Riots May Have Killed Britain's Green Consensus

Global Warming Policy Foundation
Image via Wikipedia

Newsbytes from Dr. Benny Peiser at the GWPF

 

The riots and their fallout will eat up all the political oxygen for months, if not years to come. A party conference season that should have seen at least some debate on the grave threat posed by climate change and the huge opportunity presented by the low carbon economy will now be dominated by much hand-wringing and political jostling over “the state of modern Britain”. The riots have undoubtedly emboldened those Conservative backbenchers who are at best indifferent to environmental issues and at worst openly hostile to green policies. Significantly, they are supported by a similarly emboldened right-wing media that has in recent months cranked up its opposition to environmental initiatives, most notably through the Daily Mail’s increasingly overt climate scepticism and repeated attacks on green energy policies. —James Murray, Business Green, 15 August 2011

The sun is setting on Evergreen Solar, whose green-energy business fizzled even though Gov. Deval Patrick’s administration showered the Marlboro company with $58 million in subsidies and tax breaks. Evergreen, which made solar-power panels, cut about half of its 133 remaining employees and sought bankruptcy protection after concluding that it couldn’t compete with low-cost Chinese manufacturers. The company had already shifted some work to China last year in a cost-cutting move, then closed its Devens factory in March and eliminated 800 jobs. —Jerry Kronenberg and Greg Turner, Boston Herald, 16 August 2011

 

Solar module manufacturer Solon Corp. will lay off 60 local workers as it shuts down its production facility in Tucson, the company said Monday. Solon, part of German-based Solon SE, said it will seek lower-cost sources of solar modules for utility and commercial photovoltaic systems in Asia. Tucson Sentinel, 15 August 2011

 

Last year, Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn announced the city had won a coveted $20 million federal grant to invest in weatherization. McGinn had joined Vice President Joe Biden in the White House to make it. It came on the eve of Earth Day. It had heady goals: creating 2,000 living-wage jobs in Seattle and retrofitting 2,000 homes in poorer neighborhoods. But more than a year later, Seattle’s numbers are lackluster. As of last week, only three homes had been retrofitted and just 14 new jobs have emerged from the program —Seattle Pi, 16 August 2011

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

101 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Milwaukee Bob
August 16, 2011 10:02 am

Tamara said at 8:20 am:
It took 14 people to weatherize 3 homes? Now there’s efficiency for you. /sarc
Tamara, only one person did the winterizing. Two in-the-field supervisors and one environmental consultant watched to be sure the work was done according to the “standards” as written in the 7,342 page guide produced within the program, that is updated regularly by a document specialist. Then there is the department manager for each of those areas as well as something called the Department of Unforeseen Circumstances and Contingency Planning. Nobody knows exactly what they do, but there is a manager and one person therein. An additional reporting specialist monitors ALL activities that occur as a result of and within the program for compliance to program specifications and creating/reporting back to both the State and Federal agencies overseeing the program. Plus, of course, the required Public Relation – Media Interface and Controlled Communications Department – one person. Add in the Accounting/Facilities Director (who gets paid the really BIG bucks) and the Director over the entire program and you have 14 “new” jobs created and how we are stimulating the economy of Washington via these shovel ready jobs. /sarc /sarc
Another great example of: If the government is paying for it, it’s not worth it.

RockyRoad
August 16, 2011 10:10 am

“The riots have undoubtedly emboldened those Conservative backbenchers who are at best indifferent to environmental issues and at worst openly hostile to green policies.”
So, “green policies” are sacroscanct, eh? I equate them to abject stupidity (see cedarhill’s nice description on growing tomatoes above), or reversing decades or even centuries of scientific discovery followed by engineered solutions that provide advances in living when it comes to the production of food, energy, transportation, housing, education, and all the rest.
So no, the “indifference” mentioned above isn’t really what that author wants you to believe–the “indifference” is a resounding rejection of illogical policies that don’t and can’t advance civilization in general or the quality of life for individual’s in particular (unless they’re making money in some controlling way).
When will the brainless ever learn? (Or can we hope these riots finally woke up some of the elites that are pushing a selfish, non-sustainable agenda?)

pesadia
August 16, 2011 10:17 am

Riots May Have Killed Britain’s Green Consensus
They say that “every cloud has a silver lining”
I think I just found one.

