Newsbytes from Dr. Benny Peiser of the Global Warming Policy Foundation
Britain should brace itself for another freezing winter with the return of La Niña, a climate phenomenon known to disrupt global weather, ministers have warned. The warning coincides with research from the Met Office suggesting Europe could be facing a return of the “little ice age” that gripped Britain 300 years ago, causing decades of bitter winters. The prediction, to be published in Nature, is based on observations showing a slight fall in the sun’s emissions of ultraviolet radiation, which over a long period may trigger mini ice ages in Europe. –Jonathan Leake, The Sunday Times, 9 October 2011
BRITAIN is set to suffer a mini ice age that could last for decades and bring with it a series of bitterly cold winters. And it could all begin within weeks as experts said last night that the mercury may soon plunge below the record -20C endured last year. Latest evidence shows La Nina, linked to extreme winter weather in America and with a knock-on effect on Britain, is in force and will gradually strengthen as the year ends. It coincides with research from the Met Office indicating the nation could be facing a repeat of the “little ice age” that gripped the country 300 years ago, causing decades of harsh winters. –Laura Caroe, Daily Express, 10 October 2011
Some scientists predict that the Sun is heading for a long slump in solar activity known as a Grand Solar Minimum. If this happens, it is possible that Britain could return to conditions similar to those 350 years ago when sunspots vanished during “the Little Ice Age”, when ice fairs were often held on the frozen Thames in London. –Paul Simons, The Times, 10 October 2011
Investment in more winter equipment may not be economical given rarity of British snow, says RAC Foundation chairman. The row over the need for a multimillion-pound investment in snowploughs, de-icing equipment and salt stocks deepened this morning with the publication of a government-backed report using Met Office predictions that successive hard winters are rare. Quarmby said the Met Office remained convinced that the severe cold snap is a one-off phenomenon. “We cannot say this is an annual event,” he said. –Dan Milmo, The Guardian, 23 December 2010
The Met Office is working with academics to try and predict the likelihood of severe winters over the next 20-30 years. The work aims to help transport authorities understand the risks of further severe winters after the coldest December since records began in 1910. But the work was criticised this week by Benny Peiser, director of the Global Warming Policy Foundation. “I would strongly advise not to rely on any 20-30 year winter forecasts,” he said. “The point is that nobody really understands the basic feedbacks and climate dynamics that drive annual winter variability, let alone that long in advance.” –Local Transport Today, 25 February 2011
In October 2009 the Met Office predicted a mild winter because of El Nino. Temperatures in December would be above average, they said. In reality December temperatures were a whopping 1.1 degrees below the recent average. In 2010, contributing to the Quarmby Report, the Met Office advised to assume that the chance of a severe winter in 2010–11 is no greater (or less) than the current general probability of 1 in 20. Boy, were they wrong! Mean temperatures over the UK were 5.0 °C below average during December and 0.3 °C below average in January. –-David Whitehouse, The Observatory, 10 October 2011
The fact is that nobody knows if the forthcoming winter will be severe or mild. The only wise advice that can be given is to plan as if 2011 is going to be like the previous three winters, and one doesn’t need multi-million pound computers to make it. –-David Whitehouse, The Observatory, 10 October 2011
Snow is starting to disappear from our lives. Sledges, snowmen, snowballs and the excitement of waking to find that the stuff has settled outside are all a rapidly diminishing part of Britain’s culture, as warmer winters – which scientists are attributing to global climate change – produce not only fewer white Christmases, but fewer white Januaries and Februaries. According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia,within a few years winter snowfall will become “a very rare and exciting event”. “Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,” he said. –The Independent, 20 March 2000
Green thinking represents a challenge to the status quo? That’s a laughable idea. From schools and universities to every corner of the Western political sphere, the climate-change outlook is the status quo. In fact, it’s the new conservatism. –Brendan O’Neil, The Australian, 8 October 2011

Bloke down the pub says:
October 10, 2011 at 11:49 am
I’m aware of the misery that an harsh winter can cause, never the less I hope we get it as it will make more people question the BS they are being fed on cagw.
______________________________________________________________
I also hope the USA, especially Washington DC gets plastered. It will cost me a pretty penny in added hay and grain but if it wakes people up before the next elections it would be well worth it.
Meanwhile I need another place to store the extra load of hay….
