PUNTA ARENAS, CHILE – After discovering an emerging crack that cuts across the floating ice shelf of Pine Island Glacier in Antarctica, NASA’s Operation IceBridge has flown a follow-up mission and made the first-ever detailed airborne measurements of a major iceberg calving in progress.
NASA’s Operation Ice Bridge, the largest airborne survey of Earth’s polar ice ever flown, is in the midst of its third field campaign from Punta Arenas, Chile. The six-year mission will yield an unprecedented three-dimensional view of Arctic and Antarctic ice sheets, ice shelves and sea ice.
Pine Island Glacier last calved a significant iceberg in 2001, and some scientists have speculated recently that it was primed to calve again. But until an Oct. 14 IceBridge flight of NASA’s DC-8, no one had seen any evidence of the ice shelf beginning to break apart. Since then, a more detailed look back at satellite imagery seems to show the first signs of the crack in early October.
While Pine Island has scientists’ attention because it is both big and unstable – scientists call it the largest source of uncertainty in global sea level rise projections – the calving underway now is part of a natural process for a glacier that terminates in open water. Gravity pulls the ice in the glacier westward along Antarctica’s Hudson Mountains toward the Amundsen Sea. A floating tongue of ice reaches out 30 miles into the Amundsen beyond the grounding line, the below-sea-level point where the ice shelf locks onto the continental bedrock. As ice pushes toward the sea from the interior, inevitably the ice shelf will crack and send a large iceberg free.
“We are actually now witnessing how it happens and it’s very exciting for us,” said IceBridge project scientist Michael Studinger, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md. “It’s part of a natural process but it’s pretty exciting to be here and actually observe it while it happens. To my knowledge, no one has flown a lidar instrument over an actively developing rift such as this.”
A primary goal of Operation IceBridge is to put the same instruments over the exact same flight lines and satellite tracks, year after year, to gather meaningful and accurate data of how ice sheets and glaciers are changing over time. But discovering a developing rift in one of the most significant science targets in the world of glaciology offered a brief change in agenda for the Oct. 26 flight, if only for a 30-minute diversion from the day’s prescribed flight lines.
The IceBridge team observed the rift running across the ice shelf for about 18 miles. The lidar instrument on the DC-8, the Airborne Topographic Mapper, measured the rift’s shoulders about 820 feet apart (250 meters) at its widest, although the rift stretched about 260 feet wide along most of the crack. The deepest points from the ice shelf surface ranged 165 to 195 feet (50 to 60 meters). When the iceberg breaks free it will cover about 340 square miles (880 square kilometers) of surface area. Radar measurements suggested the ice shelf in the region of the rift is about 1,640 feet (500 meters) feet thick, with only about 160 feet of that floating above water and the rest submerged. It is likely that once the iceberg floats away, the leading edge of the ice shelf will have receded farther than at any time since its location was first recorded in the 1940s.
| In October, 2011, NASA’s Operation IceBridge discovered a major rift in the Pine Island Glacier in western Antarctica. This crack, which extends at least 18 miles and is 50 meters deep, could produce an iceberg more than 800 square kilometers in size. IceBridge scientists returned soon after to make the first-ever detailed airborne measurements of a major iceberg calving in progress. Credit: NASA/Goddard/Jefferson Beck |
Veteran DC-8 pilot Bill Brockett first flew the day’s designed mission, crisscrossing the flow of the glacier near the grounding line to gather data on its elevation, topography and thickness. When it came time to investigate the crack, Brockett flew across it before turning to fly along the rift by sight. The ATM makes its precision topography maps with a laser than scans 360 degrees 20 times per second, while firing 3,000 laser pulses per second. When flying at an altitude of 3,000 feet, as during this flight, it measures a swath of the surface about 1,500 feet wide. As the crack measured at more than 800 feet wide in places, it was important for Brockett to hold tight over the crevasse.
“The pilots did a really nice job of keeping the aircraft and our ATM scan swath pretty much centered over the rift as you flew from one end to the other,” said Jim Yungel, who leads the ATM team out of NASA’s Wallops Island Flight Facility in Virginia. “It was a real challenge to be told…we’re going to attempt to fly along it and let’s see if your lidar systems can map that crack and can map the bottom of the crack.
“And it was a lot of fun on a personal level to see if something that you built over the years can actually do a job like that. So, yeah, I enjoyed it. I really enjoyed seeing the results being produced.”
While the ATM provided the most detailed measurements of the topography of the rift, other instruments onboard the DC-8 also captured unique aspects. The Digital Mapping System, a nadir-view camera, gathered high-definition close-ups of the craggy split. On the flight perpendicular to the crack, the McCORDS radar also measured its depth and the thickness of the ice shelf in that region.
Catching the rift in action required a bit of luck, but is also testimony to the science benefit of consistent, repeated trips and the flexibility of a manned mission in the field.
“A lot of times when you’re in science, you don’t get a chance to catch the big stories as they happen because you’re not there at the right place at the right time,” said John Sonntag, Instrument Team Lead for Operation IceBridge, based at Goddard Space Flight Center. “But this time we were.”
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/icebridge/news/fall11/pig-break.html
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
![600808main_pig-break2-orig_full[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/600808main_pig-break2-orig_full1.jpg?resize=640%2C305&quality=83)
I wondered what drug they were on.
No doubt this will be the talk of Durban.
I suppose NASA is following the money. But how the mighty have fallen, from once putting men on the moon to now watching an iceberg form in the Southern ocean . Without a spaceship they can’t do much of the space part of their job description anyway.
