Quote of the week – Gore and carnage

The punch line from Rex Murphy’s recent editorial in the National Post will upset sensitive readers who still think Gore is the messiah rather than a barker.

Gore’s meltdown might just be the moment when the people of the planet saw the carney show for what it was.

Heh. He is of course referring to this.

Read the entire brilliant editorial here

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
81 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
August 23, 2011 11:34 pm

I wonder what Al Gore’s ex-wife has to say about him.
I am sure if he cheated all of us with his convenient lies, I bet he probably cheated on his wife as well?
anyway,
I wondered if you all figure out what was the real cause of the extra warming?
It was the increase in vegetation. That, in turn, could be partly caused by the extra carbon dioxide acting as a fertilizer.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/03/24/the-earths-biosphere-is-booming-data-suggests-that-co2-is-the-cause-part-2/
So, in the end, it turns out that all those blaming the increase in CO2 were (partly) right after all….
….it was just the proposed mechanism that was completely wrong…..
which still makes Al Gore a cheat, does it not?
http://www.letterdash.com/HenryP/more-carbon-dioxide-is-ok-ok

August 24, 2011 1:07 am

Jesse Fell says:
August 23, 2011 at 1:02 pm
With that, I sign off from this discussion.
Hence all subsequent responses are pointless…or perhaps more pointless than those before he quit. I wonder if responding to the cut-and-paste is really the way to go? By their very content, Jesse’s posts indicated that his mind is made up, and no arguement will change that, despite his invitation to show him that he had been duped. All it served to do was clog up this post with yet another troll rant; and in so doing losing the focus: Rex Murphy’s scathing analysis of the ‘state’ of climate ‘science’. Jesse Fell succeeding quite nicely in disrupting the thread, and getting us to do all the work!

Bruce Cobb
August 24, 2011 4:23 am

Jesse Fell says: I intend to curl up with the following books:
– Principles of Atmospheric Science, buy John E. Frederick
– What We Know About Climate Change, by Kerry Emmanuel

Because, being a warmist troll requires reinforcing his Warmist Beliefs. Reading anything not on the standard Warmist reading list would be verboten anyway, as it could cause (gasp) doubts to creep in.

August 24, 2011 8:10 am

Too good. True. It is a religion. But without God in it. That’s sad.
http://www.letterdash.com/HenryP/what-was-that-what-henry-said

August 24, 2011 12:31 pm

It is to the CBC’s credit that it is afraid to dump Rex from the airwaves and leave the field to the Bugmeister. Perhaps visions of having its staff ‘staked’ à la Count Drakul Coast-to-Coast deter it?

JPeden
August 24, 2011 11:13 pm

Mike Bromley the Kurd says:
August 24, 2011 at 1:07 am
Jesse Fell says:
August 23, 2011 at 1:02 pm
“With that, I sign off from this discussion.”
Hence all subsequent responses are pointless…or perhaps more pointless than those before he quit. I wonder if responding to the cut-and-paste is really the way to go?

Other interested people are reading and still reading. So once someone like Jesse Fell enters, he must be responded to. Otherwise he can freely spread disinformation – illogic, falsehood, and anti-scientific argument – as, in effect, a propaganda tactic, whether he intends to or not.
His informal, unhinged, and utimately defective arguments are the kind which a lot of people out there might or do accept. And it’s always a challenge to try to defeat them in terms which open minded people of common sense can understand, while it’s also an opportunity to interject facts and the actual use of real science which are not widely known as a result of Climate Science’s tactics, which intentionally leave out the vast majority of validly applicable info and science.
Continuing to respond even after he disappears still helps me to see how others handle his arguments, and learn, and it keeps him from having the last word, another tactic meant to “convince” the not so savvy reader.
I’m always trying to develop and remember one-liners which might apply to the CO2 = CAGW “thinking”, so here I think we’re kind of stuck with making lemonade out of lemons.