NASA probe to 'touch, taste and smell' the sun.

From Science @NASA: Let’s hope it doesn’t taste like chicken or smell like feet.

NASA’s daring plan to visit the sun took a giant leap forward today with the selection of five key science investigations for the Solar Probe+ spacecraft.

Slated to launch no later than 2018, the smart car-sized spacecraft will plunge directly into the atmosphere of the sun, aiming to solve some of the biggest mysteries of solar physics. Today’s announcement means that researchers can begin building sensors for unprecedented in situ measurements of the solar system’s innermost frontier.

“Solar Probe+ is going where no spacecraft has gone before,” says Lika Guhathakurta, Solar Probe+ program scientist at NASA HQ. “For the first time, we’ll be able to ‘touch, taste and smell’ the sun.”

Solar Probe+ (factsheet, 550px)

Click on the image to view a pdf fact sheet about Solar Probe+. See also “NASA Plans to Visit the Sun” from Science@NASA.

Last year, NASA invited top researchers around the world to submit proposals detailing possible science investigations for the pioneering spacecraft. Thirteen proposals were received and five have been selected:

–SWEAP, the Solar Wind Electrons Alphas and Protons Investigation: The most abundant particles in the solar wind are electrons, protons and helium ions. SWEAP will count these particles and measure their properties, even “sweeping up” some of them in a special Solar Probe Cup for direct analysis. The principal investigator is Justin C. Kasper of the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory in Cambridge, Mass.

Solar Probe+ (spacecraft, 200px)

An artist’s concept of Solar Probe+, heat shield up and solar panels folded. [more]

–WISPR, the Wide-field Imager for Solar Probe Plus: WISPR is a telescope that will make 3D images of the sun’s atmosphere similar to medical CAT scans. WISPR can actually see the solar wind, allowing it to image clouds and shock waves as they approach and pass the spacecraft. This telescope is an important complement to the spacecraft’s in situ instruments, which sample the plasmas that WISPR images. The principal investigator is Russell Howard of the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC.

–FIELDS, The Fields Investigation for Solar Probe Plus: This instrument will make direct measurements of electric and magnetic fields, radio emissions, and shock waves which course through the sun’s atmospheric plasma. FIELDS also turns Solar Probe Plus into a giant dust detector, registering voltage signatures when specks of space dust hit the spacecraft’s antenna. The principal investigator is Stuart Bale of the University of California in Berkeley.

–ISIS, Integrated Science Investigation of the Sun: The ISIS EPI-Hi and EPI-Lo instruments will monitor electrons, protons and ions which are accelerated to high energies by shock waves in the sun’s atmosphere. These are the very same particles that pose a threat to astronauts in space, disable satellites, and ionize Earth’s upper atmosphere.

–Solar Probe+ Observatory Scientist: This was a proposal not for an instrument, but for a person. The principal investigator, Marco Velli, becomes the mission’s Observatory Scientist. In the years ahead, he will become deeply familiar with the spacecraft and its construction, helping to ensure that adjacent in situ instruments do not interfere with one another as they sample the solar environment. He will also guide the mission’s “big picture” science investigations after Solar Probe+ enters the sun’s atmosphere.

“The sensors we’ve selected to ride aboard Solar Probe+ are designed to solve some of the biggest mysteries of solar physics,” says Dick Fisher, head of NASA’s Heliophysics Division in Washington DC.

Solar Probe+ (venus flyby, 200px)

Solar Probe+ passes Venus en route to the sun. [animations]

Why is the sun’s atmosphere is so much hotter than its surface? And what propels the solar wind?

“We’ve been struggling with these questions for decades,” says Fisher. “Solar Probe+ should finally provide some answers.”

Solar Probe+ will likely discover new mysteries, too, in a realm that no other spacecraft has dared enter. At closest approach, Solar Probe+ will be 7 million km or 9 solar radii from the sun. There, the spacecraft’s carbon-composite heat shield must withstand temperatures as high as 2000 degrees C and survive blasts of radiation that would quickly disable other missions. From these near distances inside the sun’s atmosphere, the solar disk will loom 23 times wider than it does in the skies of Earth.

“What will we find there?” wonders Guhathakurta. “This is truly unexplored territory.” By design, Solar Probe’s winning instruments are sufficiently versatile to investigate many different kinds of phenomena. Whatever comes along–be it electric or magnetic, high- or low-energy, wavy or turbulent–they should be able to measure it.

“The possibilities for discovery,” she says, “are off the charts.”

