Guest post by David Archibald
Colder is drier.
The figure above is after a figure from Maus et al 2010 “Long term solar activity influences on South American rivers”. It shows a very good correlation between solar activity, as measured by sunspot number, and the flow rate of the Parana River, the second largest river in South America. The Parana River now hosts the Itaipu Dam with installed capacity of 14,000 MW.
A recent paper in an engineering journal shows a similar strong solar control on the level of Lake Victoria in East Africa (Mason March 2010): 
As Mason notes, an interesting correlation was noticed in the early 1900s between lake level and solar activity, in the form of the sunspot number. The interest this caused waned when the correlation seemed to disappear after about 1928. The early 1960s saw a dramatic climate anomaly in East Africa. Lake levels rose significantly, including those of Lake Victoria, and flows in the Tana River in Kenya doubled. The sluice gates at the Owen Falls dam were opened to release the additional water required by the Nile waters agreement and they stayed open, almost continuously, until well into the 1990s. This surplus water also led Uganda to invest in a new hydroelectric power station at Kiira. But the lake level starting falling from 1964 with an oscillation around the falling trend. This oscillation, controlled by solar activity, is shown in the following figure from Mason:
The falling trend in the level of Lake Victoria meant that the new hydro dam at Kiira did not produce any long term, additional energy for Uganda.
Back to South America and the Itaipu Dam – it produces 90% of the electric power consumed by Paraguay and 19% of Brazil’s consumption. As Maus et al note, the relationship between smaller solar activity and low Parana’s discharge can also be found in historical records.
For example, low discharges were reported during the period known as the Little Ice Age (LIA). In particular, a traveller of that period recalls in his diary that in the year 1752 the streamflow was so small that the river could not even be navigated by the ships of that time, which were less than 5 ft draft, to be compared with ships up to 18 ft draft that can navigate it at present as far north as Asuncion in Paraguay.
Our prediction for Solar Cycle 24 in terms of F10.7 flux is shown following:
Given the link between East African and central South American rainfall and solar activity, the list of economic impacts from the current solar minimum (Solar Cycles 24 and 25) can be expanded to:
- Canadian agricultural will get a severe whacking from a shortened growing season and un-seasonal frosts.
- 24 year drought in central South America
- 24 year drought in East Africa
- Paraguay and Brazil having severe power shortages.
This list is by no means exhaustive. The last time the world witnessed mass starvation was the 1965-67 drought in India which killed 1.5 million people. Things don’t look pretty.
References:
Mauas, P.J..D., A.P.Buccino and E.Flamenco, 2010, Long-term solar activity influences on South American rivers, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics on Space Climate, March 2010.
Mason, P.J., 2010, Climate variability in civil infrastructure planning, Civil Engineering 163, pages 74-80.
David Archibald
July 2010
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


Charles S. Opalek, PE says:
July 23, 2010 at 2:12 pm
Now sounds like the solar system rules the Galactic Wheel it is riding on, in and around.
Smotes chest, raises sheild and sword.
Charles S. Opalek, PE says:
July 23, 2010 at 2:12 pm
More like the solar system is a flea on the Galactic arse.
Leif Svalgaard says:
July 23, 2010 at 10:50 am
Leif: Have you seen the new pfss images from SDO?
http://sdowww.lmsal.com/sdomedia/SunInTime/2010/07/23/f_HMImagpfss.jpg
The trailing large spot in SN1089 that has the black leading white (it’s a sandwhich) magnetics on the spot itself.
This trailing white mag. part of the spot traces it’s magnetic lines to the S. Solar Pole.
Does this tell you anything about what’s going on with SC24?
Charles S. Opalek, PE says:
July 23, 2010 at 2:12 pm
Everything is driven by cycles.
I don’t think this throwback to pre-medieval mysticism is a very fruitful idea, instead it is just plain nonsense. And there can be no resonances, unless cycles are physically coupled by [known] forces.
REPLY: Leif, I’ll point out that our solar system orbits are cycles, our Earthly seasons are cycles, and our ices ages are driven by cycles. I hardly think these are mysticisms. Other cycles of rotation are galaxy sized. – Anthony
Andrew W says:
July 23, 2010 at 12:42 am
This DA post is just silly.
The sunspot figure for the Parana River has been obviously been adjusted (tortured) to get a better fit with the river flow data….
_______________________________________________
Perhaps you would prefer a peer reviewed report from NASA on river – sun correlation?
NASA Finds Sun-Climate Connection in Old Nile Records (title and link are from NASA)
or perhaps this?
Linkages Between Solar Activity, Climate Predictability and Water Resource Development: Journal of the South African Institute of Civil Engineering
More peer-reviewed Solar variability drought links:
Is solar variability reflected in the Nile River?
