Guest post by Alexandre Aguiar, METSUL Communications Director, Brazil
(note there’s much more here at METSUL’s blog)
Corpses are still under tons of rocks and mud in the hills of Rio de Janeiro, but some experts are already rushing to the microphones here in Brazil and abroad to declare the worst natural disaster in the Brazilian history as a clear and unequivocal evidence of global warming (a.k.a. global climate disruption).

The Brazilian media is not immune to the frenzy on global warming and extreme weather events. The Folha de Sao Paulo newspaper, one of the most important media outlets in the country, published a report connecting the Rio de Janeiro disaster to the Queensland flooding in Australia and the recent snowstorms in the United States and Western Europe.

To establish the ongoing catastrophe in Brazil as a global warming product is a bogus claim in the view of the staff of MetSul Meteorologia. The same can be said to the events of cold snaps and snow in the Northern Hemisphere – strong negative Arctic Oscillation related – and the massive flooding in Australia, a direct result of the strong and natural derived La Niña event.
Rio de Janeiro is subject to heavy or extreme rainfall every year, but this time the amount of precipitation was very heavy and in a short period of time, creating an inland tsunami-like torrent. The risk of major extreme rain episodes this summer was widely anticipated by MetSul meteorologists as analog years strongly pointed to a summer similar to the ones with disastrous events in the past. Rain gauges in Nova Friburgo measured 300 millimeters (12 inches) of rain in just 24 hours from January 11th to 12th. The tragedy happened in the Sierras of Rio de Janeiro (Região Serrana) where major topographical forcing is usually present in extreme rainfall. Moisture flow from the ocean (SSTs are above average in the South Atlantic) find a natural physical barrier in the mountains of Rio de Janeiro, making the region prone to extreme rainfall during summer months and early autumn.
The most affected cities (Petrópolis, Teresópolis and Nova Fribrugo) are located between mountains as high as 5 to 6 thousand feet and besides rivers cross these towns. The only way the water can take are the valleys and the regional rivers. Due to the regional terrain, the major menace to the population is landslide. For many decades Brazilian authorities allowed construction of homes and buildings in the slopes, so every single year landslides with numerous deaths are recorded in the states of Rio de Janeiro, Sao Paulo and Minas Gerais.
The front page of the Extra newspaper from Rio de Janeiro (click over the picture for a wider view) published on January 13th 2010 showed that every single year in the last decade witnessed tragedies caused by rain in the state of Rio. The newspaper headline is “Até quando?” (When will it end?). The paper argues: “The government excuse is always the same…it rained an equivalent to…”. The dominant opinion in the Brazilian media and public arena is that these repeated tragedies must be above all attributed to poor risk management and ridiculous urban planning instead of only blaming nature. Despite recognizing the ferocity of the rain, many are calling this week tragedy a manmade disaster.
In the state of Rio de Janeiro, there is massive occupation of the slopes and the hills, so landslides tend to be much more devastating and tragedies much more frequent. If this week’s rainfall have happened in the same region 35 years ago, the consequences would have been incredibly less dramatic. Satellite pictures released by the Brazilian Global TV Network show clearly some of the risky areas that concentrate most of the victims (Caleme, Posse and Meudon) as heavily populated nowadays in contrast to low or no land occupation 35 years ago.






There are anecdotal and historic accounts of extreme rainfall in the state of Rio de Janeiro since Brazil was a Portuguese colony in the 1600’s and 1700’s, but meteorological records are not available for that period. Great tragedies caused by rain and landslides in Rio de Janeiro began mainly in the second half of the 20th century coinciding with the demographic explosion and the massive and unorganized occupation of the hills. The risky areas of today, where the tragedies of the modern times use to happen almost every year, were not occupied 100 years ago, and for that reason the vast majority of the tragic events concentrate in the last 50 years.
-
April 1756 – Three days of heavy rainfall caused flooding, home collapses and “lots of victims” all over the town – still small – of Rio de Janeiro.
-
February 1811 – Between February 10th and 17th heavy rains caused a “catastrophe” in the city of Rio de Janeiro. Hills collapsed, the city was flooded and landslides were widespread with a torrent of water and mud invading town. Historical accounts tell of many victims, but there is no official number. The regent prince – designated by Portugal – ordered the churches to be open to serve as shelters.

