Dead terran spacecraft find new life in moon orbit

From Science @NASA: A pair of NASA spacecraft that were supposed to be dead last year are instead flying to the Moon for a breakthrough mission in lunar orbit.

“Their real names are THEMIS P1 and P2, but I call them ‘dead spacecraft walking,'” says Vassilis Angelopoulos of UCLA, principal investigator of the THEMIS mission. “Not long ago they appeared to be doomed, but now they are beginning an incredible new adventure.”

Artemis (artemis, 550px)

An artist’s concept of THEMIS-P1 and P2 (since renamed ARTEMIS-P1 and P2) in lunar orbit. [larger image]

The story begins in 2007 when NASA launched a fleet of five spacecraft into Earth’s magnetosphere to study the physics of geomagnetic storms. Collectively, they were called THEMIS, short for “Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms.” P1 and P2 were the outermost members of the quintet.

Working together, the probes quickly discovered a cornucopia of previously unknown phenomena such as colliding auroras, magnetic spacequakes, and plasma bullets shooting up and down Earth’s magnetic tail. This has allowed researchers to solve several longstanding mysteries of the Northern Lights.

Artemis (Northern Lights, 200px)

In their previous life, THEMIS-P1 and P2 were on a mission to study Northern Lights. [more]

The mission was going splendidly, except for one thing: Occasionally, P1 and P2 would pass through the shadow of Earth. The solar powered spacecraft were designed to go without sunlight for as much as three hours at a time, so a small amount of shadowing was no problem. But as the mission wore on, their orbits evolved and by 2009 the pair was spending as much as 8 hours a day in the dark.

“The two spacecraft were running out of power and freezing to death,” says Angelopoulos. “We had to do something to save them.”

The team brainstormed a solution. Because the mission had gone so well, the spacecraft still had an ample supply of fuel–enough to go to the Moon. “We could do some great science from lunar orbit,” he says. NASA approved the trip and in late 2009, P1 and P2 headed away from the shadows of Earth.

With a new destination, the mission needed a new name. The team selected ARTEMIS, the Greek goddess of the Moon. It also stands for “Acceleration, Reconnection, Turbulence and Electrodynamics of the Moon’s Interaction with the Sun.”

The first big events of the ARTEMIS mission are underway now. On August 25, 2010, ARTEMIS-P1 reached the L2 Lagrange point on the far side of the Moon. Following close behind, ARTEMIS-P2 entered the opposite L1 Lagrange point on Oct. 22nd. Lagrange points are places where the gravity of Earth and Moon balance, creating a sort of gravitational parking spot for spacecraft.

Artemis (Lagrange Points, 550px)

The ARTEMIS spacecraft are currently located at the L1 and L2 Earth-Moon Lagrange points. [more]

“We’re exploring the Earth-Moon Lagrange points for the first time,” says Manfred Bester, Mission Operations Manager from the University of California at Berkeley, where the mission is operated. “No other spacecraft have orbited there.”

Because they lie just outside Earth’s magnetosphere, Lagrange points are excellent places to study the solar wind. Sensors onboard the ARTEMIS probes will have in situ access to solar wind streams and storm clouds as they approach our planet—a possible boon to space weather forecasters. Moreover, working from opposite Lagrange points, the two spacecraft will be able to measure solar wind turbulence on scales never sampled by previous missions.

“ARTEMIS is going to give us a fundamental new understanding of the solar wind,” predicts David Sibeck, ARTEMIS project scientist at the Goddard Space Flight Center. “And that’s just for starters.”

ARTEMIS will also explore the Moon’s plasma wake—a turbulent cavity carved out of the solar wind by the Moon itself, akin to the wake just behind a speedboat. Sibeck says “this is a giant natural laboratory filled with a whole zoo of plasma waves waiting to be discovered and studied.”

Artemis (orbits, 200px)

A Youtube video describes the complex orbits of the two Artemis spacecraft.

