EPA's action Jackson moving forward

Issued today 4/28/2010

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/39/Lisa_P_Jackson_-_nomination_announcement.jpg
Lisa P. Jackson - EPA

EPA Press Office

press@epa.gov

202-564-4355

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

April 28, 2010

Statement of Lisa P. Jackson Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Legislative Hearing on Clean Energy Policies That Reduce Our Dependence on Oil

House Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment

WASHINGTON – Chairmen Markey and Waxman, Ranking Members Upton and Barton, Chairman Emeritus Dingell, and Members of the Subcommittee, thank you for inviting me to testify about the Environmental Protection Agency’s work to reduce America’s oil dependence and greenhouse gas emissions. That work stems from two seminal events.

First, in April 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court concluded in Massachusetts v. EPA that the Clean Air Act’s definition of air pollution includes greenhouse gases. The Court rejected then-Administrator Johnson’s refusal to determine whether that pollution from motor vehicles endangers public health or welfare.

In response to the Supreme Court’s decision, and based on the best available science and EPA’s review of thousands of public comments, I found in December 2009 that motor-vehicle greenhouse gas emissions do endanger Americans’ health and welfare.

I am not alone in reaching that conclusion. Scientists at the 13 federal agencies that make up the U.S. Global Change Research Program have reported that unchecked greenhouse gas emissions pose significant risks to the wellbeing of the American public. The National Academy of Sciences has stated that the climate is changing, that the changes are mainly caused by human interference with the atmosphere, and that those changes will transform the environmental conditions on Earth unless counter-measures are taken.

The second pivotal event was the agreement President Obama announced in May 2009 between EPA, the Department of Transportation, the nation’s automakers, America’s autoworkers, and the State of California to seek harmonized, nationwide limits on the fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of new cars and light trucks.

My endangerment finding in December satisfied the prerequisite in the Clean Air Act for establishing a greenhouse gas emissions standard for cars and light trucks of Model Years 2012 through 2016. So I was able to issue that final standard earlier this month, on the same day that Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood signed a final fuel efficiency standard for the same vehicles.

Using existing technologies, manufacturers can configure new cars and light trucks to satisfy both standards at the same time. And vehicles complying with the federal standards will automatically comply with the greenhouse gas emissions standard established by California and adopted by 13 other states. This harmonized and nationally uniform program achieves the goal the President announced last May.

Moreover, the EPA and DOT standards will reduce the lifetime oil use of the covered vehicles by more than 1.8 billion barrels. That will do away with more than a billion barrels of imported oil, assuming the current ratio of domestic production to imports does not improve. The standards also will eliminate more than 960 million metric tons of greenhouse gas pollution.

But if Congress now nullified EPA’s finding that greenhouse gas pollution endangers the American public, that action would remove the legal basis for a federal greenhouse gas emissions standard for motor vehicles. Eliminating the EPA standard would forfeit one quarter of the combined EPA-DOT program’s fuel savings and one third of its greenhouse gas emissions cuts. California and the other states that have adopted California’s greenhouse gas emissions standard would almost certainly respond by enforcing that standard within their jurisdictions, leaving the automobile industry without the nationwide uniformity that it has described as vital to its business.

I would like to mention one more action that EPA has taken to reduce America’s oil dependence and greenhouse gas emissions. In February, I signed a final renewable fuels standard. It substantially increases the volume of renewable products – including cellulosic bio-fuel – that refiners must blend into transportation fuel. EPA will implement the standard fully by the end of 2022. In that year alone, the standard will decrease America’s oil imports by 41 and a half billion dollars. And U.S. greenhouse gas emissions that year will be 138 million metric tons lower thanks to the standard.

EPA’s recent work on vehicles and fuels shows that enhancing America’s energy security and reducing America’s greenhouse gas pollution are two sides of the same coin.

R133

==============================

h/t to WUWT reader Michael C. Roberts

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
184 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Quinn the Eskimo
April 28, 2010 3:51 pm

Gee, for some she didn’t mention the IPCC. Which is funny, because the Endangerment Finding is explicitly relies upon and wholeheartedly adopts the IPCC. Makes you go “hmmm.”

Amino Acids in Meteorites
April 28, 2010 3:55 pm

Lisa Jackson wants the youth too:
4:30 until end of this video

matthew
April 28, 2010 4:02 pm

let’s do some math:
A savings of 1.8 billion barrels of oil saved equals how many days worth of oil regularly consumed in the US? Well, at 2008 levels of 19.5 million barrels per day, that’s about 92.3 days worth of oil.

HankHenry
April 28, 2010 4:06 pm

“But if Congress now nullified EPA’s finding that greenhouse gas pollution endangers the American public, that action would remove the legal basis for a federal greenhouse gas emissions standard for motor vehicles.”
This sounds like the EPA lobbying congress to affirm its judgment about what’s best for us. It’s not congress that makes law. It’s the agencies that congress sets up to do what they can’t find the resolve to undertake.

Amino Acids in Meteorites
April 28, 2010 4:08 pm

EPA Funds Community Organizations….
“These grants mark the beginning of a full-scale revitalization of what we do and how we think about environmental justice,” said EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson…..things like helping “Denver’s low-income Latino immigrant community…”……EPA helping on a community level. takepart to learn more about what the new and improved EPA is doing to protect the environment.
http://www.takepart.com/news/2009/03/25/epa-funds-community-organizations-working-for-environmental-justice
…..organizations working with communities throughout the country…..
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/mar2009/2009-03-24-092.asp

Mark II
April 28, 2010 4:11 pm

Somewhat off topic for this discussion, but a federal office for the president-elect was instituted by the Presidental Transition Act of 1963.
cotwome says:
April 28, 2010 at 3:01 pm
I like that picture…
What federal building in Washington DC is the ‘Office of the President Elect’ located?

