Greenland and AGW

The last written records of the Norse Greenlan...
The last written records of the Norse Greenlanders are from a 1408 marriage in the church of Hvalsey...Image via Wikipedia

Guest post by S Jay Porter

In 891 AD. Eric The Red set off from Iceland with a few followers to explore a land to the west which they had probably spotted some time before while sailing out in their longboats, and then returned three years later with about 500 fellow Vikings. At first they settled on the south-east coast, close to the tip of this new land and then, as the population grew, created a further settlement to the south-west. They called their new home ‘Greenland’.

It has been said that this name was a ‘spin’, a publicity stunt to entice more Vikings to come to join the new settlers, but this would have been pointless if it had been impossible for them to survive. They must at least have been able to create their own dwellings, build their own fires, make their own clothes and above all, grow their own food. The settlers might have been able to trade such things as polar bear-skins and fox furs for iron and other necessities on occasional trips to Europe, but their compatriots in Denmark and Iceland would have been neither able nor willing to row their longboats out each month with groceries.

At present, the temperatures in Greenland range from a maximum of 7C in July to -9C in January. This is too cold for grain such as wheat and even rye to grow and ripen in the short summer of such northern latitudes. Nor are sheep and cattle happy at those temperatures. Hill sheep might be able to nibble away at moss and short grass, but cattle need lush meadows and hay to fatten and live through a winter. Solid wood is needed for building, boat building and warmth, but only bushes and such weak trees as birch now grow in Greenland.

In 1991, two caribou hunters stumbled over a log on a snowy Greenland riverbank, an unusual event because Greenland is now above the treeline. (1) Over the past century, further archaeological investigations found frozen sheep droppings, a cow barn, bones from pigs, sheep and goats and remains of rye, barley and wheat all of which indicate that the Vikings had large farmsteads with ample pastures. The Greenlanders obviously prospered, because from the number of farms in both settlements, whose 400 or so stone ruins still dot the landscape, archaeologists guess that the population may have risen to a peak of about five thousand. They also built a cathedral and churches with graves which means that the soil must have been soft enough to dig, but these graves are now well below the permafrost (2).

There is also a story in ‘Landnamabok, the Icelandic Book of Settlement, which tells of a man who swam across his local fjord to fetch a sheep for a feast in honour of his cousin, the founder of Greenland, Erick the Red. Studies of Channel swimmers show that 10C would be the lowest temperature that a man would be able to endure for such a swim, but the average August temperature of water in the fjords along the southern Greenland coast now rarely exceeds 6C. The water at that time must therefore have been at least 4C warmer and probably more than that which means that the summer temperatures (for the air) in the fjords in southern Greenland would then have been 13C-14C, (3) as compared with the present temperatures mentioned above.

It follows that temperatures must have been higher than those of today’s during that first settlement of Greenland which lasted from approximately 900 until the mid-1400s AD, when these settlements died out. There is no written explanation for this sudden demise but climate scientists have discovered that Iceland, like the rest of Europe, was gripped by a rapid and centuries-long drop in temperature, known as the Little Ice Age. And in a recent study, William D’Andrea and Yongsong Huang of Brown University, Providence RI (4) have traced the variability of the Greenland climate over a period of 5,600 years when previous inhabitants were also subjected to rapid warm and cold swings in temperatures

Yet the whole reason for the existence of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change (IPCC) is to thrust upon the world’s population the idea that industrialisation in the West over the last 100 years and our profligate use of fossil fuels is producing a run-away heating of the planet through the emission of greenhouse gases, mainly CO2, which unless checked will lead to its — and humanity’s — death. The western governments are happily looking forward to a vast increase in taxes to pay for measures to reduce ’carbon emissions’ and even the possibility of a Global Government to control everything has been mentioned (5).

So the possibility that temperatures were higher in the past in any part of the world was a thorn in the sides of those Climatologists who are wedded to the whole idea of Anthopogenic Global Warming (AGW), also known as Climate Change.

Unfortunately for them, an English Climatologist, Hubert H Lamb, first formulated the idea of a Medieval Warming Period (MWP) in 1965 and other surveys have found that this warming did not just occur in the northwestern hemisphere but was global (6). Lamb founded the UK Climate Research Unit (CRU) in 1971 and until the mid 1990s the MWP was undisputed fact and was shown even in the IPPC progress report of 1990. But Dr David Darning (University of Oklahoma College of Earth and Energy) in his recent testimony to Congress (7) said ‘…I received an astonishing email from a major researcher in the area of climate change. It said “We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period”’ And this the ‘warmist’ Climatologists certainly tried to do.

