From a press release from Villanova University, more worry. I don’t know about the researchers experiences, but my property is overrun with the Western Fence Lizard. I can hardly avoid stepping on them there are so many around the house. Personally, I don’t understand the linkage between warmer temperatures and lizard extinction as I’ve yet to see a lizard who didn’t want to warm itself up in direct sunshine or on heat radiating rocks/concrete/asphalt.
Maybe the researchers never saw the story about Iguanas dying and falling out of trees due to cold this past winter. Anyway, I’ll sure miss Godzilla.
Study documents widespread extinction of lizard populations due to climate change
International team of biologists, including Villanova University’s Dr. Aaron Bauer, find alarming pattern of population extinctions attributable to rising temperatures.
An international team of biologists has found an alarming pattern of population extinctions attributable to rising temperatures. If current trends continue, up to 20 percent of all lizard species are predicted to go extinct by 2080. The study was published in the May 14th issue of Science.
The researchers, led by Barry Sinervo, professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of California, Santa Cruz, conducted a major survey of lizard populations worldwide, studied the effects of rising temperatures on lizards, and used their findings to develop a predictive model of extinction risk. Their model accurately predicted specific locations on five continents (North and South America, Europe, Africa, and Australia) where previously studied lizard populations have already gone locally extinct. Based on the predicted probabilities of local extinction, the probability of species extinction was estimated to be 6 percent by 2050 and 20 percent by 2080. As the ongoing extinction of populations is directly related to climate change, limiting the carbon dioxide production that is driving global warming is crucial for avoiding the wave of lizard extinction in future.
“We did a lot of work on the ground to validate the model and show that the extinctions are the result of climate change,” Sinervo said. “None of these are due to habitat loss. These sites are not disturbed in any way, and most of them are in national parks or other protected areas.” While recent global extinctions of amphibians are not directly related to climate change, but largely due to the spread of disease, the ongoing extinctions of lizards are due to climate warming from 1975 to the present.
The disappearance of lizard populations was first recognized in France and then in Mexico, where 12 percent of the local populations had gone extinct since the lizards had previously been studied. Although the lizards normally bask in the sun to warm up, higher temperatures exceeding their physiological limits keep them in the shade, restricting their activity and preventing them from foraging for food. The researchers used these findings to develop a model of extinction risk based on maximum air temperatures, the physiologically active body temperature of each species, and the hours in which its activity would be restricted by temperature. The model accurately predicted the disappearance of Mexican lizards and was then extended globally to lizards in 34 different families on five continents and validated by comparing the predicted results with actual local extinctions.
Data for African lizards was provided by Villanova University professor Aaron Bauer, whose research focuses on the evolution of geckos and other reptiles in the Southern Hemisphere. Bauer, who is the Gerald M. Lemole M.D. Endowed Chair of Integrative Biology, has worked in southern Africa for more than 20 years and has described more than 100 new species of lizards from around the world. Although the predicted extinction risk for the African lizards studied was low, neighboring Madagascar can expect to lose many species and extensive local extinctions have already been documented. “In many parts of the world, lizards are almost certainly going extinct due to climate change before their very existence is known to biologists” said Bauer, whose research is funded by the National Science Foundation.
Bauer believes that most Americans, particularly those in the northeast, where there are few – often inconspicuous – lizard species, are unaware of their ecological importance. However, the disappearance of lizard populations is likely to have repercussions up and down the food chain. Lizards are important prey for many birds, snakes, and other animals, and they are important predators of insects.
The climate projections used to model extinction risks assume a continuation of current trends in carbon dioxide emissions from human activities. Many of the extinctions projected for 2080 could be avoided if global efforts to reduce emissions are successful, but it may be too late to avoid the losses predicted for 2050.
Funding for this study came from grants from the National Geographic Society, National Science Foundation, and a diversity of international funding bodies.
================================================
In fairness, a second press release, from AAAS about the same subject issued minutes after the Villanova release at least has some supporting data imagery. See below.