I thought “greenies” didn’t like airliners.
Maybe that only applies to modern fuel efficient ones 🙂
Why would a chunk of ice calving off a floating shelf of sea ice of Antarctica affect sea levels? Its allready displaced its own weight in sea water
I had already read this article and was surprised there was no overt global warming attribution given, though they did manage to squeeze in the sea level rise meme.
What do you think , is this another global warming story for Brian Williams /NBC News?
What really gets me is “The NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS)”
“Current research at GISS, under the direction of Dr. James Hansen, emphasizes a broad study of Global Change, which is an interdisciplinary initiative addressing natural and man-made changes in our environment that occur on various time scales — from one-time forcings such as volcanic explosions, to seasonal/annual effects such as El Niño, and on up to the millennia of ice ages — and that affect the habitability of our planet.”
Either study space or change the name. Actually, if it were up to me they’d all be looking for another job (scam). De-funded. Two last orders, get out and stay out.
Why is NASA studying Antarctic ice? This has nothing to do with space?
Earth is a planet in space. One of the goals of studying other planets and moons is to better understand them and to better understand Earth. NASA engages in a variety of programs indirectly related to Space. Someone mentioned that they could just get sattelite data. How do you think the satellites are designed? Based on what? For many decades NASA has conducted airborne science as part of programs to develop equipment and scientific models to support development of sattelites. It cost much less to learn from an airborne mission than to pay for a rocket launch and find it was not the right sattelite sensor design. Much has been learned over the years. The first LANSAT for example will give you data. The data is the answer. The problem is what was the question. You have to correctly understand the light arriving from the Sun, the changes as the light propagates thorugh the atmosphere, how the light is reflected off different materials on the suface, back through the atmosphere and finally account for any instrument effects. Then develop computer programs to process the data and extract understanding as to mineral deposits or moisture content. The DC-8 has undergone hundreds of missions of many types from remote sensing to in-situ measurements. The current mission even has a gravity sensor.
As for the comment in the article about risk to sea level rise, the risk is that a change to the floating ice may change the rate of flow of the so-called land-locked ice.
If we cannot afford a few science aircraft, then shut it all down and go home. Humans can live just fine in prepetual ignorance like dairy cows.
PS: I was a Mechanical Engineer on the DC-8 program for about 10 years.
Of course 880km2 is quite smaller than the largest observed iceberg that came from the Filchner shelf, measured 31,000km2 and was mapped by the USSGlacier on November 12, 1956!
Even if the glacier was growing it would be cracking
I wonder what kind of climate change spin NBC News and Brian Williams will put on this story when it happens. Ten to one he won’t be neutral.
Maurizio Morabito (omnologos)
November 3, 2011 at 1:54 am
Quite telling … 40 years ago NASA was excited by the Moon. Nowadays, any crack will suffice.
###
Moon? Crack???
and
Kaboom nailed it. Scarlet, ONLY if the glacier was growing. That’s the sign of more ice squeezing out from the interior. A shrinking glacier quietly melts away, and the face recedes as liquid water drains away.
It is new and fascinating to watch, and I could do it all day long, as long as it is not somehow being blamed on my…….. transgressions.
Alas, fascination with our natural world is being subverted into some kind of weird guilt trip, where the mere entry into Nature’s realm is frowned upon.
By people that have never experienced its ……….uncaring, relentless pursuit of equilibrium.
‘ It is likely that once the iceberg floats away, the leading edge of the ice shelf will have receded farther than at any time since its location was first recorded in the 1940s.’
Is it just me, or does saying that the leading edge will have “receded” not seem a little incorrect?It hasn’t really “receded” i.e. shrunk/melted, it has broken off as part of a natural process due to gravity and, presumably, more ice pushing it along.
The cynics amongst us all can just picture the emotive headline involving the use of the word receded.
Frickin’ carbon, man.
By the way, why does the article feel the need to convert all measurements into Euros?
Ray the Ratbag
To follow up on the seismic tremor comment. I would suggest that it would certainly have affected the crack to some extent. Recently had the experience of a large (7.2) shake off Alaska on board the MV Orion (expedition ship) from only 26nm away. It rattled the ship noisily for a sustained period, even though we were in 500m of water. So would almost certainly (depending on magnitude and distance) affect the spread of the ice crack as shown in the videos and photos.
Correction to the last. Use Ray the Ratbag as published name please
[Reply: WordPress allows you to add nicknames. Please do it that way, because it’s not practical for us to change your name every time. ~dbs, mod.]
There’s a fossil that’s trapped in a high cliff wall
There’s a dead salmon frozen in a waterfall
There’s a blue whale beached by a springtide’s ebb
There’s a butterfly trapped in a spider’s web
There’s a red fox torn by a huntsman’s pack
There’s an antarctic sheet with a giant crack
There’s a little black spot on the sun today
It’s the same old thing as yesterday
Is James Hansen’s soul up there?
Obama says space is too expensive. Let the Commies do space.
Anyone with even a half arsed academic and practical knowledge of materials and / or earth sciences can tell from one look at the photo that the root cause is stress and strain, not some sort of “melting” event. “Ice tectonics” in other words.
You guys all claim to represent “sound science”, yet you don’t give science much respect that doesn’t directly apply to your claims. I love space, but there’s more to science than just rockets and global warming. Just because it doesn’t interest you doesn’t mean its not important.
^I hate how NASA isn’t getting enough money for space exploration, but degrading other areas of science isn’t going to help