Another target of the ARTEMIS mission is Earth’s magnetotail. Like a wind sock at a breezy airport, Earth’s magnetic field is elongated by the action of the solar wind, forming a tail that stretches to the orbit of the Moon and beyond. Once a month around the time of the full Moon, the ARTEMIS probes will follow the Moon through the magnetotail for in situ observations.

“We are particularly hoping to catch some magnetic reconnection events,” says Sibeck. “These are explosions in Earth’s magnetotail that mimic solar flares–albeit on a much smaller scale.” ARTEMIS might even see giant ‘plasmoids’ accelerated by the explosions hitting the Moon during magnetic storms.

These far-out explorations may have down-to-Earth applications. Plasma waves and reconnection events pop up on Earth, e.g., in experimental fusion chambers. Fundamental discoveries by ARTEMIS could help advance research in the area of clean renewable energy.

After six months at the Lagrange points, ARTEMIS will move in closer to the Moon—at first only 100 km from the surface and eventually even less than that. From point-blank range, the spacecraft will look to see what the solar wind does to a rocky world when there’s no magnetic field to protect it.

“Earth is protected from solar wind by the planetary magnetic field,” explains Angelopolous. “The Moon, on the other hand, is utterly exposed. It has no global magnetism.”

Studying how the solar wind electrifies, alters and erodes the Moon’s surface could reveal valuable information for future explorers and give planetary scientists a hint of what’s happening on other unmagnetized worlds around the solar system.

Orbiting the Moon is notoriously tricky, however, because of irregularities in the lunar gravitational field. Enormous concentrations of mass (mascons) hiding just below the surface tug on spacecraft in unexpected ways, causing them over time to veer out of orbit. ARTEMIS will mitigate this problem using highly elongated orbits ranging from tens of km to 18,000 km.

“We’ll only be near the lunar surface for a brief time each orbit (accumulating a sizable dataset over the years),” explains Angelopoulos. “Most of the time we’ll linger 18,000 km away where we can continue our studies of the solar wind at a safe distance.”

The Dead Spacecraft Walking may have a long life ahead, after all.

Author: Dr. Tony Phillips | Credit: Science@NASA

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

77 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
RACookPE1978
Editor
October 28, 2010 12:19 pm

DesertYote says:
October 28, 2010 at 10:34 am (Edit)
George E. Smith
October 28, 2010 at 9:06 am
#
To add to what
Leif Svalgaard
October 28, 2010 at 9:52 am
said:

The force vector field about the unstable point accelerates objects away. About the stable point, objects are accelerated towards the point. Think of L1 and L2 as being on a hill, push to[o] far and objects fall off, and L4 and L5 as being in a valley.

If so, would not then both L4 and L5 “attract” all randomly moving nearby dust and debris into their regions over the past 3.5 billion years of a stable moon-earth orbit system, thus “filling up” the previously empty L4 and L5 spots with a new moon/asteroid combination? Granted, fast-moving debris might not get trapped, but slow-moving dust should be there in abundance.

DesertYote
October 28, 2010 12:24 pm

-S
October 28, 2010 at 11:45 am
That’s not true. I get it, and it has been bothering me for awhile. It is just that some of love math so much, especially cool math like that involved in deriving L point stability and orbits, that it over shadows other issues.
NASA has always reused mission hardware. I used to work for a organization that built a lot of stuff for NASA. It is an awesome feeling to read articles on the current activities of missions that I was involved with 20 years ago!
BTW, I saw this yesterday, talk about spin.
“2. Eco-friendly Spacecraft: Recycle, Reuse, Record – The EPOXI mission is recycling the Deep Impact spacecraft, whose probe intentionally collided with comet Tempel 1 on July 4, 2005, revealing, for the first time, the inner material of a comet. The spacecraft is now approaching a second comet rendezvous, a close encounter with Hartley 2 on Nov. 4. The spacecraft is reusing the same trio of instruments used during Deep Impact: two telescopes with digital imagers to record the encounter, and an infrared spectrometer. ”
this is from:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/epoxi/epoxi20101025.html