In 1998 a graph was produced by geophysicist Michael Mann, known as the Hockey Stick Graph’, which managed to almost air-brush out of existence the Medieval Warming Period . This was published in the eminent scientific magazine Nature and also in several places in the IPPC Report of 2001 and created a world-wide sensation. Here was proof positive the world was overheating and it was All Our Fault.

However, investigation of the graph by historians and climatologists who doubted the existence of global warming, brought criticism centred around the statistical method used and the associated computer programme. It was eventually called the most discredited study in the history of science and quietly dropped by the IPPC from the latest 2007 IPPC report for policy makers.

The Hockey Stick graph had also attempted to remove the Little Ice Age which was another world-wide event, lasting from roughly the early 14th century to the mid-19th century with short interspersed warm periods. It is well-known from written reports that temperatures must at times have been considerably lower than in the Medieval Warming Period since Frost Fairs were often held on the frozen Thames until 1814 and in 1658, during the coldest period of the Little Ice Age, King Karl X Gustav of Sweden led an army across the frozen Danish waters to lay siege to Copenhagen.

It was also at this time that the Viking settlements in Greenland gradually died out. The Medieval Warming Period is usually agreed to have lasted from approximately 900 to approximately 1300 AD and from then onwards the climate cooled again. Glaciers grew, sea ice advanced and marine life migrated southwards as it did so, leaving the Greenlanders with a smaller and more difficult catch. The summers became shorter and progressively cooler, limiting the time cattle could be kept outdoors and increasing the need for winter fodder which became less available. Trade between Greenland, Iceland and Europe became more difficult and finally ceased. (3) It can only be hoped that a few Greenlanders escaped to re-settled somewhere less cold before starvation overcame them all.

But since temperatures during the Medieval Warming Period were higher in Greenland than they are even today, and since this was followed by a Cooling Period, and since this has happened many times before (which have not been considered here), the fact that the earth may have warmed somewhat since the mid 1850s is not unusual. Nor will it be unusual if the temperatures now start to drop.

Above all, since man was not industrialised before the mid-1850s and so was not emitting any huge amounts of CO2, any warming which has occurred over the past 150 years (for which we should be grateful) is obviously a natural event and —

— NOT ALL OUR FAULT!

——————————————————————————————————————————–

Word Count: 1,418

Sonya Porter

Source Material:

(1) http://watsupwiththat.com (The Viking farm under the sand in Greenland by Terese Brasen)

(2) http://www.archaeology.org

(3) ‘Heaven and Earth’ by Prof. Ian Plimer

(4) http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/05/31/temperature-reconstruction-of-greenland-shows-ups-and-downs-in-climate-happened-over-5600-years/

(5) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lsltxgrr_o

(6) http://www.science-skeptical.de/blog

(7) http://epw.senate.gov/hearing_statements.cfm?id=266543

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

169 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
June 1, 2011 12:53 pm

MarkW says:
June 1, 2011 at 12:24 pm
Everything that I have read states that the Earth’s magnetic field is too localized to deflect cosmic rays.
Perhaps you should read something that tells you the truth instead. E.g. at low latitudes anything with energy less than ~12GeV are deflected. At mid-latitudes the limit is ~5 GeV. This is called the cut-off rigidity. Here is some info on that: http://www.adv-geosci.net/13/31/2007/adgeo-13-31-2007.pdf
“Here we have considered an important atmospheric parameter, the cosmic ray induced ionization, in two regions in the Northern Hemisphere – the European region and the Far East region – during the last millennium. We have shown that CRII variations in these two regions are dominated by changes caused by the migration of the geomagnetic pole, which exceed those variations due to solar activity changes. We note that the migration of the magnetic pole during the last millennium, which caused significant effects in cosmic ray induced ionization variations in some regions, was not exceptional. Actually, it can be regarded as a minor excursion (about 2000 km or 18 ◦ of a great circle during the millennium). There is evidence for more dramatic excursions of the geomagnetic axis, even for historical times. For example, the magnetic pole could have migrated for more that 90◦ of a great circle during the so-called “Sterno-Etrussia” geomagnetic excursion around 700 BC (Dergachev et al., 2004). The corresponding changes in local CRII must then be dramatic and may result in strong regional effects.”
Because CO2 is well-mixed in the atmosphere the cosmic ray intensity shown here
http://www.leif.org/research/Greenland-Temp-DAndrea.png can be considered an average over the globe. Again: the variation of the Earth’s magnetic field is the major factor regulating the flux of galactic cosmic rays.

