Spacequakes

From Science @ NASA.gov Researchers using NASA’s fleet of five THEMIS spacecraft have discovered a form of space weather that packs the punch of an earthquake and plays a key role in sparking bright Northern Lights. They call it “the spacequake.”

Spacequakes (animation, 200px)

A spacequake in action. Click to launch a computer-simulated movie created by Walt Feimer of Goddard’s Scientific Visualization Lab.

A spacequake is a temblor in Earth’s magnetic field. It is felt most strongly in Earth orbit, but is not exclusive to space. The effects can reach all the way down to the surface of Earth itself.

“Magnetic reverberations have been detected at ground stations all around the globe, much like seismic detectors measure a large earthquake,” says THEMIS principal investigator Vassilis Angelopoulos of UCLA.

It’s an apt analogy because “the total energy in a spacequake can rival that of a magnitude 5 or 6 earthquake,” according to Evgeny Panov of the Space Research Institute in Austria. Panov is first author of a paper reporting the results in the April 2010 issue of Geophysical Research Letters (GRL).

In 2007, THEMIS discovered the precursors of spacequakes. The action begins in Earth’s magnetic tail, which is stretched out like a windsock by the million mph solar wind. Sometimes the tail can become so stretched and tension-filled, it snaps back like an over-torqued rubber band. Solar wind plasma trapped in the tail hurtles toward Earth. On more than one occasion, the five THEMIS spacecraft were in the line of fire when these “plasma jets” swept by. Clearly, the jets were going to hit Earth. But what would happen then? The fleet moved closer to the planet to find out.

“Now we know,” says THEMIS project scientist David Sibeck of the Goddard Space Flight Center. “Plasma jets trigger spacequakes.”

Spacequakes (magnetogram, 550px)

During a spacequake, Earth’s magnetic field shakes in a way that is analogous to the shaking of the ground during an earthquake. Image credit: Evgeny Panov, Space Research Institute of Austria. [larger image]

According to THEMIS, the jets crash into the geomagnetic field some 30,000 km above Earth’s equator. The impact sets off a rebounding process, in which the incoming plasma actually bounces up and down on the reverberating magnetic field. Researchers call it “repetitive flow rebuffing.” It’s akin to a tennis ball bouncing up and down on a carpeted floor. The first bounce is a big one, followed by bounces of decreasing amplitude as energy is dissipated in the carpet.

“We’ve long suspected that something like this was happening,” says Sibeck. “By observing the process in situ, however, THEMIS has discovered something new and surprising.”

The surprise is plasma vortices, huge whirls of magnetized gas as wide as Earth itself, spinning on the verge of the quaking magnetic field.

Spacequakes (vortices, 200px)

A THEMIS map of plasma flows during a spacequake. The axes are labeled in Earth radii, so each swirl is about the size of Earth. [larger image]

“When plasma jets hit the inner magnetosphere, vortices with opposite sense of rotation appear and reappear on either side of the plasma jet,” explains Rumi Nakamura of the Space Research Institute in Austria, a co-author of the study. “We believe the vortices can generate substantial electrical currents in the near-Earth environment.”

Acting together, vortices and spacequakes could have a noticeable effect on Earth. The tails of vortices may funnel particles into Earth’s atmosphere, sparking auroras and making waves of ionization that disturb radio communications and GPS. By tugging on surface magnetic fields, spacequakes generate currents in the very ground we walk on. Ground current surges can have profound consequences, in extreme cases bringing down power grids over a wide area.

After THEMIS discovered the jets and quakes, Joachim Birn of the Los Alamos National Lab in New Mexico conducted a computer simulation of the rebounding process. Lo and behold, vortices appeared in good accord with THEMIS measurements. Moreover, the simulations suggest that the rebounding process can be seen from Earth’s surface in the form of ripples and whirls in auroral displays. Ground stations report just such a phenomenon.

“It’s a complicated process, but it all fits together,” says Sibeck.

The work isn’t finished. “We still have a lot to learn,” he adds. “How big can spacequakes become? How many vortices can swirl around Earth at once–and how do they interact with one another?”

Stay tuned for answers from THEMIS.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

114 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
jimgineer
July 31, 2010 12:19 am

Leif Svalgaard says:
July 29, 2010 at 8:04 pm
Not if you place a copper plate between the two. A competent engineer would know about the ‘skin depth’: An electromagnetic wave entering a conducting medium is damped and reduced in amplitude by a factor 1/e in a distance depending on the frequency and the conductivity. For the Earth and spacequakes that distance is a few hundred kilometers, a far cry from the 2900 km down to the core, so no effect.
So are you saying the earths surface is the conducting medium for the spacequake?
Would a spacequake reach the earths surface thru earths magnetic poles?
What is the frequency range of spacequakes in Hz ?
What is the frequency range of the AC component of the earths magnetic field in Hz?

July 31, 2010 2:50 am

Leif Svalgaard says: July 30, 2010 at 10:48 pm
————————————————————-
(no need for blah –blah bit)
There is flaw is in your reasoning.
Energy of magnetic disturbance in the Arctic ocean depths and ‘few hundred km’ of crust turns into heat (not important) and mechanical oscillations (crucial) which reverberate throughout the globe.
As ‘anty-planetarist in chief’ you may know that there is highly academic work by Dr. Josef Garai from Florida International University, which links magnetic reversals to astronomical cycles.
http://www.garai-research.com/research%20statement/earth's%20magnetic%20field%20reversals/text%20magnetic%20reversals.htm
Here is the monthly data file of temperature data, you can analyse it to your heart content.
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/crutem3_hadsst2_0-360E_66-90N.txt
Next ?

