UK ads banned for overstating climate change

From The Times

Ed Miliband’s adverts banned for overstating climate change

by Jonathan Leake, Environment Editor

the Advertising Standards Asociation has banned Ed Miliband's  Environment department from running misleading nursery rhyme  advertisements on climate change.
The adverts' claims 'were not supported by science'

TWO government advertisements that use nursery rhymes to warn people of the dangers of climate change have been banned by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) for exaggerating the potential harm.

The adverts, commissioned by Ed Miliband, the energy secretary, used the rhymes to suggest that Britain faces an inevitable increase in storms, floods and heat waves unless greenhouse gas emissions are brought under control.

The ASA has ruled that the claims made in the newspaper adverts were not supported by solid science and has told the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) that they should not be published again.

It has also referred a television commercial to the broadcast regulator, Ofcom, for potentially breaching a prohibition on political advertising.

The rulings will be an embarrassment for Miliband, who has tried to portray his policies as firmly science-based. He had commissioned two posters, four press advertisements and a short film for television and cinema, which started appearing in October last year in the run-up to the Copenhagen climate talks.

They attracted 939 complaints — more than the ASA received for any advertisement last year. The deluge posed problems for the ASA, which is not a scientific body, so it decided to compare the text of Miliband’s adverts with the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Based on that comparison, it ruled that two of the DECC’s adverts had broken the advertising code on three counts: substantiation, truthfulness and environmental claims.

Of the two banned adverts, one depicted three men floating in a bathtub over a flooded British landscape, and the text read: “Rub a dub dub, three men in a tub — a necessary course of action due to flash flooding caused by climate change.”

It then explained: “Climate change is happening. Temperature and sea levels are rising. Extreme weather events such as storms, floods and heat waves will become more frequent and intense. If we carry on at this rate, life in 25 years could be very different.”

The second showed two children peering into a stone well amid an arid, post-climate-change landscape. It read: “Jack and Jill went up the hill to fetch a pail of water. There was none as extreme weather due to climate change had caused a drought.”

It then added: “Extreme weather conditions such as flooding, heat waves and storms will become more frequent and intense.”

It was these additional claims, rather than the nursery rhymes or illustrations, that fell foul of the ASA, which ruled it was not scientifically possible to make such definitive statements about Britain’s future climate.

The ASA said: “All statements about future climate were based on modelled predictions, which the IPCC report itself stated still involved uncertainties in the magnitude and timing, as well as regional details, of predicted climate change.” It added that both predictions should have been phrased more tentatively.

The ASA did, however, reject other complaints, including one suggesting the DECC adverts were misleading because they presented human-induced climate change as a fact.

Miliband said: “On the one issue where the ASA did not find in our favour, around one word in our print advertising, the science tells us that it is more than 90% likely that there will be more extreme weather events if we don’t act.”

Greg Barker, shadow minister for climate change, said: “It is so unnecessary to exaggerate the risks of global warming, and also counterproductive.”

Read the complete article here

========================

Here’s the website where the ads originate from ActOnCO2

Here are some of the advertisements in question:

ActonCO2_Twinkle

Hey_Diddle

Jack&Jill

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
163 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
March 14, 2010 6:30 pm

Models are supposed to predict things, yet the current model had only one episode of global temperature stasis lasting 15 years (in 700 years of runtime). Yet Phil Jones in a BBC interview 13 Feb ’10 said that’s exactly what has happened in the past 15 years. For details please see http://luysii.wordpress.com/2010/03/12/i-dont-trust-models-in-general-climate-models-in-particular/

March 14, 2010 9:48 pm

Great article.
How can these scientists predict the climate in 40 years time, when there is so much that is unknown ? Surely they should base any assumptions on things that can be measured, such as a rise in sea levels. After all, surface temperatures go up and down, but the rise in sea levels reflects both melting ice and thermal expansion.

Henry chance
March 15, 2010 5:58 am

Romm, Gore and Hansen are treatable. I am sure Gore regrets inventing the web which allows people to fact check his dogma.
The more they lose traction, the more hysterical they become.
Should we borrow from Wendy’s “Wheres the Beef” ad and question the warming claims?

OceanTwo
March 15, 2010 7:22 am

This the problem with government ‘regulation’ (actually control – regulation is an incorrect term).
The government produces an advertisement. Said advertisement is suspect. You turn to the government to determine weather such is true. People become reliant on these entities to determine weather what they see or do is ‘correct’ or not, rather than taking everything with a dose of skepticism.
The majority are quite happy to go along with things since ‘it must be right because the [government] watchdog says it’s alright’.
Governments are not to be trusted. Period. This doesn’t mean that governments should not exist, or that they don’t do good things; but the majority of instruments the government executes are not brought about with the interests of the people in mind.
This is particularly true of any proposed Global Warming action: 100% of them do not have the interests of the people governed as the reason for enacting them.

tallbloke
March 16, 2010 1:42 am

rbateman (20:59:03) :
Once again, Britain stands alone.

Has Obama stopped pushing the climate agenda?

Rick Thom
March 16, 2010 11:07 pm

So: An East Indian guy, a Chinese guy and a British guy are floating around in a bathtub…

March 17, 2010 7:09 am

We covered the run-up to this back in November when the “drowning dog” video first came to our attention:
http://www.panscourer.com/2010/03/17/advertising-standards-authority-milibands-climate-change-advert-was-propaganda/

David
March 18, 2010 4:48 am

Seems like the ASA is the only sensible organisation in this ridiculous country. Perhaps they should take charge of the AGW bandwagon and knock some sense into the politicians.

Ian M
March 18, 2010 5:27 am

Sam (17:17:45) : I’m right with you, mate. This idiotic, incompetent, corrupt bunch of morons currently in Government have to be voted out this coming May. Vote LibDem, Greens, UKIP, Jury Team, …, just about anything if it means we can oust those deceitful, authoritarian bureaucrats who collectively have brought this country to its knees, and continue to steal our money to pay bankers and ignore our protests against inappropriate property development.

Roger
March 18, 2010 8:26 am

Hey diddle diddle
It’s time for a fiddle
Who cares what the real science says
We do want we want to whom we want
‘Cause we know it always pays.
Hey diddle diddle
It’s time for a fiddle
Let’s cook the books like the bankers
We’ll have such fun at the taxpayers’ expense
‘Cause we’re a bunch of w*nkers.

Roger
March 19, 2010 1:40 am

Hey diddle diddle
It’s time for a fiddle
Labour numpties dance to Brown’s tune
Cleggie scowls to see such scum
Cameron just licks his silver spoon.

EcoHustler
March 24, 2010 7:26 am

EcoHustler Newsflash
This is not a chimney
It’s still big, it’s still dirty it’s still inefficient… and guess what?… you’re still paying for it! Families will have to pay a new levy on electricity bills for at least the next 20 years in order to fund this dubious technology that keeps us bound to burning fossil fuels for years to come…
http://ecohustler.co.uk/2010/03/13/this-is-not-a-chimney/

1 5 6 7