Since there is so much worry about the Arctic Sea Ice extent this time of year, it is always good to get some historical perspective. According to this study, our current low Arctic ice extents are not unprecedented.
From a press release of the Geological Survey of Norway:

Less ice in the Arctic Ocean 6000-7000 years ago
Recent mapping of a number of raised beach ridges on the north coast of Greenland suggests that the ice cover in the Arctic Ocean was greatly reduced some 6000-7000 years ago. The Arctic Ocean may have been periodically ice free.

The complete story follows.

”The climate in the northern regions has never been milder since the last Ice Age than it was about 6000-7000 years ago. We still don’t know whether the Arctic Ocean was completely ice free, but there was more open water in the area north of Greenland than there is today,” says Astrid Lyså, a geologist and researcher at the Geological Survey of Norway (NGU).
Shore features

Together with her NGU colleague, Eiliv Larsen, she has worked on the north coast of Greenland with a group of scientists from the University of Copenhagen, mapping sea-level changes and studying a number of shore features. She has also collected samples of driftwood that originated from Siberia or Alaska and had these dated, and has collected shells and microfossils from shore sediments.

”The architecture of a sandy shore depends partly on whether wave activity or pack ice has influenced its formation. Beach ridges, which are generally distinct, very long, broad features running parallel to the shoreline, form when there is wave activity and occasional storms. This requires periodically open water,” Astrid Lyså tells me.
Pack-ice ridges which form when drift ice is pressed onto the seashore piling up shore sediments that lie in its path, have a completely different character. They are generally shorter, narrower and more irregular in shape.
Open sea
”The beach ridges which we have had dated to about 6000-7000 years ago were shaped by wave activity,” says Astrid Lyså. They are located at the mouth of Independence Fjord in North Greenland, on an open, flat plain facing directly onto the Arctic Ocean. Today, drift ice forms a continuous cover from the land here. Astrid Lyså says that such old beach formations require that the sea all the way to the North Pole was periodically ice free for a long time.
”This stands in sharp contrast to the present-day situation where only ridges piled up by pack ice are being formed,” she says.
However, the scientists are very careful about drawing parallels with the present-day trend in the Arctic Ocean where the cover of sea ice seems to be decreasing.
“Changes that took place 6000-7000 years ago were controlled by other climatic forces than those which seem to dominate today,” Astrid Lyså believes.
Inuit immigration
The mapping at 82 degrees North took place in summer 2007 as part of the LongTerm project, a sub-project of the major International Polar Year project, SciencePub. The scientists also studied ruined settlements dating from the first Inuit immigration to these desolate coasts.
The first people from Alaska and Canada, called the Independence I Culture, travelled north-east as far as they could go on land as long ago as 4000-4500 years ago. The scientists have found out that drift ice had formed on the sea again in this period, which was essential for the Inuit in connection with their hunting. No beach ridges have been formed since then.
”Seals and driftwood were absolutely vital if they were to survive. They needed seals for food and clothing, and driftwood for fuel when the temperature crept towards minus 50 degrees. For us, it is inconceivable and extremely impressive,” says Eiliv Larsen, the NGU scientist and geologist.
===========================
h/t to Ecotretas
Sponsored IT training links:
Take advantage of latest 350-001 dumps and 640-802 practice exam to practice and pass your VCP-410 exam on first try.
>>two B-17 Flying Fortresses and six P-38 Lightning fighters trapped
>>under an estimated 250 feet of ice
You will have to check, but it is possible that an aluminium structure will gravitate through the ice until it hits bedrock. A penny on an ice-cube will perform a similar trick.
.
And 125000 years ago a sea passage once divided Antarctica.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/sep/05/climate-change-ice-caps-antarctica
The Guardian sees this as a global warming warning sign but misses the obvious, that the previous interglacial was NATURALLY much warmer than this one.
See also Drenge et al, The Nordic Seas” An overview.
http://tinyurl.com/Nordic-Seas
Does anyone know whether the current ‘retreat‘ of Arctic ice has anything to do with a a natural climate variation “Bond Event”?
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/278/5341/1257
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bond_event
