Gamma ray flash was star swallowed whole by black hole

Yikes! What a way to go. One wonders if there were any planets around that star and if they may have contained life. We’ll never know.

Black hole eats star, producing bright gamma-ray flash

By Robert Sanders, Media Relations UC Berkeley  | June 16, 2011

BERKELEY —

A bright flash of gamma rays observed March 28 by the Swift satellite may have been the death rattle of a star falling into a massive black hole and being ripped apart, according to a team of astronomers led by the University of California, Berkeley.

When the Swift Gamma Burst Mission spacecraft first detected the flash within the constellation Draco, astronomers thought it was a gamma-ray burst from a collapsing star and designated it GRB 110328A. On March 31, however, UC Berkeley’s Joshua Bloom sent out an email circular suggesting that it wasn’t a typical gamma-ray burst at all, but a high-energy jet produced as a star about the size of our sun was shredded by a black hole a million times more massive.

Gamma-ray flare observed by the Swift satellite.
Images from Swift's Ultraviolet/Optical (white, purple) and X-ray telescopes (yellow and red) were combined in this view of the gamma-ray flare, catalogued as GRB 110328A. The blast was detected only in X-rays, which were collected over a 3.4-hour period on March 28, 2011. (NASA/Swift/Stefan Immler)

Careful analysis of the Swift data and subsequent observations by the Hubble Space Telescope and the Chandra X-ray Observatory confirmed Bloom’s initial insight. The details are published online today (Thursday, June 16) in Science Express, a rapid publication arm of the journal Science.

“This is truly different from any explosive event we have seen before,” Bloom said.

What made this gamma-ray flare, called Sw 1644+57, stand out from a typical burst were its long duration and the fact that it appeared to come from the center of a galaxy nearly 4 billion light years away. Since most, if not all, galaxies are thought to contain a massive black hole at the center, a long-duration burst could conceivably come from the relatively slow tidal disruption of an infalling star, the astronomers said.

“This burst produced a tremendous amount of energy over a fairly long period of time, and the event is still going on more than two and a half months later,” said Bloom, an associate professor of astronomy at UC Berkeley. “That’s because as the black hole rips the star apart, the mass swirls around like water going down a drain, and this swirling process releases a lot of energy.”

Bloom and his colleagues propose in their Science Express paper that some 10 percent of the infalling star’s mass is turned into energy and irradiated as X-rays from the swirling accretion disk or as X-rays and higher energy gamma rays from a relativistic jet that punches out along the rotation axis. Earth just happened to be in the eye of the gamma-ray beam.

Bloom draws an analogy with a quasar, which is a distant galaxy that emits bright, high-energy light because of the massive black hole at its center gobbling up stars and sending out a jet of X-rays along its rotation axis. Observed from an angle, these bright emissions are called active galactic nuclei, but when observed down the axis of the jet, they’re referred to as blazars.

“We argue that this must be jetted material and we’re looking down the barrel,” he said. “Jetting is a common phenomenon when you have accretion disks, and black holes actually prefer to make jets.”

Looking back at previous observations of this region of the cosmos, Bloom and his team could find no evidence of X-ray or gamma-ray emissions, leading them to conclude that this is a “one-off event,” Bloom said.

“Here, you have a black hole sitting quiescently, not gobbling up matter, and all of a sudden something sets it off,” Bloom said. “This could happen in our own galaxy, where a black hole sits at the center living in quiescence, and occasionally burbles or hiccups as it swallows a little bit of gas. From a distance, it would appear dormant, until a star randomly wanders too close and is shredded.”

Probable tidal disruptions of a star by a massive black hole have previously been seen at X-ray, ultraviolet and optical wavelengths, but never before at gamma-ray energies. Such random events, especially looking down the barrel of a jet, are incredibly rare, “probably once in 100 million years in any given galaxy,” said Bloom. “I would be surprised if we saw another one of these anywhere in the sky in the next decade.”