Getting new chains for the newish car (old chains/car excellent last year) and a UPS for the windmill brownouts. No doubt road clearing will be as hopeless as last time. Food, shovel, warm clothes in the car, sweaters and hats at home. I don’t really mind making my own arrangements if only I didn’t have to pay the taxes too for the services I don’t get.
I hope harry_readme.txt is involved in this, with his little adj( ) array!
I think the Met Office have devised a failsafe formula.
If it’s warm, they can say AGW! AGW! we told ya so! and if it’s cold they can say Freezing! Freezing! we told ya so! They may even have sent an anonymous caller to pay Piers to have a peek at his forecasts which they can incorporate into their own so as to have a better chance of saying Told ya so!
Certainly, making noises about the Sun is moving in the direction of the real source of temperature change longterm (Landscheidt, Daly, Sharp, SSB etc is no doubt still a bridge too far) which means……….. (drum roll) ………… that they will even at this eleventh hour turnabout retain their credibility, power to demand homage, and ability to say Told ya so! which after all is their sole raison d’etre. People have short memories and will forget AGW before remembering how ruthlessly the Met Office supported it and crushed dissent… until it saw fit to quietly appropriate the dissenting views as its own.
/cynic
Kev-in-Uk says:
October 10, 2011 at 12:14 pm
polistra says:
October 10, 2011 at 11:33 am
PMSL – AND I’d pay to watch! (though maybe not every orifice!).
On a more serious note, those of us in the UK unable to pay the exagerrated price of ‘carbon’ due to the scaremongering by the likes of Jones et al, will be the ones who actually suffer. Jones and the many other brown nosing AGW scammers (I refuse to call them scientists) have doubtless milked enough from the public funded ‘research’ to pay for their fuel bills!
_________________________________________________
No, No Kev, you have it WRONG!
Get with the program – Jones and Mann will be on the beaches in the Caribbean doing “Research” on the link between global Warming and Malaria all on your nickel, ERRrrrr pence.
If we had more CO2 this wouldn’t happen. Start the crimes against humanity tribunals now!
I believe that Joe Bastardi has been saying for some time, (Joe or anyone else please correct me if I am wrong) that the people who would normaly talk up or push the AGW angle know that there is a cooling coming. Is this a way of qualiying that cooling within the AGW meme?
steven mosher says:
October 10, 2011 at 12:38 pm
Just to add without the obvious already mentioned by other people replying to your post.
1) How can this only be regional when during the instrumental record, the same regions concerned have behaved like wise with global temperatures.
2) Instrumental records since the LIA (1850’s) have showed increased temperatures in all global site regions.
How can other regions warm since the 1850’s likewise with the regions concerned, yet didn’t cool from the LIA in the first place? During the instrumental record the LIA nonsense of regional areas only affected is not demonstrated at all during warming and cooling global espisodes.
@Dave Springer says: October 10, 2011 at 11:48 am
I agree with your statement. An addition of CO2 to our atmosphere is not ony benificial, it might save us from the catastrophy of an ice age. It’s pathetic that science spend billions on researching CO2’s effect on weather/climate and we still don’t have a clue as to what causes an icae age. Its an ice age that will kill billions not CO2.
“The Met Office is working with academics to try and predict the likelihood of severe winters […] the Met Office advised to assume that the chance of a severe winter in 2010–11 is no greater (or less) than the current general probability of 1 in 20.”
I’m actually starting to get quite angry at the people relentlessly & cluelessly pushing the patently untenable assumption of randomness. Perhaps the public is actually going to have to outright strip these people of their powers. My advice to these people: Develop a clue now. Also: Please feel welcome to ask for help. Cordial relations are entirely feasible with the right approach. Best Regards.
I’m not sure I’d jump on the “It’s going to get colder” bandwagon yet. As failed models attest, the climate is a very complex system. I am glad to see some scientists acknowledging to the public that the sun does play a role in climate though.
Most of Britain is further North than Hudson Bay.
Most of Norway, and all of Iceland (which also get the Gulf Stream) is further North than the southernmost end of the Greenland ice cap. Yet Norway is inhabited right up to Nordkapp which is on the same latitude as the middle of Greenland. Norway also spans the same latitude range as Alaska. USA spans the latitudes from Cairo to Switzerland, with New York further South than the whole of France.
What a huge difference ocean currents make in one way! What a huge difference the size of landmass, and its latitudinal centre of gravity, make in another way!
steven mosher says:
October 10, 2011 at 12:38 pm
“The LIA was limited in geographical distribution. As was the MWP. Interesting problems that have nothing to do with global warming.”