August 16, 2011 10:34 am

If anyone ever wanted to see the green job explosion, the above is it in a microcosm. Millions thrown at an industry only to send the jobs to China….. Or creates imaginary jobs such as the example in Seattle.
As to the riots there and the flash mobs here…….. its heart breaking.

mwhite
August 16, 2011 11:34 am

Roger Longstaff says – Thats 13 of us

Lord Beaverbrook
August 16, 2011 11:38 am

If you were a really cynical person you could speculate that the the riots were the best argument required to turn over the nanny state and it’s failed left wing dogma of NGO’s, Quango’s and institutions that tell you how you should live whilst creaming off your taxation for unelected officials that earn more than the Prime Minister.
You could also speculate that it offers the perfect opportunity to reform the, increasingly independent, Police force making them accountable for their actions with the introduction of elected senior officers that can be ousted without account passing to ministers.
Another opportunity also arises to introduce laws to remove people from the streets at the whim of local constabularies without applying to the courts first. These new laws will allow officers to remove any concealing clothing from those whom are ‘suspected’ of breaching the peace and also allow localised curfews to be enforced. Perfect to counter rioting but also useful to close down an area around a pub, night club or even barbeque in a back garden, yard, that has got rowdy.
We might even find that if the cause of the rioting is intentionally directed towards the young, black, organised crime gangs then a multitude of further Conservative pollicies can be brought to the fore whilst turning the country away from the Liberal and Labour ‘caring’ about our dissaffected youth in time for an election ringing with the success of an Olympic year in the capitol.
Of course you would have to be totally cinical if you were to try and tie all this to single incident in Tottenham that sparked a powder keg in an area that was awaiting an excuse to vent anger, even if the extent of the anger spread further than intended and caught many forces off guard for a couple of nights, what is the phrase coined so often by the American authority……. collateral damage.
There will be a climate shift in attitude and policy in the UK, some beneficial some not. What will not change is that our freedom will be further erroded and we will be paying for it through our taxation.
Democracy is the worst form of government, apart from all the others….. Winston Churchill, I believe.

John B
August 16, 2011 11:41 am

Roger Longstaff – That’s 14

Pete in Cumbria UK
August 16, 2011 11:42 am

What will happen is all so depressing and predictable…..
There will be “A Crackdown” as there has been ‘Crackdowns’ before n number of times and n is now tending towards a very large number.
Crackdowns involve creating yet more ways of criminalising people, making them feel like criminals even when they’re not, restricting liberties and (not least), more ways of taking money off people in the way of fines and taxes. The level of fines have already been decided as I write this, its just the number of new offences that is to be decided as various Government depts fight over how much they think they’re due and how many more staff they’ll need. Government job creation, UK style, at its finest.
As an example of a previous crackdown, UK truckers tried a similar protest to what the Aussie truckers are now engaging in.
Result= UK truckers now have they’re licences to trade removed from them the minute they’re deemed to be organising a protest. They are effectively put right out of business and all the while over zealous police will be photographing, checking tachographs, seatbelts, lights and even fining them for smoking whilst in their cabs (not in proper control of the vehicle you see)
In a nutshell, THAT is what the riots were about – Big Brother is now getting too big.

John B
August 16, 2011 11:43 am

Richard S Courtney – 9.41am
Richard – you have that word perfect – spot on.

Flask
August 16, 2011 11:44 am

The economic situation in Europe will stifle any agenda that the IPCC can muster on the CAGW front. The USA will be in no mood to transfer any wealth by carbon trading so long as they are reminded of their government’s debt. As long as it’s AA+, they can’t do anything to “stop the rising seas” or whatever O said.
it’s effectively over. They could all start saving money by defunding the alarmist research.

Brian
August 16, 2011 11:47 am

The Green Lobby group are losing credibility eh? It was a con right from the start, from Al Gore
his compatriots, James Hansen and Stephen Schelberg and the IPCC.”
And people talk about the believers conspiracy theories about Big Oil…
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_oUc6WpOAwto/TKuUTW8SVaI/AAAAAAAAbUc/i24m-XOYoHY/s1600/an-inconvenient-truth.jpg

Nuke
August 16, 2011 11:50 am

Our schools in the USA can’t teach the most basic of morals (no stealing, no cheating, no lying) without being accused of being judgmental, or discriminating. Our children are taught that crime comes from economic and social injustice; many criminal acts are therefore justified and excusable. (That sounds like a judgment, too, btw.)
Is it any wonder that children who never learned to respect others only think of themselves?

August 16, 2011 11:51 am

So,the article doesn’t say whether the entire $20 mil was spent on the 3 houses. Anyone know?
I believe that about $2,000 each was spent on the houses….the rest went in administrative costs.

wws
August 16, 2011 11:52 am

“Green jobs” aka weatherizing involves handing a drug addicted ex-con a caulk gun to hold while he wanders around casing your house and trying to figure out when you’ll be gone.