Hubble Space Telescope image of galaxy.
A visible-light image of GRB 110328A's host galaxy (arrow) taken on April 4, 2011, by the Hubble Space Telescope's Wide Field Camera 3. The galaxy is 3.8 billion light years away. (NASA/ESA/A. Fruchter, STScI)

The astronomers suspect that the gamma-ray emissions began March 24 or 25 in the uncatalogued galaxy at a redshift of 0.3534, putting it at a distance of about 3.8 billion light years. Bloom and his colleagues estimate that the emissions will fade over the next year.

“We think this event was detected around the time it was as bright as it will ever be, and if it’s really a star being ripped apart by a massive black hole, we predict that it will never happen again in this galaxy,” he said.

Bloom’s colleagues include UC Berkeley theoretical physicist Elliot Quataert, who models the production of jets from accretion disks, and UC Berkeley astronomers S. Bradley Cenko, Daniel A. Perley, Nathaniel R. Butler, Linda E. Strubbe, Antonino Cucchiara, Geoffrey C. Bower and Adam N. Morgan; Dimitrios Giannios and Brian D. Metzger of Princeton University; Andrew J. Levan of the University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom; Nial R. Tanvir, Paul T. O’ Brien, Andrew R. King and Sergei Nayakshin of the University of Leicester in the U.K.; Fabio De Colle, Enrico Ramirez-Ruiz and James Guillochon of UC Santa Cruz; William H. Lee of the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México in Mexico City; Andrew S. Fruchter of the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, Md.; and Alexander J. van der Horst of the Universities Space Research Association in Huntsville, Ala.

Levan is first author of the companion Science Express paper, and leader of the Chandra and Hubble Space Telescope observation team.

Bloom and his laboratory are supported by grants from NASA and the National Science Foundation.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

115 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
LeeHarvey
June 17, 2011 9:56 am

I’ve always wondered what the potential is for ‘quick’ destruction of a star system in the course of a galactic collision such as is expected between the Milky Way and Andromeda in a few billion years. It would seem that the odds would be substantially higher than of seeing such an event happen in a ‘static’ galaxy…

June 17, 2011 10:05 am

I love the term “flash”. I guess in astronomical scales, it was a flash (but then what is a normal burst like?). A fascinating finding, and due to its relative longevity, was a good one to study.

PaulH
June 17, 2011 10:17 am

Can we add voracious black holes to the list of catastrophes caused by global warming? ;->

Bratise
June 17, 2011 10:25 am

OT The accuweather global warming page by Brett linked here is not “lukewarmer” and you are giving it undone recognition by doing so. Its most definitely in the “pure warmista camp” have a look for yourself not one mention of solar news or IPCC etc. Its been veering this way for some time as his job probably depends on continuation of AGW and the site itself. Suggestion put it in the same list as RC etc. link here
http://www.accuweather.com/blogs/climatechange/Science

dougsherman
June 17, 2011 10:25 am

“… we predict it will never happen again in this galaxy.”
Now I have to question every other conclusion this guy has made.

Jan Sobieski
June 17, 2011 10:26 am

More unraveling. Climates crooks at work.
“Changing Tides: Research Center Under Fire for ‘Adjusted’ Sea-Level Data Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/06/17/research-center-under-fire-for-adjusted-sea-level-data/#ixzz1PYTtsLrc

Nigel S
June 17, 2011 10:28 am

What’s the carbon footprint of that?

reason
June 17, 2011 10:29 am

“a galactic collision such as is expected between the Milky Way and Andromeda in a few billion years.”
Kinda puts “our” problems into perspective…

June 17, 2011 10:34 am

Now THAT was Global Warming — err Globular warming — you know what I mean!

peterhodges
June 17, 2011 10:37 am

may have been…thought to…could conceivably
Hmmm…sounds familiar.

reason
June 17, 2011 10:40 am

“Now I have to question every other conclusion this guy has made.”
I second that.

June 17, 2011 10:44 am

“a galactic collision such as is expected between the Milky Way and Andromeda in a few billion years.”
Ack! tax now to prevent this AGC (Anthropogenic galactic collision)

Olen
June 17, 2011 10:50 am

Good to be on the outer edge.

