PUNTA ARENAS, CHILE – After discovering an emerging crack that cuts across the floating ice shelf of Pine Island Glacier in Antarctica, NASA’s Operation IceBridge has flown a follow-up mission and made the first-ever detailed airborne measurements of a major iceberg calving in progress.
NASA’s Operation Ice Bridge, the largest airborne survey of Earth’s polar ice ever flown, is in the midst of its third field campaign from Punta Arenas, Chile. The six-year mission will yield an unprecedented three-dimensional view of Arctic and Antarctic ice sheets, ice shelves and sea ice.
Pine Island Glacier last calved a significant iceberg in 2001, and some scientists have speculated recently that it was primed to calve again. But until an Oct. 14 IceBridge flight of NASA’s DC-8, no one had seen any evidence of the ice shelf beginning to break apart. Since then, a more detailed look back at satellite imagery seems to show the first signs of the crack in early October.
While Pine Island has scientists’ attention because it is both big and unstable – scientists call it the largest source of uncertainty in global sea level rise projections – the calving underway now is part of a natural process for a glacier that terminates in open water. Gravity pulls the ice in the glacier westward along Antarctica’s Hudson Mountains toward the Amundsen Sea. A floating tongue of ice reaches out 30 miles into the Amundsen beyond the grounding line, the below-sea-level point where the ice shelf locks onto the continental bedrock. As ice pushes toward the sea from the interior, inevitably the ice shelf will crack and send a large iceberg free.
“We are actually now witnessing how it happens and it’s very exciting for us,” said IceBridge project scientist Michael Studinger, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md. “It’s part of a natural process but it’s pretty exciting to be here and actually observe it while it happens. To my knowledge, no one has flown a lidar instrument over an actively developing rift such as this.”
A primary goal of Operation IceBridge is to put the same instruments over the exact same flight lines and satellite tracks, year after year, to gather meaningful and accurate data of how ice sheets and glaciers are changing over time. But discovering a developing rift in one of the most significant science targets in the world of glaciology offered a brief change in agenda for the Oct. 26 flight, if only for a 30-minute diversion from the day’s prescribed flight lines.
The IceBridge team observed the rift running across the ice shelf for about 18 miles. The lidar instrument on the DC-8, the Airborne Topographic Mapper, measured the rift’s shoulders about 820 feet apart (250 meters) at its widest, although the rift stretched about 260 feet wide along most of the crack. The deepest points from the ice shelf surface ranged 165 to 195 feet (50 to 60 meters). When the iceberg breaks free it will cover about 340 square miles (880 square kilometers) of surface area. Radar measurements suggested the ice shelf in the region of the rift is about 1,640 feet (500 meters) feet thick, with only about 160 feet of that floating above water and the rest submerged. It is likely that once the iceberg floats away, the leading edge of the ice shelf will have receded farther than at any time since its location was first recorded in the 1940s.
| In October, 2011, NASA’s Operation IceBridge discovered a major rift in the Pine Island Glacier in western Antarctica. This crack, which extends at least 18 miles and is 50 meters deep, could produce an iceberg more than 800 square kilometers in size. IceBridge scientists returned soon after to make the first-ever detailed airborne measurements of a major iceberg calving in progress. Credit: NASA/Goddard/Jefferson Beck |
Veteran DC-8 pilot Bill Brockett first flew the day’s designed mission, crisscrossing the flow of the glacier near the grounding line to gather data on its elevation, topography and thickness. When it came time to investigate the crack, Brockett flew across it before turning to fly along the rift by sight. The ATM makes its precision topography maps with a laser than scans 360 degrees 20 times per second, while firing 3,000 laser pulses per second. When flying at an altitude of 3,000 feet, as during this flight, it measures a swath of the surface about 1,500 feet wide. As the crack measured at more than 800 feet wide in places, it was important for Brockett to hold tight over the crevasse.
“The pilots did a really nice job of keeping the aircraft and our ATM scan swath pretty much centered over the rift as you flew from one end to the other,” said Jim Yungel, who leads the ATM team out of NASA’s Wallops Island Flight Facility in Virginia. “It was a real challenge to be told…we’re going to attempt to fly along it and let’s see if your lidar systems can map that crack and can map the bottom of the crack.
“And it was a lot of fun on a personal level to see if something that you built over the years can actually do a job like that. So, yeah, I enjoyed it. I really enjoyed seeing the results being produced.”
While the ATM provided the most detailed measurements of the topography of the rift, other instruments onboard the DC-8 also captured unique aspects. The Digital Mapping System, a nadir-view camera, gathered high-definition close-ups of the craggy split. On the flight perpendicular to the crack, the McCORDS radar also measured its depth and the thickness of the ice shelf in that region.
Catching the rift in action required a bit of luck, but is also testimony to the science benefit of consistent, repeated trips and the flexibility of a manned mission in the field.
