The Birds, now occupying near you

I wonder if the Hitchcock estate and/or the current copyright holder might want a piece of this action? The whole green movement has gone occupy crazy lately, which I suppose is a reflection of the failure of the movement as they write “Modern environmentalism has failed”. So it seems the strategy now is “if you can’t beat ’em, sit on them until they are annoyed enough to do something about it”.

This was on local über green activist Dr. Mark Stemen’s Facebook page.

Yeah, that looks attractive, that’ll pack ’em in. Color optional I suppose.

But it does give a view on the mindset. Like the last dark poster with the mask for the parking garage protest, these misguided kids think these sorts of images are attractive advertising. Maybe for Goths and Alfred Hitchcock fans, though I doubt the Hitchcock fans would stay long.

They have a website: http://deepgreenresistance.org/ where they claim the goal is to basically shut down modern industrial society:

The strategy of Deep Green Resistance starts by acknowledging the dire circumstances that industrial civilization has created for life on this planet. And that these circumstances should be met with solutions that match the scale of the problems.

This is a vast undertaking but it needs to be said: it can be done. Industrial civilization can be stopped.

And as I read more, I find their view on climate:

Furthermore, as intense climate change takes over, ecological remediation through perennial polycultures and forest replanting will become impossible. The heat and drought will turn forests into net carbon emitters, as northern forests die from heat, pests, and disease, and then burn in continent-wide fires that will make early twenty-first century conflagrations look minor.5 Even intact pastures won’t survive the temperature extremes as carbon is literally baked out of remaining agricultural soils.

Resource wars between nuclear states will break out. War between the US and Russia is less likely than it was in the Cold War, but ascending superpowers like China will want their piece of the global resource pie. Nuclear powers such as India and Pakistan will be densely populated and ecologically precarious; climate change will dry up major rivers previously fed by melting glaciers, and hundreds of millions of people in South Asia will live bare meters above sea level. With few resources to equip and field a mechanized army or air force, nuclear strikes will seem an increasingly effective action for desperate states.

But if a runaway greenhouse effect could be avoided, many areas could be able to recover rapidly. A return to perennial polycultures, implemented by autonomous communities, could help reverse the greenhouse effect. The oceans would look better quickly, aided by a reduction in industrial fishing and the end of the synthetic fertilizer runoff that creates so many dead zones now.

I think they’ve been occupying a bong too long.

Goals

The ultimate goal of the primary resistance movement in this scenario is simply a living planet—a planet not just living, but in recovery, growing more alive and more diverse year after year. A planet on which humans live in equitable and sustainable communities without exploiting the planet or each other.

Given our current state of emergency, this translates into a more immediate goal, which is at the heart of this movement’s grand strategy:

Goal 1: To disrupt and dismantle industrial civilization; to thereby remove the ability of the powerful to exploit the marginalized and destroy the planet.

This movement’s second goal both depends on and assists the first:

Goal 2: To defend and rebuild just, sustainable, and autonomous human communities, and, as part of that, to assist in the recovery of the land.

To accomplish these goals requires several broad strategies involving large numbers of people in many different organizations, both aboveground and underground. The primary strategies needed in this theoretical scenario include the following:

Strategy A: Engage in direct militant actions against industrial infrastructure, especially energy infrastructure.

Strategy B: Aid and participate in ongoing social and ecological justice struggles; promote equality and undermine exploitation by those in power.

Strategy C: Defend the land and prevent the expansion of industrial logging, mining, construction, and so on, such that more intact land and species will remain when civilization does collapse.

Strategy D: Build and mobilize resistance organizations that will support the above activities, including decentralized training, recruitment, logistical support, and so on.

Strategy E: Rebuild a sustainable subsistence base for human societies (including perennial polycultures for food) and localized, democratic communities that uphold human rights.

It is sad these folks have become so brainwashed that they think the planet is dying and the only choice left is some sort of organized resistance. They have apparently just dismissed all of the good things that the ecological movement has produced, such as improving our air and water since the 60’s as if it never happened.

In the meantime, our own local “Occupy Chico” is having a “huge” impact.

Photo from KPAY-radio Matt Ray

This whole “occupy” thing is just a blip, and because it has no focus, nobody really pays much attention to it. When the next scheduled event comes up in city plaza, they’ll be asked to move, and they probably won’t, and then we’ll have the usual downward spiral for these sorts of things where the end game is “occupy jail”.

