Scripps: Antarctic Ice Shelf Collapse Possibly Triggered by Ocean Waves

WUWT readers may remember this article:

Watch the Wilkins ice shelf collapse in time lapse animation – looks like ‘current’ events to me where mechanisms other than melt were discussed. It was pointed out that this photo appeared to be showing a stress crack, like the sort you’d get from a wave. Melt makes rounded irregular edges, not sharp straight line ones.

http://www.ogleearth.com/wissm.jpg

Now there’s a study from Scripps that suggests that long period waves could be a big factor.

Antarctic Ice Shelf Collapse Possibly Triggered by Ocean Waves, Scripps-led Study Finds

Extremely long waves could have initiated 2008 collapse events

Scripps Institution of Oceanography / University of California, San Diego

Depicting a cause-and-effect scenario that spans thousands of miles, a scientist at Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego and his collaborators discovered that ocean waves originating along the Pacific coasts of North and South America impact Antarctic ice shelves and could play a role in their catastrophic collapse.

Image: Joe HarriganImage: Joe Harrigan

Peter Bromirski of Scripps Oceanography is the lead scientist in a new study published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters that describes how storms over the North Pacific Ocean may be transferring enough wave energy to destabilize Antarctic ice shelves. The California Department of Boating and Waterways and the National Science Foundation supported the study.

According to Bromirski, storm-driven ocean swells travel across the Pacific Ocean and break along the coastlines of North and South America, where they are transformed into very long-period ocean waves called “infragravity waves” that travel vast distances to Antarctica.

Bromirski, along with coauthors Olga Sergienko of Princeton University and Douglas MacAyeal of the University of Chicago, propose that the southbound travelling infragravity waves “may be a key mechanical agent that contributes to the production and/or expansion of the pre-existing crevasse fields on ice shelves,” and that the infragravity waves also may provide the trigger necessary to initiate the collapse process.

Peter BromirskiPeter Bromirski

The researchers used seismic data collected on the Ross Ice Shelf to identify signals generated by infragravity waves that originated along the Northern California and British Columbia coasts, and modeled how much stress an ice shelf suffers in response to infragravity wave impacts. Bromirski said only recently has technology advanced to allow scientists to deploy seismometers for the extended periods on the ice shelf needed to capture such signals.

The study found that each of the Wilkins Ice Shelf breakup events in 2008 coincided with the estimated arrival of infragravity waves. The authors note that such waves could affect ice shelf stability by opening crevasses, reducing ice integrity through fracturing and initiating a collapse. “(Infragravity waves) may produce ice-shelf fractures that enable abrupt disintegration of ice shelves that are also affected by strong surface melting,” the authors note in the paper.

Whether increased infragravity wave frequency and energy induced by heightened storm intensity associated with climate change ultimately contribute to or trigger ice shelf collapse is an open question at this point, said Bromirski. More data from Antarctica are needed to make such a connection, he said.

In separate research published last year, Bromirski and Peter Gerstoft of Scripps Oceanography showed that infragravity waves along the West Coast also generate a curious “hum”-subsonic noise too low for humans to hear (see Scripps explorations story Earth Sounds from Central America).

h/t to Dr. Richard North

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

77 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Antonio San
February 13, 2010 2:51 pm

The slew of interesting non alarmist papers coming out AFTER Copenhagen continues. Editors were hoping these would be drowned in the noise of an accord but after the fiasco, scrutiny is on them except of course at Joe Romm agit-prop center…

February 13, 2010 2:51 pm

From the UC:SD release …

“(Infragravity waves) may produce ice-shelf fractures that enable abrupt disintegration of ice shelves that are also affected by strong surface melting,” the authors note in the paper.
Whether increased infragravity wave frequency and energy induced by heightened storm intensity associated with climate change ultimately contribute to or trigger ice shelf collapse is an open question at this point, said Bromirski. More data from Antarctica are needed to make such a connection, he said.

Disintegration of ice sheets already subject to strong surface melting.
Possibly linked to increased storm intensity.

sasquatch
February 13, 2010 2:59 pm

I’m no lettered expert but logic told me, and I tell the warmist sheeple, that warming is drip drip…..crack is likely tidal action of some sort or tectonic activety.
I lampoon that icebergs are a sign of growing glaciers/ice-shelves—the tidal action thingy. Retreating glaciers are not tide-water but up on the beach—-produce no icebergs or bergy bits.
All those pictures of ice-choked Disco Bay are just ignorant propaganda.
It should come as no surprise that India called BS to the IPCC shrinking glaciers…..especially the Siachen glacier—a 60 year old, on going, battlefield.

u.k.(us)
February 13, 2010 3:08 pm

The only reason the ice shelf was out that far, is due to all the ice behind it pushing it. the time to “worry” is when there are no ice shelves. They are just calving glaciers, aren’t they?

Mark S
February 13, 2010 3:11 pm

Articles like this serve to highlight the real tragedy of AGW: so much interesting science was suppressed or obscured because it didn’t support the AGW hysteria.