I am genuinely surprised and disappointed that Steven Mosher would make this statement with such bold assurance. I hardly think the science warrants such certitude. Is Steven getting “religion”?
Palm trees of Rothesay, Scotland.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rothesay_gardens_-_geograph.org.uk_-_799345.jpg
Sailed on The Waverley from Glasgow to Rothesay (1964ish) as a wee boy. Was stunned to see, live and in colour, real Palm trees.
The CET ‘Central England Temperature’ has roughly 30 year periods of warming and cooling throughout the data set from the 17th century. These match up with the global temperatures that are available during this period. Therefore at least by this data, England doesn’t behave generally different from global temperatures over decades. Unless the sun becomes much less active over the next 2 cycles (nobody knows for sure yet, then a LIA maybe possible) Anything else this report is just over estimating a normally cyclic 30 year cooling period mentioned above.
La Nina affects winter weather in the UK quite widely from very mild to very severe winters. Usually when the UK has a strong La Nina lasting throughout the three winter months, (December, January and February) mild/very mild winters are expected. (zonal with weather fronts coming off the Atlantic ocean) If the NAO supports the negative phase during the period, coldest weather tends to occur at the beginning of winter and can avoid the mild/very mild tradition. When La Nina is weak during the UK winter, these are the periods prone to the coldest winters, especially when the NAO supports a negative phase during this time. (1962/63 was a famous UK winter example)
You’ve got to say that the Met Office is not quick on the uptake, but it is encouraging they are actually starting to look at solar variability.
Here’s a quote from the Science News article from yesterday (““Solar changes help create cold northern winters“):
“If the Met Office computer model can accurately reproduce past forecasts, the researchers hope to start incorporating solar variability into long-term weather predictions.”
My boldface. In other words in their model they currently assume the Sun is this unchanging ball of fire in the sky. As they say, the only way from here is up.
Just imagine how the Met Office feels today!
Just like the good old days of the 60’s – I’m alright Jack!
The Sun looks after the UK and the Magical Met Office, cos it does things just to the UK (well grudgingly, maybe other bits of Europe) that it does not do to the rest of the planet. So there! We know why we are getting colder, we have our Sun and we are happy, our Sun looks after us! No nasty global warming for us! The rest of you just get off and sort yourselves out, you need to, cos you are getting super, super warm in order to allow the Magical Met Office and the UK to get cooler!
The Sun knows who to look after!
Ground control to Major Tom….
This is what happens when you plot your temperature proxies upside down. Hey the Yamal tree ring proxy said we were going to get lower temps so they snipped a quarter century of data that showed declining temps and spliced on the ‘homogenized’ record. You can hide the decline in a graph, but its hard to do when the decline occurs in reality! They will try though. I guess there was a lot more heat lost in the deep oceans than is good for us – what say Dr T.
Let us see now, we have a falling PDO, a topping out of AMO, and a cyclical change to lower output in solar activity. Even before a fall in the AMO and a peak in the current, lowered solar cycle we already have a leveling out of global mean sea level and global mean ocean heat content.
…….and God said let there be LOL!
Dave Springer says:
October 10, 2011 at 11:48 am
So what I want to know from the climate boffins is exactlty how much CO2 we need to inject into the atmosphere to make things like the Little Ice Age a practical impossibility in the future.
============================
I think that R. Gates considers this to be his particular field of specialty. I’m expecting that he will be able to tell you to within 10ppm.
I am at a loss. Could anyone give me a climate condition that is the opposite of CAGW. They seem to have claimed all the good ones. Is there anything left?
No snow – warming
Record snow – warming
Mild winter – warming
Record cold – warming
Drought – warming
floods – warming
Rise in sea level – warming
Fall in sea level – warming
Less clouds – warming
More clouds – warming
More winter Arctic ice – warming
Less summer Arctic ice – warming
and its only two days ago I was enthralled by a local newspaper advert (Devon, England) stating/including “snow tyres”… To the best of my knowledge, and we visit Switzerland once or twice a year, this is the first time I have EVER seen “snow tyres” detailed in press in the South of England.
but it fits the pattern nicely of having been snowed in for three days last winter.
need a nother windmill ?
Cardinal Roger Black in his disinformation pulpit preaching new distortions of old news …
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15199065
Complete with mandatory team exclusions of course. UV apparently no longer forms ozone, it’s absorbed by it. ‘Barking’ indeed.