October 28, 2010 12:24 pm

racookpe1978 says:
October 28, 2010 at 12:19 pm
If so, would not then both L4 and L5 “attract” all randomly moving nearby dust and debris into their regions over the past 3.5 billion years of a stable moon-earth orbit system
First, the orbit of the Moon has not been stable over billions of years [it is getting larger].
Second, But there are such debris at Jupiter’s L4 and L5: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter_Trojan

October 28, 2010 12:26 pm

Enneagram says:
October 28, 2010 at 10:03 am
You will have to revisit Pythagoras.
nuts …

DesertYote
October 28, 2010 12:35 pm

racookpe1978
October 28, 2010 at 12:19 pm
Not to much. Going back to the valley analogy, think of L4 & L5 as a shallow valley on a hill. Past a certain point, the force vector field again accelerates objects away from the L point. The accumulation of perturbations from the other bodies in the solar system will tend to knock objects out of the “dimple”. To get into the dimple is also not a simple matter. Its like trying to roll a ball up a hill to land and stay in within the dimple, to fast and the ball does not stop but rolls out, too slow and the ball does not make it up the hill.

October 28, 2010 12:43 pm

:
> … would not then both L4 and L5 “attract” all randomly moving nearby
> dust and debris into their regions over the past 3.5 billion years of a
> stable moon-earth orbit system, thus “filling up” the previously
> empty L4 and L5 spots with a new moon/asteroid combination?
Yes, that has indeed happened, for example at Jupiter’s L4 an L5 points:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter_Trojan
Here’s a more complete list of known LaGrangrian objects, man-made and otherwise:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_objects_at_Lagrangian_points

Scott Basinger
October 28, 2010 12:56 pm

Dead satellites walking? Why not make the press release totally B-movie rated and call it “Zombie Robots in Space!” 🙂

Tim
October 28, 2010 1:46 pm

L1 & L2 for the win! It has been a long time since I’ve heard of those. Way back in the 70s reading Gerard O’Neill’s book “The High Frontier”.

Tenuc
October 28, 2010 2:18 pm

Enneagram says:
October 28, 2010 at 10:03 am
“From thousand of years ago knowledge was transmitted by simple, very simple symbols, as the Pythagorean Tetraktis. The fundamental laws of the cosmos are as simple.”
The Monad is the Father Embracing all that will be.
The Dyad, the form of Difference, and
Mother of Multiplicity.
The Triad, the first actual number,
With Beginning, End, and Mean,
The Tetrad completes the arrangement
Of the Soul and what is seen.
Ancient Tetraktys, Pythagoras’ vision divine,
The Decad, a perfect Limit, and Cosmic Paradigm.
Original poem by Robert Apatow
The more complex things seem to be becoming, the further we drift from the truth. The position of the observer decides how he views reality. We will only ever be able to understand the universe by looking inwards, rather than looking out.

DesertYote
October 28, 2010 2:27 pm

Tim says:
October 28, 2010 at 1:46 pm
L1 & L2 for the win! It has been a long time since I’ve heard of those. Way back in the 70s reading Gerard O’Neill’s book “The High Frontier”.
###
We don’t need no oil, nor a Tokamak coil,
Solar power supplies us with juice,
Powerbeams are sublime, so no one will mine,
If we cook an occasional goose.
A lost verse from the L5 song.

October 28, 2010 2:32 pm

Ric Werme says:
October 28, 2010 at 7:21 am
“http://themis.ssl.berkeley.edu/overview.shtml says two probes (these?) got 20 and 30 Earth radii out as part of the primary mission. That’s really far out of the Earth’s gravity well, so that and likely good fuel management made this new mission possible.”
However, the article claimed that the probes were spending as much as 8 hours a day in the dark, which is only possible in Low Earth Orbit, at about 1.1547 Earth radii (ie, below 1000km), from which the delta V to L1 & L2 is ~3km/s. Even with good fuel management you wouldn’t get that much left at end of life, unless it had been planned that way from the outset. So something doesn’t add up. Alternatively, had they been in a very high, slow, orbit (>300 Earth radii, 5x the Moon’s orbit) they could have spent up to 8 hours behind the Earth at a time, but then would not have been in full shadow, since the Earth would have eclipsed less than half of the Sun’s disk.