In fact, there was a group of rapid fire press releases withing minutes that hit Eurekalert:

================================================
As global temperatures rise, the world’s lizards are disappearing
20 percent of all lizard species could be extinct by 2080, researchers say
This press release is available in Chinese, Japanese, Spanish, French, Portuguese and Finnish. Surveying Sceloporus lizard populations in Mexico, an international research team has found that rising temperatures have driven 12 percent of the country’s lizard populations to extinction. An extinction model based on this discovery also forecasts a grim future for these ecologically important critters, predicting that a full 20 percent of all lizard species could be extinct by the year 2080.
The detailed surveys of lizard populations in Mexico, collected from 200 different sites, indicate that the temperatures in those regions have changed too rapidly for the lizards to keep pace. It seems that all types of lizards are far more susceptible to climate-warming extinction than previously thought because many species are already living right at the edge of their thermal limits, especially at low elevation and low latitude range limits.

Caption: Global maps of observed local extinctions in 2009, and projections for 2050 and 2080 based on geographic distributions of lizard families of the world.
Although the researchers’ prediction for 2080 could change if humans are able to slow global climate warming, it does appear that lizards have crossed a threshold for extinctions—and that their sharp decline will continue for decades at least.of California in Santa Cruz, along with colleagues from across the globe, reached these conclusions after comparing their field studies of the lizards in Mexico with extensive data from around the world. Their research will be published in the May 14 issue of Science, the peer-reviewed journal published by AAAS, the nonprofit science society.
After compiling the global field data, Sinervo and his colleagues studied the effects of rising temperatures on lizards’ bodies, and created a model of extinction risks for various lizard species around the world. Their model accurately predicted specific locations on five continents where populations of lizards have recently gone extinct, and it might inform researchers on how these patterns of extinction will continue in the future.
“How quickly can Earth’s lizards adapt to the rising global temperatures? That’s the important question,” Sinervo said. “We are actually seeing lowland species moving upward in elevation, slowly driving upland species extinct, and if the upland species can’t evolve fast enough then they’re going to continue to go extinct.”
According to the researchers’ global model, which is derived from today’s trends of carbon dioxide emissions from human activities, about six percent of lizard species are due for extinction by the year 2050. Since carbon dioxide hangs around in the atmosphere for decades, the researchers say that this statistic can no longer be avoided. However, they do say that concentrated global efforts to reduce carbon dioxide in the atmosphere could possibly avert the 2080 scenarios, in which 20 percent of lizard species are expected to disappear from the planet.
The detailed study notes specifically that lizards that bear live young are particularly at risk of extinction, compared to those that lay eggs. “Live-bearers experience almost twice the risk of egg-layers largely because live-bearers have evolved lower body temperatures that heighten extinction risk,” Sinervo said. “We are literally watching these species disappear before our eyes.”
Sinervo began focusing his attention on lizard extinctions after he noticed an obvious trend during his field work in France. He identified an unsettling pattern of lizard extinctions with French researchers, Jean Clobert and Benoit Heulin, while they were surveying some of their well-documented populations. Disturbed by their findings, they contacted colleagues around the world—Jack Sites and Donald Miles in the United States, Fausto Méndez-de-la-Cruz in Mexico, and Carlos Frederico Duarte Rocha in Brazil—and a global collaboration ensued.
“This work is a fine example of interdisciplinary science and international collaboration, using methods and data from a range of scientific disciplines to improve confidence in the prediction of the biological effects of contemporary climate change, and in particular showing how long-term records and research are so crucial to the understanding of ecological change,” said Andrew Sugden, the International Managing Editor of Science.
“We would never have been able to do this without certain free, online tools like Google Scholar and Google Earth,” Sinervo said. “It took us awhile to pinpoint the appropriate search terms. But once we did, we locked onto key published studies. I was surprised at how fast researchers began sending us data… That’s what happens though: When scientists see a problem, with global evidence backing it, they come together.”
In order to fine-tune their model with this surprising global outpouring of data, Sinervo and his colleagues used a small electronic device that mimics the body temperature of a lizard basking in the sun. They placed these thermal models in sun-drenched areas for four months at sites in Mexico where lizard populations were still thriving—and at sites where they have already gone extinct.