July 31, 2010 2:53 am

Lets try again: if doesn’t work copy and paste:
http://www.garai-research.com/research%20statement/earth's%20magnetic%20field%20reversals/text%20magnetic%20reversals.htm
it doesn’t work copy and paste:
http://www.garai-research.com/research%20statement/earth's%20magnetic%20field%20reversals/text%20magnetic%20reversals.htm
[Note: Cut & paste doesn’t work. The only way I could make the link work was to go to this link:
http://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=19500.0
then go to the last comment (by buffalo49) and click on the link at the bottom. ~dbs, mod.]

July 31, 2010 2:57 am

Well, it failed again:
Google: Astronomical cycles are detected in the R-N reversals of the earth’s magnetic field

July 31, 2010 5:23 am

DBS Thanks.
Googling: Astronomical cycles are detected in the R-N reversals of the earth’s magnetic field
works

899
July 31, 2010 12:59 pm

Enneagram says:
July 30, 2010 at 5:38 pm
Leif Svalgaard says:
July 29, 2010 at 8:26 pm
Enneagram says:
July 29, 2010 at 5:13 pm
because those jumping electrons….ELECTRICITY!
Failure of basic science education
Synthetize some magnetite to know it intimately.
Whoa!! You’re not talking something ‘X-Rated,’ are you?
;o)

July 31, 2010 2:45 pm

jimgineer says:
July 31, 2010 at 12:19 am
So are you saying the earths surface is the conducting medium for the spacequake?
No, the spacequakes take place far above the Earth, but induces electric currents in sea water, soil, and underground crust.
Would a spacequake reach the earths surface thru earths magnetic poles?
No, through the intervening [almost] vacuum.
What is the frequency range of spacequakes in Hz ?
Wide range from milliHz to kiloHz. Most power around a milliHz.
What is the frequency range of the AC component of the earths magnetic field in Hz?
Decades, so ~10^-12 Hz or longer.

jimgineer
July 31, 2010 4:49 pm

Leif, I am a retired broadcast engineer and an amateur radio operator. I am having a hard time visualizing the conductor you speak of relating to skin depth. Starting from a .001 Hz sub elf signal in space thru the atmosphere around the surface of the earth, thru the atmosphere then back out in space?
Would a properly tuned elf radio be able receive this like lightning or meteor showers which produce “whistlers”, “tweaks”, and spherics?
The reason I ask is I am interested in trying to receive the associated RF and I want to get the antenna right.

July 31, 2010 5:09 pm

jimgineer says:
July 31, 2010 at 4:49 pm
I am having a hard time visualizing the conductor you speak of relating to skin depth. Starting from a .001 Hz sub elf signal in space thru the atmosphere around the surface of the earth, thru the atmosphere then back out in space?
I think we are talking about different things. The ‘space quake’ thing is also a misnomer. The proper term is a ‘geomagnetic substorm’. This is sudden intensification of currents above and below the surface. As such there are lots of electromagnetic waves generated that can be [and has been] received by ordinary RF equipment. Here is what one guy reports http://www.spaceweathersounds.com/sndbites.htm
The other issues was whether these would penetrate to the Earth’s core and slow down the circulation of the circulation and thereby change the Earth’s magnetic field. That does not happen.

July 31, 2010 5:17 pm

Leif Svalgaard says:
July 31, 2010 at 5:09
The other issues was whether these would penetrate to the Earth’s core and slow down the circulation of the core and decrease the Earth’s magnetic field. That does not happen.

DirkH
July 31, 2010 6:19 pm

Leif Svalgaard says:
July 30, 2010 at 5:57 am
“[…]There is no electrical ‘power’ involved as the electrons cannot flow away from the protons [electric attraction is enormous].”
Can the sun’s radiation ionize atoms? Let’s see:
http://www.spacetoday.org/SolSys/Sun/SolarIndicesFAQ.html
“What is the ionosphere? The ionosphere is part of Earth’s upper atmosphere where free electrons occur in sufficient density to have an influence on the propagation of radio frequency electromagnetic waves. Its ionization depends for the most part on activity on the Sun. Its density varies according to the sunspot cycle, the season, and global locations — polar, auroral zones, mid-latitudes, and equatorial regions. Most of its ionization is produced by x-ray and ultraviolet radiation from the Sun.”
Ok, so the sun’s radiation ionizes atoms in the ionosphere. So some of the photons should also be intense enough to ionize atoms somewhere in interplanetary space, i suppose.

July 31, 2010 6:53 pm

DirkH says:
July 31, 2010 at 6:19 pm
Ok, so the sun’s radiation ionizes atoms in the ionosphere. So some of the photons should also be intense enough to ionize atoms somewhere in interplanetary space, i suppose.
Apart from the fact that these are already ionized, just producing a mixture of electrons and ions does not generate an electric current. To get a current you need to separate the two species so that you get an electric field. A magnetic field is a good separator mechanism because it deflects charges of one sign in one direction and charges of the opposite signs in the opposite direction.

August 1, 2010 3:38 am

Leif Svalgaard says:July 31, 2010 at 5:09
The other issues was whether these would penetrate to the Earth’s core and slow down the circulation of the core and decrease the Earth’s magnetic field. That does not happen.
Group of scientists
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/07/27/spacequakes/#comment-443240
suggests that these electro-magnetic oscillations impact on the crust and they are possibly (on occasions) earthquake triggers, in which case must be a transfer into mechanical oscillations and these propagate much further. Velocity and distance of propagation of mechanical oscillations are proportional to density which increases with depth. Mechanical disturbances would traverse the globe’s core.
A clear demonstration of linkage is the Hudson Bay area, where there is coincidence between the Earth’s surface uplift, gravity anomaly and strongest geomagnetic field (GMFz) in the Northern hemisphere (see pages 3,4,5 and 8,9 of
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/NATA.htm )

1 3 4 5
Verified by MonsterInsights