Act Now! Make Money From Global Warming!

Guest Post by Willis Eschenbach

Over at the National Institutes of Health, they have announced that there are funds available for research into the effects of climate on human health (NIH announces climate change and health funding). I guess it’s like they said in the movie “Field of Dreams”, their famous line that “If you pay for it, they will come.” Or something like that, I have a feeling that’s not exactly what they said in the movie, but you get the idea.

The NIH “Report Outlining Research Needs” (PDF

I thought I’d spread this opportunity around a bit, in case any WUWT readers needed extra income. For example, there’s money for studying the effects of climate change on mental health, which they describe as (emphasis mine):

Mental Health and Stress-Related DisordersBy causing or contributing to extreme weather events, climate change may result in geographic displacement of populations, damage to property, loss of loved ones, and chronic stress, all of which can negatively affect mental health. Research needs include identifying key mental health effects and vulnerable populations, and developing migration monitoring networks to help ensure the availability of appropriate health care support.

You likely weren’t even aware that the loss of loved ones can negatively affect mental health, but don’t let that hold you back! Because there’s more to this exciting funding opportunity than just monitoring migrations and being negative about mental health. Click the “Continue reading …” button below on your screen right this minute to find out about more money-making chances in the exciting new field of human climate health science! Press the button now to secure your future, this opportunity won’t last!

You cared enough about your future to push the button, so here is the information that only industry insiders ever get about this funding. For exmple, it’s not widely known but one of our “hottest” fields is the effect of climate on our nerves. You’ve noticed how people get nervous just talking about the climate, but you probably didn’t know you could profit from it. Here’s how you can enter this smoking hot new field (emphasis mine):

Neurological Diseases and Disorders—Climate change, as well as attempts to mitigate and adapt to it, may increase the number of neurological diseases and disorders in humans. Research in this area should focus on identifying vulnerable populations and understanding the mechanisms and effects of human exposure to neurological hazards such as biotoxins (from harmful algal blooms), metals (found in new battery technologies and compact fluorescent lights), and pesticides (used in response to changes in agriculture), as well as the potentially exacerbating effects of malnutrition and stress.

You can’t make this stuff up, folks, this is the real deal, money-making opportunities being spawned right and left by climate change. But don’t think they’re leaving other diseases out of the picture. Take, cancer, for example. The nattering nabobs of negativity might point out that we mostly don’t know what causes cancer, and mostly we can’t cure it or prevent it. But don’t listen to those nay-sayers! There’s still real cash to be made in studying climate change and cancer. Consider this:

Cancer—Many potential direct effects of climate change on cancer risk, such as increased duration and intensity of ultraviolet (UV) radiation, are well understood; however the potential impact of changes in climate on exposure pathways for chemicals and toxins requires further study. Science should investigate the effects of mitigation and adaptation measures on cancer incidence so that the best strategies can be developed and implemented; for example, research to inform understanding of the benefits of alternative fuels, new battery and voltaic cells, and other technologies, as well as any potential adverse risks from exposure to their components and wastes.

Well, OK, maybe the climate change isn’t causing cancer, but the way that we mitigate and adapt to it is. Or it sure might be, who knows, so when you see those kinds of claims, you shouldn’t bother pointing out the blatant logical inconsistencies. Instead, when you follow this revolutionary NIH program, soon you’ll be stepping right over those ugly scientific potholes and thinking “Wow, who cares if it’s warming, there’s real climate dollars to be made here!”

Here’s the bottom line—the votes are in, folks, and the debate is over. Despite the best efforts of the oil industry shills to deny the obvious facts, the chain of causation is crystal clear. Climate change causes things like alternative fuels, voltaic cells, compact fluorescent lights, and new battery technologies, and these inevitably lead to cancer and neurological diseases and negative mental health outcomes.

And that undeniable basic science is gold for people such as yourselves, my friends, pure gold. The future is now, pick up the phone immediately and call the NIH to find more about your stellar opportunities to make big money in the exciting new field of green climate health change analysis …

w.

OBLIGATORY FINE PRINT: The author certifies that he has no economic, fiscal, personal, or for that matter, really even the slightest interest of any kind in the NIH program. All warranties, expressed or implied, are hereby neither expressed nor implied. Prior results are no guarantee of future performance. Please recycle or otherwise dispose of your old emails and unused web sites in an ecologically responsible manner. All funds provided courtesy of the US Taxpayer.  No electrons were harmed in the preparation of this post. All characters are imaginary and, in common with much of climate science, none are based on real individuals or observations. In some instances names have been changed to protect the guilty. Any resemblance between this NIH funding program and vital medical research is purely coincidental. Offer void where prohibited or taxed. Not valid in Washington, DC.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

89 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RiHo08
October 9, 2011 3:51 pm

NIEHS: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences has in the past identified asbestosis, lead, and urban pollution as health hazards. More recently the breast cancer gene BRCA 1 has been identified via grants of NIEHS. Climate change is a newly identified toxin with impacts on asthma, heart disease, and mental disorders. Two years of funding. Please post Intent to submit proposals by April 2012.
The head of NIH is Frances Collins of Human Genome fame and the Howard Hughes Institute in Ann Arbor. Letters querying the wisdom of such research should be directed to him. Queries regarding the Federal granting institutions for physical anthropology may be more appropriate.