February 13, 2010 3:13 pm

Extremely long waves could have initiated 2008 collapse events

Is a long wave not a global warming effect ?
;.)

janama
February 13, 2010 3:24 pm

OT – Phil Jones throws AGW under a truck!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8511670.stm

Steve Goddard
February 13, 2010 3:25 pm

WUWT explained that the breakup was mechanical (i.e. not due to melting) nearly a year ago.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/04/26/media-addicted-to-melt-when-it-it-should-be-crack/
Good to see others starting to catch up.

Henry chance
February 13, 2010 3:29 pm

Romm says extreme and catastrophic warming event.
Obviously when the sea levels rise 6-15 feet, we will see a lot of this.

February 13, 2010 3:29 pm

u.k.(us) (15:08:24) :
The only reason the ice shelf was out that far, is due to all the ice behind it pushing it. the time to “worry” is when there are no ice shelves. They are just calving glaciers, aren’t they?

Not in the case of the Wilkins.

debreuil
February 13, 2010 3:33 pm

Wow, hard to beat this for a headline in the msm:
World may not be warming, say scientists
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7026317.ece

Editor
February 13, 2010 3:35 pm

Oh, so it wasn’t global warming. Imagine that.

debreuil
February 13, 2010 3:37 pm

“It’s not just temperature rises that tell us the world is warming,” he said. “We also have physical changes like the fact that sea levels have risen around five inches since 1972, the Arctic icecap has declined by 40% and snow cover in the northern hemisphere has declined.”
Kevin Trenberth
Hmm, maybe he’s going to have to edit his power point and take out the snow cover bullet point.

Ray
February 13, 2010 3:38 pm

What? AGW makes bigger waves now? The surfers will be happy.

Dave Wendt
February 13, 2010 3:47 pm

Ron Broberg (14:51:57) :
Disintegration of ice sheets already subject to strong surface melting.
Possibly linked to increased storm intensity.
The sea water in the open fissures seems to be refreezing at a nice clip, no melt water on the iceflows, doesn’t seem to be ideal conditions for “strong surface melting”.
“Possibly linked to increased storm intensity.” It’s more like possibly linked to possibly increased storm intensity possibly linked to possible climate change possibly linked to human activity. Or maybe it’s just a bunch of Martians jumping on pogosticks.

Simon
February 13, 2010 3:50 pm

lots of “possibly”, “could”, “may” and the usual stuff from this blog.
[Note: that is the claim of Scripps. ~dbs, mod.]

MookyMoose
February 13, 2010 3:58 pm

I have often wondered what the effect of the Dec 2004 tsunami had on the ice shelves.
On another note:
“World may not be warming, say scientists”
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article7026317.ece
WUWT and Anthony mentioned

u.k.(us)
February 13, 2010 4:00 pm

Phil. (15:29:56) :
u.k.(us) (15:08:24) :
The only reason the ice shelf was out that far, is due to all the ice behind it pushing it. the time to “worry” is when there are no ice shelves. They are just calving glaciers, aren’t they?
Not in the case of the Wilkins.
===========
looks like a calve to me from this link ??
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://isiria.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/wordieiceshelf.jpg&imgrefurl=http://isiria.wordpress.com/2008/03/27/wilkins-ice-shelf-continues-to-break-up/&h=525&w=480&sz=94&tbnid=DD4Wa5_pXgjatM:&tbnh=132&tbnw=121&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dwilkins%2Bice%2Bshelf&usg=__XptV8AtZvMlcyxLLr4JYIO3WHTQ=&ei=Ijt3S9PgM4XCNuGe5ZYP&sa=X&oi=image_result&resnum=5&ct=image&ved=0CBgQ9QEwBA

Robert
February 13, 2010 4:06 pm

Confirmation bias is so interesting. When anti-AGW believers don’t see papers they like, it’s evidence of censorship. When they do, it’s evidence that censorship is breaking down and failing. As opposed to, say, considering the possibility they may have been wrong about alleging censorship in the first place.

rbateman
February 13, 2010 4:10 pm

I would be worred if that ice shelf drifted out into the shipping lanes.
The way they cavalierly run cruise ships about these days, it would be an accident looking for a place to happen.

rbateman
February 13, 2010 4:12 pm

Ray (15:38:28) :
Oh, but the surfers are in wave heaven. Lots of tectonic shaking going on with that Solar Activity (AP) thing way down (whatever it might have to do with it).

RDay
February 13, 2010 4:16 pm

I wonder if Bromirksi has an office anywhere near true believer, Somerville? That would make for some awkward hallway encounters.

February 13, 2010 4:18 pm

Robert (16:06:46),
Where do you see “censorship”?

u.k.(us)
February 13, 2010 4:26 pm

u.k.(us) (16:00:03) :
Phil. (15:29:56) :
u.k.(us) (15:08:24) :
sorry phil.
you are correct, i think, no glaciers here.
anthony, you need a “NEVER MIND” button for idiots like me.

Michael
February 13, 2010 4:40 pm

[snip] Off topic completely.

1 2 3 4