
Guest post by S Jay Porter
In 891 AD. Eric The Red set off from Iceland with a few followers to explore a land to the west which they had probably spotted some time before while sailing out in their longboats, and then returned three years later with about 500 fellow Vikings. At first they settled on the south-east coast, close to the tip of this new land and then, as the population grew, created a further settlement to the south-west. They called their new home ‘Greenland’.
It has been said that this name was a ‘spin’, a publicity stunt to entice more Vikings to come to join the new settlers, but this would have been pointless if it had been impossible for them to survive. They must at least have been able to create their own dwellings, build their own fires, make their own clothes and above all, grow their own food. The settlers might have been able to trade such things as polar bear-skins and fox furs for iron and other necessities on occasional trips to Europe, but their compatriots in Denmark and Iceland would have been neither able nor willing to row their longboats out each month with groceries.
At present, the temperatures in Greenland range from a maximum of 7C in July to -9C in January. This is too cold for grain such as wheat and even rye to grow and ripen in the short summer of such northern latitudes. Nor are sheep and cattle happy at those temperatures. Hill sheep might be able to nibble away at moss and short grass, but cattle need lush meadows and hay to fatten and live through a winter. Solid wood is needed for building, boat building and warmth, but only bushes and such weak trees as birch now grow in Greenland.
In 1991, two caribou hunters stumbled over a log on a snowy Greenland riverbank, an unusual event because Greenland is now above the treeline. (1) Over the past century, further archaeological investigations found frozen sheep droppings, a cow barn, bones from pigs, sheep and goats and remains of rye, barley and wheat all of which indicate that the Vikings had large farmsteads with ample pastures. The Greenlanders obviously prospered, because from the number of farms in both settlements, whose 400 or so stone ruins still dot the landscape, archaeologists guess that the population may have risen to a peak of about five thousand. They also built a cathedral and churches with graves which means that the soil must have been soft enough to dig, but these graves are now well below the permafrost (2).
There is also a story in ‘Landnamabok, the Icelandic Book of Settlement, which tells of a man who swam across his local fjord to fetch a sheep for a feast in honour of his cousin, the founder of Greenland, Erick the Red. Studies of Channel swimmers show that 10C would be the lowest temperature that a man would be able to endure for such a swim, but the average August temperature of water in the fjords along the southern Greenland coast now rarely exceeds 6C. The water at that time must therefore have been at least 4C warmer and probably more than that which means that the summer temperatures (for the air) in the fjords in southern Greenland would then have been 13C-14C, (3) as compared with the present temperatures mentioned above.
It follows that temperatures must have been higher than those of today’s during that first settlement of Greenland which lasted from approximately 900 until the mid-1400s AD, when these settlements died out. There is no written explanation for this sudden demise but climate scientists have discovered that Iceland, like the rest of Europe, was gripped by a rapid and centuries-long drop in temperature, known as the Little Ice Age. And in a recent study, William D’Andrea and Yongsong Huang of Brown University, Providence RI (4) have traced the variability of the Greenland climate over a period of 5,600 years when previous inhabitants were also subjected to rapid warm and cold swings in temperatures
Yet the whole reason for the existence of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change (IPCC) is to thrust upon the world’s population the idea that industrialisation in the West over the last 100 years and our profligate use of fossil fuels is producing a run-away heating of the planet through the emission of greenhouse gases, mainly CO2, which unless checked will lead to its — and humanity’s — death. The western governments are happily looking forward to a vast increase in taxes to pay for measures to reduce ’carbon emissions’ and even the possibility of a Global Government to control everything has been mentioned (5).
So the possibility that temperatures were higher in the past in any part of the world was a thorn in the sides of those Climatologists who are wedded to the whole idea of Anthopogenic Global Warming (AGW), also known as Climate Change.