“There are periods of the day when lizards can’t be out, and essentially have to retreat to cooler places,” Sinervo said. “When they’re not out and about, lizards aren’t foraging for food. So we assessed how many hours of the day lizards would have been driven out of the sun at these different locations. Then, we were able to parameterize our global model.”
For the authors, who claim a deep appreciation for these lizards and the important role the reptiles play in the global food chain, these findings are both “devastating and heart-wrenching.” But, they say, hope does remain for the world’s lizards.
“If the governments of the world can implement a concerted change to limit our carbon dioxide emissions, then we could bend the curve and hold levels of extinction to the 2050 scenarios,” Sinervo concluded. “But it has to be a global push… I don’t want to tell my child that we once had a chance to save these lizards, but we didn’t. I want to do my best to save them while I can.”
Charles Higley says:
May 13, 2010 at 4:57 pm
“It’s difficult to buy any of this as the study was made in the last ten years during which there has been no warming. So, how can this be? It cannot.
I want them to show that the warming in these regions is real before they jump to conclusions regarding the cause. […]”
I (generously) gave them that their model worked and the 5 places where the temperatures actually rose the predicted extinctions actually occurred. However, temperatures going up and subsequent extinctions of the (whatever) local lizards says nothing about why the temperature went up at that location. They have assumed that the local temperature went up due to AGW, but they provide no proof, unless (ahem! koff!) one of their references in their paper is to a hockey stick based on tree rings ;o)
Does this mean no more Geico commercials?
After Al Gore made $3 trillion trading carbon credits, he’s been systematically buying off every branch of science, telling them to support AGW in their work, or else.
Is there no stopping this man ?
Nobel Prize, Oscar, Pulitzer Prize, Fields Medal – his ambition, power and wealth show no signs of stopping…
About 2 weeks ago, I was watching a TV doco about the vast coral island archipelago of Tahiti, and what a wonderful life the inhabitants there live. As the program progressed I was waiting for it; “any minute now“, something like: But, all this will soon disappear because of AGW. But no, not a mention of it, or of rising sea levels, and everyone was smiling and relaxed.
Well, stuff me pink, I thought, that’s amazing, and I felt warm and relaxed just like the Tahitians, that included interviews with Polynesians, French, and a German.
But alas, my serenity was soon shattered by a following Oz doco where it was declared by various learned plant researchers that increasing levels of CO2 are either reducing productivity or poisoning some foods.
Wheat is yielding less protein, Cassava has less tuber growth and increasing cyanide, and some other catastrophes, but worst of all, the iconic Koala (aka Koala Bear) is under threat because of bad things happening to eucalyptus (gum) leaves.
Back on to the cassava: They showed what looked like fairly old film of some Africans paralytically stricken by cyanide poisoning, which at first was thought to be polio. However, cassava, (not indigenous to Africa), has always contained cyanide and it apparently had not been properly prepared for eating.
In all this, although there were claims of less this, or more that, nothing, zilch, zero, was said about by how much!
Check this out: “Koalas vulnerable to higher carbon dioxide levels”
http://www.abc.net.au/rural/nsw/content/2006/s2239199.htm
But then for a laugh, check this out; both are from the ABC: “Koala Wars“. (Too many koalas)
http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s528804.htm
Models are first of all only guesses. Second of all models are toys for researchers to manipulate to get the result they want (AKA work for the grant money). We shouldn’t believe any of these predictions.
The Australian outback is noted for its heat. If you leave a piece of metal on the ground for 2 minutes in Midsummer it will blister your hand if you try to pick it up. One thing we have plenty of is lizards, I wouldn’t even bet that every single species has been listed. We even have one little guy who was learned to stand on 2 feet, during the intense midday heat he faces directly into the sun to reduce his profile and stands with 2 feet off the ground every minute is so he changes feet. Presumably because the ground is so hot that he can only keep his feet on the ground about a minute.
Their model accurately predicted …
Well, actually it did no such thing.
All the more likely what it DID do was make a case for further study to determine whether the ‘model’ considered ALL the factors involved, and that includes other environmental effects such as chemical pollutants, etc. We already know that BPA is causing some fish to change sex, and that’s just one chemical in the mix.