October 9, 2011 4:01 pm

LazyTeenager says:
“Seems to overlook the fact that the grant money does not go into the grantees pocket for their own personal use. The grant money is used to produce a product: knowledge.”
Lazy’s childlike naiveté is so cute, isn’t it?
Michael Mann gets a $1.8 million payola grant to study mosquitoes. The grant didn’t go to a biologist, or an epidemiologist. True, the payola went to the university. So Mann gets top pay for his rainmaking, plus he gets an unlimited travel allowance. And he makes maximum use of his travel perqs. I doubt if he stays in a Motel 6, either. Mann also gets a large part of the money for his own personal use in an expense account. It’s just one step removed for plausible deniability. Only a credulous teenager would believe Mann’s mosquito payola was intended to “advance knowledge.” And that grant was just the tip of the iceberg; Mann has collected many millions in similar grants. Want a list? Just ask.

Robber
October 9, 2011 4:19 pm

Wow! I go from cold to hot to cold every day, not to mention season to season, so that must be having a disastrous impact on my health.

Claude Harvey
October 9, 2011 4:28 pm

Proposal to study effects of global warming:
Proposed study will attempt to quantify the potential mental health, economic and criminal justice system impacts of large segments of the general population having acted on global warming predictions only to be faced with the advent of another Little Ice Age. Specific areas of investigation will include:
1) Unfunded liability for essentially worthless alternate energy projects with 30-year taxpayer guaranteed mortgages looming ahead.
2) Cost of resurrecting fossil energy production infrastructure.
3) The clothing crisis
4) The prison crisis. Will prisons be forced to release violent criminals in order to make room to accommodate public demands that climate scientists be incarcerated?
5) Etc.

Mark
October 9, 2011 4:29 pm

If I had control over NIH’s budget, and I was mandated by a fiscally conservative congress to find ways to reduce my budget by 20 to 30% starting in 2012, then I would have a very hard time allocating any money to efforts like the ones noted here.

Old England
October 9, 2011 4:34 pm

I thought the true mental health problem caused by AGW was the scientists who turn to crime, fudge results and are (as we say in England) “economical with the truth” in return for the money.
That’s the worst mental health problem associated with AGW that I come across in everyday life.
NIH – can I please have $2m to research this .

George Turner
October 9, 2011 4:37 pm

I’m applying. My proposal is to observe the health status of people who travel from far northern climates to tropical areas instead of waiting for the arctic to turn tropical.
Yes, I’m going to be asking Swedish girls wearing bikinis on Mexican beaches lots of personal health questions. I supsect alcohol will be involved. Grant money can by a lot of margaritas and Coronas.

Steve Oregon
October 9, 2011 4:49 pm

Have we crossed the mother of all tipping points?
We have 1000s of bureaucrats dreaming up endless ways to fill in the blank
climate change may result in ___________________________
and calling for research.
Causing more breaucrats and even more ways climate chang may result in things needing more bureaucrats.

Speed
October 9, 2011 4:49 pm

This is better than Matthew Lesko. Will there be a late night informercial?

Jeremy
October 9, 2011 4:53 pm

Just FYI, the line is…
“If you build it, they will come.”
and…
“Go the distance.”
/Spent too many brain cells memorizing movies.
//Don’t even get me started on Star Trek.

Glenn
October 9, 2011 4:54 pm

There’s money available? That’s it. Defund the bozos now!

October 9, 2011 4:56 pm

“If you pay for it, they will come.”
Possible alternate phrasing: “If you pay for it, they will parrot you.”
Ed Fix describes it best:
“This is another of those research RFPs (Request for Proposal) which states the desired conclusion and offers money for confirmatory research.”
Reprehensible.
Here’s the study that really needs to be done: what percentage of government grants went, like this one did, to reinforce the theory of AGW, as opposed to objectively studying it?

Bill Illis
October 9, 2011 5:13 pm

Governments are as broke as they can get, yet climate change funding just seems to grow and grow and reach into all kinds of new areas.

October 9, 2011 5:25 pm

The “99%’ number is so bogus. There are almost no truly poor people in America. Despite propaganda to the contrary, almost everyone has enough to eat [those with the lowest incomes tend to be the most obese], almost everyone has a place to live, and everyone is entitled to medical care.
Truly poor people have distended bellies and arms like broomsticks. Today’s “poor” are generally that way due to bad choices: drug abuse, unmarried pregnancies, preference for welfare over work, etc. And there is tremendous churning within the population cohorts. Those in the bottom 20% tend to rise out of that cohort over time… and plenty of people in higher cohorts end up dropping into lower ones.
In a free market there will always be income disparities. People are not created with equal abilities, drive, intelligence or ambition. These “99%” mob gatherings are simply coveting of the results of others’ drive and discipline. The top 1% of the population pays most of the country’s tax receipts. So how much more is their “fair share”? The entire bottom half of the population pays no federal taxes. What should their “fair share” be? And name one ‘poor’ person who ever created a job.
The most despicable thing about Obama is his fanning of the class warfare flames. He might reap the whirlwind. Or worse, the rest of us might. [BTW, I am not a rich guy. Retired, on a fixed income.]