LarryD
October 28, 2010 2:43 pm

For the L1, L2, and L3 points, a halo orbit or Lissajous orbit has to be used, since those points aren’t dynamically stable. L4 and L5 can be dynamically stable, if there aren’t perturbing factors. In the case of the Earth-Moon system, the eccentricity of the Moons’ orbit and solar perturbations render them dynamically unstable also.
If you map the space-time curve for the Lagrangian points, L1-L3 are saddle points, while L4 and L5 are dimples.
L2 and L3 can also be understood as point and the surface of the second body’s Hill sphere.

October 28, 2010 2:54 pm

Tenuc says:
October 28, 2010 at 2:18 pm
We will only ever be able to understand the universe by looking inwards, rather than looking out.
nuts…

Tenuc
October 28, 2010 3:40 pm

Leif Svalgaard says:
October 28, 2010 at 2:54 pm
‘Tenuc says:
October 28, 2010 at 2:18 pm
…We will only ever be able to understand the universe by looking inwards, rather than looking out.’
Leif Reply: “nuts…”
There is a goose trapped in a narrow necked bottle. Poof… in an instant the goose is out.
Questions:-
How did the goose get out of the bottle without breaking it?
How did the goose get into the predicament in the first place?

October 28, 2010 3:52 pm

Tenuc says:
October 28, 2010 at 3:40 pm
Questions:-
How did the goose get out of the bottle without breaking it?
How did the goose get into the predicament in the first place?

In four dimensions these questions are non-issues.

October 28, 2010 5:00 pm

I do not know anything about geese.
The goose in question ….( not exist)
I see as the greatest concern to attack the correct positions of Dr. Leif.
The question is. The topic is about the math of 200 years ago.
Leif, In four dimensions These questions are non-issues.
Nice read ….
Amazing how all “barycentric friends” are not present.
Lukewarmers,
I do not believe … this position of relative comfort.

RACookPE1978
Editor
October 28, 2010 5:13 pm

Tenuc says:
October 28, 2010 at 3:40 pm (Edit)
….

There is a goose trapped in a narrow necked bottle. Poof… in an instant the goose is out.
Questions:-
How did the goose get out of the bottle without breaking it?
How did the goose get into the predicament in the first place?

1) The goose did not break the bottle. As a caring engineer, I did, in order to save the goose’s neck.
2) The goose, like many too careless in their pursuit of life but who think they can learn all that is important from peer-reviewed theoretical research, measured his neck and then measured the bottle’s neck.
Thus fully informed about the theory of sticking heads in bottles, he chose to stick his head in the bottle. His head, now closed in the bottle, swelled up and prevented removal because the goose forgot about feedback, biology, and the small size of the thermal expansion of glass under under pressure.

George E. Smith
October 28, 2010 5:22 pm

“”” Leif Svalgaard says:
October 28, 2010 at 9:52 am
George E. Smith says:
October 28, 2010 at 9:29 am
namely an equilateral triangle of three point objects of arbitrary masses. […] The point object restriction I believe is necessary
This is a common misconception. It is enough that the objects are spherically symmetric. Also, L4 and L5 are ‘stable’ against small perturbations [for large enough mass ratios]. L1, L2, and L3 require slight ‘station keeping’ [small corrections to the spacecraft position]. “””
Thanks Leif; I wasn’t too sure about the “point object” aspect; which is why I had the CYA weasel words. I thought later that maybe non-zero moments of inertia might not be a problem. I gather without looking at pictures that L4 and L5 are the Trojan locations and assumed they were sort of meta-stable, in that for Jupiter; there are already occupants there (apparently).