Bebben
June 1, 2011 12:54 pm

Me, I have often wondered, where are the historians and archaeologists in the debate about the MWP and the LIA? Their voices seem totally absent. No opinion at all?
Have they just hid under their desks, waiting for the global warming hysteria to blow away?

Ged
June 1, 2011 1:10 pm

Actually, the speed of the different frequencies of light through space do not seem completely identical. For instance, with supernova, X-rays always reach us before gamma rays if the event is sufficiently far enough way. That is, in the X-ray spectrum, we can watch the supernova unfold, and then we can watch the same event happen again in the gamma ray spectrum often weeks to months later. The same holds true for the visible spectrum, which often will reach us weeks before the X-ray bursts. This could be caused if the curving of space due to gravity over long travel times effects the different wavelength bands disproportionately, or an actual intrinsic variation in the value of c out around the 6th or 7th decimal place as you go from one end of the spectrum to the other. As it is, visible light seems to be the “fastest” type of light when watching cosmological events.
I don’t know if this has anything to do with any supposed effects of supernovas on the planet’s climate (especially, since a supernova close enough to us to effect our climate would be too close to have variations in the travel time of light be significant). But, it is an interesting little tidbit to consider. You read this sort of info all the time if you’re interested in supernovas.

walt man
June 1, 2011 1:14 pm

http://www.greenland-guide.gl/reg-south.htm
During the summer, South Greenland fully lives up to its Danish name, Green Land, as this is the most fertile part of the country. In fact most of the flora of Greenland grow in this particular region. The winter climate is relatively mild, and summer temperatures reaching 16-18°C are not uncommon. Because of these conditions, the economic life of this area is also very different from the rest of Greenland, with sheep farming and agriculture playing an important part. If you take a boat trip along the fjords you will see isolated sheep farms, some of which have paths and rough roads leading to them, while for others the only contact with the outside world is by boat or radio transmitter.
The sheep are rounded up in September, and some 20,000 lambs are taken on flat-bottomed boats to the slaughterhouse in Narsaq, one of the three sizeable large towns in South Greenland.
Many sheep farmers have built cabins near their farms, in which guests can stay for a day or two before they continue on foot to the next farm.
The abundant fertility of this region was also the reason why Eric the Red chose to live in South Greenland in around 985 AD, after he was outlawed from Iceland.
================
Your first encounter with large animals in Greenland usually takes place very soon after arrival. More than 3,000 musk oxen live in the area around Kangerlussuaq Airport and some of them can be seen in the immediate surroundings. A one-hour guided tour of the area will most likely include an encounter with these large, sedate animals.
Reindeer live all over the ice-free parts of Greenland, and you may be lucky to see a herd. Reindeer hide is very insulating, and if you decide to go on a dog-sledge tour you will have the chance to dress in clothes made from reindeer hide.

June 1, 2011 1:19 pm

Lets practice some skepticism.
“There is also a story in ‘Landnamabok, the Icelandic Book of Settlement, which tells of a man who swam across his local fjord to fetch a sheep for a feast in honour of his cousin, the founder of Greenland, Erick the Red. Studies of Channel swimmers show that 10C would be the lowest temperature that a man would be able to endure for such a swim, but the average August temperature of water in the fjords along the southern Greenland coast now rarely exceeds 6C. The water at that time must therefore have been at least 4C warmer and probably more than that which means that the summer temperatures (for the air) in the fjords in southern Greenland would then have been 13C-14C, (3) as compared with the present temperatures mentioned above”
Practice the same level of scepticsm about this paragraph that you do about AGW.

June 1, 2011 1:21 pm

Ged says:
June 1, 2011 at 1:10 pm
Actually, the speed of the different frequencies of light through space do not seem completely identical.
No, not ‘actually’. There are no such observations as you refer to.