Lawrie Ayres
October 9, 2011 5:30 pm

The one thing I have noted over the years is that all these potential disasters only affect Western communities. The floods in India or Pakistan are an annual event but the people there seem to have adapted without suffering any rise in mental health issues. In fact there don’t appear to be nearly as many mental health problems among the truly poor. Much of the stress in modern living comes directly from wealth itself. Wealth means having more time to focus on self as opposed to focusing on family and community and just surviving. When you are knee deep in water in a rice paddy you don’t concern yourself with a few parts per million of a trace gas nor do you fuss over whether a gay couple can be married.

J. Felton
October 9, 2011 5:31 pm

You know, now that I think about it, having someone who makes far more money then me, has a bigger house, ( or several) and consumes way more then me telling me that I need to cut back does make me a little anxious.

October 9, 2011 5:42 pm

I hope they emphasise that most dangerous communicable diseases, for crops and people, happen when it’s cold and humid.

October 9, 2011 5:51 pm

“now that I think about it, having someone who makes far more money then me, has a bigger house, ( or several) and consumes way more then me telling me that I need to cut back ”
Now, now, J. Felton, here’s no need to personalize this by bringing up Al Gore …

ShrNfr
October 9, 2011 5:58 pm

Will they accept proposals that examine the effect of global cooling?

October 9, 2011 5:59 pm

J. Felton says:
October 9, 2011 at 5:31 pm
You know, now that I think about it, having someone who makes far more money then me, has a bigger house, ( or several) and consumes way more then me telling me that I need to cut back does make me a little anxious.

I do hope you’re not just coming to that conclusion!

Gail Combs
October 9, 2011 6:00 pm

LazyTeenager says:
October 9, 2011 at 2:55 pm
Seems to overlook the fact that the grant money does not go into the grantees pocket for their own personal use.
The grant money is used to produce a product: knowledge.
_______________________________________________________
Time to wake up. There is absolutely no reason to actually DO the study just make up the results like Cetero Research did.
Drug Testing Lab May Have Falsified Results: FDA
Federal drug regulators are warning pharmaceutical companies that a major drug testing lab may have faked the results of some of its tests.
Last week, the FDA indicated that pharmaceutical companies may have to have some pending drugs retested, because it appears that Cetero Research, a major drug testing lab, could have falsified results….
http://www.aboutlawsuits.com/drug-testing-lab-falsified-results-19940/
….The FDA inspected Cetero in May and December last year and found falsified records about studies.
Specifically, in at least 1,900 instances between April 2005 and June 2009, laboratory technicians identified as conducting certain studies were not actually present at Cetero facilities at that time, the FDA said in its May report.
The FDA also said at the time that Cetero might have “fixed” studies to get the desired result, or did not include failed results in their report…..
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/26/us-fda-cetero-violation-idUSTRE76P7E320110726
Now don’t you feel safe about taking that new drug the Doctor just prescribed….

Geoff Sherrington
October 9, 2011 6:13 pm

I have a toenail health problem with ingrowth. I can see it.
Friends tell me I also have a mental health problem. What is a mental and where can I see one?

u.k.(us)
October 9, 2011 6:16 pm

Now wait a minute.
Does not, being skeptical of climate change, constitute a mental health disorder ?
Or is this one-way research that only benefits the preconceived notion ?

Mike.
October 9, 2011 6:26 pm

Is this event not going back a bit? No matter, what I find more disturbing than a money grab though, is some of the prepositions in the text. The ‘metals’ and organics and ‘pesticides’ could also be interpreted as something already in compositions or by products of actual attempts in improving earth’s albedo albeit possibly unnecessary, and that the money grab is crafted for some numb-nut to come up with a plausible excuse for possible unnecessary damage already afflicted.

October 9, 2011 6:59 pm

Research complete: I found that people tend to shiver less with warmer external temperatures. They also have more discretionary funds because they don’t have to spend so much money on heating costs or on excess clothing. People in a warmer world can enjoy more abundant foods, not only from the better harvests due to increased CO2, but also from longer growing seasons. They even get a greater diversity of fruits and vegetables.
Even home gardeners report more flowers and vegetables in warmer climates and no longer feel as compelled to buy a home greenhouse in order to lengthen their growing season. People also can exercise outside for a longer season and cut down on their workout club expenses. Warmer weather gives them the chance to get fresh air while exercising and also more sunshine and Vitamin D. Oh yes, less SAD type depression because they are not as confined to indoor activity (since the don’t have a much chance as freezing off their keisters/tuchases in cold weather). Consequently, less mental health disorders and the expenses of treatment — and less suicide as well. I could go on as that’s only the beginning!

Verified by MonsterInsights