Greenland and AGW

The last written records of the Norse Greenlan...
The last written records of the Norse Greenlanders are from a 1408 marriage in the church of Hvalsey...Image via Wikipedia

Guest post by S Jay Porter

In 891 AD. Eric The Red set off from Iceland with a few followers to explore a land to the west which they had probably spotted some time before while sailing out in their longboats, and then returned three years later with about 500 fellow Vikings. At first they settled on the south-east coast, close to the tip of this new land and then, as the population grew, created a further settlement to the south-west. They called their new home ‘Greenland’.

It has been said that this name was a ‘spin’, a publicity stunt to entice more Vikings to come to join the new settlers, but this would have been pointless if it had been impossible for them to survive. They must at least have been able to create their own dwellings, build their own fires, make their own clothes and above all, grow their own food. The settlers might have been able to trade such things as polar bear-skins and fox furs for iron and other necessities on occasional trips to Europe, but their compatriots in Denmark and Iceland would have been neither able nor willing to row their longboats out each month with groceries.

At present, the temperatures in Greenland range from a maximum of 7C in July to -9C in January. This is too cold for grain such as wheat and even rye to grow and ripen in the short summer of such northern latitudes. Nor are sheep and cattle happy at those temperatures. Hill sheep might be able to nibble away at moss and short grass, but cattle need lush meadows and hay to fatten and live through a winter. Solid wood is needed for building, boat building and warmth, but only bushes and such weak trees as birch now grow in Greenland.

In 1991, two caribou hunters stumbled over a log on a snowy Greenland riverbank, an unusual event because Greenland is now above the treeline. (1) Over the past century, further archaeological investigations found frozen sheep droppings, a cow barn, bones from pigs, sheep and goats and remains of rye, barley and wheat all of which indicate that the Vikings had large farmsteads with ample pastures. The Greenlanders obviously prospered, because from the number of farms in both settlements, whose 400 or so stone ruins still dot the landscape, archaeologists guess that the population may have risen to a peak of about five thousand. They also built a cathedral and churches with graves which means that the soil must have been soft enough to dig, but these graves are now well below the permafrost (2).

There is also a story in ‘Landnamabok, the Icelandic Book of Settlement, which tells of a man who swam across his local fjord to fetch a sheep for a feast in honour of his cousin, the founder of Greenland, Erick the Red. Studies of Channel swimmers show that 10C would be the lowest temperature that a man would be able to endure for such a swim, but the average August temperature of water in the fjords along the southern Greenland coast now rarely exceeds 6C. The water at that time must therefore have been at least 4C warmer and probably more than that which means that the summer temperatures (for the air) in the fjords in southern Greenland would then have been 13C-14C, (3) as compared with the present temperatures mentioned above.

It follows that temperatures must have been higher than those of today’s during that first settlement of Greenland which lasted from approximately 900 until the mid-1400s AD, when these settlements died out. There is no written explanation for this sudden demise but climate scientists have discovered that Iceland, like the rest of Europe, was gripped by a rapid and centuries-long drop in temperature, known as the Little Ice Age. And in a recent study, William D’Andrea and Yongsong Huang of Brown University, Providence RI (4) have traced the variability of the Greenland climate over a period of 5,600 years when previous inhabitants were also subjected to rapid warm and cold swings in temperatures

Yet the whole reason for the existence of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change (IPCC) is to thrust upon the world’s population the idea that industrialisation in the West over the last 100 years and our profligate use of fossil fuels is producing a run-away heating of the planet through the emission of greenhouse gases, mainly CO2, which unless checked will lead to its — and humanity’s — death. The western governments are happily looking forward to a vast increase in taxes to pay for measures to reduce ’carbon emissions’ and even the possibility of a Global Government to control everything has been mentioned (5).

So the possibility that temperatures were higher in the past in any part of the world was a thorn in the sides of those Climatologists who are wedded to the whole idea of Anthopogenic Global Warming (AGW), also known as Climate Change.