It is important to note that the depths of the Little Ice Age;
http://www.eh-resources.org/timeline/timeline_lia.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age
also coincides with a period of a high number of major volcanoes. i.e. ones with a Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) rated 5 or higher:
1580 ± 20 – VEI6 – Billy Mitchell
1586 – VEI5? – Kelut, Java
1593 – VEI5? – Raung, Java
1600 – VEI6 – Huaynaputina
1625 – VEI5 – Katla
1640 – VEI5 – Komaga-Take, Japan
1641 – VEI6 – Mount Parker
1650 – VEI6 – Kolumbo, Santorini
1660 – VEI6 – Long Island (Papua New Guinea)
1663 – VEI5 – Usu, Japan
1667 – VEI5 – Shikotsu (Tarumai), Japan
1673 – VEI5? – Gamkonora, Halmahera
1680 – VEI5? – Tongkoko, Sulaw
As comparison, note the lower number of major volcanoes that occurred during the last century:
1902 – VEI6(?) – Santa Maria, Guatemala
1907 – VEI5 – Ksudach, Kamchatka
1912 – VEI6 – Novarupta (Katmai)
1932 – VEI5+ – Azul, Cerro (Quizapu)
1956 – VEI5 – Bezymianny, Kamchatchka
1980 – VEI5 – St Helens, US
1982 – VEI5 – El Chichon, Mexico
1991 – VEI6 – Pinatubo, Philippines
The effects of volcanoes on Earth’s climate are well know, e.g. “the 1991 explosion of Mount Pinatubo, a stratovolcano in the Philippines, cooled global temperatures for about 2–3 years.
In 1883, the explosion of Krakatoa (Krakatau) created volcanic winter-like conditions. The next four years after the explosion were unusually cold, and the winter of 1887 to 1888 included powerful blizzards.Record snowfalls were recorded worldwide.
The 1815 eruption of Mount Tambora, a stratovolcano in Indonesia, occasioned mid-summer frosts in New York State and June snowfalls in New England and Newfoundland and Labrador in what came to be known as the “Year Without a Summer” of 1816.
A paper written by Benjamin Franklin in 1783 blamed the unusually cool summer of 1783 on volcanic dust coming from Iceland, where the eruption of Laki volcano had released enormous amounts of sulfur dioxide, resulting in the death of much of the island’s livestock and a catastrophic famine which killed a quarter of the population. Temperatures in the northern hemisphere dropped by about 1 °C in the year following the Laki eruption.
In 1600, the Huaynaputina in Peru erupted. Tree ring studies show that 1601 was cold. Russia had its worst famine in 1601 to 1603. From 1600 to 1602, Switzerland, Latvia and Estonia had exceptionally cold winters. The wine harvest was late in 1601 in France, and in Peru and Germany wine production collapsed. Peach trees bloomed late in China, and Lake Suwa in Japan froze early.[4]
In 1452 or 1453, a cataclysmic eruption of the submarine volcano Kuwae caused worldwide disruptions.
The Great Famine of 1315–1317 in Europe may have been precipitated by a volcanic event,[5] perhaps that of Kaharoa, New Zealand, which lasted about five years.[6]
The extreme weather events of 535–536 are most likely linked to a volcanic eruption.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volcanic_winter
One big volcano and we could be in for a world of hurt…
“…One big volcano and we could be in for a world of hurt…”
Eyjafjallajøkull brought EUssr air traffic to a halt not so long ago. Based on anecdotal historical evidence, one should suspect big sister Katla is due in the not too distant future.
“Eyjafjallajokull has blown three times in the past thousand years,” Dr McGarvie told The Times, “in 920AD, in 1612 and between 1821 and 1823. Each time it set off Katla.” from The Times March 21 2010.
The recent rumbling seems to have even the treehuggers taking note:
http://www.clickgreen.org.uk/news/international-news/122604-earthquake-swarm-after-officials-confirm-eruption-at-iceland-volcano-katla.html
linked from here (yesterday):
http://www.katla-volcano.co.uk/
Last time Katla had threw a wobbly in 1918, she was erupting for 14 months.
Better stockpile some coal or oil for the fire before the watermelons ban it.
Jeff D says:
October 10, 2011 at 3:59 pm
I am at a loss. Could anyone give me a climate condition that is the opposite of CAGW. They seem to have claimed all the good ones. Is there anything left?…
________________________________________________
YES! A thriving economy and money in our pockets./sarc