
From AIM. High up in the sky near the poles some 50 miles above the ground, silvery blue clouds sometimes appear, shining brightly in the night. First noticed in 1885, these clouds are known as noctilucent, or “night shining,” clouds. Their discovery spawned over a century of research into what conditions causes them to form and vary – questions that still tantalize scientists to this day. Since 2007, a NASA mission called Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere (AIM) has shown that the cloud formation is changing year to year, a process they believe is intimately tied to the weather and climate of the whole globe.
“The formation of the clouds requires both water and incredibly low temperatures,” says Charles Jackman, an atmospheric scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., who is NASA’s project scientist for AIM. “The temperatures turn out to be one of the prime driving factors for when the clouds appear.”
So the appearance of the noctilucent clouds, also known as polar mesospheric clouds or PMCs since they occur in a layer of the atmosphere called the mesosphere, can provide information about the temperature and other characteristics of the atmosphere. This in turn, helps researchers understand more about Earth’s low altitude weather systems, and they’ve discovered that events in one hemisphere can have a sizable effect in another.
Since these mysterious clouds were first spotted, researchers have learned much about them. They light up because they’re so high that they reflect sunlight from over the horizon. They are formed of ice water crystals most likely created on meteoric dust. And they are exclusively a summertime phenomenon.
“The question people usually ask is why do clouds which require such cold temperatures form in the summer?” says James Russell, an atmospheric scientist at Hampton University in Hampton, Va., who is the Principal Investigator for AIM. “It’s because of the dynamics of the atmosphere. You actually get the coldest temperatures of the year near the poles in summer at that height in the mesosphere.”
As summer warmth heats up air near the ground, the air rises. As it rises, it also expands since atmospheric pressure decreases with height. Scientists have long known that such expansion cools things down – just think of how the spray out of an aerosol can feels cold – and this, coupled with dynamics in the atmosphere that drives the cold air even higher, brings temperatures in the mesosphere down past a freezing -210º F (-134 ºC).

| › Download video
Noctilucent clouds streaming across the sky in Utrecht, The Netherlands on June 16, 2009. Credit: Robert Wielinga |
In the Northern hemisphere, the mesosphere reaches these temperatures consistently by the middle of May. Since AIM has been collecting data, the onset of the Northern season has never varied by more than a week or so. But the southern hemisphere turns out to be highly variable. Indeed, the 2010 season started nearly a month later than the 2009 season.
Atmospheric scientist Bodil Karlsson, a member of the AIM team, has been analyzing why the start of the southern noctilucent cloud season can vary so dramatically. Karlsson is a researcher at Stockholm University in Sweden, though until recently she worked as a post-doctoral researcher at the University of Colorado. A change in when some pretty clouds show up may not seem like much all by itself, but it’s a tool for mapping the goings-on in the atmosphere, says Karlsson.
“Since the clouds are so sensitive to the atmospheric temperatures,” says Karlsson. “They can act as a proxy for information about the wind circulation that causes these temperatures. They can tell us that the circulation exists first of all, and tell us something about the strength of the circulation.”
She says the onset of the clouds is timed to something called the southern stratospheric vortex – a winter wind pattern that circles above the pole. In 2010, that vortex lingered well into the southern summer season, keeping the lower air cold and interfering with cloud formation. This part of the equation is fairly straightforward and Karlsson has recently submitted a paper on the subject to the Journal of Geophysical Research. But this is not yet the complete answer to what drives the appearance of these brightly lit clouds.
AIM researchers also believe there is a connection between seemingly disparate atmospheric patterns in the north and south. The upwelling of polar air each summer that contributes to noctilucent cloud formation is part of a larger circulation loop that travels between the two poles. So wind activity some 13,000 miles (20,920 km) away in the northern hemisphere appears to be influencing the southern circulation.
The first hints that wind in the north and south poles were coupled came in 2002 and 2003 when researchers noticed that despite a very calm lower weather system near the southern poles in the summer, the higher altitudes showed variability. Something else must be driving that change.
Now, AIM’s detailed images of the clouds have enabled researchers to look at even day-to-day variability. They’ve spotted a 3 to10 day time lag between low-lying weather events in the north – an area that, since it is fairly mountainous, is prone to more complex wind patterns – and weather events in the mesosphere in the south. On the flip side, the lower atmosphere at the southern poles has little variability, and so the upper atmosphere where the clouds form at the northern poles stays fairly constant. Thus, there’s a consistent start to the cloud season each year.