Keith
June 1, 2011 1:22 pm

Bebben says:
June 1, 2011 at 12:54 pm
Me, I have often wondered, where are the historians and archaeologists in the debate about the MWP and the LIA? Their voices seem totally absent. No opinion at all?
See the article on Norse settlement ecology above for a survey of research from the last 90 years. Also read Brian Fagan’s The Little Ice Age, The Long Summer, and The Great Warming. Brian Fagan is an anthropolgist who did his fieldwork in Africa, has written extensively on archaeology, and professes to be a warmist, The extensive evidence presented in the three books above can support both sides of the argument.
Keith

Laurie Bowen
June 1, 2011 1:38 pm

the Knife
ROTFLMAO????
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ROFLMAO – Cached – Similar
For people like me who “have no clue”

Vince Causey
June 1, 2011 1:54 pm

Leif,
“Ged says:
June 1, 2011 at 1:10 pm
Actually, the speed of the different frequencies of light through space do not seem completely identical.
No, not ‘actually’. There are no such observations as you refer to.”
I believe there is an experiment designed to detect if such a difference occurs due to quantum effects. The sort of ‘differences’ they (sorry, forgot the name of the project) were talking about were of the order of microseconds over a journey of several billion light years. Certainly not the weeks that Jed was talking about.

June 1, 2011 2:18 pm

Vince Causey says:
June 1, 2011 at 1:54 pm
I believe there is an experiment designed to detect if such a difference occurs due to quantum effects.
Physicists are constantly trying to verify their fundamental assumptions by experiment. To my knowledge nobody has yet found any flaws with [General and Special] Relativity. Lots of claims, but none that hold up.

Mark
June 1, 2011 2:32 pm

MarkW says:
The super nova that caused the Crab Nebula was spotted by the Chinese in 1054, it was bright enough to be seen during the day for a short time. The Crab Nebula is 6500 light years away. Gamma rays traveling at 99% of the speed of light would have arrived 65 years later. Those traveling at 90% of the speed of light would have arrived 650 years later.
Gamma rays are composed of photons. They travel at exactly the same speed as other photons, including those which comprise visible light. Are you confusing them with COSMIC rays which, being mostly protons, must travel more slowly than “light”?

MarkW
June 1, 2011 2:53 pm

Leif: You are mighty quick to declare your personal beliefs to be truth.
http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/phy00/phy00976.htm

June 1, 2011 3:33 pm

Leif,
Here is another funny thing to note.
Another argument I here around here
1. average global temperature as no meaning. yet, it was colder in the LIA and warmer
in the MWP. That’s funny.
2. 7000 thermometers is not enough to tell the average temperature we need stations
every 50 miles. But, greenland is teleconnected to the entire globe, if it was warm there is was warm everywhere.
3. Thermometers are not precise enough, and we wanna see the data, but tall tales about guys swimming across Fjords can be trusted. especially if a wedding sheep is involved.
what’s the speed of dark?

James Bull
June 1, 2011 3:39 pm

Many years ago my sister who was living in Canada at the time gave me a book by Farley Mowat called West Viking the ancient Norse in Greenland and north America. In it he gave a history of the Vikings trade and journeys of discovery to both Greenland and the coast of America.
James Bull

Ian George
June 1, 2011 4:16 pm

Omnologos
‘how about the Faer-Oer and Svalbards? What are the written records about them saying?’
Svalbard Luft seems to only go back to 1977.
Danmarkshavn is less than 1000kms away and shows very little warming.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/gistemp_station.py?id=431043200000&data_set=1&num_neighbors=1
Where’s your link?

Jer0me
June 1, 2011 4:20 pm

R. Gates says:
June 1, 2011 at 10:50 am

But the larger point is that just because some climate change was caused by some forcing in the past does not mean that a similar change can’t be caused by an entirely different forcing in the future. The existence of the MWP with whatever caused it (solar, GCR’s, ocean, etc.) does not preclude future warming from being caused by entirely different factors.

And by exactly the same reasoning, there is absolutely no reason to equate the current warming period with CO2. Warming such as this has happened before without the similar increases in CO2. Therefore to demonstrate that CO2 is causing the current warming period needs a lot of evidence.
There is none.

June 1, 2011 4:30 pm

MarkW says:
June 1, 2011 at 2:53 pm
You are mighty quick to declare your personal beliefs to be truth.
This is not my ‘personal belief’. This is the way it is. The vast majority of cosmic rays do not get anywhere near the Earth’s atmosphere. The rare and most energetic do, of course, but their flux is very small.
On slide 12 of http://www.leif.org/EOS/Beer-GCRs.pdf you can see the effect of changing the Earth’s magnetic field [that keeps the cosmic rays at bay]. Decrease the screening effect of the magnetic field [rigidity cutoff] dramatically increases the 10Be production due to the changing flux at low altitudes.
steven mosher says:
June 1, 2011 at 3:33 pm
what’s the speed of dark?
The intellectual darkness that many people live in seems to be speedy enough to overwhelm any attempt to lift it.