“A lot of times when you’re in science, you don’t get a chance to catch the big stories as they happen because you’re not there at the right place at the right time,” said John Sonntag, Instrument Team Lead for Operation IceBridge, based at Goddard Space Flight Center. “But this time we were.”
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/icebridge/news/fall11/pig-break.html
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
![600808main_pig-break2-orig_full[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/600808main_pig-break2-orig_full1.jpg?resize=640%2C305&quality=83)
Quite telling … 40 years ago NASA was excited by the Moon. Nowadays, any crack will suffice.
A somewhat more sober announcement than in April 2009 when the Wilkins ice shelf collapsed:
“Global warming blamed for unstable ice shelf in Antarctica
Satellite images of Antarctica show a huge ice shelf has become unstable, with icebergs breaking off it, in the latest evidence of climate change.” Daily Telegraph 29 Apr 2009.
Surely sanity can’t be returning to climate science?
Hmmm… I wonder how long before someone says, “Look – more evidence of global warming!”.
5… 4… 3…
ummmm don’t NASA do space anymore?
Imagine if NASA was around in the Younger Dryas, they would be having a heart attack with 10 degree warming in 10 years LOL
What’s the point of watching this? Do these people get paid for watching ice break?
There’s a sentiment developing here: Hasn’t NASA got something better to do?
Glaciers calve off Antarctica? Whatever next?
Since when did the National Aeronautics and Space Administration become an iceberg authority?
I’m glad to see that the word “calving” has been put back into the dictionary.
well I think it is fascinating
There’s been some rather healthy seismic activity round about Antarctica in the past 4 days. Especially the undersea ridges leading away from the continent.
Wonder how that affects the progress of cracks.
NASA -“National Aeronautics and Space Adminstration”. I guess getting to fly in an airplane is what its all about. The ice crack is just the excuse. A travel adventure at public expense. Much more fun than sitting in front of a computer terminal waiting for satellite downloads.
A good calving – guaranteed to break the ice at parties…
BTW, I think your title should have been: “NASA on Antarctic Crack”., subtitled perhaps, The guys from NASA get off on some Antarctic Snow….”
Its worse than we thought……………..
rbateman says:
November 3, 2011 at 3:15 am
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/ortho/270_-90.php
Just to be geologically correct, the Pacific-Antarctic Ridge does not “lead away from” the Antarctic Plate. It forms a plate margin. That earthquake, http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/usb0006i5a.php ,
was a shallow temblor likely to cause some shellfish to get riled. It probably was not felt by anybody on the Antarctic landmass, and most certainly didn’t disturb the ocean. It did, however, most likely ( not “may have” or “could”) released some CO2!!!!!!!!! EEEEEK! Back to out regularly-scheduled thread, “NASA on Crack”
Here’s a TERRA satellite elapsed-time video of a previous large calving at the PIG (Pine Island Glacier), which occurred Nov 2001, 10 years ago this month:
http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a003100/a003127/index.html
Created a 10×30 mile berg (B-21) comparable in size (about 75% smaller) to the one forming now.
Here’s what B-21 looked like in Jan 2001, before it calved. Satellite view of crack:
http://pigiceshelf.nasa.gov/img/pig_tongue.jpg
Here’s a recent photo of B-21, still floating in the bay:
http://eoimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/ve/2561/PIA03700.jpg
Sounds like CO2-intensive work, but I’m sure that’s OK if it’s in the name of alerting people to the nefarious power of CO2.
@me
> Here’s a recent photo of B-21, still floating in the bay:
> http://eoimages.gsfc.nasa.gov/ve/2561/PIA03700.jpg
Correction, that image was taken in 2002
What happens when you drop an ice cube into hot tea? What happens if the tea is already cool?
Pretty interesting !!!
The key statement to remember :
“the calving underway now is part of a natural process for a glacier that terminates in open water.”
a natural process for a glacier
a natural process for a glacier
a natural process for a glacier
a natural process for a glacier
Aside from the global warming alarmism that would accompany any such discussion of ice and Antarctica by NASA, you have to believe it’s fairly interesting to talk about the breakup of a large and thick chunk of ice in the ocean.
Why there? Was that particular portion of the glacier when it was still grounded subject to local earthquakes and formed a zone of weakness in the ice, essentially forcing the zone to fracture at a later time? Was it bending stresses in the ocean having to do with some unknown length frequency and thickness of the glacier? Is a floating tongue of a large glacier too big to fail… until it does?
But yes, I get it. It’s Antarctica, glaciers, sea level — of course it’s a chance for the grant money kept afloat by carbon dioxide…
If a glacier calves off in a forest, and nobody is around to hear it, does a climate scientist make a sound?
Must be lots of fresh ice forming inland to push out that glacier.
But, but, but…
Where is the “it’s worse than we thought” statement? Where are the doom-laden predictions. Could it be, as others have suggested, that sanity is slowly returning to science? It certainly appears so. I can’t wait for the MSM to drop the AGW scaremongering as well!