Unfortunately for them, an English Climatologist, Hubert H Lamb, first formulated the idea of a Medieval Warming Period (MWP) in 1965 and other surveys have found that this warming did not just occur in the northwestern hemisphere but was global (6). Lamb founded the UK Climate Research Unit (CRU) in 1971 and until the mid 1990s the MWP was undisputed fact and was shown even in the IPPC progress report of 1990. But Dr David Darning (University of Oklahoma College of Earth and Energy) in his recent testimony to Congress (7) said ‘…I received an astonishing email from a major researcher in the area of climate change. It said “We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period”’ And this the ‘warmist’ Climatologists certainly tried to do.
In 1998 a graph was produced by geophysicist Michael Mann, known as the Hockey Stick Graph’, which managed to almost air-brush out of existence the Medieval Warming Period . This was published in the eminent scientific magazine Nature and also in several places in the IPPC Report of 2001 and created a world-wide sensation. Here was proof positive the world was overheating and it was All Our Fault.
However, investigation of the graph by historians and climatologists who doubted the existence of global warming, brought criticism centred around the statistical method used and the associated computer programme. It was eventually called the most discredited study in the history of science and quietly dropped by the IPPC from the latest 2007 IPPC report for policy makers.
The Hockey Stick graph had also attempted to remove the Little Ice Age which was another world-wide event, lasting from roughly the early 14th century to the mid-19th century with short interspersed warm periods. It is well-known from written reports that temperatures must at times have been considerably lower than in the Medieval Warming Period since Frost Fairs were often held on the frozen Thames until 1814 and in 1658, during the coldest period of the Little Ice Age, King Karl X Gustav of Sweden led an army across the frozen Danish waters to lay siege to Copenhagen.
It was also at this time that the Viking settlements in Greenland gradually died out. The Medieval Warming Period is usually agreed to have lasted from approximately 900 to approximately 1300 AD and from then onwards the climate cooled again. Glaciers grew, sea ice advanced and marine life migrated southwards as it did so, leaving the Greenlanders with a smaller and more difficult catch. The summers became shorter and progressively cooler, limiting the time cattle could be kept outdoors and increasing the need for winter fodder which became less available. Trade between Greenland, Iceland and Europe became more difficult and finally ceased. (3) It can only be hoped that a few Greenlanders escaped to re-settled somewhere less cold before starvation overcame them all.
But since temperatures during the Medieval Warming Period were higher in Greenland than they are even today, and since this was followed by a Cooling Period, and since this has happened many times before (which have not been considered here), the fact that the earth may have warmed somewhat since the mid 1850s is not unusual. Nor will it be unusual if the temperatures now start to drop.
Above all, since man was not industrialised before the mid-1850s and so was not emitting any huge amounts of CO2, any warming which has occurred over the past 150 years (for which we should be grateful) is obviously a natural event and —
— NOT ALL OUR FAULT!
——————————————————————————————————————————–
Word Count: 1,418
Sonya Porter
Source Material:
(1) http://watsupwiththat.com (The Viking farm under the sand in Greenland by Terese Brasen)
(2) http://www.archaeology.org
(3) ‘Heaven and Earth’ by Prof. Ian Plimer
(5) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lsltxgrr_o
(6) http://www.science-skeptical.de/blog
(7) http://epw.senate.gov/hearing_statements.cfm?id=266543
>> Robert says:
June 1, 2011 at 7:36 am
A regional warming in the North Atlantic does not equate to a Global warming during the MWP. <<
So you accept without question the idea that, for 4 centuries, only the regions that had actual historical climate records experienced warming, while the rest of the world was colder in balance in places where there were no historical records to inconveniently refute that claim.
Would you like to buy a bridge in New York city? I can get it for you at a great price!
Typos: IPPC should be IPCC
[Fixed, thanx. ~dbs]
The History Channel shows periodically a 2 hr show on the LIA. Very informative. It starts at the Viking settlement in Greenland and goes thru the plague, root crop development, why the French Revolution, year with no summer, Napolean’s retreat from Russia, etc.