Jim Barker
April 28, 2010 4:11 pm

She said something the other night on The Daily Show, that seemed to infer that the air we exhale “might” be considered for taxation.

Enneagram
April 28, 2010 4:17 pm

You got get rid of the Jackson five!

MJ
April 28, 2010 4:21 pm

I’m kinda confused here. Is the CO2 from motor vehicles the ONLY CO2 that’s bad? I didn’t see the part where breathing, cow farting, or bio-matter produced CO2 is classified and how do they know the difference? I assume that there will be inspections of motor vehicles at designated facilities with appropriate Carbon Offset certificates ready for purchase. And will this “certificate” have a picture of Al Gore on it?
I am just stunned that scientists have said that motor vehicle CO2 emissions are dangerous…

Henry chance
April 28, 2010 4:22 pm

I made a post earlier tying this gubment to the EPA and Chrysler. I checked and no where are there mentions of Chrysler being the property of Fiat on the Fiat website. This means that the EPA and jackson must rule over the chrysler arm of our feds.
What is Jackson doing at Chrysler to punish their production of CO2 emmitters?
Surely she takes the supreme court ruling as giving he the authority to stop car production without the legislation of Congress.

April 28, 2010 4:24 pm

This administration is so depressing.
November can’t come soon enough.

rbateman
April 28, 2010 4:25 pm

So if 13 federal agencies start chanting with all thier might that Greenhouse Gas Warming is out of control, does that override the chill in the greater part of N & S America?
No, it means that 13 federal agencies are living in a PNS dream.
13 Federal agencies do not command the weather or the climate.

kadaka (KD Knoebel)
April 28, 2010 4:29 pm

Emphasis added.

In February, I signed a final renewable fuels standard. It substantially increases the volume of renewable products – including cellulosic bio-fuel – that refiners must blend into transportation fuel. EPA will implement the standard fully by the end of 2022.

Cellulosic bio-fuel? As in liquid fuel made from corn stalks and sawdust? Last I read, this was being tried in the lab, in response to concerns about biofuel making impacting the food supply, and was nowhere near commercial deployment let alone production in quantities sufficient for nationwide mandated use.
And this must be implemented by 2022? How?

Brent Matich
April 28, 2010 4:30 pm

I can’t believe these clowns got into office. Well , you guys are stuck with the head clown for three more years . Good luck with that!
Brent in Calgary

Robert of Ottawa
April 28, 2010 4:34 pm

Who elected this woman? This bureaucratic dictator.

TimH
April 28, 2010 4:37 pm

Poor Lisa. If they had based their legislation on reducing fossil fuel for national security reasons instead of global warming, they wouldn’t be in such a mess. You can’t argue to save the endangerment finding now because of all the potential good the legislation could bring… not if the finding is based on utter nonsense. Yet there she is, doing just that.

April 28, 2010 4:41 pm

Is she one of the ones who has the daftness that they say global warming is causing?
When truth doesn’t matter, tyranny soon follows.

Robert of Ottawa
April 28, 2010 4:44 pm

To all Americans: This is how you defeat this little bitch tyrant.
Ask her if the elected President of the US of A has the power to tell American citizens how to live, what to consume and how much energy they can use. Obviously, this is not within the constitutional powers of the president of the US of A. So, why does she assume these powers?

Chuck L
April 28, 2010 4:46 pm

“In February, I signed a final renewable fuels standard. It substantially increases the volume of renewable products – including cellulosic bio-fuel – that refiners must blend into transportation fuel. EPA will implement the standard fully by the end of 2022.”
I seem to recall hearing of a recent study that manufacturing and using ethanol adds more CO2 to the atmosphere than does using gasoline to power internal combustion engines. This administration and the EPA are very efficient in their attempted destruction of our country: the cost of energy will go up (as regressive a tax as can be) as will the price of food as more farm acreage is used for ethanol production. Factor in the increased transportation costs and you have a triple dose of inflation to add to inevitable higher interest rates as the dollar sinks due to the nearly exponential increase in the deficit. November may be the most crucial mid-term election in the history of the USA.

rbateman
April 28, 2010 4:47 pm

Lisa Jackson is not an elected official. She should not be legislating from an appointed position.

Michael
April 28, 2010 4:47 pm

Lets just all get this strait right now.
TOTAL PLANETARY WEATHER IS CLIMATE!

David L
April 28, 2010 4:48 pm

This administration has to pay for the trillion’s it has spent in the past year. They’ll do it by taxing the very air we breathe. Now that’s change you can believe in!!!!!

Amino Acids in Meteorites
April 28, 2010 4:50 pm

For years Americans have not been paying attention to who they’ve been voting for. So now Americans have people like Lisa Jackson ruling over them.
A quote from her staggering intellect:
“Greenhouse gases are pollution.”
~Lisa Jackson, EPA
To her the use of the EPA is for “Environmental Justice”. She sounds like a Marxist.
——————————————————————————————-
“One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.”
~Plato
——————————————————————————————–
Lisa Jackson speaking on how she views the EPA:

Stephan
April 28, 2010 4:50 pm

The most fervent warmers (state) are in for one hell of a shock
http://www.appinsys.com/globalwarming/RS_California.htm

Bruce Cobb
April 28, 2010 4:59 pm

This is certainly good news for America’s enemies, who must be celebrating about now.