Little Blue Guy
October 28, 2010 6:59 pm

George E. Smith says:
October 28, 2010 at 5:22 pm
I gather without looking at pictures that L4 and L5 are the Trojan locations and assumed they were sort of meta-stable, in that for Jupiter; there are already occupants there (apparently).
There are currently about 4000 Jupiter trojan asteroids with catalogued orbits, asymmetrically distributed between the planet’s L4 and L5 at a 2:1 ratio. There are no doubt hundreds of thousands of smaller motes hanging around as well.

Patrick Crowley
October 28, 2010 9:45 pm

As I remember, Arthur C Clark was writing about Lagrange points in the ’60’s. Just like he did about geocentric orbits in the ’40’s. Or maybe it was another sci-fi writer like Izamov or Heinlein. I am glad the mathematics have been improved and hats off to the NASA folks who actually did this.

DocWat
October 29, 2010 5:32 am

Dr. Leif Svalgaard , What about the science data coming from the P1 and P2? Orbits and geese in bottles, not withstanding.

Editor
October 29, 2010 5:40 am

Paul Birch says:
October 28, 2010 at 2:32 pm

Ric Werme says:
October 28, 2010 at 7:21 am
“http://themis.ssl.berkeley.edu/overview.shtml says two probes (these?) got 20 and 30 Earth radii out as part of the primary mission. That’s really far out of the Earth’s gravity well, so that and likely good fuel management made this new mission possible.”
However, the article claimed that the probes were spending as much as 8 hours a day in the dark, which is only possible in Low Earth Orbit,….

That’s true for circular orbits, but these were in extemely eccentric orbits. I don’t fully understand the arrangement, but I assume that when the major axis of the orbit line up with the sun and the perigee is sunward, then the satellites would whip around the sunward side of the Earth and dawdle on the shady side for the long climb and fall on the other side.
John Day says:
October 28, 2010 at 10:15 am

Here’s a Java simulator where you can get some answers to these questions:
http://www.princeton.edu/~rvdb/JAVA/astro/galaxy/Galaxy0.html

Oh good, I was going to post this, it’s nice to know other people know of Vanderbei’s site. I strongly recommend people interested in orbital dynamics spend a little time playing with the simulator, it’s fascinating seeing how what appears to be a stable orbit can quickly fall apart.
Also, check out his home page for other interests and the photos he’s coaxed out of his Questar telescope and others.

October 29, 2010 5:58 am

DocWat says:
October 29, 2010 at 5:32 am
Dr. Leif Svalgaard , What about the science data coming from the P1 and P2? Orbits and geese in bottles, not withstanding.
That data will be interesting because we’ll sample the solar wind before it hits the Earth, so space weather forecasting will improve.

October 29, 2010 6:34 am

Ric Werme says:
October 29, 2010 at 5:40 am
“”Paul Birch: … the probes were spending as much as 8 hours a day in the dark … only possible in Low Earth Orbit”
That’s true for circular orbits, but these were in extemely eccentric orbits. I don’t fully understand the arrangement, but I assume that when the major axis of the orbit line up with the sun and the perigee is sunward, then the satellites would whip around the sunward side of the Earth and dawdle on the shady side for the long climb and fall on the other side.”
I don’t think that quite works. With a low perigee (1.15R) and a very high apogee (25R) the orbital velocity at apogee is indeed low enough, at 440m/s, to keep the probe in shadow for up to 8 hours at a time. But not 8 hours a day, since the orbital period is then ~3 days. However, if you make the burn at perigee, the delta V to L1 & L2 is then only a few hundred metres per second, which is certainly plausible. Though a much smaller burn would nudge the orbit out of shadow anyway.
I guess the 8 hours a day could have been a journalistic error.

November 1, 2010 2:58 pm

Yeah, I remember Clark writing about LaGrange points and discussions about having space stations there. To the person who asked if this could have been a manned mission – I guess the costs/risks are considered too great.