-
April 1883 – Eleven inches of rain (220 mm) in a matter of four hours flood the city of Rio de Janeiro.

-
April 1924 – Heavy flooding and landslides with fatalities.
-
January 1940 – Flooding and landslides in the city of Rio de Janeiro. Santo Cristo district was the most affected.

-
January 1942 – Flooding and landslides in the city of Rio de Janeiro. The Salgueiro Hill was the the main disaster area.

-
January 1962 – Heavy flooding and several landslides in the city of Rio de Janeiro after 242 mm of precipitation during a storm.
-
January 1966 – The storm of January 2nd, 1966, brought record rainfall to the city of Rio de Janeiro. Flooding and massive landslides caused 250 casualties. Other 70 people died after the storm due to diseases.





-
January 1967 – Heavy rain and landslides provoked the collapses of buildings in the city of Rio. 200 people died and 300 were injured. 300 people died in the states of Rio de Janeiro and Guanabara (today Guanabara and Rio form the state of Rio de Janeiro).




-
November 1981 – Landslides in the Sierras of Rio kill 20 people in the city of Teresopolis.
-
February 1987 – Flooding and landslides kill 292 people. The city of Rio de Janeiro and the Sierras of the state concentrate the damages and the victims.
-
February 1988 – 277 people died in flooding and landslides in the Baixada Fluminense region and in the city of Petrópolis in the Sierras. In the rest of the month hundreds more died in new landslides and flooding. A hospital collapsed, killing 18 people. Damages topped 1 billion dollars.