“The real importance of all of that,” says Hampton’s Russell, “is not only that events down where we live can affect the clouds 50 miles (80 km) above, but that the total atmosphere from one pole to the next is rather tightly connected.”
Hammering out the exact mechanisms of that connection will, of course, take more analysis. The noctilucent cloud season will also surely be affected by the change in heat output from the sun during the upcoming solar maximum. Researchers hope to use the clouds to understand how the sun’s cycle affects the Earth’s atmosphere and the interaction between natural- and humankind-caused changes.
“These are the highest clouds in Earth’s atmosphere, formed in the coldest place in Earth’s atmosphere,” says Goddard’s Jackman. “Although the clouds occur only in the polar summer, they help us to understand more about the whole globe.”
AIM is a NASA-funded Small Explorers (SMEX) mission. NASA Goddard manages the program for the agency’s Science Mission Directorate at NASA headquarters in Washington. The mission is led by the Principal Investigator from the Center for Atmospheric Sciences at Hampton University in Virginia. The Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics (LASP), University of Colorado, Boulder, and the Space Dynamics Laboratory, Utah State University, built the instruments. LASP also manages the mission and controls the satellite.

Temperature of -210º F (-134 ºC)
Hmmm
Above −78.51° C or −109.3° F, carbon dioxide changes directly from a solid phase to a gaseous phase through sublimation, or from gaseous to solid through deposition.
Cold enough for CO2 to form CO2 ice crystals?
Ozone? At –112 °C, it condenses.
The occurance of NLC in NH is in sync with high ozone levels.
Sorry, but if you need -134 oc for noctilucent clouds, then most of the clouds photographed over Utrecht in this posting are not noctilucent. Most of them are clearly contrails, with a possibility of a little noctilucent above them.
.
I was checking out some of the links left by some readers here. Btw thanks guys.
Some historical notes on noctilucent clouds, along with possible resistive material and “electroluminescence”.. not a word I could have made up on my own thank you.. Some really farout, time period photos of noctilucent clouds in this doc..
Otto Jesse and the Investigation of Noctilucent Clouds 115 Years Ago
Wilfried Schröder
Bremen-Roennebeck, Germany
ABSTRACT
Extracts from Otto Jesse’s papers relating to twilight studies, noctilucent clouds, and atmospheric movements are presented here to illustrate his contribution to the subject during the years 1884–1901. The most important result of his activity was the establishment of the Berlin Atmospheric Programme, which included regular monitoring of noctilucent clouds by visual and photographic means. Furthermore, Jesse studied problems of dynamic processes in noctilucent clouds and in the corresponding upper-atmospheric layers.
3. Jesse’s results
.. It was undoubtedly a pioneering achievement that Jesse succeeded in organizing the photographic monitoring of noctilucent clouds. From this he established the height of these clouds and found an average value of 82.08 km (Table 1), this value being confirmed by recent investigations (Bronšten and Grišin 1970). This was the first proof of the existence of cloudsat this height in the terrestrial atmosphere.
.. Jesse could also demonstrate chaotic changes within single noctilucent clouds based on these photographs, which led to the conclusion that in this height range (80–85 km) wind fields have extremely rapid variations. Archenhold (1894) wrote on the observed changes in a noctilucent cloud: “The noctilucent cloud is, in its initial state, subject not only to very quick changes—new branches of the cloud
.. Finally Jesse also established the annual changes of the frequency of occurrence of noctilucentclouds. Foerster remarked: “The clouds were observed in Berlin in the interval between the end of May and the end of July” (Foerster 1906, p. 53). As an early stage in his work, Jesse considered the origin of noctilucent clouds and their essential features (Jesse 1888). He discussed in this paper and in his study “Noctilucent clouds and their resistant material in general space” the connection between noctilucent clouds and the existence of a so-called resistant material.
