Poudre River Sets A Record

By Steven Goddard

From The Declining Spring Snowcover Department

Yesterday afternoon, the Cache La Poudre River set its June 12 stream flow record flowing through Fort Collins, Colorado. At 1:30 and 2:45 PM, the river hit 5,600 cubic feet per second, which broke the previous record of 5,540 feet per second set in 1983. This is normally the week of peak flow for the year.

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 10:15         MDT    8.00            3770

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 10:30         MDT    8.02            3790

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 10:45         MDT    8.19            4010

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 11:00         MDT    8.26            4110

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 11:15         MDT    8.41            4310

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 11:30         MDT    8.49            4420

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 11:45         MDT    8.65            4650

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 12:00         MDT    8.68            4690

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 12:15         MDT    8.73            4770

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 12:30         MDT    8.88            4990

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 12:45         MDT    9.00            5170

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 13:00         MDT    9.02            5200

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 13:15         MDT    9.04            5230

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 13:30         MDT    9.27            5600

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 13:45         MDT    9.21            5500

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 14:00         MDT    9.22            5520

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 14:15         MDT    9.18            5450

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 14:30         MDT    9.25            5570

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 14:45         MDT    9.27            5600

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 15:00         MDT    9.25            5570

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 15:15         MDT    9.24            5550

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 15:30         MDT    9.25            5570

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 15:45         MDT    9.19            5470

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 16:00         MDT    9.19            5470

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 16:15         MDT    9.15            5410

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 16:30         MDT    9.18            5450

USGS    06752260        2010-06-12 16:45         MDT    9.04            5230

http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwisweb/data/img/USGS.06752260.04.00060..20100605.20100612.log.0.p50.gif

The height maxed out at 9.27 feet

http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwisweb/data/img/USGS.06752260.02.00065..20100605.20100612..0.p50.gif

I took some video of it on Tuesday when it was at 4,000 cfs.

The flood was the result of a long, cold, snowy winter/spring – followed by a week of hot weather – followed by 48 hours of heavy rain and snow in the mountains. More heavy rain is forecast over the next 24 hours.

Since the start of the water year (Oct. 1) Colorado has been very cold.

http://www.hprcc.unl.edu/products/maps/acis/hprcc/WaterTDeptHPRCC.png

Two weeks ago, The Huffington Post reported :

Global Warming Study Predicts Hotter, Drier Summers In Colorado

Unfortunately, we didn’t have a summer last year. It was cold and rained all summer long. This weekend’s high temperature has been 51F.

http://www.hprcc.unl.edu/products/maps/acis/hprcc/JJA09TDeptHPRCC.png

———————————————————————————————————————-

“Some people just don’t know when to quit”

Correction: The title of the article is incorrect. After writing the original text, I found out that yesterday’s peak stream flow was exceeded on June 21, 1983 and April 30, 1999. The correction made it into the body of the text before publication but unfortunately did not make it in to the title.

It has been pouring rain all night and it may exceed the June 21, 1983 record, but will probably not beat the April 30, 1999 mark – which was 10.46 ft, and 7,710 cfs

[and title now corrected ~ ctm]

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
61 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
June 13, 2010 10:25 am

Please don’t allow the facts to taint a perfectly good hoax. Your government is here to help:
http://www.fws.gov/pacific/Climatechange/changepnw.html

June 13, 2010 10:45 am

I forecast a drop in the solar signal, and increased N.Hemisphere rain from around the 8th june.
Spain and Pakistan had large floods;
http://www.dartmouth.edu/~floods/Currentt.htm
In the UK on the 8th a.m. it was like heavy tropical rain.

June 13, 2010 10:51 am

The fact that it is warm somewhere on the planet apparently proves that the Poudre isn’t flooding.
Climate Science 101

anna v
June 13, 2010 10:54 am

bubbagyro says:
June 13, 2010 at 10:14 am
I thought the sarcasm was clear: we in Greece are hot so it is climate, you are cold so it is weather.
Btw 30 years was decided to be a good averaging time for climate, long before the AGW stunt. I think it was a meteorological meeting sometime ago.

GFW
June 13, 2010 11:48 am

Scott, your guess is correct. More total precipitation, more concentrated into “extreme precipitation events” is expected. There may be *some* places that get drier, but that will be based on regional topography and will be the exception to the overall trend. A statistical trend towards more extreme precipitation events has been documented.

Andrew30
June 13, 2010 1:09 pm

GFW says: June 13, 2010 at 11:48 am
“A statistical trend towards more extreme precipitation events has been documented.”
Prove it.

bikermailman
June 13, 2010 1:16 pm

Scott, you aren’t wrong. The problem is, that for many years the Warmers told us, and still do, that a warmer planet will be droughts for everyone. The Skeptics have always tried to say that a warmer planet will be good, because it will increase rainfall. Of course, til the recent winter, they told us we were crazy saying such a thing.

Keith at hastings UK
June 13, 2010 2:20 pm

What does increased rainfall do to the rate of heat transfer to the upper troposphere? (if that’s the right word).
I guess it should push heat up due latent heat of condensation and /or freezing: any ideas as to whether this would increase heat loss to space, ultimately, and so be a negative feedback?
Not sure where to start looking for info on this. may be a trivial issue, but some storms are quite big (British euphemism for huge)

Z
June 13, 2010 2:34 pm

GFW says:
June 13, 2010 at 11:48 am
A statistical trend towards more extreme precipitation events has been documented.

And my overwhelming abilities as a Love God have been documented too.
Oh wow! They’ve just been documented again! Just a paragraph ago!
Isn’t that amazing?! [/sarc off]

MikeC
June 13, 2010 2:58 pm

Steven, what does 1983, 1999 and 2010 all have in common?