Eric the Red was exiled in 982, not 897. He led the colonizing expedition in 985. The reason his recruiting was so successful was the quasi-famine in Iceland that particular year (not any land shortage). In actuality, Greenland was known from a few early furriers, but later history sought to embellish the role of the ruling chiefs and play down the actual pioneers. Thus Eric is given 100% of the credit for Greenland’s discovery, when his biggest accomplishment was to re-name the quasi-legendary Vritamann-Land. As luck would have it he arrived just as the MWP was well underway, and so had an easy time selling the move to the Icelanders.
Let’s not forget that if Greenland then was climatically the same as Greenland today, there would definitely have been no settlement. The same may be true of Iceland as well, which nearly died out itself.
Robert’s notion of “regional warming” if true still had a global effect. Though I disagree that it was limited to the North Atlantic, the sea level records point to the oceans being upwards of 1m higher than present globally during the MWP. Inupiat Oral Traditions along Alaska’s North Slope speak of a persistently ice-free Arctic many centuries ago. Some early coastal habitation sites in California have been all but washed away from sea levels higher than now during the centuries prior to the LIA. The MWP had global implications.
And what was the sea level mean in various places in 800 AD?
Obviously the Sun and Moon, but did you know that Venus can be seen in the daytime sky as well? It’s hard to find, but if you know just where to look you can see a bright white dot in the blue sky. Very neat.
“At present, the temperatures in Greenland range from a maximum of 7C in July to -9C in January.”
This statement is obviously wrong – the minimum January temperature, even in the warmest part of Greenland is obviously way lower than -9°C.
If you meant the January maximum, please say so, otherwise you risk considerable loss of credibility .
I am so old that we were taught (geology before the Mann doctrine) Greenland was greener and warmer than the present (last 1500 years or whatever). Not to be confused with those who are trying to save the trees, etc., world from humanity by promoting green everything while they purchase their recycled toilet paper through redistribution of our money such as CO2/carbon taxes.
Anyway, nice post. I plan to share it.
P.S. Send to IPCC and congressional leadership (oops, sorry, there is not any legitimate leadership in the “district”).
The temperatures in Greenland and eliminating the Medieval Warming Period are central to the climate catastrophe scenario built on a rapidly melting Greenland ice sheet. Ignoring the Roman Warm Period buttresses this scenario. Yesterday’s article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences was preceeded by research published in March 2010 on Iceland temperatures between 360 B.C. and 1660 A.D. The researchers label their charts with the Roman Warming Period, Medieval Warming Period and Little Ice Age. The authors note temperatures higher than the modern record in 130 B.C. and brief warm periods during the MWP creating year-round ice free sea conditions facilitating travel to Greenland and Iceland. They caution that winter temperatures were cooling off even during the MWP creating difficult living conditions in Iceland at that time.
usehttp://www.pnas.org/content/107/12/5306.full?sid=b126e75e-7f03-4b45-b850-afe46b691492
Robert.
To your assertion that Medieval Warm Period was regional:
South Africa
http://ruby.fgcu.edu/courses/twimberley/EnviroPhilo/Tyson.pdf
confirmed to the exact years.
Also confirmed in Mexico (stalagmites)
Bolivia (glacial cores, valley erosion)
Peru (ditto)
The hypothesis that the MWP was regional was ancillary to the Mann-Briffa hockey stick. Proposed about the same time, and likely coordinated, there was virtually no evidence for the assertion, merely a paucity of records from the Southern Hemisphere. It had the unfortunate, to Warmists, effect of triggering a great deal of research into the issue by local universities.
They discovered that The Warmists’ hypothesis was completely inaccurate.In fact the Southern and Northern correlation between the MWP and the LIC was absolute.
Read of some very ancient maps of Greenland showing bays , valleys and rivers now covered by ice. Did a quick searce and could not find them, no time to look right now.
Dave Springer says:
June 1, 2011 at 6:21 am
There are two things which determine the cosmic ray flux reaching the earth’s atmosphere.
You are forgetting the third thing which is the one with the most effect, namely the strength of the Earth’s magnetic field.
The second thing that determines cosmic ray flux reaching the earth’s atmosphere is the strength of the solar magnetic field.