Here are lots more references relating to past climate variation in the Arctic, (click here).
Impossible! They told us that the Holocene Optimum was a local phenomenon! I trusted them….. /not
how about the eemian?
Ralph says: September 8, 2010 at 10:49 am
This is the same era when the Sahara became wet and hospitable. So what happened? Was everywhere warm, or did all the worldwide weather bands all just move north a bit – so the ITCZ ended up over the Sahara, and N European weather ended up over Greenland?
Not necessarily
According to what I am finding, it is not out of question that the Arctic stays relatively warm while certain parts of the north hemisphere get colder. I accumulated lot of info about the Greenland-Scotland ridge and its hydrology controlling the ‘in and out’ Arctic flow. It is all meter of the currents circulation and jet stream tandem:
http://www.whoi.edu/cms/images/oceanus/Dickson_map_550_52088.jpg
http://minnesota.publicradio.org/collections/special/columns/updraft/assets_c/2010/03/1jet_stream-thumb-500×490.jpg
As warm waters inflow increases, keeping Arctic’s temperature up, so it does outflow of the cold currents. This shifts ‘jet stream’ further to the south in the NW Atlantic as it was the case in the recent months.
I would suspect similar but more extreme could have been the case around 4000 BC, when present deserts of the North Africa and the Middle East were fertile lands of the ancient civilisations. However, at the same time N. America could have been much colder than today.
A number of people have focussed on weasel words:
‘“Changes that took place 6000-7000 years ago were controlled by other climatic forces than those which seem to dominate today,” .
I would like to make a more charitable suggestion, that they said this to avoid the aggression characterised by so many warmists in the academic and political establishments when their cage is rattled by plausible contra-indications of unprecedented warming. These Norwegian researchers want to keep their jobs.
Interesting news. One of the striking features of climatism is the timeframe which is used to determine “normal” climate, or climate change (i.e. deviation from “normal”). Considering the age of our planet, the whole time for which any temperature readings are availalble is nothing more than the blinking of an eye.
I would not at all be surprised if some research into the myths and sagas of the various tribes living in the arctic (Inuit, others) would reveal hints to less and also to more ice than we see today. Who knows, maybe they even got there on open water in the first place. Why should the sea conquering people which inhabitated the pacific islands not have ventured north as well? Just a very wild speculation.
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/pubs/alley2000/alley2000.html
The record ends in 1905. Here it is merged with instrumental Greenland record and the alleged anthropogenic warming is depicted in green.
http://i45.tinypic.com/2uzz32v.jpg
HS and “unprecedented climate change” demolished in one pass.
Which external forcing, except the Atlantic SST changing in cycles, Dr Meier?
tarpon says:
September 8, 2010 at 10:17 am
You know what tundra is? Frozen peat. You know what peat is? Dead trees and bushes.
Well, not really… tundra is generally an area on top of permafrost. Peat is almost always dead sphagnum moss.
Enneagram says:
September 8, 2010 at 9:55 am
we have had dated to about 6000-7000 years ago …
What kind of dating?
—————–
Radiocarbon dating on driftwood.
Not convinced that your quote regarding the planes is evidence of anything other than that someone is deeply confused, and thinks that precipitation should be uniform over Greenland.
This just posted .
http://climateprogress.org/2010/09/08/arctic-sea-ice-history-paleoclimate-polar-amplification/
Informative, interesting, on topic for here and refreshingly clear of hair-shirtism!
It might be because it’s been termed a ‘Long Term Project‘. The story above was reported in 2008. Here are some of the same authors in 2006 – Original IPY project no: 777.
http://www.apex.geo.su.se/apex-updates-projects-2007/longterm-project.html
Jimbo says:
September 8, 2010 at 9:36 am
I posted the link above for the Geological Survey of Norway on Romm’s Climate Progress as well as Historic Variation in Arctic Ice and was quickly censored. It appeared fleetingly then was deleted
Sure did, I saw it.
Susan C. says: September 8, 2010 at 10:40 am
I have come across no other evidence that the Arctic was ice-free in this region during the Holocene, particularly “all the way to the North Pole” [why do they say this? based on what evidence?]. This area is historically where the very thickest and most stable ice is found.
Look at any of the Arctic sea ice threads. the ice is the thickest and most stable because winds blow it there. So, think about that. If there was any ice in the Arctic, this is where it would be.
