This hasn’t hit the newstands yet, but thanks to the propaganda arm of Gore Inc. aka “Repower America” I’ve been given a link to the advance online copy which you too can read in full. First let’s start with the email. Like any good flock herder, there’s a big button where you can give to the cause:
=================================================================
Dear [name deleted],
Our Chairman Al Gore just published a major article in a special summer issue of Rolling Stone.
The magazine hits the stands on Friday, June 24, but you can read it here:
http://acp.repoweramerica.org/rollingstone
Turn on the news or look out the window: Every day, we see the impacts of climate change in the form of historic droughts, floods, storms and other extreme weather events. Yet despite what scientists have been telling us for decades and what we can see with our own eyes, powerful interests continue to deny this crisis is even happening.
Vice President Gore’s essay is important — and I know it will be discussed far and wide.
Take a minute and read this article, then leave a comment on the piece and share it with your friends.
http://acp.repoweramerica.org/rollingstone
Thanks,
Maggie L. Fox
President and CEO
Alliance for Climate Protection
P.S. As you read this email, lies and misinformation are being spread about the climate crisis. We need you to change the conversation and speak up for reality. Leave a comment on Rolling Stone’s website here. Share this article on Twitter, and when you do, use the hashtag #reality. You are our voice.

===================================================================
Gore has gone full bore on “deniers”, and starts off with comparisons to WWF (no not the NGO, yes, the wrestlers) with the piece entitled:
Photo Gallery: 11 extreme-weather signs the climate crisis is real
Gore wants to take the battle to the streets, mainly because he’s losing the battle, big time. For example, here’s his advice on how to harass your hometown media:
Fourth, contact your local newspapers and television stations when they put out claptrap on climate — and let them know you’re fed up with their stubborn and cowardly resistance to reporting the facts of this issue. One of the main reasons they are so wimpy and irresponsible about global warming is that they’re frightened of the reaction they get from the deniers when they report the science objectively. So let them know that deniers are not the only ones in town with game. Stay on them! Don’t let up! It’s true that some media outlets are getting instructions from their owners on this issue, and that others are influenced by big advertisers, but many of them are surprisingly responsive to a genuine outpouring of opinion from their viewers and readers. It is way past time for the ref to do his job.
And there’s the other usual and expected talking points, like that oft cited “97% survey”.
This time, the scientific consensus is even stronger. It has been endorsed by every National Academy of science of every major country on the planet, every major professional scientific society related to the study of global warming and 98 percent of climate scientists throughout the world. In the latest and most authoritative study by 3,000 of the very best scientific experts in the world, the evidence was judged “unequivocal.”
Of course Gore never tells readers that only 5% of the original sample responses were climate scientists. See why here.
The study/survey paper is behind a pay wall but there is a comprehensive summary here.
We find that they originally contacted 10,257 scientists, of whom 3,146 responded, less than a 31% response rate. “Impending Planetary Doom” was obviously not uppermost in the minds of over two thirds of their target population. Of that number, only 5% described themselves as climate scientists, numbering 157. The authors reduce that by half by only counting those who they classed as “specialists”.
“In our survey, the most specialized and knowledgeable respondents (with regard to climate change) are those who listed climate science as their area of expertise and who also have published more than 50% of their recent peer-reviewed papers on the subject of climate change (79 individuals in total). Of these specialists, 96.2% (76 of 79) answered “risen” to question 1 and 97.4% (75 of 77) answered yes to question 2.”
So just 75 climate scientists out of people 3000 surveyed, that works out to 2.5%. No mention of the OSI survey with 30,000 people that responded of course.
On the plus side, he disses Obama on his non-existent (but sensible) climate policy:
Yet President Obama has never presented to the American people the magnitude of the climate crisis,…
…
He has simply not made the case for action. He has not defended the science against the ongoing, withering and dishonest attacks. Nor has he provided a presidential venue for the scientific community — including our own National Academy — to bring the reality of the science before the public.
Here’s what Gore says about Climategate:
But wait! The good guys transgressed the rules of decorum, as evidenced in their private e-mails that were stolen and put on the Internet. The referee is all over it: Penalty! Go to your corner! And in their 3,000-page report, the scientists made some mistakes! Another penalty!
An alternate title for Gore’s piece might be Perp Fiction.