-
Summer of 1996 – Dozens of deaths in flooding and landslides.
-
January 1999 – Dozens of deaths in flooding and landslides.
-
2010 – Nearly 100 people died in the cities of Angra dos Reis and Rio de Janeiro due to landslides on January 1st. In April, record rainfall caused over 200 deaths in massive landslides in the cities of Rio and the neighboring town of Niteroi.
Tragic events will happen again in the future, but can be less dramatic if some steps are taken urgently and seriously: improvement of risk management, urban reorganizing, investments in weather forecast and monitoring equipments and staff, a new media approach to weather warnings’ importance and a good public governance. History proves these areas will be hit again, but we as society have the power to mitigate the consequences. It is a matter of serious and urgent public priority for our authorities and the population’s will.
Author: Alexandre Amaral de Aguiar
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Increased population & property = more deaths and destruction.
It doesn’t necessarily mean it’s the worst flood that Brazil has ever experienced. See the Brisbane cafuffle.
These are not memory lapses by journalists – in many cases it may not even be ‘agenda driven’ journalism – it is sheer scientific ignorance and poor reporting. What science these reporters have picked up has been spoon fed them by films like Gore’s “Inconvenient Truth” followed by a few disaster movies – that they believe. This worrying lack of scientific understanding is reinforced by a need for a quick headline that will sell more papers, magazines advertising time on TV. This has a self-generating effect in the media as each outlet tries to outdo the other in reporting a particular subject. Stories that blame the victims for being foolish building in landslide prone areas or flood plains do not get anywhere near the traction of parents crying over a child’s death and an editorial blaming greedy bankers, developers and ‘big oil’.
Unfortunately, this lax reporting and lack of scientific knowledge is also widespread in popular science publications and documentaries.
From the news archives: Brazil floods between 1800 and 1969:
http://tinyurl.com/4pbrn6x
Example:
This reminds me where where the mass of the press when we had snow in Brazil last year? Where were they when Argentina’s beaches got whitened? Where were they when millions of tropical fish died due to cold in Bolivia?
References:
http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100827/full/news.2010.437.html
http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/americas/07/21/brazil.dead.penguins/index.html#fbid=IIUufT-MKyq&wom=false
http://en.mercopress.com/2010/08/05/snow-in-brazil-below-zero-celsius-in-the-river-plate-and-tropical-fish-frozen
http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/cold-snap-freezes-south-america-beaches-whitened-some-areas-experience-snow-for-the-first-time-in/blog-381855/
http://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blogs/santa-catarina-brazil-cold-air?xg_source=activity
http://arcticsnap.com/index.php?id=74
http://www.brazzilmag.com/component/content/article/89-august-2010/12321-brazil-hasnt-seen-so-much-snow-in-a-decade.html
http://www.aolnews.com/world/article/chilly-in-chile-south-america-hit-by-freak-cold-snap/19583528
http://sify.com/news/cold-wave-kills-six-million-fish-in-bolivia-news-international-kielkdaieea.html
Typo:
This reminds me where were
Obrigado por um artigo muinto interessante!
“if some steps are taken urgently and seriously: improvement of risk management, urban reorganising, investments in weather forecast and monitoring equipments and staff, a new media approach to weather warnings’ importance and a good public governance.”
Unfortunately, the vast bulk of funding for these things has been most effectively snatched away by religious zealots, and there simply isn’t any money left for actually dealing with anything real. If you want to save lives and accurately predict the weather, you must do so with private funding or none at all. And be prepared to be ignored and ridiculed for not following the rigid dogma set out by the high priests of the orthodoxy. Names like John Harrison, Alfred Wegener, Edwin Howard Armstrong or Nicola Tesla come to mind as some who persevered at great personal expense.
Mais uma vez, obrigado. E não deixe os bastardos desgastá-lo para baixo!
Unfortunately, this is not the case. The UK government has been told over the years to prepare for milder winters. It has been caught off guard 3 years in a row and the country has been ill prepared with stranded drivers, lack of salt and subsequent deaths.
Another example is Queensland itself. The state government was told to prepare for drought as the norm. As a result they diverted resources into desalination plants instead of flood defences. As a result the death toll now stands at 18 when it might have been less.
References:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/news/releases/archive/2008/mild-winter
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/topics/weather/8237397/Met-Office-kept-winter-forecast-secret-from-public.html
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5607:severe-weather-stalls-travelers-baffles-environmentalists&catid=32:environment&Itemid=48
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8262064/What-was-the-role-of-warmists-in-the-Queensland-flood-disaster.html
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/police-release-names-of-people-missing-from-lockyer-valley-and-toowoomba/story-fn7ikbtj-1225988957175
In the midst of debate it’s easy to forget about the victims. All Canadians join me in extending my sincere condolences to all of those tragically lost in Brazil and Australia’s flooding.
First the Brazil drought is due to AGW, now the flooding is. Will you guys make up your mind? Not that you have one apparently. One should change one’s mind and one’s underwear from time to time. But usually due to the accumulation of fecal material in either.
@Elizabeth. yes, I would hope that goes without saying.