F. Ross
June 17, 2011 10:53 am

dougsherman says:
June 17, 2011 at 10:25 am
“… we predict it will never happen again in this galaxy.”
Now I have to question every other conclusion this guy has made.

Well put; my thoughts exactly.

Andrew30
June 17, 2011 11:04 am

dougsherman;
[“… we predict it will never happen again in this galaxy.”
Now I have to question every other conclusion this guy has made.]
Yes, ‘never’ is a long time.

Jim G
June 17, 2011 11:11 am

So, how does a black hole “grow” since time stops at the singularity, it would seem that nothing could ever add to that singulariity and would take a semi-infinite amount of time to even approach it?

DirkH
June 17, 2011 11:42 am

““We think this event was detected around the time it was as bright as it will ever be, and if it’s really a star being ripped apart by a massive black hole, we predict that it will never happen again in this galaxy,” he said.”
He takes himself far too seriously. We are only watching out for gamma rays for a few years now and immediately (in historical terms) we see such an event – how unlikely is *that* when it happens so rarely? I can already see the headline next year when scientists will be baffled, surprised and flabbergasted when it happens again.

LarryD
June 17, 2011 11:50 am

Random notes:
The center regions of galaxies are high radiation areas, not likely for life to develop there. If the star migrated there from elsewhere, the high radiation would most likely kill any higher life forms in its solar system long before the star was torn apart.
Jim G: matter can enter the event horizon, though, and the additional mass will enlarge the event horizon.

tallbloke
June 17, 2011 12:02 pm

Sorry, have I strayed onto a blog discussing plots for sci fi movies?
Some of these astronomers straining at faraway gnats could better spend some time studying what is going on closer to home.

Ray
June 17, 2011 12:09 pm

Just a few days ago I was looking around on Google map for strange shapes and found this thing at 46°27′18.52″N 119°24′27.56″W.
Searching further I found out that it was the LIGO observatory at Hanford Nuclear Reservation. They have been spending hundreds of millions for this marvelous interferometer that was specifically built to detect ripples in the gravitation. The sort of ripples that such present phenomenon would cause. Yet, they are still operating and they never been able to detect anything with it, not even the present event. What a waste of money.

Kelvin Vaughan
June 17, 2011 12:15 pm

uncatalogued galaxy at a redshift of 0.3534, putting it at a distance of about 3.8 billion light years.
The bad news is that the red shift was caused by the black hole and it’s only a stones throw away.

kadaka (KD Knoebel)
June 17, 2011 12:16 pm

Now I’m wondering about rogue “wandering” black holes in space, possibly heading our way. Could a “small” one slingshot around a galactic core and be ejected out into deep space, possibly at a significant fraction of c (speed of light)? Without a noticeable accretion disk (perhaps consumed during traveling), would we even see it coming?

Mac the Knife
June 17, 2011 12:20 pm

‘And in other news, am interesting vignette from outside our Milky Way Galaxy’
Thanks, Anthony!!!

June 17, 2011 12:21 pm

Jim G says:
June 17, 2011 at 11:11 am
So, how does a black hole “grow” since time stops at the singularity, it would seem that nothing could ever add to that singulariity and would take a semi-infinite amount of time to even approach it?

That’s is only what the observer outside a black hole sees, Its all about the frame of reference.

PaulH from Scotland
June 17, 2011 12:26 pm


Despite hugely valuing your AGW de-programming posts all over the blogosphere, I feel the need to call you up on this one.
Humans will eventually colonise space (you can probably already guess I’m a Trekkie), and the cost of this research, albeit highly qualified, is probably miniscule compared to the billions spent of the AGW bollocks.
Research like this fills my optimism bank. Yes, I know it’s a wee bit irrational, but you may wish to consider indulging us largely harmless Trekkies…
Other than that, keep up the fabulous work please! ;-).

1 2 3 5
Verified by MonsterInsights