From the Alfred Wegener Institute news that a ship that reached the real geographic North Pole, unlike the hapless group of Whisky sponsored rowers (Row to the Pole) who are pointlessly attempting to reach the location of 1996 magnetic pole, which doesn’t even exist there anymore.
Research Vessel Polarstern at North Pole

Bremerhaven/North Pole, 22 August 2011. You can’t get any “higher”: on 22 August 2011 at exactly 9.42 a.m. the research icebreaker Polarstern of the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research in the Helmholtz Association reaches the North Pole. The aim of he current expedition is to document changes in the far north. Thus, the researchers on board are conducting an extensive investigation programme in the water, ice and air at the northernmost point on the Earth. The little sea ice cover makes the route via the pole to the investigation area in the Canadian Arctic possible.
Sea ice not only plays a role in the selection of the route, but is above all a major research focal point. How thick is the ice and how old? To what extent has it been deformed by pressure – is there snow or puddles of melting water on it? Satellite measurements, too, supply ice information, but measurements are still required on site to be able to interpret these data correctly. Light energy causes the ice to melt and heats up the water in the summer months. The warming of the Arctic and the related changes in heat and gas exchange processes between the ocean, sea ice and atmosphere are the paramount focus of the investigations. The oceanic currents that exchange water masses with the Atlantic and the Pacific are also undergoing change. Redistribution of the freshwater input from rivers into the Arctic Ocean is one of the factors that influence these oceanic currents.
Light is the source of energy for tiny algae that live in and under the ice and form the basis of the food web in the Arctic Ocean. Biologists classify species and determine the number of algae as well as the small and larger animals that feed on them. The researchers follow the path taken by the organisms from the water surface to the seafloor, where the remains end up as organic substance at a depth of thousands of metres after the organisms die.

These deposits on the seafloor permit conclusions to be drawn on how living conditions were in the course of the Earth’s history. After all, the sediments and the animal and plant remains they contain are up to several million years old. Following the expedition, sediment cores will be analysed in the laboratory. To improve the models of the Earth’s climate history, chemists, physicists and oceanographers additionally examine the environmental conditions in the present-day oceans. They draw conclusions on how fast organic substance is transformed and relocated as a result of altered current conditions.
All 55 scientists and technicians from six countries on board the Polarstern have a common goal: studying the changes in the Arctic. This is also reflected in the name of the expedition “TransArc – Trans-Arctic survey of the Arctic Ocean in transition”. The researchers have been investigating their questions jointly with the 43 crew members since the Polarstern left the port of Tromsø (Norway) on 5 August. The first ice floes appeared on 8 August. Since 9 August the Polarstern has been sailing through dense pack ice on the route along 60° East in temperatures of around 0° C. At first it was predominantly one-year-old sea ice, now older and consequently thicker ice floes appear.
“From a scientific point of view the North Pole is not more interesting than other places in the Arctic,” reports Prof. Ursula Schauer from on board the Polarstern. The oceanographer at the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research in the Helmholtz Association is the chief scientist of the expedition. “The expected changes are rather minor here. However, the northern part of the Canadian sector of the Arctic still numbers among the least researched regions on the globe because of the dense pack ice.” Schauer was in the central Arctic the last time in 2007 and is now experiencing a similarly small ice cover as the year that went down in the annals as the one with the lowest extent of sea ice since the beginning of satellite measurements in 1979. Initial measurements of the ice thickness confirm this: in 2011 as well as in 2007 the most frequently occurring ice thickness was 0.9 metres. As a comparison, the most frequently measured ice thickness in 2001 was around 2 metres. In that year the extent of the ice cover at the end of the melting period corresponded roughly to the long-term mean.
The Polarstern is at the North Pole for the third time in its history. On 7 September 1991 it was one of the first two conventionally driven ships to sail there, along with the Swedish research icebreaker Oden. Almost exactly ten years later, on 6 September 2001, it carried out a joint expedition at the North Pole together with the American research icebreaker Healy.
After the investigations at the North Pole and subsequently in the Canadian Basin the vessel will head for the Siberian Sea. The researchers want to study the oceanic circulation from the deep sea to the shallow shelf seas and habitats from the ice edge to the ice-free ocean. The Polarstern is expected to return to its homeport of Bremerhaven on 7 October. For all those who would like to follow the events on board until that time: the members of the expedition report regularly in the blog of the magazine GEO at (German language only) www.geo.de/blog/geo/polarstern-blog.
###
The Alfred Wegener Institute conducts research in the Arctic, Antarctic and oceans of the high and middle latitudes. It coordinates polar research in Germany and provides major infrastructure to the international scientific community, such as the research icebreaker Polarstern and stations in the Arctic and Antarctica. The Alfred Wegener Institute is one of the seventeen research centres of the Helmholtz Association, the largest scientific organisation in Germany.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I see I started quite a debate with my earlier comment “What sort of damage is ice-breaking doing to high latitude ice coverage?” Sorry I missed most of it because I had to go give the first atmospheric physics / earth science lecture of the acamedic year yesterday. One research question I’d like to know the answer to is ‘what is the maximum horizontal distance that the stress on the ice propagates away from ice breaker?’
