After "Global Climate Disruption": next name?

The name hardly matters anymore it will always translate to ” help me I’m stupid”.Its the coulda, shouda woulda syndrome. Nitwits R us in old speak.

Everyone is missing the fact Holdren is sending a signal. In fact, I believe his is throwing in the towel on AGW. The definition of ‘disruption’ is:
1. To throw into confusion or disorder.
2. To interrupt or impede the progress, movement, or procedure of.
3. To break or burst; rupture.
Using definition 2, interrupt or impede means to halt the progress of some process. This then translates to ‘Climate Change Halt’. Holdren is saying climate change has stopped. The remaining definitions are less likely:
1. Global Climate Dementia.
3. Global Climate Hernia.

A modest proposal:
Dr. James Hansen of NASA GISS has long wanted to accomplishing something that will ensure enduring fame for himself. I propose that a new term be introduced in his honor in the field of science, the Hansen Scheme. A Hansen scheme is a scientific fraud, perpetrated with governmental knowledge and assistance, that includes vigorous efforts to stifle attempts to expose said fraud, and is intended to enable said government to fleece and further restrict the lives of its citizens. Global warming is currently the most serious example of a Hansen Scheme, but not the only one now out there. Also, Hansen and Charles Ponzi belong in the same class of characters in our history.
REPLY: I don’t share this view. Never assume fraud or malice where simple incompetence will do. That said, have a look at this:

Above is a blink comparator showing the before and after of GISS adjustments to the surface temperature record, 10 years apart. – Anthony

1. Sick Climate Syndrome
2. Man-made Climate Disaster

Slightly OT, but here in Japan on 27 October, The Asahi Glass Foudation is to award the Blue Planet Prize to Jim Hansen and Robert Watson. They will receive an award certificate, a trophy, and ca. $600,000 (50 million Yen) each:
http://www.af-info.or.jp/en/blueplanet/introduction.html

…as a play on Hansen’s “Venus Syndrome,” how about the “Fund Us Syndrome”?

How about Computer Aided Science Hoax, or CASH?

I hope they stick with Global Climate Disruption.
Its catchy,
I’m warming to it.

Pete of perth September 19, 2010 at 6:00 pm
Modelocalyspe

It’s hard enough to pronounce that without your concluding lysp!
|>:|-
>:p

James Sexton says:
September 19, 2010 at 9:08 pm
baffled24 says:
September 19, 2010 at 7:56 pm
—-
If you can’t see the humor here, then the second observation of the word humor would apply to you.
—-
Is there a third or fourth observation? The only thing that seems remotely funny is the fact that the comments are, supposedly, made by adults.

Curiousgeorge,
I can see from your post that you are totally taken by your weather rock.
In Oz we gave up on them nearly a century ago in favour of the weather stick, it gives all the same details of the rock but with many enhanced features. At this point I have to say that I am not a weather stick expert, but do understand many of its salient features.
A carefully prepared stick of set length and diameter is available through our Met office, the preparation of the stick and its species a closely guarded secret. Set in the ground in a plumb position to the correct height this gives all the features of your rock,plus.
Rocks are used but only as permanent markers on the ground, thus a system of accurate time keeping for the observations. The winter and summer solstices can be predicted with accuracy. The fine calibration of this stick also gives wind speed by deflection and direction by observation of the fixed cardinal stones.
Please refer also to E.M. Smith The Chiefo for the correct procedure of the stick to ascertain the exact measure of the second and the definition of the yard the foot and many other extremely useful applications.
I fail to understand your preference for a rock in a modern world.