![Rolling_Stone-logo[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/rolling_stone-logo1.gif?resize=640%2C157)
Those that Gore labels as Deniers are the very same that didn’t fall off the hay wagon yesterday, and those who can paddle thier own boat through the available data. There isn’t anything going on today that didn’t happen in my lifetime or my parents and grandparents lifetime (that they related to me).
Businesspeople jumped out of windows in 1910, not because of Halleys Comet, but because of the Great Comet which arrived in May, 1910. The doomsayers claimed it was the end of the world, and the naieve and unsuspecting fell for it (after they jumped in panic).
Gore is a doomsayer with a twist: He’s out to rake in the dough over the panic he instigates.
Like the old saying goes: “If you can’t dazzle ’em with brilliance, baffle ’em with bullcrap”.
This is a lie of omission: “the long debunked climate to severe weather link which even NOAA says does not exist in the data.” They stated that this year’s tornado outbreak can’t be linked to climate change, but if you google “noaa climate change extreme weather” you get statements explicitly endorsing the link within the first few links., e.g., http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2008/20080619_climatereport.html
pretty much the way it looks now only sooner
No. He’s skewing perceptions to line his own pockets. He doesn’t care about the world, environment, global warming, his (ex)wife, or anything else. He simply wants money and power. Flipping metric butt-tons of it.
No it’s not Gore’s feckless media “referees”: the worst degradation for “Our Chairman’s” own WWF personna, trying to play the good guy!
@Al Gored says:
June 22, 2011 at 7:14 pm
CRS, Dr.P.H. says:
June 22, 2011 at 5:01 pm
“Oh, puh-lease!! In one corner, rent-seeking academic research whores…”
Please. Not nice to call climatutes “whores.” That sounds cheap, and they are not.
————-
REPLY I’m sorry, you are correct. I should have said “blood-sucking parasites upon humanity.”
Didn’t mean to insult anyone….
How did that come about again* … oh, right – right … I remember now, it was not quite a Dominique Strauss-Kahn** kind of ‘thing’ … or was it *** ?
* Al Gore’s surprising split from wife Tipper was prompted by an affair he was having with Larry David’s environmental activist wife
** http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominique_Strauss-Kahn#Allegations_of_sexual_assault
*** A very inconvenient masseuse: How saint Al Gore, the sanctimonious eco-crusader, lost his halo (and his wife!)
.
The most appalling thing about this is his slam on the Obama administration.
This hypocrite had the chance to JOIN the administration and fundamentally change the environmental policy of America. He turned it down!
Now, why would someone who passionately believes in his cause refuse power to do something about it. Has that ever happened in the history of mankind?
There can only be two answers. He doesn’t believe in the crap he is selling or he didn’t want to be hamstrung from making millions of dollars from doing very little real work.
“A lie of omission”, eh, Nota? But have you perhaps forgotten that
The Religion of Climate ChangeClimate Science’s basic “tenet” is that CO2 = CAGW is in practice “consistent with” everything that happens? And especially with all weather?Why the GOP should nominate Barack Obama in 2012
http://mobile.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/06/21/lind_obama_republican/
After all, Gore and the liberals aren’t happy with Spaghetti O. Kind of a neat takeoff.
Perhaps I’m the only one who has noticed this. Can ANY of you think of a single current or former Vice President of the United States of America who has written an opinion piece…for Rolling Stone? I suppose Gore surrendered his dignity a long time ago. I just imagine the rationale, “…gotta keep the idea fresh in the minds of the kids…”. I find it disgusting.
I’ve been having a little fun with Al Gore and his over-the-top “Repower America” organization for over a year now. I signed up to receive their emails, under a pseudonym, and using a separate, dedicated, free email address. I use yahoo mail, but there are plenty of others to choose among. Their weekly missives are quite entertaining, signed by the same Maggie L. Fox from this post, President and CEO of Alliance for Climate Protection. Her emails are from repoweramerica (dot) org. My fun is in responding to their true-believer rants and asking some rather pointed questions – many of them derived from what I’ve learned here at WUWT. It is especially fun during the winters, when the snows are piling up. Or during the summers, when the hurricanes are not. Seas not rising, in fact the Pacific Ocean is falling, Arctic ice is stubbornly hanging in there – especially when the wind does NOT blow it out to sea… I highly recommend this as an excellent form of entertainment. If enough people poke fun at Al Gore and his minions, perhaps they will realize they’ve been duped…. Nah, will never happen…
On the hand we seem to have Gore losing the plot even more ( if that is possible). On the other we have a journalist in the UK suggesting “peace talks” with skeptics ( the uber Green, Leo Hickman from the Guardian on Bishop Hill ).
