leaders on the firing line.
“…the international bankers was the PRIME reason for the Revolutionary War.” ~
Benjamin Franklin in his Autobiography
Fiat Money History in the US: http://kwaves.com/fiat.htm
UK & USA Central Banks: http://www.eidolonspeak.com/?p=246
An interesting side note: International Economic Club of China (Note Al Gore, Maurice Strong etc as speakers) http://www.chinaecoclub.org/home.asp
More on what Franklin had to say about bankers:

History of Money
…During a visit to Britain in 1763, The Bank of England asked Benjamin Franklin how he would account for the new found prosperity in the colonies. Franklin replied.
“That is simple. In the colonies we issue our own money. It is called Colonial Script. We issue it in proper proportion to the demands of trade and industry to make the products pass easily from the producers to the consumers.
In this manner, creating for ourselves our own paper money, we control its purchasing power, and we have no interest to pay to no one.”
In Response the world’s most powerful independent bank used its influence on the British parliament to press for the passing of the Currency Act of 1764.
This act made it illegal for the colonies to print their own money, and forced them to pay all future taxes to Britain in silver or gold.
Here is what Franklin said after that.
“In one year, the conditions were so reversed that the era of prosperity ended, and a depression set in, to such an extent that the streets of the Colonies were filled with unemployed.”
Benjamin Franklin
“The colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been that England took away from the colonies their money, which created unemployment and dissatisfaction. The inability of the colonists to get power to issue their own money permanently out of the hands of George III and the international bankers was the PRIME reason for the Revolutionary War.”
Benjamin Franklin’s autobiography
http://www.xat.org/xat/moneyhistory.html

The bankers have been taking back control ever since.

Looky here. The nice people at the World Bank are trying to help the little people “visualize” what they need to be saved from. And that nice man at the BBC is helping too!
16:39 UK time, Wednesday, 23 November 2011
@BBCRBlack via Twitter
Visualising climate change with the World Bank’s new online tool http://t.co/xeZtuqqZ
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/correspondents/richardblack/

Thank you Gail. This caused me to revisit a summary I found a long time ago.
http://heartland.org/press-releases/2009/03/08/climate-alarm-what-we-are-against-and-what-do

also archived:
…..four groups representing more than 190 investors with more than US $13 trillion of assets – Investor Network on Climate Risk (INCR), Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC), Investor Group on Climate Change (IGCC) and the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI). http://www.unepfi.org/signatories/index.html
At Durban, according to the above link, they intend to promote three ideas:
• Designing a Green Climate Fund which is effective in unlocking private investment for low-carbon and climate-resilient growth in developing countries
• Mobilising the risk management skills of the insurance industry to address loss and damage from the impacts of climate change
• Building an effective global funding mechanism for forest-based climate change mitigation

For example, on Wed, Nov 18, 2009, Coke Submit wrote in response to my email criticizing their motives:
:
Thank you for your recent email message,
At The Coca-Cola Company, we recognize that the implications of climate change are profound and wide-ranging, with expected impacts on biodiversity, water resources, public health, business and agriculture. We believe business can play a powerful role in helping drive climate solutions through innovation and competition, as well as by taking measures to reduce our own carbon footprint.
We are committed to working alongside government and civil society to address the root causes of climate change, and one way we have demonstrated that commitment is through our endorsement of the Copenhagen Communiqué.
We are among more than 500 companies in more than 60 countries that have endorsed the Copenhagen Communiqué, which calls on world leaders to agree to “an ambitious, robust and equitable global deal on climate change that responds credibly to the scale and urgency of the crisis facing the world today.” The signatories to the Communiqué agree that business will suffer if credible solutions are not found.
For our part, the Coca-Cola system continually works to reduce our carbon footprint by implementing new technologies and conservation measures for our refrigeration equipment, our packaging, our fleet and our bottling operations. For more information on these efforts, please visit the Environment section of our corporate web site.
If you have additional questions or comments to share, please feel free to contact us again.
Sheila
Industry and Consumer Affairs
The Coca-Cola Company