Nothing inconvenient or controversial about the effects of the Holocene Climate Optimum, which exactly the period in question. It is well known that temperatures in the Arctic areas during this period were warm enough to cause a retreat of the sea ice and so one would expect to find evidence of this in the record of wave action on beaches. Furthermore, nothing in this study negates or refutes the notion that current warmth could be related to the 40% increase in CO2 since the 1700’s. I do find the sudden posting of this study from two years ago to be a curious event however, as no new study or research on this seems to have precipitated this posting.
Ralph says: September 8, 2010 at 10:52 am
two B-17 Flying Fortresses and six P-38 Lightning fighters trapped
under an estimated 250 feet of ice
You will have to check, but it is possible that an aluminium structure will gravitate through the ice until it hits bedrock. A penny on an ice-cube will perform a similar trick.”
That penny trick requires a warm, not frozen penny, and an ice cube that’s nearly melting. The airplanes were below freezing temperature long before they got buried in snow. And an airplane full of air is several 1000 times less dense than a solid copper penny. Here’s a link to part of the story of the recovery and rebuilding of “Glacier Girl” one of the P-38s that is now flying for airshows. Of interest is that the tail of the airplane was 8 meters behind the rest of the fuselage due to uneven ice flow.
http://p38assn.org/glacier-girl-recovery.htm The airplane recovery team learned a lot about the dynamics of glacier flow to the sea, where they routinely break off and create icebergs.
This is not terribly surprising. There is much evidence that the Arctic was warmer in the mid-holocene than today.
Walt Meier says:
September 8, 2010 at 10:15 am
This indicates that the Arctic sea ice is quite fragile and it doesn’t take a large increase in temperatures for it to melt completely during summer – temperatures not much higher than where we’ve been in recent years.
In other words, the ice does indeed respond strongly to external forcing, as we’re seeing now.
Arctic sea ice fragile? Not really. It is however quite variable, growing at some times, melting at others depending on a variety of different conditions, most of them of a cyclic nature. All we are seeing now is the ice responding to a natural climate variation, with possibly one human element – that of soot, or black carbon deposition:
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/view.php?id=45033
Walt Meir
I would think that that temeratures were a lot higher during the holocene maximum and as co2 does not cause the earth to warm that much. I doubt if we will ever see the earth warm to the same temerature as the holocene maximum this side of the next glaciation.
“You know what tundra is? Frozen peat. You know what peat is? Dead trees and bushes.”
Sorry Tarpon, but this is not the case. Tundra is first and foremost permafrost, no proper trees will grown in a permafrost soil, the growing season will be too short.
It’s therefore perfectly possible for tundra peat to contain no tree remnants at all.
http://www.springerlink.com/content/7r740350t2344482/
Don’t know if anyone saw this as I just found the news…..
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/afp/20100908/tts-climate-warming-science-ice-c1b2fc3.html
DCA engineer says: September 8, 2010 at 11:44 am
This just posted .
http://climateprogress.org/2010/09/08/arctic-sea-ice-history-paleoclimate-polar-amplification/
The proxies used do not agree with recent past, but discrepancy confirms my conclusion in :
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/09/08/inconvenient-ice-study-less-ice-in-the-arctic-ocean-6000-7000-years-ago/#comment-477888
The article includes this graph:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/cache/MiamiImageURL/B6VBC-4YKFMY0-2-8/0?wchp=dGLbVtb-zSkWA
with following description:
Fig. 12. Comparison of a multi-proxy reconstruction of sea-ice extent in the Nordic Seas during 1200–1997 AD (black curve; Macias-Fauria et al., 2009) and maximum Arctic-wide ice extent during 1870–2003 (red curve; Kinnard et al., 2008). The discrepancy between the two records in the early 20th century corresponds to an increase in the Atlantic inflow to the Nordic Seas (e.g., Polyakov et al., 2009).
I have made my point on the climateprogress blog too.
In 1956, Jean Malaurie’s ‘Last Kings of Thule’ was published, relating his ethnographic observations made during a year in northern Greenland. There is nothing whatever about climatology in the book, except this: He was there to study raised beaches.
You cannot study raised beaches unless they are, you know, raised. So there must have been less ice earlier.