Davidg
August 16, 2011 11:58 am

I think they who tax are leeches, sucking the lifeblood of many. The true phrase should be, “enhanced leeching, greater leeching, increased leeching and improved leeching standards.”
Anyone who can be so poetic deserves my thanks!:]

JPeden
August 16, 2011 12:09 pm

elbapo says:
August 16, 2011 at 8:32 am
Those of a rightwing persuasion – be aware, however; if the sons and daughters of the ‘left’ who have spent years/£££ conversing/ protesting/ cycling and buying holier than consumables in the name of ‘saving the earth’ transfer this into attacking real problems, like deprivation and inequality – then the right really is in trouble!!
[Short version:
Snap out of it, elbapo, with you it’s only “de ja vu all over again”: you are entranced by mere unhinged verbiage which manages to confuse you while only leading everyone backwards toward Totalitarianism, which then puts nearly everyone “in trouble”!]
elbapo, as you prove again, the Left’s “thinking” doesn’t ever do anything other than complain about unhinged, purely word fetish/phobias such as “deprivation” and “inequality”! Which provenly ends up again and again in the real world of action – as now demonstrated by Britian’s rioters – with people like you encouraging and justifying the acts of people who destroy everything which creates wealth = ~”the rich conservative shop owners”.
Whereas, wealth creation, in contrast to wealth appropriation, otherwise involves essentially increasing standards of living through individually created innovations, inventions, and “sweat equity”, along with the availability of reasonably costing energy, if and as based upon the protected freedoms of individual thought and the Liberty of individual actions toward self-betterment – for example, as conceived and implemented by the individuals who created the U.S.’s system of Constitutional Capitalism. It works!
It works despite your obsession with “inequality” and even because of it: free, productive people simply don’t want to be in their previous state of permanently “equal” wealth or “deprivation”, and they usually want everyone else to improve their own lot, too, as per their protected right and legally assisted and ensured opportunity; and without the Government simply taking it away and giving it to others, such that then no one has any incentive to create wealth!
In contrast, the abject failure of a Statist or Totalitarian system to create any wealth is something which Communism has proven over and over again, by instead creating the epitome of what it says it is trying to eliminate, the de-evolved Master-Slave society – the very epitome of a classist society. Which strips the wealth off the backs of anyone who has it!
But when Communism doesn’t work, people like you ~“blame something or someone else” [Milton Freidman’s definition of an economic Communist] such as the “rightwing” or even “the sons and daughers of the ‘left'” – groups somehow imaginarily contrived to constitute the universe of all thinking people, but of course ignoring the rational thought of Classical Liberal individualists – and then only set about to try to do the same thing which didn’t work, again!
Just as the latte’ Communist Obama examples with his first ‘tranformantional’ and implied ‘revolutionary’ claim that “we are the people we’ve been waiting for”, then, while doing everything he can to attack Constitutional Capitalism, he now calls for more gov’t spending [ = the further looting of America] again, which he just got through proving once again doesn’t increase GDP and employment!
In other words, elbapo, in your inhinged groundhog day dream system of unhinged verbiage, you once again can only manage to obsess about your own salvation via group salvation, which you’ve just criticized a.k.a. “saving the earth”, via again eventually creating the same old systematic equality of deprivaton and slavery – allegedly in service of ending the same things – which Statists or Communists always ‘create’.
elbapo, you say, “Too long has the ‘Left’ been obsessed with circular and self-defeating green navelguasing – based on assumption rather than evidence,” then you want to do the same thing all over again!
Attn., ebalpo, you are being misled by mere words, mere verbiage! You must make sure the words you use mean something in the real world! Otherwise your “thinking” will not work and may even be used to lead you to produce results which are the opposite of what you vaguely conceived in your wishful dreams.
And the personal “meaning” you apparently want to achieve will be the opposite of what you wanted – you will have completed your own life as nothing more than a “useful idiot”!

Editor
August 16, 2011 12:23 pm

Richard S Courtney
You have described all my fears and concerns for my family in a nutshell.

Mac the Knife
August 16, 2011 12:30 pm

Riots May Have Killed Britain’s Green Consensus
One can only hope that some good can come from the superstitions, destruction, and deaths spawned by AGW ‘science’.
“When you believe in things that you don’t understand, then you suffer. Superstition ain’t the way!”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDZFf0pm0SE

August 16, 2011 12:33 pm

The “causes” of the riots are both a mystery and source of facile speculation to most of the MSM commentators. Why would the Children of Compassionate Socialism loot and burn? Why can’t their parents (or the police, schools, politicians, the ministry, etc.) “discipline” them?
Lord Beaverbrook hits the mark, IMHO. The Nanny State promises much but delivers little. Expectations have gradually ratcheted down to “more sacrifice necessary.” The Trodden Classes are no longer fooled, if they ever were. Excessive government, rotten to the core, leads to profound disrespect for all values.
Great Britain is lost. Increased Socialism/Fascism/Authoritarianism, even in the guise of pseudo-science designed to instill apocalyptic paranoia, won’t cure its ills. Just like they don’t cure the ills of any nation. Never have, never will.