Archenhold (1928, p. 141) remarked about this hypothesis: “Jesse supposed that both seasonalchanges in the frequency of occurrence of noctilucent clouds and their movement could be easily explained if we suppose the existence of a resistant material in our solar system.” The notion of a resistant material is also discussed by Foerster (1906, 1911) in connection with noctilucent clouds. Some further consideration of the origin of noctilucent clouds was published by Archenhold (1894, p. 6): “In order to explain the sudden changes of the structures and visibility of noctilucentclouds, I propose that noctilucent clouds are due, not only to reflections of the Sun’s light, but toan optical phenomenon similar to that in vacuum tubes (Geisslerian tubes) due to electroluminescence”..
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/1520-0477%282001%29082%3C2457%3AOJATIO%3E2.3.CO%3B2
Just The Facts says:
April 20, 2011 at 9:52 am
Funny how they were first noticed in 1885; 6 years after a solar minimum and 5 years before the next one; ie not far from solar maximum.
Just The Facts says:
April 20, 2011 at 4:33 am
..My question is whether a CME, Solar Sector Boundary, a combination thereof, or other solar phenomenon, could sufficiently disturb and disrupt the magnetosphere as to precipitate the break up/down of a polar vortex.”
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/02/16/watch-sunspot-group-1158-form-from-nothing/#comment-602054
I think that Polar Vortices, and potentially Noctilucent Clouds, could represent one of the largest current gaps in our understanding of Earth’s climate system…
~
Great post JTF. And I love this little play on words here. .
“I think that Polar Vortices, and potentially Noctilucent Clouds, could represent one of the largest current gaps in our understanding of Earth’s climate system…”
“Current gaps” is like hitting the nail on the head. More like horizontal instead of vertical which is something that has been going around in my head.
JTF.. it has already been suggested that solar impact on ionospheric winds may be ‘of’ the driving forces of polar vortex..
I have to go back and read that post again..
Got to admit, that’s one heluva fish net up there..what are we catching in the net..
http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/534399main_cips_123109-orig_full.jpg
A G Foster says: April 20, 2011 at 7:53 am
It is clear from Genesis 1 (5th Century BC?) that the sun was not responsible for daylight, else it would have been created before the first day.
=====================
5th Century BC for Genesis Authorship? You need to get caught up on your Archeology and Anthropology. It has been a long time since 1890 when that speculation was published. You are off by at least 800 years. I suggest you check out the Archaeological evidence cited in “Tyndale Bible Dictionary” by Walter A. Elwell and Philip Wesley Comfort (Google books). The best place to start is page 103-275.
Just The Facts says:
April 20, 2011 at 4:33 am
=====================
Thank you for your pin-point accuracy observations. Between you and Carla….I think we might be in the clear for at least the degradation of our own groupthink.
Thank you ….seriously….thank you.
Keep up the good work!
Chris
Norfolk, VA, USA
I sincerely meant my last message as a thank you and as a compliment.
Chris
@Wolf359
There have been no mentioning of them before, which is very odd since they can be rather a spectacular view. Obviously this very strange appearance has been subject to all kinds of speculation, ranging from volcanic origins (Krakatao eruption was 2 years earlier) to, you might have guessed it, climate change. The latter is explainable by the theory mentioned in the article.
Keith G wrote: “The fact that it gets *no* mention prior to 1885”
You’ve been through every document and fireside myth since the dawn of mankind and *know* that noctilucent clouds have never been seen prior to 1885? You’ve vetted every fairytale and holy book for mentions of lights, spirits, gods, etc. in the sky that might possibly be references to this meteorological effect?
As others have noted, this was probably the first time a scientist documented the effect without attributing it to gods and spirits.
savethesharks says: April 20, 2011 at 10:05 pm
Thank you for your pin-point accuracy observations. Between you and Carla….I think we might be in the clear for at least the degradation of our own groupthink.
I am not sure I understand what you mean, can you elucidate? Are you still upset that I challenged Joe Bastardi to provide a robust accounting of his skill in long-range weather forecasting?
Just The Facts says:
April 20, 2011 at 4:33 am
Re polar stratospheric vortices. You raise issues of consequence indeed.
This link could be relevant :
http://www.happs.com.au/images/stories/PDFarticles/TheCommonSenseOfClimateChange.pdf
So I see that “noctilucent” clouds, are NOT really “night shining” at all. They simply are high enough to still be in daylight. Whoopee !
For Exif reading, you can use Photoshopped Image Killer. It reads software info and jpeg quantization tables from Exif. Specificially, it can tell you whether image has tags or quantization tables from Adobe Photoshop. The site is free.