 

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
138 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mooloo
October 13, 2011 12:19 am

Goal 1: To disrupt and dismantle industrial civilization; to thereby remove the ability of the powerful to exploit the marginalized and destroy the planet.
Because back in the past, before industrial civilization, there were no kings and emperors?
These people are so demented that they don’t even think back to egyptian pharaohs and Chinese god-emperors. People who really knew how to exploit a workforce!
I don’t think they are terrorists, since they seek to destroy things not people, but they are certainly fanatics. And fanatics often hurt and kill by secondary effects – which is what taking down power networks would certainly do.

Patrick Davis
October 13, 2011 12:20 am

“Mike Bromley the Kurd says:
October 12, 2011 at 11:29 pm”
The main issue here is the reasoning part of the brain isn’t usually fully developed, certainly in the male brain, until their mid-20’s.

Cow Parsley
October 13, 2011 12:23 am

Is it me or is the idea of using the internet to promote your cause, whilst trying to bring the corporate culture that sustains the hardware and software behind not the slightest bit hypocritical?
Not a new thought I’m sure, its just that I find this type of hypocrisy one of the greatest problems in bothering to pay the slightest bit of attention to them and their ilk.

October 13, 2011 12:26 am

What Deep Green Resistance advocates was already tried 30 years ago.
http://www.eco-action.org/dod/no10/books_memoirs.htm
“This book is the story of Direct Action – a small urban guerrilla group whose dramatic acts of economic sabotage gave them world-wide notoriety. Their struggle was relatively short-lived. The headline grabbing bombings of the Cheekeye-Dunsmuir hydro-electric power line on Vancouver Island, and Litton systems plant in Toronto (where Cruise missile components were being built) succeeded in focusing the full resources of police investigation and surveillance on their activities. Despite being largely underground, the group were ambushed and captured on their way to a weekly shooting practice session near the town of Squamish less than one year after the group began. The ‘Squamish Five’, as they became known, were later tried and sentenced to between ten years and life for their actions.”

Matthew
October 13, 2011 12:28 am

I think I saw some Larouche types there, as well.

Steve C
October 13, 2011 12:43 am

“Strategy A: Engage in direct militant actions against industrial infrastructure, especially energy infrastructure.”
I thought most of the Western world had all sorts of shiny new anti-terrorist legislation for dealing with threats like that? Or is that legislation only for use for whipping us ordinary folk into submission?

Dave Springer
October 13, 2011 12:48 am

Ummm… I do believe your good friend Willis Eschenbach would have been on that street corner holding a sign 40 years ago. Since you don’t seem to hold that against him I’m not sure why you’ve got a problem with these kids. They’re being stupid not evil.

Gail Combs
October 13, 2011 12:59 am

RobertL says:
October 12, 2011 at 11:37 pm
My question is: what would it take for atmospheric COs levels to drop? How much cooling would we need, and for how long? Are we likely to see it anytime soon?
Because I’d really love to see the reaction when atmospheric CO2 drops.
___________________________________________________
If I remember correctly the Ice Core data showed a lag of about 800 years so we will not be around long enough to say “I told you so”…. SIGH.
Actually I hope the CO2 goes up to about 500 to 600ppm. The plants would love it. (At 2000ppm is where we start getting into toxicity problems)

Logan in AZ
October 13, 2011 1:01 am

It is worth repeating that anti-industrial ideology is not limited to a fringe of liberal arts students. The green-agenda website shows that the green-elite holds the same views. The scandal is that politicians are willing to exploit the green garbage to extend bureaucratic power, and most of the mass media voices are uncritical. The treason of the intellectuals…
http://www.green-agenda.com/

Dave Springer
October 13, 2011 1:05 am

I think a person ought to be cut some slack for being rebellious and stupid in their youth. It’s when they fail to grow out of it and become an old bald rebel like James Hansen that it becomes difficult to find the charity to forgive them for it.

October 13, 2011 1:12 am

The big spaceship in the sky will come to carry them away from the degradation … but it doesn’t take live specimens! Y’know what I’m sayin’ ?

October 13, 2011 1:14 am

Doug UK says:
October 12, 2011 at 11:42 pm
Harding
I can understand your feelings – they are now doubt like mine and very much akin to Brian Johnsons “Kids/Teenagers please leave home now whilst you still know everything”.
++++++++
My father told me to get out there and do it all whist I was so clever because when I got to his age I’d be just a stupid as he is (was). Such true words 😉

October 13, 2011 1:19 am

Robert asks

My question is: what would it take for atmospheric COs levels to drop? How much cooling would we need, and for how long? Are we likely to see it anytime soon?
Because I’d really love to see the reaction when atmospheric CO2 drops.