Just out of curiosity, I wondered how the NRL chart of sea ice compares to Cryosphere’s depiction of the same. I found the ice itself to be very similar. What is amusing is how Cryosphere greatly exaggerates the size of the Arctic relative to the size of the earth.
http://i53.tinypic.com/2iqjvq9.jpg
Still can’t see anyone on the drifting North Pole camera, but it looks like the pools are refreezing now.
Just out of curiousity I went into the Shipping Tracking webpage at http://www.marinetraffic.com/ais/ to see if I could find any pertinent info. Nothing shows for the Arctic.
However, when I dropped down to the Antarctic, seems that China has one of its bulk cargo vessels stuck in the icepack or inland. As the AIS shows, it is a live position as shown here:
http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x145/brityank/China_Cargoship_stuck_AA.png
Oh – and if it’s vast stretches of “open water” during the height of Summer, and there is no land at the North Pole, just what are those folks standing on once off the ship??
_____________________________________________________________________________
Regarding the impact of ship traffic upon the Arctic ice…..I have thought about this long & hard and believe it likely that ship traffic would disrupt the integrity of the ice mass could lead to loss from the effects of currents, wind and melting. Think of how rapidly shaved ice melts in a drink vs. ice cubes. The ice is only a few meters thick after all.
We cannot know the answers without studying the situation, it would make an interesting project. If the UN is so concerned about the ice mass, they should declare a one-year moratorium on ALL ice-breaking activity in order to judge the effect upon sea ice extent. When pigs fly.
_____________________________________________________________________________
What we have here is the classic argument from ignorance;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance
Shaved ice that’s a meter thick, that’s some big glass you all are ah holdin’ there. 🙁
We can also place a rough estimate of the increased surface area of ice that is relatively thin with respect to its horizontal dimensions, T << L and T << W, and is broken up into smaller pieces. Placing reasonable numbers on the number of pieces from an initial single piece yields a number that's only a few precent greater than the original surface area.
Last I checked, the Arctic was not made up out of ice cubes or shaved ice, but rather very thin aspect ratios of ice slabs.
So since I haven't included the surface area effect into my previous estimate of surface area disturbed, and assuming this effect increases the surface area of said disturbed ice by 10%, using one meter thick ice yields;
Area * Thickness * Surface Area Increase (%) = 300 km^2 * 0.001 km * 0.10 = 0.03 km^3
Now compared to total Arctic sea ice volumes of 4,000 km^3 (summer minimum) to 20,000 km^3 (winter maximum) yields a range of 0.03/4000 = 0.00075% (summer) to 0.00015% (winter).
For other informal fallacies used throughout this thread (subs and icebreakers) see;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_repetition
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_cause_and_consequence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_composition
Give me one more whack at this, and I'm quite sure I can show that icebreakers and subs lead to a net gain in Arctic sea ice extents/areas/thicknesses/volumes.
Or perhaps Ancient Aliens did it, we should investigate this possibility, however remote it may be, using the UN.
No wait, Ghosts did it, we should investigate this possibility, however remote it may be, using the UN.
😉
No one has observed that the same Alfred Wegner Institute as orgainzed this trip by icebreaker is the same institute that organized six weeks of air flights over parts of the Arctic Ocean last year to measure ice thickness. My feeling is that they are among the “good guys”.
IanM
Kelvin Vaughan says:
August 24, 2011 at 8:40 am
Still can’t see anyone on the drifting North Pole camera, but it looks like the pools are refreezing now.
=========================
Yup. Also, new ice is already forming at the edges of certain parts of the pack. Especially in far Western longitudes.
The north-west-passage is supposedly open – could someone post something about that?
Tony,
Not a lot of meat here (dated 8/25/2011);
http://www.esa.int/esaEO/SEMT7TRTJRG_index_0.html
ESA states that for the main E-W route “recent satellite data show that the most direct course in the Northwest Passage now appears to be navigable as well.
I’ve been watching the MODIA Aqua/Terra images on a daily basis, but it’s been mostly cloud covered these past ~two weeks;
http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/imagery/single.cgi?image=crefl1_143.A2011220194500-2011220195000.2km.jpg
http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/imagery/single.cgi?image=crefl2_143.A2011228191500-2011228192000.2km.jpg
http://rapidfire.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/imagery/single.cgi?image=crefl2_143.A2011229182000-2011229182500.2km.jpg
The last one is from a week ago.
I’ve also been looking at USGS Landsat 5/7 imagery, but all recent images show cloudy conditions.