Ask and ye shall receive NOAA

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administratio...
Image via Wikipedia

A while back, I highlighted this, and now comments are open to the public and I’m sure there will be many readers who would like to contribute.

NOAA seeks public comments on scientific integrity policy

June 16, 2011

NOAA’s draft scientific integrity policy is available for public review and comment until Aug. 15, 2011. The policy incorporates the principles of scientific integrity contained in guidance from the White House, and addresses how NOAA ensures quality science in its practices and policies and promotes a culture of transparency, integrity and ethical behavior.

“Scientific integrity is at the core of producing and using good science,” said Jane Lubchenco, Ph.D., undersecretary for oceans and atmosphere and NOAA administrator. “By being open and honest about our science, we build understanding and trust. This policy reflects the commitment I made when I first came to NOAA to strengthen science, ensure it is not misused or undermined, and base decisions on good science. This scientific integrity policy is about fostering an environment where science is encouraged, nurtured, respected, rewarded and protected.”

At the beginning of Lubchenco’s tenure, NOAA embarked on a thoughtful and transparent effort to draft a policy to uphold the principles of scientific integrity. The policy contains the principles articulated in President Obama’s March 9, 2009, memorandum and further guidance provided in White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) Director John Holdren’s Dec. 17, 2010, memorandum on scientific integrity. The policy responds to Holdren’s directive to agencies to submit their draft policies to OSTP by early August.

NOAA’s draft policy:

  • Lays out formal guidance with a “Code of Conduct”
  • Creates the conditions for enabling first-rate science and guarding against attempts to undermine, discredit or change it
  • States the key role of science in informing policy
  • Encourages scientists to publish data and findings to advance science, their careers and NOAA’s reputation for reliable science
  • Encourages NOAA scientists to be leaders in the scientific community
  • Provides whistle-blower protection
  • Applies to all NOAA employees and provides applicable policies for contractors and grantees who conduct, supervise, assess and/or interpret scientific information for the use of NOAA, the Department of Commerce and the nation
  • Includes a training component.

In April, NOAA submitted a progress report to OSTP describing its progress on developing a scientific integrity policy and describing relevant policies currently in effect. In February 2011, an early draft scientific integrity policy was shared with all of the agency’s employees for their review and comment. The draft announced today takes those comments into consideration.

NOAA also seeks comments on the accompanying handbook that outlines procedures to respond to allegations of misconduct. Both draft documents can be found electronically at www.noaa.gov/scientificintegrity.

Those without computer access can call 301-734-1186 to request a copy of the draft policy and handbook and instructions for returning written comments via mail by Aug. 15.

NOAA’s mission is to understand and predict changes in the Earth’s environment, from the depths of the ocean to the surface of the sun, and to conserve and manage our coastal and marine resources. Visit us on Facebook and Twitter.

==================================================================

It seems they left out this important paragraph from the press release above, burying it in a link, so I’ll helpfully provide it for you:

Please send your feedback to integrity.noaa@noaa.gov either in an email or a MS Word document by August 15, 2011. Please include a reference to the section, sub-section, and paragraph when providing comments on specific language in the draft documents.

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

82 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Steve in SC
June 18, 2011 4:34 pm

John W. Garrett says:
June 18, 2011 at 7:50 am
The first thing NOAA needs to do is eliminate the position of chief propagandist, political scientist, and head salesman.
( in case you’re wondering, all three positions are currently held by James Hansen )

Earth to commentators!
Earth to commentators!
You are wrong wrong and wrong John W.
James Hansen is employed by NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies.
What he does is not part of the mission of NASA.
Now your three bears are Janey, Tommy, and Tommy P. Yes they should be fired.

James Sexton
June 18, 2011 5:22 pm

jafo says:
June 18, 2011 at 11:36 am
Hansen isn’t with NOAA……you can’t google that before you post? No wonder many are ignorant about this topic.
charles nelson
Way to use one year. So you are saying that there hasn’t been any melting in the last ~30 years?
======================================================================
Hmm, melting or taken away by the winds and current. That’s a distinction that should probably be made. And then, there’s some of us here that would say……so……an ice free Arctic would be much more beneficial to mankind than detrimental. But, alas, it is only a pipe-dream. http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2011/2010GL045698.shtml
But you’re correct, Hansen is on the other side of the same coin……….. govt. funded ideological advocacy.

SSam
June 18, 2011 5:52 pm

NOAA and scientific integrity.
Total and unmitigated bullshit.

joe
June 18, 2011 8:21 pm

wow, the NOAA is going to get guidance on “promoting a culture of transparency, integrity and ethical behavior” from the liar-in-chief, this oughta be great….i think everyone saw enough of obama’s (lack of)”transparency, integrity and ethical behavior” during the health care shove down….“We gotta pass the bill so you can find out what’s in it”

joe
June 18, 2011 8:45 pm

btw, it seems like they trying to ramp up the AGW fraud again thru the media – i heard some clown on the John Bachelor radio show saying that the flows of the Colorado River are dwindling and will be expected to further decrease with “onset of global warming” and of course he makes no mention of the huge snowfall we’ve had in the Sierra Nevada range…they just pick and choose their “facts” as it suits their needs…seems to be a concerted effort…
and then i heard on some radio news, prob CNN or ABC, someone claiming that there has been a huge upturn in extreme weather(hurricanes, tornados, blizzards(?)) the last 5 years or so and that this is attributable to AGW….this was radio news…i guess they don’t need to check facts…

Mr Green Genes
June 19, 2011 2:21 am

kim says:
June 18, 2011 at 1:13 am
er, uh Mooney. Though I often hesitate to correct slips like that.
With Holdren and Chu as his picks, we need to worry about scientific integrity after integrity in general.
kim, I generally agree with you, typing errors can creep in quite easily. However, I couldn’t help wondering if you’d made a minor spelling error here. There seems to be a letter missing.

kim
June 19, 2011 2:56 am

Ar Ar Arf.
======