file=0744
“Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 16:17:21 +000 ???
To: Mike Hulme
From: Nicola Sheard
Subject: Fwd: Climate Change Adaptation Fund
From: “michael see”
To:
Cc: ,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
Subject: Climate Change Adaptation Fund
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 18:05:05 -0000
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
27 November 2000
Dear All
Proposal for a Climate Change Adaptation Fund to assist countries vulnerable to effects
of climate change/global warming – in the presence or absence of Kyoto Protocol
ratification
/ Communication 2
Copies: Dr Klaus Tofper, Mrs Jacqueline Aloisi de Larderel (UNEP); Michael Z. Cutajar
(UNFCCC)
Dear All,
I have met Henderson Investors this afternoon to discuss the proposal.
Summary of the meeting with Henderson –
1) Henderson expressed an interest in the proposal
2) It is thought that governments would be the prime donors or investors in the fund,
rest would be
large corporates
3) Assuming a 70/30 or 60/40 humanitarian aid to investment-driven portfolio, the
investment
proportion could focus on actual projects or equity investments in quoted companies
4) The next step would be for CARE Denmark to put forward a proposal to Henderson on how
CARE and Henderson could work together – and other parties – this could culminate in
an
application to UNFCCC Bonn for observer status certification of CARE to participate
in the
negotiating sessions of UNFCCC – i.e. adaptation fund proposition.
_________________
My second report is as follows:
Proposed format of application by CARE International (Denmark) to UNFCCC –
Application for observer status accreditation as a Non-Governmental Organisation in
UNFCCC negotiating sessions (a standard form may have to be completed)
CDM refers to Clean Development Mechanism (art. 12), ET Emissions Trading (art. 17), JI
Joint Implementation (art. 6)
CARE operates in 64 developing and underdeveloped countries – its OECD member countries
are
Australia, Austria, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Japan, Norway, UK and USA. The
Secretariat is based in Brussels.
– strategic locations
22 Least Developed Countries – Asia, Middle East, C&E Europe, South America, Haiti
– 44 projects in Africa; 25 projects in Asia; 19 projects Middle East, C&E Europe, 1999
– very strong international reputation and working relationship with developing country
governments
– capable of influencing both “North” and “South” governments on the concept of a
global climate
change adaptation fund – irrespective of Kyoto Protocol – i.e. if mandatory
contributions from
KP’s flexible mechanisms not forthcoming, voluntary donations could finance fund –
many blue
chip companies could contribute to market their global citizen image
– CARE Denmark is to employ two personnel in December – part of their remit is to look
at the
impact of climate change in developing countries
– CARE International’s global presence enables supply of real-time information on the
impacts of
climate change in LDCs and developing countries
(a) to construct a vulnerability index – humanitarian and
social-economic-linked – which
can be combined with weather effects data from the Tyndall Centre
(b) act as processing centre for the deployment of humanitarian aid once
a major
climatic disaster is reported – the needs basis may have to be
jointly approved
by the UN/UNFCCC/UNEP. ”
A bankers wet dream.