Well, since most of the CO2 is in the deep ocean, and judging from ice ages and all, there’s a lag on the order of 800 years for CO2 to rise coming out of an ice age, and a more irregular but longer lag before it drops going into the next ice age. So, as us CO2 exhalers say, ummm, don’t hold your breath…

October 13, 2011 1:20 am

RobertL says: October 12, 2011 at 11:37 pm

… I have a serious question – that’s a bit off-topic. Like most people here, I believe that the warming/cooling cycles of the earth are driven by various cycles and processes. Then atmospheric CO2 levels follow the warming – not the other way around. So, when it gets warmer, COs is outgassed from the oceans.
My question is: what would it take for atmospheric COs levels to drop? How much cooling would we need, and for how long? Are we likely to see it anytime soon?

Thanks Robert. I see this question asked too few times IMHO.
People forget that the CO2 exchange with the oceans is of an order or orders of magnitude greater than our own emissions – and follows Henry’s Law so as to actually hide and swallow our contribution, if I’ve understood Henry’s Law right (and IMO, photosynthesis also effectively hides and swallows our contribution).
I fear that the Mauna Loa Observatory might put a spin on their figures – at least, for a while. Key issue should be sea level: when that starts declining overall, then is the time to expect CO2 levels to fall. Mind, they won’t fall to nothing, just to a lower level, if I have understood Henry’s Law aright. However, cometesimals indicate that the planet may have a continual drip-tap feed from the sky to the oceans, so even sea level may not quite level out. Figures would help, since cometesimals’ effect may be negligible in the time scale we’re dealing with.

Wally
October 13, 2011 1:23 am

Sounds just like the Anarchist movement of the 1900’s to 1930’s.
Nothing has changed, really. Just another bunch of crackpot loonies who think its time to tear down civilisation and get us all back ploughing fields. Pol Pot woulda been proud of em.

Layne Blanchard
October 13, 2011 1:25 am

Looks like those Chico occupiers have total control of about 50 sq ft. If I recall correctly, I usually had to drink myself stupid to do something I would be embarrassed about for the rest of my life. These kids don’t appear to be drinking.

SandyInDerby
October 13, 2011 1:39 am

Gail Combs says:
October 12, 2011 at 10:27 pm
Having grown up in rural Scotland, with no Electricity, No Gas, a Septic Tank, Water from a spring, No Car and No Public Transport (4 miles to the bus), I love Civilization in general and electricity in particular!
I hate gloomy rooms and have no love of cycling!

John Marshall
October 13, 2011 1:49 am

What a bunch of wacko loons. If this is what an expensive education gives us then heaven help us.

Lew Skannen
October 13, 2011 2:16 am

I wonder whether these people have ever occupied a school desk.

old44
October 13, 2011 2:29 am

AGW melted his coloured crayons.

Mat
October 13, 2011 2:32 am

So why don’t these nice people go join the one group that practice what they preach the Amish community who Value rural life, manual work and humility they will love the rejection of labour-saving technologies also Modern innovations like electricity and any status goods which might cultivate personal vanity.
Also they could do with the genetics Because a smaller gene pool has some nasty side effects like increased incidences of certain genetic disorders from inbreeding !
Then again I don’t think the religious teachings and devout life style will stick with these lazy minded fools also their hatred for the modern world stops before they have to give up their I pods and blackberry !

Bloke down the pub
October 13, 2011 2:36 am

For the workd to exist at a subsistence level would require a massive reduction in population. Knowing how much the green movement loves futile gestures, eg Australia’s new carbon tax, perhaps the members of DGR should volunteer to drop dead.

October 13, 2011 2:50 am

These kids need to spend some time camping in the wild with out electronics or lighters to start fire. Its too easy for them to head on down to the local fast food chain for dinner while protesting big international corporations. They would have more impact if they were to move off the grid and support themselves.

Al Gore's Holy Hologram
October 13, 2011 2:52 am

How does one steal from the ‘poor’?

Al Gore's Holy Hologram
October 13, 2011 2:57 am

If brown people came up with Strategy A and C they’d be called terrorists. How come rich white kids get away with it? Oh yeah, same aims as some crazy white rich folk in power.