Editor
August 16, 2011 12:37 pm

By that I mean that, having begun to instill the values I grew up with, I realise that these now seem at odds with ‘the norm’, which seems to undermine good parenting. I seem to risk being considered a ‘bad parent’ because I encourage ‘dangerous behaviour’.

kellys_eye
August 16, 2011 12:41 pm

It’s such hypocricy of British MPs to demand swift and ‘hard’ punishment of ‘rioters’ when they themselves just ‘returned their ill-gotten gains’ for nothing worse than some vocal castigation (recent revelations of British MPs abusing their expenses). We now have Government mandarins accused of using taxpayer-funded credit cards (Government Procurement Cards) to purchase items of a personal nature….. if this isn’t ‘rioting’ by stealth then what is?
THIS is supposed to be ‘leading by example’???? This is a damn good reason TO riot…….

1DandyTroll
August 16, 2011 12:57 pm

In EU industries of all kinds are moving to asia. For one single reason, too expensive with all the taxes, fines, and what not the enviro-fundmanetalist communist hippies and other communists has dreamt up to make industries pay to exist or settle in countries in EU.
Industries in EU pay an enormous amount of money in taxes just for the right to hire and employ people. These people then have to pay numerous taxes for the right to work. The industries also pays all sort of taxes on profit. They have to pay dearly for property. Pre-fines for keeping everything to highest euro-cratic standards of clean and green (not that it seem to be doing much good anyway). The R&D cost alone to keep pushing to meet the eurocrazy safety standards is mind boggling (that cost has to be earned back from somewhere else in the company).
But for some reason EU has several standards for things like power outlets and rail roads and not even a primary common language, so the cost to adapt and produce eurcrazy supposedly clean, green and safe has to be paid for by, wait for it… no not the industries, no they moved the production to asia, the laid of workers who are now poorer consumers therefor need really cheap asian produced stuff with less safety (conforming to safety standards is a bit different apparently in asia, but since the product is produced outside EU different rules apply).
It was done for our best, right, the “perfect” welfare system, to save the earth, but still not the stupendous jay walkers who still think they’ll not break their legs crossing the street even though that horrendously expensive to R&D and to conform to the highest of the eurocratic safety and design standards really doesn’t do much to protect hurrying legs from frustrated drivers in rush hour. But hey, the socialist governments are a truly happy, because with the extra money they got from the industries they can afford to put up even more “traffic” cameras (all made in asia of course). But don’t think the safety bumper industry (using only recycled materials, I’m “sure”) is booming in EU, apparently, it is even too expensive for them ( and dealing with petrochemical products in EU…)
Ironically the service sector was teeming, then enter present day reality not so much since nobody wants to service a bunch of poor folks on the dole who can’t pay for the services. :p
You have to be truly crazy green to believe you can run a profitable country without “dirty” industries, except into the ground.
It is no wonder the logistics industries are booming though, because everything is produced and manufactured somewhere else. Only problem though, the green horror now wants to have all the cargo go by train. And they have yet to come up with one single design and safety standard for common power outlets. :()

ANH
August 16, 2011 1:20 pm
Adam Gallon
August 16, 2011 1:29 pm

What on earth is “Weatherization”?

homo sapiens
August 16, 2011 1:40 pm

There’s a long way to go before the British citizenry appreciates the full horror of their predicament.
Roger says …..
“the BBC News for the past two days has been featuring the installation of an offshore turbine farm. Whilst there were some alusions to the increase in bills that the governments wind power programme would undoubtedly engender, we were assured by an employee of the installation company that these costs would diminish within the next twenty years.
The British Brainwashing Corporation can thus be seen to be furthering the will of an inept or corrupt government, which has set it’s face against a growing weight of both scientific and engineering contrarian evidence, whilst at the same time protecting it’s ill advised staff pension fund investments”
YES,
BBC’s notoriously unindependent science spokesperson, David Shukman, failed to point out the £150 billion cost of this insane project (including the £50 billion needed for the associated tramsmission and infrastructure costs).
Nor did he say that economist Professor Dieter Helmen of OU had already informed him earlier that these stupendous figures were totally unaffordable for the UK economy,
nor did he explain that for our money we would get a system which . . .
a) will generate electricity at three to four times the cost of power from coal/gas/nuclear
b) will only generate electricity for 28% of the time
c) will probably generate NO electricity on the coldest days/nights of winter when conditions are usually anticyclonic
d) will not allow the decomissioning of a single conventional power station, BUT …
e) will soon start to cause lengthy power cuts – even nationwide blackouts, as 40% of UK power generators will shortly have to be closed down under farcical EU emission regulations..