Author: Dr. Tony Phillips | Credit: Science@NASA

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
133 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
September 3, 2010 1:42 pm

Zeke the Sneak says:
September 3, 2010 at 1:25 pm
That’s only in 5 years. Are you alright Dr S.
Maybe more like 8, and there are always delays [with SDO we had two years delay], so perhaps 10 years is more realistic. And I’m ok for now [at 68], but who knows…

September 3, 2010 1:46 pm

Zeke the Sneak says:
September 3, 2010 at 1:25 pm
Don’t worry Dr.S.will be still preaching reconnection…:-)

Hu Duck Xing
September 3, 2010 2:03 pm

Leon said;
“Or finds a knife and wonders if it’ll fit in those odd things in the wall with two little holes. ” Uh,,, Leon,,, I did that when I was two years old. I still remember seeing the “Blue Light!”

peterhodges
September 3, 2010 2:10 pm

leif, the electric guys come out because you always bait them, and then feed them by contradicting yourself.
i suspect you enjoy the game 😉
anyways “magnetic reconnection” looks like yet another theory that fails to match observations and “at the most basic level remains an exceptionally challenging problem” because it is woefully misguided. yet it spawns a whole ‘nother self perpetuating, misguided sub-industry to suck up dollars and research time.
From the LANL press release linked above –
“To model reconnection in large astrophysical plasmas, researchers are employing a technique that allows the plasma and magnetic field to cross the boundaries of the simulation. ”
“cross the boundaries” is a modeling euphemism for “breaking the rules”
i linked the press release because it is informative and readable, but there is plenty more if one searches

September 3, 2010 2:28 pm

peterhodges says:
September 3, 2010 at 2:10 pm
“To model reconnection in large astrophysical plasmas, researchers are employing a technique that allows the plasma and magnetic field to cross the boundaries of the simulation. ” “cross the boundaries” is a modeling euphemism for “breaking the rules”
No, not at all. It means here to be able to use boundary conditions set by data external to the simulation domain and to allow the plasma to flow out of the domain.
Reconnection is a highly successful paradigm that has found support both by direct laboratory experiments, computer simulation, and spacecraft observations. To quote Bob Lin from his talk at the upcoming AGU meeting]:
Robert P Lin
[…]Imaging measurements from RHESSI indicate that the acceleration of both ions and electrons is related to magnetic reconnection in the corona above the flare soft X-ray loops. […] RHESSI imaging suggests that the most common (>100s per month near solar maximum) solar particle acceleration, that produces impulsive solar energetic particle events seen in the interplanetary medium (IPM), are related to magnetic reconnection between open (connected to the IPM) and closed magnetic field lines.[…] new in situ observations from spacecraft going close to the Sun, plus new types of imaging observations can lead to significant advances.
As your link states: “Magnetic reconnection is a fundamental process in physics, the continuous brreaking and rearrangement of magnetic field lines in a plasma.”
There is nothing misguided here.

Zeke the Sneak
September 3, 2010 2:44 pm

To both of your continued excellent and optimal electrophysiological well-being

Zeke the Sneak
September 3, 2010 2:45 pm

To both of your continued excellent and optimal electrophysiological well-being, ah ah

September 3, 2010 3:26 pm

Zeke the Sneak says:
September 3, 2010 at 2:45 pm
ah ah
That ‘ah ah’ sounds like you have an electrophysiological problem…

Alex Buddery
September 3, 2010 3:37 pm

Tastes like burny

Pops
September 3, 2010 4:18 pm

Where’s Oliver K. Manuel when you need him?

Zeke the Sneak
September 3, 2010 4:56 pm

My electrophysiology? I haven’t had any complaints yet.

Jim Barker
September 3, 2010 5:11 pm

Thanks for the abstracts, Leif. The probe seems to be gathering huge amounts of data, and I don’t see how they’re sending it back. I imagine that broadcasting from the sun will be non-trivial.

Pascvaks
September 3, 2010 5:24 pm

“For the first time, we’ll be able to ‘touch, taste and smell’ the sun.”
Leif
What’s the best condition(s) to have for this probe to go?(or the type they’re planning for) High or low sunspots/TSI/F10.7/MF? What type target surface area is best – trans equatorial coronal hole , normal corona? Any other major conditions they’d like to encounter that are more a matter of luck than anything else?