Much of this can be laid at the door of human overpopulation. If you don’t build houses in river valleys and on flood plains, you won’t get flooded.
We had the same in the UK a few years back, with the brain dead media here debating why new housing estates on flood plains were flooding so regularly nowadays.
Derr, I’ll give you one guess, Brian….. (must be Global Warming…..)
.
Someone pointed me to this quote my Mark Twain (in the boom “Life on the Mississippi”) that sums up my thoughts on this article quite nicely:
Now, if I wanted to be one of those ponderous scientific people, and ‘let on’ to prove what had occurred in the remote past by what had occurred in a given time in the recent past, or what will occur in the far future by what has occurred in late years, what an opportunity is here! Geology never had such a chance, nor such exact data to argue from! Nor ‘development of species,’ either! Glacial epochs are great things, but they are vague–vague. Please observe:–
In the space of one hundred and seventy-six years the Lower Mississippi has shortened itself two hundred and forty-two miles. That is an average of a trifle over one mile and a third per year. Therefore, any calm person, who is not blind or idiotic, can see that in the Old Oolitic Silurian Period,’ just a million years ago next November, the Lower Mississippi River was upwards of one million three hundred thousand miles long, and stuck out over the Gulf of Mexico like a fishing-rod. And by the same token any person can see that seven hundred and forty-two years from now the Lower Mississippi will be only a mile and three-quarters long, and Cairo and New Orleans will have joined their streets together, and be plodding comfortably along under a single mayor and a mutual board of aldermen. There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact.
The entire main stream media has turned int a bunch of “Tragedy Vultures”, exploiting every tragic event and taking it out of context.
How does the line go again.
“Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it.”
There are anecdotal and historic accounts of extreme rainfall in the state of Rio de Janeiro since Brazil was a Portuguese colony in the 1600’s and 1700’s, but meteorological records are not available for that period.
Translation: The same things occured in the Maunder, we know they took place, but the Warmists are not interested in saving lives/property by giving advance warning of when/where. The Warmists want the power and the money. The unfortunate are simply in the way of nature and Agenda.
We should expect more such events this year and for some time to come.
Read your literature.
Nobody will read it for you.
Its like talking to a brick wall. But if folks would visit the Smithsonian weekly activity reports you might be able to grasp the significant ongoing activity now and in the recent years throughout the world. Chaiten and neighborhood were spewing plumes significantly.
Merapi spewed vast steam, particulate and aerosols. Eyjafjallajokull melted 100 million cubic meters of ice into steam.
A few days ago the BBC had a “media commentator” (whatever that is) reviewing the news on BBC 24 (or whatever it’s called nowadays). One of his first comments was to claim that it is incredible that despite the floods in Australia, etc there are still climate sceptics (or whatever term he used) around. No one, of course, was around to enlighten this dimwit.
Thank you, Alexandre! It’s a real boost to hear that rationality and real science are alive in Brazil! Including the true null hypothesis.
I remember about four years ago, there was a chap called Ken Ring (a self taught weather forecaster from New Zealand, who uses lunar cycles) on Today FM, a radio station here in Ireland.
His forecast for Australia was that the droughts they had been experiencing at that time would cease around now because the moon would hit its most southerly point vis a vis the Earth. Looks like all he got wrong was the magnitude, probably didn’t foresee such a strong La Nina.
I wonder if Brazil is experiencing rain that should have been falling in the Amazon, falling instead in Rio because of the pull of the moon.
For Ireland he forecast colder winters and warmer summers, and he’s right so far :-), or should that be :-(.
Now I am merely a doctor and not a climate scientist but I do know about floods in Brisbane. I survived the 1974 flood. I have 6 adult children all of whom have bought real estate in the Brisbane area. So we know the flood record.
Between 1840 (when the first records were taken) and 1900 there was on average one flood as big as 1974 every fifteen years
In the 20th century the climate changed (as it always does) and we have had two big floods in 111 years.
Some of the CO2 religionists are blaming the recent flood on global warming ! There wasn’t a lot of global warming or carbon dioxide around in the 19th century.
I feel it is important for me to add that I actually agree that the flooding and snow and nasty weather are all indeed indications of global warming: At least, nasty weather that would be expected from a climate system working to maintain itself during a tens of thousands of years long recovery from an ice age. This is simply the geological/climatological times in which we live, and there is nothing we could ever do to change it.
I remain unconvinced that human contributions to CO2 have any more than a minuscule and negligible effect on our environment. It is not up to me to explain why CO2 isn’t a problem, but rather up to the so called experts to prove that it is–without resorting to tricks, obfuscation, abuse and tyranny.
Let’s look at what an elite meteorologist has to say:
http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=1727
It appears to me that all this precipitation makes Henrik Svensmark look more on the money as each day passes.
@David Falkner
4) Chuck Norris turned on the air conditioner. What more proof do you need?
That’s it, I’m convinced. 😉
Can anyone explain what type of organization Metsul Meteorologia is? Government, academic, think tank, etc? I’ve tried googling a bit and most everything’s in Portuguese…