(Journal of Geophysical Research, Volume 111, Issue D21, November 2006)
– Alexander Ruzmaikin, Joan Feynman, Yuk L. Yung
Palaeoclimatic and archaeological evidence for a 200-yr recurrence of floods and droughts linking California, Mesoamerica and South America over the past 2000 years
(The Holocene, Volume 13, Number 5, pp. 763-778, 2003)
– Amdt Schimmelmann et al.
Possible solar forcing of century-scale drought frequency in the northern Great Plains
(Geology, Volume 27, Number 3, pp. 263-266, Mar 1999)
– Zicheng Yu, Emi Ito
Rainfall and drought in equatorial east Africa during the past 1,100 years
(Nature, Volume 403, Number 6768, pp. 410-414, January 2000)
– Dirk Verschuren et al.
Solar Forcing of Drought Frequency in the Maya Lowlands
(Science, Volume 292, Number 5520, pp. 1367-1370, May 2001)
– David A. Hodell et al.
Solar forcing of Holocene droughts in a stalagmite record from West Virginia in east-central North America
(Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 35, Issue 17, September 2008)
– Gregory S. Springer et al.
Solar variability and the levels of Lake Victoria, East Africa, during the last millenium
(Journal of Paleolimnology, Volume 33, Number 2, pp. 243-251, February, 2005)
– J. Curt Stager et al.
(Thanks to Poptech for many of these references) http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html
“Cooler is drier”
HaHa. Not where I live.
All your waters is mine!
errr…snows that is 😉
rbateman says:
July 23, 2010 at 4:01 pm
This trailing white mag. part of the spot traces it’s magnetic lines to the S. Solar Pole. Does this tell you anything about what’s going on with SC24?
The magnetic field will connect wherever it can. Such large-scale connection are quite common.
Leif Svalgaard says:
July 23, 2010 at 4:13 pm
REPLY: Leif, I’ll point out that our solar system orbits are cycles, our Earthly seasons are cycles, and our ices ages are driven by cycles. I hardly think these are mysticisms. Other cycles of rotation are galaxy sized. – Anthony
The mysticism is not in the cycles as there are all over the place, but the notion that the cycles are connected as such. Only when there are forces that connect the cycles can they resonate and couple. The seasonal variation is not a ‘cycle’, but just a result of the varying geometry. It is not the ‘cycle’ that drives that variation.
Tommy says:
July 23, 2010 at 12:58 am
I wonder if sunspots throw particles that pepper over the Earth’s skies, seeding clouds for more rain.
______________________________________
The theory closest to that is the solar wind changes with the sunspots. The amount of cosmic rays hitting earth changes with the solar wind. An increase in cosmic rays helps seed clouds and increase rain. (
NASA: Solar Wind Loses Power, Hits 50-year Low: http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2008/23sep_solarwind/
Svensmark Cloud – Cosmic Ray Experiment: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/09/10/svensmark-global-warming-stopped-and-a-cooling-is-beginning-enjoy-global-warming-while-it-lasts/
CERN Latest news on the Cloud Experiment: http://the-daily-politics.blogspot.com/2010/01/cern-latest-news-on-cloud.html
Spencer: Clouds Dominate CO2 as a Climate Driver Since 2000
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/13/spencer-clouds-dominate-co2-as-a-climate-driver-since-2000/
Spencer on solar geomagnetic to earth climate connections
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/10/spencer-on-solar-geomagnetic-to-earth-climate-connections/
I was expecting to see Lief show up and put someon in a headlock and give them nuggies. 😉
I am confused, and have a hard time differentiating between sarcastic comments and serious ones… sigh. I am not a native Anglophone… sigh.
If the sunspot correlates with cooling through sun magnetosphere shrinking, and increased cloud nucleation from increased cosmic rays from the shrank protection from the solar magnetosphere, how come we won’ t get more rain?
Maybe the rain effect is different near the equator? Here in Montreal, lattitude 45N, the weather gets darn wet or snowy in the winter… We did have dry spells, however.
Could it be that the devil is in the water vapor circulation details?
Leif Svalgaard:
At July 23, 2010 at 4:13 pm you assert;
“The seasonal variation is not a ‘cycle’, but just a result of the varying geometry. It is not the ‘cycle’ that drives that variation.”
Say what!?
You think the Earth orbitting the Sun is not a cycle?
The fact that the geometry varies because the Earth orbits the Sun causes the seasons. You think the seasons do not cycle?
The fact that the orbit is eliptical causes the distance from the Earth to the Sun to vary throughout the year. You think this does not cause the solar flux to the Earth to cycle?
The fact that the SH has more ocean cover than the NH induces global temperature to rise by 3.8 deg.C from June to January and then to fall by similar amount from January to June each year. You think this is not a global temperature cycle?
Clearly, few things can “cycle” if you define that every “result of the varying geometry” is not a cycle.
Your assertion is pure sophistry.