Z
June 13, 2010 2:59 pm

Keith at hastings UK says:
June 13, 2010 at 2:20 pm
What does increased rainfall do to the rate of heat transfer to the upper troposphere? (if that’s the right word).
I guess it should push heat up due latent heat of condensation and /or freezing: any ideas as to whether this would increase heat loss to space, ultimately, and so be a negative feedback?
Not sure where to start looking for info on this. may be a trivial issue, but some storms are quite big (British euphemism for huge)

There is an IR picture of one of the hurricanes leaving a giant cool streak in the middle of the Atlantic – but I can’t seem to find it at the moment.

June 13, 2010 4:10 pm

MikeC
I had birthdays in all three of those years. What else did they have in common?

tallbloke
June 13, 2010 4:32 pm

stevengoddard says:
June 13, 2010 at 4:10 pm
MikeC
I had birthdays in all three of those years. What else did they have in common?

el nino giving way to la nina?

rbateman
June 13, 2010 4:52 pm

Here in NW Calif., the Transylvania Alps weather is finally gone, replaced by mid 80’s to 90 degrees. Still in the low 40’s at night. A cooldown is in the forecast. The mulberry trees are usually out in mid April. Just started to bloom this week.
Wheat, oats and barley 6′ high. Anise 12′ tall and still shooting up.
Overall weather pattern for this year resembles 1998.

Gary Mount
June 13, 2010 6:51 pm

4 hours ago a landslide in British Columbia destroyed 10 homes.
http://news.ca.msn.com/top-stories/cbc-article.aspx?cp-documentid=24562317
A few months ago the British Columbia Minister of Forests said we are in for a hot dry summer and lots of forest fires, because he “believes in climate change.”.
The area that just had the land slide had 4 times the average amount of rain for May.

Billy Liar
June 13, 2010 7:23 pm

rbateman says:
June 13, 2010 at 4:52 pm
‘Wheat, oats and barley 6′ high. Anise 12′ tall and still shooting up.
Overall weather pattern for this year resembles 1998.’
Boy, you got big ole plants in NW CA -what height does that anise stop at?

Pamela Gray
June 13, 2010 8:48 pm

We are still hoping Oregon wheat will recover from rust. It is expected that state wide, we could see a 20% reduction in yield with as much as 50% in some harder hit areas. Too much rain, too humid and cool to allow crops to dry out between downpours.

Gary Mount
June 13, 2010 9:55 pm

Prairie Crops Drowning
Lauren Davis
Saturday, June 12, 2010
Wet weather will put a significant damper on Canadian grain crops.
Fields are so soggy, it’s estimated that 3 to 5 million hectares could go unseeded in Western Canada.
Saskatchewan has been the hardest-hit province thus far.
Greg Marshall of the Agricultural Producers Association says muddy conditions like the ones being seen in the prairies are abnormal.
He predicts wheat crops could produce their lowest yields in almost 40 years.
http://www.cfra.com/?cat=3&nid=73739
or here also:
http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/todays-paper/spring+holds+seeding+year/3146289/story.html

June 13, 2010 10:01 pm

The El Nino to La Nina transition occurred in 1998, not 1999.

Breckite
June 13, 2010 11:05 pm

I live in Breckenridge, CO, and since 2005 I’ve skied so much deeeeep powder, so often, every season, that I’ve lost track of all those glorious powder days. If that’s a result of global warming, then bring on the warming! Furthermore, each of the five summers I’ve spent in Breck have been cool and wet. No drought. Plenty of water. The surrounding forests where I mt. bike regularly are moist and actually lush in many areas. Last October A-Basin ski area had its earliest opening ever and Loveland ski area had its second earliest opening ever. More evidence of global warming? In 2008 I skied waist deep powder in May, and in 2010 I again skied waist deep in May-The heat is making it snow in May! Colorado ski areas are not seeing shorter seasons, lack of snow, rising snow-levels or any of the other dire predictions made by the climate alarmists. In fact, ski seasons are still six months long, snowfall hasn’t diminished, and temperatures are frigid during winter, and cool during the in-between winter months. I know, I live in it.

hunter
June 14, 2010 5:39 am

Any stats on the larger Colorado river basin watershed?

June 14, 2010 6:19 am

Breckite
You might appreciate this article.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/30/debunking-nwf-claims-part-2/

Steve Keohane
June 14, 2010 7:24 am

hunter says: June 14, 2010 at 5:39 am
Any stats on the larger Colorado river basin watershed?

Today these three stations are all above the 90th percentile, and all are within 25 miles of one another, Glenwood Springs being furthest downstream:
Gypsum, CO : 3,270CFS Dotsero, CO : 10,800CFS Glenwood Springs : 14,600CFS
I think they removed the flood warning yeserday, 6/13. I Drove from Glenwood to Denver and back yesterday and saw the Colorado out of its banks in the Glenwood Canyon, the bike trail was closed due to water from the river being on it.
Real time watershed flows in Colorado here:
http://co.water.usgs.gov/

RHS
June 14, 2010 8:04 am

I was watching the local news (www.9news.com) late last week (Thursday’ish) in the middle of the heat and one of the news anchors (not the weather person) stated with the heat, all the snow which is normally around until the fourth of July would be gone three to four weeks early. The problem with his statement is, we are already three weeks out from 7/4 and there is still snow. As a matter of fact, our mountains above 9500 feet had snow.
The snow might completely melt just before the fourth of July, but there is no way it is going to be gone this week, much less last week…