More on ARKstorm

I covered this earlier in a post here.  Atmospheric Rivers can cause this sort of pattern, read more about them here. If the goal of press releases like this one from USC and the ones from USGS is to scare people and businesses out of the state, this combined with the taxation, waste, business hostile environment, and sluggish economy give just about anyone all the reason they need to pick up and leave. The movie below is from USGS, and gives their view.

USC: California superstorm would be costliest US disaster

A hurricane-like superstorm expected to hit California once every 200 years would cause devastation to the state’s businesses unheard of even in the Great Recession, a USC economist warns.

Researchers estimate the total property damage and business interruption costs of the massive rainstorm would be nearly $1 trillion.

USC research professor Adam Rose calculated that the lost production of goods and services alone would be $627 billion of the total over five years. Rose, a professor with the USC School of Policy, Planning, and Development, also is the coordinator for economics at the Center for Risk and Economic Analysis of Terrorism Events (CREATE) at USC.

That number would make the severe storm scenario “the costliest disaster in the history of the United States̶, Rose said, more than six times greater than the 2001 World Trade Center attacks and Hurricane Katrina, which each caused $100 billion in business interruption.

The storm simulation U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) scientists termed “ARkStorm – or “atmospheric river storm” – is patterned after the U.S. West Coast storms that devastated California in 1861-62.

The storms lasted for 45 days, forming lakes in the Mojave Desert and the Los Angeles Basin. California was left bankrupt after the storms wiped out nearly a third of the state’s taxable land, according to the USGS.

But those storms were no freak event, said USGS scientists, who called the ARkStorm model “plausible, perhaps inevitable.”

The ARkStorm areas include Orange County, Los Angeles County, San Diego and the San Francisco Bay area. The megastorm likely would require the evacuation of 1.5 million people.

According to the USGS, the ARkStorm would:

  • create hurricane-force winds of up to 125 miles per hour in some areas and flood thousands of square miles of urban and agricultural land to depths of 10 to 20 feet.
  • set off hundreds of landslides that would damage roads, highways and homes.
  • disrupt lifelines such as power, water and sewers that would take weeks or months to repair.

Rose estimated the ARkStorm would cause the state’s unemployment rate to jump six percentage points in the first year, a further blow to the California economy that currently has one of the highest unemployment rates in the nation at 12.4 percent.

Rose called the severe storm scenario “much more imaginable” after Los Angeles was hit with 9.42 inches of rain in December. It was the wettest December in downtown Los Angeles in more than a century.

Climate scientists said global warming is a major factor behind the increasingly destructive power of hurricanes and other storms.

The sea level is rising as oceans warm and glaciers melt, which can create higher storm surges and more disastrous flooding in coastal areas.

“Climate change affects how the whole ecosystem works,” said Mark Bernstein, managing director of The USC Energy Institute.

“Storms form based on how warm the oceans are and how the jet stream changes,” Bernstein said. “The consequence is [the rain] will come in shorter and more intense bursts.”

Businesses and local governments can minimize the long-term impacts of such a disaster, Rose said, by creating emergency plans, increasing inventories of critical materials, backing up information systems, and diversifying supply chains and routes.

###
0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

82 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Richard M
March 8, 2011 7:07 pm

I’ll admit I don’t know what the global temperature was in 1861 but I’m going to guess it was cooler than now. So, the only real evidence we have indicates that these super storms occur when the temperature is cooler, not warmer. Admittedly, it’s only one data point, but that’s one more data point than those who claim the storms are more likely when it’s warmer.

R. de Haan
March 8, 2011 7:26 pm

And the message is…. never go anywhere without your boat.

March 8, 2011 11:49 pm

How many bureau-dollars (i.e. taxpayer dollars) went up in smoke here? The House of Reps needs to get out their scissors on the USGS budget and USC grants.
Write a scary report, get a bigger grant. It is a circle. This nonsense has got to stop.

Blade
March 9, 2011 4:56 am

A hurricane-like superstorm expected to hit California once every 200 years would cause devastation to the state’s businesses unheard of even in the Great Recession …”

Liberal eco-socialists in Sacramento and local governments cause devastation to the state’s businesses unheard of even in the Great Recession …
Keep on voting for them and Cry Me a River.

AntiAcademia
March 9, 2011 4:38 pm

This is really scary. It is scary because, according to Mr. Watts comments, it can happen and the human and financial damage may be huge. It is scary because it is a GOLDEN opportunity for the socialists to enslave us more, to get even more power, control and $trillions. In the 1929s (Great Depression) we made a HUGE mistake: Hayek “solution” was pouring more gasoline on the fire while socialist Keynes, based on pseudoscience, recommended lower interest rates that were actually water to put off the fire.
The socialists seized the opportunity presented by Hayek’s colossal error and the consequences for freedom, prosperity and happiness were horrifying: The world saw a colossal advance of socialism, big government and destruction of economic growth, and perhaps some of the super mass murderer socialist states -like Nazi Germany- would have never existed had libertarians never made that colossal mistake.
The correct handling of this unavoidable extreme weather is of extreme importance. Thanks Mr. Watts for this post.

Dave Worley
March 9, 2011 6:46 pm

It was just a metaphor.
They’re trying to subliminally tell the citizens that the state is “underwater”.
That’s how they communicate out there in movieland.
Discussing a problem directly is a no-no. Paper dolls are ok.

Mark
March 22, 2011 3:49 am

The USGS’ Arkstorm scenario (((assumes))) no damage will be done to California’s nuclear facilities!!! Sort of blows your mind, but read it for yourself:
http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2010/1312/
(click the link on the right to see the full report)
Some of the operators of electric generators did not participate in the drill and so at
pg 42 it says:
“Damage to power system components from landslides is not accounted for, nor
is any special consideration made of shutdown of nuclear power plants or of
other generating facilities not in the flooded areas…. These limitations
argue for a more thorough assessment by PG&E and other utilities.”
My question is: when is that going to happen, and will USGS have any money in its budget to pay for it to happen? Call your congressional reps if you care.