TwoPac
September 3, 2010 6:01 pm

Zeke the Sneak – the NSRL accelerates protons and heavy ions, mimicking components of solar particle events and galactic cosmic rays. You must have mistyped in your search, you brought up the light source at BNL.

peterhodges
September 3, 2010 6:12 pm

i appreciate the reply leif
it is an exciting probe collecting all kinds of data which we can hope will push the science forward.
as someone mentioned in a previous thread, we could also use a ‘stereo above’ and a ‘stereo below’ to help paint a more thorough picture

reid simpson
September 3, 2010 6:26 pm

Leif,
Bless you sir for taking the time you spend trying to educate those like me. And bless you for your patience in dealing with us.

September 3, 2010 7:01 pm

TwoPac says:
September 3, 2010 at 6:01 pm
the NSRL accelerates protons and heavy ions,
I got the ‘National Soybean Research Laboratory: http://www.stratsoy.uiuc.edu/
Pascvaks says:
September 3, 2010 at 5:24 pm
What’s the best condition(s) to have for this probe to go?
since it is exploratory, any condition will do. The anticipated launch might be at solar minimum, which – I think – is fine, as things are less chaotic then.

Zeke the Sneak
September 3, 2010 7:13 pm
Alvin
September 3, 2010 7:30 pm
September 4, 2010 4:25 am

paulw: September 3, 2010 at 7:11 am
It’s a difficult experiment, and even probes sent to Venus managed to burn up (in this case, entering the atmosphere of the planet).
The earliest Sov probes didn’t burn up on entry, their sensors failed and the probes themselves were crushed by the atmospheric pressure. Later probes landed softly, but simple glitches like stuck lens caps on the cameras and bad batteries nullified the efforts. But, if I recall my Cold War history correctly, they did manage to plant ten probes on the surface with sensors and TV transmitters intact.
Myron Mesecke: September 3, 2010 at 8:20 am
Getting that close to the Sun I’m surprised NASA didn’t name it Icarus.
I’m heartbroken they’re not calling the probe a “heliocopter”…

Editor
September 4, 2010 6:46 am

Leif Svalgaard says:
September 3, 2010 at 12:49 pm
> They don’t consider retired scientists, and I may not be around when the mission flies.
I assume it’s considered good form to be around when a mission like this ends too. With a likely launch in May 2015, Solar Probe+ will begin its prime mission near the end of Solar Cycle 24 and finish near the predicted maximum of Solar Cycle 25 in 2022. Given the usual delays, “end of SC24” may be about right. 🙂
I wonder how many people involved with the primary mission Voyage probes are still working on them from time to time.

Paul Martin
September 4, 2010 8:13 am

Where’s the associated DISASTER AREA concert?

Zeke the Sneak
September 4, 2010 11:58 am

The BNL strong focusing AGS is much prettier but still a strong focusing accelerator in principle 🙂
http://www.bnl.gov/rhic/AGS.asp
“4. Alternating Gradient Synchrotron
As ions enter the Alternating Gradient Synchrotron (AGS) from the Booster, they are traveling at about 37% the speed of light. As they whirl around the AGS and are accelerated as in the Booster, the ions get even more energy — until they are traveling at 99.7% the speed of light.”
So if the AGS is getting energies from 100MeV to 10 GeV using field gradients, why does NASA say that ions in space are accelerated/and continuously picking up speed away from the sun
by “shock waves”?

September 4, 2010 12:18 pm

Zeke the Sneak says:
September 4, 2010 at 11:58 am
So if the AGS is getting energies from 100MeV to 10 GeV using field gradients, why does NASA say that ions in space are accelerated/and continuously picking up speed away from the sun by “shock waves”?
There are completely different things going on. The ions in space [solar wind] are not moving at 99% of the speed of light, but at 0.1% and are not accelerated by field gradients, but by heating due to shock waves crashing and heating the corona. There is a further acceleration akin to that of a de Laval nozzle [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Laval_nozzle ], where the weakening of solar gravity with height corresponds to the widening of the exhaust tube, helping the solar wind to attain supersonic speed.

Zeke the Sneak
September 4, 2010 1:13 pm

Solar particles have reached the earth in as little as 30 minutes.
“The Jan. 20th proton storm was by some measures the biggest since 1989. It was particularly rich in high-speed protons packing more than 100 million electron volts (100 MeV) of energy. Such protons can burrow through 11 centimeters of water.”
That’s 40% of the speed of light.
That is an interesting theory which posits an exhaust tube effect. But these are charged particles, not just hot gas. So if they are accelerating to 40% the speed of light, they are likely experiencing a force in a field.