kate65 says:
November 25, 2011 at 2:53 pm
This letter helps explain and should be a centerpost of any political movement to slow the AGW movement. http://myslu.stlawu.edu/~shorwitz/open_letter.htm
__________________________
Thanks for the link. As I said my anger toward the bankers is not some idiotic “Conspiracy Theroy” but a matter of following the threads.
Steven Horwitz got part of it but not all of it.
During the Clinton Admin. five banking laws were passed that tore down the protections set up after the Great Depression to prevent a second depression. These laws set-up the mess that link talks about.
However the real killer, the key to the mess that Steven Horwitz missed, Matt Taibbi picked up on. That is the CDSs that were left unregulated that allowed banks to “Insure” dicey mortgages for very little money down with AIG. The US government bailed out AIG so they could pay their “Gambling debt” when they started to go belly up after too many foreclosures because they did not charge enough $$$ to cover their side of the Credit Default Swap (CDS) gamble.
On top of that Obama got into the act with his phony “Loan Modification Program” People who were NOT in foreclosure but were having to struggle to pay their mortgages were enticed into the program. The government b-rat set up a modification plan with lower payments. After the bank lost the paper work several times thereby stalling for about a year, the bank would decide if there was one or more CDSs on the mortgage. If there was the bank sent the “mark” a letter saying they did not “qualify” for the program and now the mark owed all the amounts not paid, interest, penalties AND LAWYERS FEES, if the amount due was not paid within thirty days they would foreclose.
The Amount due was usually over $10,000. If the “mark” managed to beg, borrow or steal enough to cover the amount, the bank started the second dance. The bank would state they could not give the exact amount owed because they did not have a firm figure for the “Lawyer Fees” As the time closes in on the thirty day foreclosure date, the mark then has to hire a lawyer to get the [self-snip] bank to come up with the amount owed.
To add insult to injury all the money “loaned” by these banks was created on the spot out of “Pixie Dust” by an accounting entry!!! http://www.marketskeptics.com/2009/03/us-banks-operate-without-reserve.html
Meanwhile the Media [owned by JP Morgan] is lamenting that not enough people are “taking advantage” of the Loan modification program…. GRRRrrrr
References:
Quick index of banking laws: http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/important/index.html
Matt T. Articles:
http://www.democracynow.org/2009/3/25/aig_and_the_big_takeover_matt
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/03/22-6
Nitty gritty:
http://www.realtytrac.com/content/news-and-opinion/how-the-aig-bailout-could-be-driving-more-foreclosures-4861
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/meet-foreclosure-experts-hair-stylists-walmart-floor-workers-and-assembly-lines-workers-all-
J P Morgan and the Media: http://www.newsandtech.com/dougs_page/article_f3a45be0-4717-11df-aace-001cc4c03286.html

When you look at who runs the World Wildlife Fund you see big corporations and banks (GE, Goldman Sachs, Cargill, etc., etc.) and when you look at some of the things the WWF does – i.e. collaborating with Monsanto to greenwash the company – you’re left with one conclusion: the WWF is a public relations firm created by and for rich corporations. They hide behind the WWF to make themselves look politically correct and very green and they’ve been pushing the climate change scare for years.
Is there a connection between the corporate greens at WWF and the World Bank? If someone can connect the dots for me I’d appreciate it, I lack the time to do the research.
I don’t follow the climate circus on a daily basis like WUWT readers so sometimes what I read here goes over my head. Is there a good ‘climate change fraud for dummies’ article that I can print and read in the bus? I know there are a couple of books but I’d prefer a shorter version.

This whole thing is incredible. I loved the Solar threads here with Leif. Now i’ve got a new favourite: Cash threads with Gail. Agent FOIA gambled a great risk—he/she waited for this anniversary to release the next tranche of emails assumnig he’d be alive to do so. I wouldn’t put it past this conglomeration- deluded into thinking no one should stand in the way of them saving the planet- into investigating FOIA and perhaps ‘intervening’. The access to the emails points to a inside job. We know it was dumped into a Russian server. The few who are the web gate keepers should be able trace the time and location of the uploads. What is incredible is the feat was repeated. The leaks derailed the Copenhagen meeting Sark, Merk, Brown and O’bama. The combined secret service power of these nations seems unable to ‘deal with’ FOIA. A clue to his/her identity. Who ever it is needs to make provision for the password release incase of a visit from the heavies. The Climate Science perversion is total. Why would ‘Russia’ want to derail the AGW steam roll. Who………………..without the protection of state, would wait a year and repeat the release of these damaging emails.

Thanks Gail for the time and effort you have put in that shows up the scoundrels and fraudsters.
Speaking of “scoundrels and fraudsters” SPREAD THIS SO IT BECOMES VIRAL
History of Money: The Money Masters 1/2

“SPREAD THIS SO IT BECOMES VIRAL”
Shouldn’t that be ANTIDOTAL?

Gail: Did you watch those links to Youtubes?? What do you think of them?? I know very little of economics. I foud the quotes rather alarming. Is the ideas in them fringe?