Climategate 2.0 the sequel – they're baaaack

Josh just couldn’t keep his brush away from this one…

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

33 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Editor
November 23, 2011 1:20 am

TinyCO2, v funny!

Urederra
November 23, 2011 1:46 am

R. Shearer says:
November 22, 2011 at 5:57 pm
I always thought cause preceded effect. Now I undertand, the cause is the effect.

In Postmodern Science The Effect (Climategate 1.0) precedes The Cause (Climategate 2.0)
It is the re-birth of “In mother Russia” jokes.

November 23, 2011 1:48 am

Hint; how to fix the models
http://xkcd.com/941/

Gabby
November 23, 2011 3:31 am

#1914 “- I agree with Phil on the solar crowd – basically I think most of them act like nuts -” ….
“It is virtually a waste of time talking to most of them…………..
And I am someone who thinks longterm solar variability influences climate!
Tom”
Where to start with this one……

Editor
November 23, 2011 6:57 am

Like, most sequels, Climategate 2.0 isn’t as good as the original. That made major rents in the veil of secrecy around the team and provided confirmation of things suspected. The sequel looks like it will only be providing a few more peaks at several topics. Worthwhile enough, and certainly worth a bag or two of popcorn.

Bob Diaz
November 24, 2011 11:35 am

Josh, Thanks for the laugh and have a Happy Thanksgiving!!!!

Steve T
November 25, 2011 6:58 am

chuck nolan says:
November 22, 2011 at 4:08 pm
Interstellar Bill says:
November 22, 2011 at 2:44 pm
They needn’t worry about their precious AGW funding.
First of all, too many people have invested their authority & prestige in AGW
to ever admit that there wont’ be any future disaster.
Second, DOD-starvation
and the slow-motion cancellation of our space program
will leave plenty of dollars for rent-seeking catastrophists
to suck up unnoticed in the current fight over trillions.
—————–
Trouble is we’re borrowing 43 cents out of every dollar to provide for these scientists.
###################################################################
We are actually borrowing the 43 cents from our children, but what’s the problem. Our grandchildren and great grandchildren can pay them back….. /sarc off….. sorry, no, that’s probably true
This is the true problem with spending billions on something that doesn’t warrant it.
steve T

A Virtual Computer Scientist
November 26, 2011 10:33 pm

If we want a movie…. how about Phil Jones playing the part of Paul Newman in Cool Hand Luke. Muir could play the Captain.
Whack….
What we’ve got here….. is… failure to communicate (all the FOIA emails)

Verified by MonsterInsights