As others have stated, it was a lot warmer a thousand years ago. Heck, it was a LOT warmer back in the 1930’s. So how was it that the lizards survived those spates of warming?
Are modern lizards a pack of wussies when it comes to warmer weather?
I think they just got a little frustrated. They meant the Blizzards were gong extinct but this past winter’s weather blew it. So, they just dropped a couple of letters and published anyway.
Here is the article (subscription required for full access):
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/328/5980/894
Some more news stories (much overlap):
http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100513/full/news.2010.241.html
http://www.latimes.com/news/science/la-sci-lizards-20100513,0,3133013.story
http://www.vpr.net/npr/126797405/
It is painfully obvious in reading the responses above that folks will dismiss any research that conflicts with their preconceived views without even reading the article. That’s why your are often called [snip] as apposed skeptics. I don’t know if this work on lizards will hold up as other researchers look into this. There is a great deal of debate as to the causes of frog and amphibian extinctions. Clearly we should be conscious of the many stresses human actively is placing on nature including CO2 emission’s potential effect on climate.
The utter incompetence of these “researchers” is only exceeded by the lateness of their attempt to dip their straws into the dwindling global warming swill trough. We really need to start cleaning these bozos out of the academic world.
Two questions:
1) given all the time/money/tears devoted to temperature measurements by NASA and Jones – how did these biologist so easily – nay blithely – assert that temps were 2 degrees above normal?
2) Considering UHI: do lizards go extinct in cities? Why not in my city?
I found this in the same issue of Science:
Science 14 May 2010:
Vol. 328. no. 5980, pp. 899 – 903
DOI: 10.1126/science.1186440
Reports
Carbon Dioxide Enrichment Inhibits Nitrate Assimilation in Wheat and Arabidopsis
Arnold J. Bloom,* Martin Burger,{dagger} Jose Salvador Rubio Asensio, Asaph B. Cousins{ddagger}
The concentration of carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere may double by the end of the 21st century. The response of higher plants to a carbon dioxide doubling often includes a decline in their nitrogen status, but the reasons for this decline have been uncertain. We used five independent methods with wheat and Arabidopsis to show that atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment inhibited the assimilation of nitrate into organic nitrogen compounds. This inhibition may be largely responsible for carbon dioxide acclimation, the decrease in photosynthesis and growth of plants conducting C3 carbon fixation after long exposures (days to years) to carbon dioxide enrichment. These results suggest that the relative availability of soil ammonium and nitrate to most plants will become increasingly important in determining their productivity as well as their quality as food.
http://www.sciencemag.org.proxy.lib.siu.edu/cgi/content/abstract/328/5980/899
So much for the CO2 is plant food theory.
I can confirm part of this paper. Here in Minnesota I have not seen a single lizard in the last six months.
Today I confirmed my dropping of Science News. I cannot take one more headline claiming global warming “may” cause harm to .. –insert name of favorite fuzzy, furry animal here–. Of course, on the other side of the wildlife diversity front, global warming “may” increase invasive species, thorny bushes, noxious weeds, and disease spreading bugs.
I think they should have read WUWT a few months back.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/01/04/where-are-the-corpses/
Willis, as usual, beat them to the story.
From the article:
“Based on the predicted probabilities of local extinction, the probability of species extinction was estimated to be 6 percent by 2050 and 20 percent by 2080.”
So if I understand this correctly, nothing is even being said of 20% lizard species going extinct by 2080. It says that in 2080 any lizard species has a 20% chance of being extinct, if it lives in a place that has gotten warmer by as a much as what is produced by a fart in a VW bus.
By 2080 100% of these scientists, mercifully, will be extinct. And a corpse with egg on its face is still a corpse.
Mike says:
“So much for the ‘CO2 is plant food’ theory.” Say what?
That must be why CO2 levels in greenhouses are kept somewhere between 1,200 and 2,000 PPM.
Not to mention why net primary production between 1982 and 1999 increased by 6%.