Unfortunately for them, an English Climatologist, Hubert H Lamb, first formulated the idea of a Medieval Warming Period (MWP) in 1965 and other surveys have found that this warming did not just occur in the northwestern hemisphere but was global (6). Lamb founded the UK Climate Research Unit (CRU) in 1971 and until the mid 1990s the MWP was undisputed fact and was shown even in the IPPC progress report of 1990. But Dr David Darning (University of Oklahoma College of Earth and Energy) in his recent testimony to Congress (7) said ‘…I received an astonishing email from a major researcher in the area of climate change. It said “We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period”’ And this the ‘warmist’ Climatologists certainly tried to do.

In 1998 a graph was produced by geophysicist Michael Mann, known as the Hockey Stick Graph’, which managed to almost air-brush out of existence the Medieval Warming Period . This was published in the eminent scientific magazine Nature and also in several places in the IPPC Report of 2001 and created a world-wide sensation. Here was proof positive the world was overheating and it was All Our Fault.

However, investigation of the graph by historians and climatologists who doubted the existence of global warming, brought criticism centred around the statistical method used and the associated computer programme. It was eventually called the most discredited study in the history of science and quietly dropped by the IPPC from the latest 2007 IPPC report for policy makers.

The Hockey Stick graph had also attempted to remove the Little Ice Age which was another world-wide event, lasting from roughly the early 14th century to the mid-19th century with short interspersed warm periods. It is well-known from written reports that temperatures must at times have been considerably lower than in the Medieval Warming Period since Frost Fairs were often held on the frozen Thames until 1814 and in 1658, during the coldest period of the Little Ice Age, King Karl X Gustav of Sweden led an army across the frozen Danish waters to lay siege to Copenhagen.

It was also at this time that the Viking settlements in Greenland gradually died out. The Medieval Warming Period is usually agreed to have lasted from approximately 900 to approximately 1300 AD and from then onwards the climate cooled again. Glaciers grew, sea ice advanced and marine life migrated southwards as it did so, leaving the Greenlanders with a smaller and more difficult catch. The summers became shorter and progressively cooler, limiting the time cattle could be kept outdoors and increasing the need for winter fodder which became less available. Trade between Greenland, Iceland and Europe became more difficult and finally ceased. (3) It can only be hoped that a few Greenlanders escaped to re-settled somewhere less cold before starvation overcame them all.

But since temperatures during the Medieval Warming Period were higher in Greenland than they are even today, and since this was followed by a Cooling Period, and since this has happened many times before (which have not been considered here), the fact that the earth may have warmed somewhat since the mid 1850s is not unusual. Nor will it be unusual if the temperatures now start to drop.

Above all, since man was not industrialised before the mid-1850s and so was not emitting any huge amounts of CO2, any warming which has occurred over the past 150 years (for which we should be grateful) is obviously a natural event and —

— NOT ALL OUR FAULT!

——————————————————————————————————————————–

Word Count: 1,418

Sonya Porter

Source Material:

(1) http://watsupwiththat.com (The Viking farm under the sand in Greenland by Terese Brasen)

(2) http://www.archaeology.org

(3) ‘Heaven and Earth’ by Prof. Ian Plimer

(4) http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/05/31/temperature-reconstruction-of-greenland-shows-ups-and-downs-in-climate-happened-over-5600-years/

(5) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lsltxgrr_o

(6) http://www.science-skeptical.de/blog

(7) http://epw.senate.gov/hearing_statements.cfm?id=266543

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

169 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
James Sexton
June 1, 2011 6:41 am

Sonya, very nice. It was well written and concise. One friendly critique would be to strengthen the sources. While you and I may considered WUWT as authoritative, many others may not……same for other skeptical sites and youtube. I find, that most often on the skeptic sites, the posts themselves are well sourced.
I do look forward to the obvious follow up article………. strengthening the argument that the MWP and LIA were not local events.
Best wishes ,
James

Dave Springer
June 1, 2011 6:56 am

correction on gamma ray speed
In a somewhat surprising observation gamma rays arriving from distant sources millions of light years away trail the visible light from the source by a few minutes. So while it’s true that all photons travel very close to the speed of light they don’t all travel at exactly the same speed and vary ever so slightly by frequency.
The startling implication in that is an intergalactic medium. It’s well known that light of different frequency has different propagation speeds through matter. That’s how prisms and rainbows work to break white light up into a beautiful spectrum of colors.
The old hypothesis of luminiferous aether, a universal medium through which light travels which was discounted over 100 years ago, looks like it’s going to make a comeback.