George Monbiot has gone very quiet lately except for a burst of support for nuclear energy. Fred Pearce ( also from the UK ) seems to have disappeared from the game. I’m not sure what is going on in the US with the die hard AGW journalists but I sense some are trying to find a way out of the corner they put themselves in
Does this add up to desperation ( Gore) and seeing light from the others.
JPeden: I don’t really understand what you’re trying to say. A statistically significant increase in extreme weather is, in fact, consistent with global warming. But that doesn’t mean that every weather event is caused by warming. In the case of tornadoes, we haven’t seen a pattern of increased tornadic activity in general, so there’s no calling this year a trend. The fact that those who agree with the theory of global warming acknowledge as much should be a testament to their intellectual honesty; but, it has no bearing on whether warming is actually occurring or not.
I think we should rather interpret this as Rolling Stone having lost the plot. How many readers, believing that they are at some cultural cutting edge, are going to read this ranty diatribe from yesterday’s man and decide that RS is peddling BS?
Burn your cars!
I plopped a comment over at Rolling Stone. I wonder what publishers think. Most pro AGW articles seem to get bashed by the mass of public comments.
I’m not surprised. The more informed population that reads news on the internet is completely different then the MTV masses that are clueless. Of course comments even on a paper like the Guardian or this example like the Rolling Stone are going to reflect the non-snow jobbed informed class.
Problem is, in the real scope of things, the informed class is still a small minority compared the the sheep class.
Here’s to a real cold winter to wake up more sheep!
Curious question. I wonder when the powers that be will start to keep a list of deniers to round up and place in the concentration camps? I get the willies when I post comments on AGW articles like the Al piece in Rolling Stone.
‘There coming to take you away away’ repeat
I wonder if Al still keeps his Five Dollar bill, three quarters and a square of purple cloth with him. You know he missed his chance in 1997…
Gore has been spending lots of money indoctrinating a band of Gore-youth. It sound like thisarticle is directed at them.
The trouble is that here in Australia vast swathes of the professional politicians, MSM, the CSIRO, the ABC, Tim Flannery, and myriads of other rent seekers will be following his party line.
Not to mention Ross Garnaut. May they shiver miserably as the new solar minimum progress!
If AlGore gave a speech in the woods…would anybody hear him ?
It’s interesting to compare the two charades: The Euro and Manmade warming. Both of them exist in the absence of any substantial material support, and almost exclusively due to a huge political pressure that “wants” them to exist. In one sense, it is quite amazing that people can achieve so much with so little. In the case of the Euro, we have numerous countries each with their own economies, each therefore going at their own economic speed, but somehow despite the obvious fact that they are different economic units, nothing but human will power and “definition” have linked them together under one currency.
Of course, the Euro cannot change the fundamentals: it cannot make Greece as prosperous as Germany, or to put it another way, it cannot force Germany to sacrifice its economy in order to boost Greece and create economic parity which is what is needed if two economic units are to share a common currency.
Likewise, the “belief in warming”, cannot change the facts about natural variation. That belief can so distort the temperature record and the “science” interpreting that record so as to hide the fact the real world does not support the belief.
But … like the Euro, sooner or later real temperatures, like real economies, will divulge from the myth that has been created.
Of course, the biggest difference is that it is possible to physically align currencies … in effect to remove local economic control and replace it with one “empire” of Europe, but I doubt that is acceptable, so it is pretty inevitable that the Euro will collapse, obviously the biggest cracks will be between those economies which differ most in their “speed” and so develop the greatest mismatch soonest, but as all economies are independent, and so move at different speeds, sooner or later they will all reach sufficient mismatch to create the same “cracks” and one after another they will depart the Euro.
The big question, though is which will happen first? Will the real climate force global warmist to drop global warming before or after the real different speeds of the Euro countries force them to drop the Euro?
James Reid says:
June 22, 2011 at 5:09 pm
Sad but very dangerous… like a cornered cougar!
Sorry James but that is an insult to cougars. I think ‘cornered rat’ is more fitting.
Make that as the as the solar minmum prgresses.
Cheers
John