WTF? US Geological Survey studying rice, fungus, & climate

From this USGS Press Release. What, you don’t have enough earthquakes to chase or maps to make? Read your mission statement when you applied to congress for funding:

The USGS plays a crucial role in protecting the public from natural hazards such as floods and earthquakes, assessing water quality, providing emergency responders with geospatial data to improve homeland security, analyzing the strategic and economic implications of mineral supply and demand, and providing the science needed to manage our natural resources and combat invasive species that can threaten agriculture and public health. The USGS is working in every state and has nearly 400 offices across the country. To aid in its interdisciplinary investigations, the USGS works with over 2,000 federal, state, local, tribal and private organizations.

Not one thing about agricultural research and climate. Mission FAIL. We have other agencies for this and this is a duplication of services. While the research may have significant merit, USGS appears to be getting too big for it’s britches.

Climate Adaptation of Rice Symbiogenics — a New Strategy for Reducing Climate Impacts on Plants

Released: 7/13/2011 12:37:41 PM

Contact Information:

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey

Office of Communication

119 National Center

Reston, VA 20192

Rusty  Rodriguez 1-click interview

Phone: 206-526-6596Catherine  Puckett 1-click interview

Phone: 352-264-3532

Seattle – Rice – which provides nearly half the daily calories for the world’s population – could become adapted to climate change and some catastrophic events by colonizing its seeds or plants with the spores of tiny naturally occurring fungi, just-published U.S. Geological Survey-led research shows.

In an effort to explore ways to increase the adaptability of rice to climatic scourges such as tsunamis and tidal surges that have already led to rice shortages, USGS researchers and their colleagues colonized two commercial varieties of rice with the spores of fungi that exist naturally within native coastal (salt-tolerant) and geothermal (heat-tolerant) plants.

The experiments were “quite successful,” said author and Seattle-based USGS researcher Rusty Rodriguez, Ph.D. The rice plants thrived, achieving notable increased tolerance to cold, salt and drought, even though the rice varieties they tested were not naturally adapted to these stressors. Conferring heat tolerance to rice is the next step for the research team since rice production decreases by 10 percent for every temperature increase of 1-degree centigrade during the rice-growing season.

“This is an exciting breakthrough,” Rodriguez said. “The ability of these fungi to colonize and confer stress tolerance, as well as increased seed yields and root systems in rice – a genetically unrelated plant species from the native plants from which the fungi were isolated — suggests that the fungi may be useful in adapting plants to drought, salt and temperature stressors predicted to worsen in future years due to climate change.”

In fact, said Rodriguez, using these tiny fungi – called endophytes – is one of the only real strategies available for mitigating the effects of climate change on plants in natural and agricultural ecosystems. “We have named this emerging area of research “symbiogenics” for symbiosis-altered gene expression. The DNA of the rice plant itself, however, is not changed,” Rodriguez added. “Instead, we are re-creating what normally happens in nature. And with rice yields projected to decrease by 15 percent in developing countries by 2050, such strategies are needed.”

The way it works is this. All plants seem to have symbiotic endophytes – microscopic fungi or bacteria – living in them that do not cause disease in the plant.  The kind of endophytes that Rodriguez and his colleagues examined are all mutualistic, meaning the plant and the fungi have a close and positive relationship that bestows benefits on both partners: stress tolerance for the plant, nutrients and a lack of competition for the fungus.

The scientists took fungal endophytes from dunegrass, a species exposed to seawater and therefore salt-tolerant, and colonized the rice plants and seeds with its fungal spores, which germinated and infiltrated the plant’s tissue.  The results, said Rodriguez, were dramatic: the endophytes reduced water consumption of the plant by up to one half, and increased its growth, the number of seeds it produced, and how much it weighed by as much as 50 percent.

“Conventional thinking was that the dunegrass is salt tolerant because of genetic adaptations that occurred over time (the process of Darwinian evolution), but we found that when we removed the fungus from dunegrass, the plants were no longer salt tolerant,” Rodriguez said. “This means that plants in natural habitats may not be adapting themselves genetically to the stress, but instead are establishing a beneficial partnership with a fungus that makes them more salt tolerant.”

During the last 40 years of climate change, the authors pointed out, the minimum air temperature in rice-growing season has increased in China and the Philippines, resulting in a substantial decrease in rice yields there, decreases predicted to continue. “Collectively, these events, along with an increasing world population, have contributed to shortages and increased prices of rice, exacerbating hunger and famine issues globally.”

The authors emphasized that even though it may be possible to compensate for some of the effects of climate change by incorporating, say, earlier-producing varieties of rice into agricultural practices, the adaptive capabilities of rice will be what ultimately determines how severely climate change affects the annual yield of rice.

The research, Increased Fitness of Rice Plants to Abiotic Stress via Habitat Adapted Symbiosis: A Strategy for Mitigating Impacts of Climate Change, was published in PLoS One, and is available online.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
54 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Don Keiller
July 14, 2011 3:20 pm

“Yield decreases by 10% for each 1 degree C rise in temp during the growing season”
Maybe at constant CO2, but increased CO2 not only increases photosythesis (and hence yield), but also raises the photosynthetic temperature optimum .

July 14, 2011 4:30 pm

Nic says:
July 14, 2011 at 11:37 am
It has been known for years that beneficial microbes help plants grow better and reduce stress. They do not need to study things we already know.

Say what? Induced salt tolerance is, as I noted above, a big deal. Both for coastal and irrigated lands and crops. I doubt much, or nearly enough, is known “already” of the devilish details.

1DandyTroll
July 14, 2011 4:41 pm

Dave Springer says:
July 13, 2011 at 10:03 pm
“WTF?
This is clearly in the domain of the USGS and if you had quoted more than one paragraph from this link that appears at the top of the OP it would be clear to everyone:
http://www.geosociety.org/geopolicy/news/0806-USGScoalition-FY09HouseTestimony.pdf
The National Biological Service was integrated into the USGS in 1996. Exactly what other agencies do you suppose this kind of research falls under if not the National Biological Service?
Sounds like someone got up on the wrong side of the bed today.”
The National Biological Service was started in 1993 then three years later ended up inside the belly of USGS.
“The mission of NBS is to work with others to provide the scientific understanding and technologies needed to support the sound management and conservation of our Nation’s biological resources.”
Does rice fall under that statement or: “We provide leadership on food, agriculture, natural resources, and related issues based on sound public policy, the best available science, and efficient management.” That the department of agriculture stand for and behind and support.
Why pay two to do the job of one?

July 14, 2011 11:38 pm

1DandyTroll says:
July 14, 2011 at 4:41 pm

Why pay two to do the job of one?

Job creation is Job One?