Richard
Leif Svalgaard says:
July 23, 2010 at 5:31 pm (Edit)
The mysticism is not in the cycles as there are all over the place, but the notion that the cycles are connected as such. Only when there are forces that connect the cycles can they resonate and couple. The seasonal variation is not a ‘cycle’, but just a result of the varying geometry. It is not the ‘cycle’ that drives that variation.
There are harmonic/numerical relationships which exist between many periodicities and cycles on Earth, in the solar system and beyond. That we don’t yet understand the causes linking them doesn’t mean we should choose to remain ignorant of them. Especially when they help us understand things like climate.
The music of the spheres, and the inter play of perhaps hundreds sineodic cycles periodically in and out of resonance. Will in the long term be understood to control all things, not just the climate. The harmonic waves that create matter are understood by some but rejected by the consensus of quantum mechanics, a one hundred year failure of ever increasing complexity and more theories than you can poke a stick at.
The climate science of co2 and the thousands of things that it causes in their minds, is becoming the same complexity, until recently spiraling outwards. Both in scope and cost, my joy of recent times has seen the spiral halted and turned back on itself. I am reminded here of the woop woop bird, that flies in ever decreasing circles to disappear up its own fundamental orifice. One can only hope that this occurs soon.
“And there can be no resonances, unless cycles are physically coupled by [known] forces.”
Or coupled by known forces in unknown [as yet] waves.
>> The seasonal variation is not a ‘cycle’, but just a result
>>of the varying geometry. It is not the ‘cycle’ that drives
>>that variation.
Que?
A cycle is “a series of events that are regularly repeated in the same order” – err, like the seasons. And the seasons are regulated by the Earth’s orbital cycle. And longer term climatic cycles may well be influenced by the Moons 19-year cycle (and the Sun’s 11-year cycle). And the much longer term ice-age and magnetic cycles may well be regulated by the Earth’s precessional cycle (and this is not simply an effect of ‘geometry’).
And the connection between many of the cycles of the Solar System, is gravity. As you know a small tug on a spinning/precessing body can produce wild swings and oscillations (cycles), and every body in the Solar System feels the influence of the others to some degree or other. A Sun that is not even allowed to rotate about its own Solar System center has to be a prime candidate for gravitationally induced cycles.
.
Jantar says:
July 23, 2010 at 12:56 am (Edit)
I’m having trouble finding the raw sunspot numbers. All the online sites I’ve looked at give graphs but no numbers.
Another source for sunspot data is the Royal Observatory of Belgium, at the Solar Influences Data Analysis Center (SIDC). http://sidc.oma.be/
They provide daily and monthly data starting in the year 1818.
Michael Hove says:
July 24, 2010 at 6:16 am (Edit)
Another source for sunspot data is the Royal Observatory of Belgium, at the Solar Influences Data Analysis Center (SIDC). http://sidc.oma.be/
They provide daily and monthly data starting in the year 1818.
That’s the same series that I linked from http://www.woodfortrees.org
Leif Svalgaard says:
July 23, 2010 at 4:13 pm
..Only when there are forces that connect the cycles can they resonate and couple. The seasonal variation is not a ‘cycle’, but just a result of the varying geometry. It is not the ‘cycle’ that drives that variation
Thanks Dr. S
Beautifully done. Simple. Elegant. Clear.
And it captures the “heat” aspect of climate that “temperatures” ignore. It’s all that heat in the mass flow of water that matters, not the temperature at which it flows.
As we get hotter, more megatons of water evaporate and rise to the top of the air column, then condense dumping their heat high above the CO2 blocking level letting it rush to space. That cold water then falls as rain and the process repeats.
Moving vast quantities of HEAT, even if the temperatures don’t change much.
And this posting shows how we can see that heat flow in the mass flow of the water that falls from the sky.
Nice, very nice.
@JFA in Montreal:
It is all about mass flow of water as a way to move heat. A hot ocean dumps that heat via water evaporating, rising to the top of the air column, and condensing back to water (liberating heat high up in the sky, to radiate into space).
A cold ocean does not do this nearly so much, so less mass flow of water moving less heat.
That water falls as rain and snow after dumping the heat up high.
Notice that the Infrared Radiation and CO2 “blocking” mechanisms are bypassed by this mass transport.
So in a colder global climate, you get less rainfall, in a warmer one, you get more.
Yes, this can be counter to the seasonal pattern you are used to. The warm tropical air hitting cold northern air makes a lot of water condense and fall. But with a cooler Gulf of Mexico, there would be less water in that warm air running in to a northern cold air mass, so less rain during that cold season.
The seasonal change to cold air is the trigger for the date of the rain, but the decade long average ocean temperature is the engine that drives the quantity.
Leif,
you take the statement “correlation is not causation” to an unhealthy level.
Peat bogs colder-dryer or warmer-wetter depending on what the sun does
Part 1
Peat bogs colder-dryer or warmer-wetter depending on what the sun does
Part 2