Unfortunately there is no correlation between the temperature in Greenland and the cosmic ray flux [modulated by either the Earth’s magnetic field or the Sun’s]:
http://www.leif.org/research/Greenland-Temp-DAndrea.png
stephen richards says:
June 1, 2011 at 8:37 am
R. Gates says:
June 1, 2011 at 7:38 am
I am equally skeptical about those who insist that a 40% increase in CO2 since the 1700′s has absolutely no effect on climate.
40% is misguidance and you are well aware of that. In parts per million it’s nothing.
Like going from absolute zero to liquid O². Still going to freeze your nether regions very badly. 🙂
————-
In the case of CO2, I disagree with you completely. A 40% increase to levels not seen in at least 800,000 years is significant and is hardly “misguidance”. In chaotic systems such as the climate, a few parts per million one way or another can make all the difference. But the larger point is that just because some climate change was caused by some forcing in the past does not mean that a similar change can’t be caused by an entirely different forcing in the future. The existence of the MWP with whatever caused it (solar, GCR’s, ocean, etc.) does not preclude future warming from being caused by entirely different factors.
Correction to above chart labels: Roman Warm Period and Medieval Warm Period.
Interesting article on the ecology of Norse settlement in Iceland and Greenland with analysis of Norse farm economies, meat and grain choices, land management, and their impact on long-term settlement viability.
http://www.uio.no/studier/emner/hf/ikos/MAS2300/v05/undervisningsmateriale/Pensum/Vesteinsson%20et%20al%202002%20-%20Enduring%20Impacts%20Viking%20Settlement.doc
MarkW says:
June 1, 2011 at 4:23 am
“I’ve been wondering. The super nova that caused the Crab Nebula was spotted by the Chinese in 1054, it was bright enough to be seen during the day for a short time. The Crab Nebula is 6500 light years away. Gamma rays traveling at 99% of the speed of light would have arrived 65 years later. Those traveling at 90% of the speed of light would have arrived 650 years later. So gamma rays from this nearby super nova would have been arriving during the period of the little ice age. Coincidence? ”
A tantalizing correlation! Thanks for that thought provoking inference….
Leif.
and dont forget Cosmic rays are such a tiny tiny trace element they could not possibly have any effect.
It’s funny to take a sceptical argument like “Co2 is a trace gas” and apply it to cosmic rays.
The answer to Greenland’s warming and cooling is simple to me – plate tectonics. Obviously Greenland is on its own plate that moves north and south relatively rapidly (geologically speaking), sometimes very rapidly. Greenland had moved south enough to cause the warming allowing the Viking settlements, and then moved north again causing the cooling that extinguished those settlements.
Can I have my Nobel Prize now?
steven mosher says:
June 1, 2011 at 11:55 am
It’s funny to take a sceptical argument like “Co2 is a trace gas” and apply it to cosmic rays.
What is worse is to apply it when there is not even a demonstrated correlation.
You are forgetting the third thing which is the one with the most effect, namely the strength of the Earth’s magnetic field.
—
Everything that I have read states that the Earth’s magnetic field is too localized to deflect cosmic rays. They are coming in at 90 to 99% of the speed of light. By the time they reach a region where the earth’s magnetic field becomes measurable, they are mere microseconds from impacting the atmosphere. The earth’s field is not strong enough to completely deflect such particles in such a short time frame.
Roman Warm Period, (and whatever followed, for how long?) Medieval Warm Period, Little Ice Age. Dates, please?
Robert says:
June 1, 2011 at 7:36 am
“One of the signatures of greenhouse warming is that it is bipolar. ”
Now THAT is a T-Ball set up for any number of snarky comedic responses! ROTFLMAO!!!
It is important to remember that Vikings acquired art of sailing after they rowed their boats to Ireland, took sailing lessons and were taught the route to Greenland and North America by St. Brendan the Navigator.
Kelvin Vaughan,
They are going to the North Magnetic Pole, not the North Pole.