Francois
June 1, 2011 7:10 am

The chronology is very imprecise. The Black Death period (1347-50)was a cold one in Europe at least Could you please provide us with something a bit more legible (a graph perhaps)? Or a better series of dates?

Alan the Brit
June 1, 2011 7:10 am

I have said this before. Trawling a AGW site some time ago I came across the “how tro combat” article by a fairly well known activist. He said the emphasis on Greenland that must be pointed out that yes, they may have lived comparitively well, but it was a hard life!!! Well, for his & their information, unti modern living & electricity, gas, & oil, & nuclear, life was far from a stroll in the park on a Sunday afternoon. It is only after the common usage of the aforementioned “devils inventions” that child mortality, mortality in general, sickness, disease, hunger, poverty, essentially life expectancy, has risen to the levels of health care & living standards of today. Before that, it was a “hard life”, regardless of where you lived. Even in more sub-tropical climes somebody wanted to enslave somebody else to create their wealth. Today no such slavery is required, we have fossil fuels (if oil is indeed such a beast), & nuclear power. I know it’s not perfect, nothing ever is, apart from Utopian Socialism, of course but some are more equal than others & the Blairs/Browns/Mandelsons/Clintons/Obamas/Gores of this world need that little bit extra to compensate for all the worrying they have to do on our behalf. Shame, isn’t it?

Mike M
June 1, 2011 7:11 am

” and then returned three years later with about 500 fellow Vikings. ” I’m confused by this, they returned with a whole bunch of three year olds??

T.C.
June 1, 2011 7:14 am

“The professor’s name is Deming, not Darning.
Doug”
True, but given his ability to confound the politically correct status quo, his name could be “Darning,” as in “Darn that man!”
:o)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Deming
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Deming

reason
June 1, 2011 7:18 am

“In elementary school I was taught that the Vikings intentionally misnamed Greenland and Iceland (Greenland was in fact an “ice land” while Iceland was actually green) to confound enemies seeking to raid their colony. I have no idea who made this up.”
I remember hearing this “explanation” as well. As were you, I was too young to ask for a works-cited on the tale.

Jryan
June 1, 2011 7:24 am

Greenland was once hospitable and isn’t any longer because it’s too cold = warmist head asplode.

Robert
June 1, 2011 7:36 am

This article was just really bad.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/medieval-warm-period-basic.htm
A regional warming in the North Atlantic does not equate to a Global warming during the MWP. One of the signatures of greenhouse warming is that it is bipolar. There is not a single study with any credibility (sorry Dr. Loehle) that puts the MWP as greater than present temperatures globally.
In fact if you take that Lamb paper (the one used in the 1990 IPCC) and update it to present it would even show present being much warmer.
I don’t understand why there is a continuous barrage of half-truths in this article.
Take for example Anderson et al (2008) pretty strongly demonstrates that the present warming is beyond what has occurred on baffin island over the last 1600 years at least. Does that mean that I equate that to global temperatures? No!

R. Gates
June 1, 2011 7:38 am

Good post as a nice general introductory summary of the Viking colonization of Greenland, the MWP, and the Little Ice Age.
One point: The climate doesn’t change from just one cause, and so just because the MWP wasn’t caused by human activity, doesn’t mean some of the late 20th Century warming wasn’t. Said another way: you can have the same effect happen from multiple causes. The existence of the MWP and numerous other warming events during the Holocene keep me skeptical about the full nature of AGW, however, I am equally skeptical about those who insist that a 40% increase in CO2 since the 1700’s has absolutely no effect on climate.