Martin
June 1, 2011 4:42 pm

The article states:
“At present, the temperatures in Greenland range from a maximum of 7C in July to -9C in January.”
Last year in the Greenland capital Nuuk it reached a balmy 23C in September! The average temps for Nuuk in July 2010 was 12C.
Farming is actually booming in Greenland today.
http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/ecology/greenland-is-green-again/392
“51 farms (all of them sheep farms except for one with 22 cows)
[snip]
A local supermarket in Greenland is stocking fresh locally grown cauliflower, broccoli, and cabbage for the first time.”
And another interesting article on farming in Greenland…
http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,434356,00.html
Global Warming a Boon for Greenland’s Farmers
“Known for its massive ice sheets, Greenland is feeling the effects of global warming as rising temperatures have expanded the island’s growing season and crops are flourishing. For the first time in hundreds of years, it has become possible to raise cattle and start dairy farms.”
Agriculture in Greenland

June 1, 2011 5:09 pm

MarkW says:
June 1, 2011 at 2:53 pm
You are mighty quick to declare your personal beliefs to be truth.
This is not my ‘personal belief’. This is the way it is.
And has been known for more than a hundred years, see section 3.1.2 of
http://www.leif.org/EOS/gosse01-cosmogenic-nuclide-review.pdf

commieBob
June 1, 2011 5:21 pm

Kelvin Vaughan says:
June 1, 2011 at 8:33 am
According to my daily paper a team of British adventurers are going to row right to the North Pole in July. They are starting out from Resolution (actually, it’s Resolute Bay) in Canada 450 miles away from the pole.

ROFL – That really takes me back. Once upon a time I worked for the government of Canada and spent a fair amount of time camped out on the arctic sea ice. Every year there would be at least one ‘adventurer’ trying to do something heroic. We knew what we were doing and we were comfortable and reasonably safe. The ‘adventurers’, on the other hand, mostly didn’t know what they were doing and almost always had to be rescued. My favorite was the guy who wanted to motorcycle to the pole. His emergency food supply was chocolate bars stuffed into his tires.
I googled the article and found that the rower is going to the north magnetic pole. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-south-scotland-11426210 There’s a big difference, although not as much as there was thirty years ago. The north magnetic pole has moved out of the Canadian arctic archipelago into water that (as far as I can tell) was solid ice even in 2007. I’m willing to bet a coffee and a donut that our rower won’t make it to the north magnetic pole.

Mac the Knife
June 1, 2011 6:08 pm

Laurie Bowen says:
June 1, 2011 at 1:38 pm
the Knife
ROTFLMAO????
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ROFLMAO – Cached – Similar
For people like me who “have no clue” ”
Mia Culpa, Laurie!
It’s hard to ‘type straight’ when I’m laughing hard! I’ll try not offend your sensibilities with my occasional ham handed typos – forgive me?!
…And I’ll tear the heart out of anyone that says you “have no clue”, sweet Lady!

MrX
June 1, 2011 6:22 pm

Last year in the Greenland capital Nuuk it reached a balmy 23C in September! The average temps for Nuuk in July 2010 was 12C.

“51 farms (all of them sheep farms except for one with 22 cows)
——————–
The only vegetables they can grow is potatoes. Most (ie. nearly all) of their food is imported. I live in Canada and I say 12C is too damn cold. Without technology, Greenland would be deserted today. Can’t grow food. And the trees have to be personally attended by people on site.
Sorry, but that’s not global warming. Whatever warmer weather they’re getting is the warm current in northern Atlantic these past several years.

Dave N
June 1, 2011 6:52 pm

““At present, the temperatures in Greenland range from a maximum of 7C in July to -9C in January.”
This statement is obviously wrong – the minimum January temperature, even in the warmest part of Greenland is obviously way lower than -9°C.”
It’s not wrong, but it could be clearer, worded thus:
“At present, the temperatures in Greenland range from a maximum of 7C in July to a maximum of -9C in January”
The whole point of the statement is to illustrate what the warmest temps are now for Greenland, as opposed to what they were when the Vikings lived there.

iron brian
June 1, 2011 7:53 pm

steven mosher says:
June 1, 2011 at 3:33 pm
what’s the speed of dark?
we must prove that dark is faster than light.
http://ayersline.com/Jokes/darksucker.htm

noaaprogrammer
June 1, 2011 9:22 pm

There’s a fair amount of history recorded during the MWP and LIA for countries in the northern latitudes. What about further south? What were the climate changes that inundated all the Saharan roads and river basins with sand dunes? Are there any extant ancient histories about what happened there?