I have lived in the wild of the arctic to the tropics and if there is one thing for sure, Lizards like heat and not cold. Global cooling is the danger to lizards not warming.
This article attests to the low level of quality of AGW science in this modern era.
Anyone with any experience at all would know that this “research” is BS (bad science).
Also to be published in May 14 Science is a study by UCD plant researchers claiming that rising CO2 will have a deleterious effect on crops:
Rising CO2 levels threaten crops and food quality. From the press release:
May 13, 2010
Rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide interfere with plants’ ability to convert nitrate into protein and could threaten food quality, according to a new study by researchers at the University of California, Davis. The scientists suggest that, as global climate change intensifies, it will be critical for farmers to carefully manage nitrogen fertilization in order to prevent losses in crop productivity and quality.
The study, which examined the impact of increased carbon dioxide levels on wheat and the mustard plant Arabidopsis, will be published in the May 14 issue of the journal Science.
“Our findings suggest that scientists cannot examine the response of crops to global climate change simply in terms of rising carbon dioxide levels or higher temperatures,” said lead author Arnold Bloom, a professor in UC Davis’ Department of Plant Sciences.
“Instead, we must consider shifts in plant nitrogen use that will alter food quality and even pest control, as lower protein levels in plants will force both people and pests to consume more plant material to meet their nutritional requirements,” Bloom said.
more at: http://www.news.ucdavis.edu/search/news_detail.lasso?id=9479
p.s. Watch out Anthony. Western Fence Lizards are a reservoir in of the Lyme Disease agent, Borrelia burgforferi. It still takes a tick to transmit it, so as long as your property and animals aren’t tick infested, you’re OK. (They’re sure cute though – the lizards not the ticks.)
#
Dr A Burns says:
May 13, 2010 at 4:28 pm
….Villanova seems to be scammer heartland. They also promote the world’s second biggest scam after AGW – Six Sigma…..
________________________________________________________________________
Funny you should mention Six Sigma, I just slammed it in another post today but was nice enough not to name it. I am a Quality Engineer/Chemist and I absolutely HATE Six Sigma and the ISO crap that goes with it. We use to call the stuff the “flavor of the month”
This research is even dumber than the famous wood spider drug study.
Youtube clip of the spider study
How does it happen that no lizards appear on the official list of extinct Australian animals ?
http://www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/publicthreatenedlist.pl?wanted=fauna#other_animals_extinct
I guess it makes the paper read better if you don’t have to divide by zero.
“We did a lot of work on the ground to validate the model and show that the extinctions are the result of climate change,” Sinervo said
I groan and stop reading articles every time the word “Model” appears!!!!!!!!!
By the way, my two resident gecko (s?) are currently eyeing up a big fly in my living room. They seem very happy, as does the Chameleon in my garden. I would just like to use WUWT to pass on my thanks to them for the great job they do 😉
oldseadog says:
May 13, 2010 at 2:41 pm
I don’t think I got the html tags right. Sorry
Reply: Just type or paste the URL and don’t bother with tags. ~ ctm
“Back on to the cassava:”
Oh, about 22 years ago, an anthropology professor at the University of Utah related a very sad story about finding his research subjects, a pygmy family in the Congo that he had been studying for many years, lying dead around a still smoldering cooking fire. They had eaten improperly prepared cassava.
My wife is from Ecuador and they eat yuca (cassava) all the time without any major preparation. She has never heard of anyone dying from ingesting bad yuca. Well, after the professor’s story, I thought it prudent to do some research on the matter. According to the information I read, cassava is like apricot pits. There aren’t really sweet and bitter varieties. It is dependent on environmental factors, such as soil type, amount of water available, kind of water, and who knows what else. Often what kills people is that they become used to eating “sweet” cassava for many years and then a variable in the environment changes and people die. What I read is probably 30 years old, so more may be known now, but I still hear stories every once in awhile about cassava poisonings — and I still nervously eat yuca when it is served — and my father ate “sweet” apricot pits and then fed us, if he didn’t experience any ill effects.
I suppose that increases in cassava poisonings could be blamed on climate change, but cassava is also being grown on more marginal land as countries push to increase production.