Beesaman
June 1, 2011 7:53 am

I’m afraid that AGW has become such a religion that its advocates, or should that be acolytes, will not believe anything else, even if glaciers were knocking at their front doors.

cotwome
June 1, 2011 7:54 am

After the ‘Hockey Stick’ broke, a lot of alarmists now refer to the MWP as the ‘Medieval Climate Anomaly’. Somehow in their minds 400 years of temperatures above normal (whatever normal means) is an anomaly, yet they point to the last 50 years or so as “proof” of AGW.

Enneagram
June 1, 2011 8:01 am

Norway should build up there a vacation resort for those who believe and run away from Global Warming, and the UN should build up there a branch office to host IPCC headquarters and a research facility for all members of the Climate-Gate emailers.

Peter Walsh
June 1, 2011 8:05 am

I thought that it was a Dr David deming who received the email about getting rid of the MWP?

Pull My Finger
June 1, 2011 8:11 am

There is absolutely no evidence at all that the Chinese ever sailed to America or Europe.

June 1, 2011 8:13 am

Robert says:
“A regional warming in the North Atlantic does not equate to a Global warming during the MWP. One of the signatures of greenhouse warming is that it is bipolar. There is not a single study with any credibility (sorry Dr. Loehle) that puts the MWP as greater than present temperatures globally.”
That’s not correct. Here is an overlay of temperatures from both hemispheres [Vostok in Antarctica and Greenland]. The synchronous warming and cooling was bipolar.
And there has been some discussion of the possibility that current temperatures are as high as the MWP. But based on the empirical evidence of the ice cores, that is unlikely. Furthermore, warming episodes prior to the MWP were clearly higher than current temperatures.

Kelvin Vaughan
June 1, 2011 8:33 am

According to my daily paper a team of British adventurers are going to row right to the North Pole in July. They are starting out from Resolution in Canada 450 miles away from the pole.

1DandyTroll
June 1, 2011 8:35 am

Why is there still fuzz over if the MWP was global or local? If it was local to only part of the northern hemisphere and everything else stayed the same, there’d still have been global warming in the statistical department. :p

stephen richards
June 1, 2011 8:37 am

R. Gates says:
June 1, 2011 at 7:38 am
I am equally skeptical about those who insist that a 40% increase in CO2 since the 1700′s has absolutely no effect on climate.
40% is misguidance and you are well aware of that. In parts per million it’s nothing.
Like going from absolute zero to liquid O². Still going to freeze your nether regions very badly. 🙂

stephen richards
June 1, 2011 8:38 am

Robert says:
Most intelligent people quit when they can see the rim of the hole at eye level.

stephen richards
June 1, 2011 8:40 am
Dennis Wingo
June 1, 2011 8:42 am

Everyone should read H.H. Lamb’s book on the “Climate History of the Modern Age”. If you read the book and the multifaceted evidence presented, you can have little doubt about the existence of the MWP or LIA.
Not only does he use tree rings, he uses archeology of farming locations, crop types used, as well as a plethora of written records from around the world to establish his premise.

DaveF
June 1, 2011 8:45 am

Mike M at 7:11:
“…they returned with a whole bunch of three year olds?”
Well, you have to remember that, warm or cold, the winter nights in Greenland are awfully long….

Ellen
June 1, 2011 8:46 am

The Norse sagas are a mixture of fact, truth, and exaggeration. They are NOT wild stories. So while Harald Hardrada may have done more or less slaying, conquering, and traveling than the saga states, if he did it in England, the location of England is usually described reliably.
This is understandable. A novel that located New York City — the real one, not another city of the same name — in Nebraska would have insurmountable credibility problems. Skalds don’t like wasting their credibility on things they could easily get right. If the sagas say Greenland had such-and-so a climate, they’re probably accurate.

DirkH
June 1, 2011 8:46 am

Very informative, thanks for this great essay.